Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Anonymity on the internet essay
Importance of online anonymity
Negatives of anonymity online
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Anonymity on the internet essay
ANONYMITY: A POSSIBILTY IN CYBERSPACE
Prajwal F D’souza, 4NM14EC100, +91 7899032542, prajwal.dsouza14@gmail.com
Abstract: This article focuses on the areas of anonymity in cyberspace, as to why people prefer anonymity and how it affects their behaviour when they’re online. Also highlighted are the certain aspects of social behaviour that are a byproduct anonymity because of which people gain a certain form of freedom of speech upon masking their identity, and how this brings out both socially desirable and undesirable outcomes. Also discussed is why authorities and certain organizations prove to be a threat to the future of anonymity.
Keywords: Anonymity, identity, self-representation, privacy, socialization.
Introduction: Anonymity
…show more content…
Anonymity seems to lift people’s inhibitions and can lead to unusual acts of generosity, or on the other hand it may lead to misbehaviour and harmful acts. Those who use anonymity do so in order to reduce the social risks of holding a deferring viewpoint on popular topics such as feminism. They create a different persona online, one that is different from their real self. [1] They modify their own behaviour to manage presentations of their false identity to others often by falsification of personal information. Michael Callahan founded an anonymous social network for teens that has particularly seen many positive outcomes. In his own words, he says “In social media, at the forefront is your identity, and you have to tailor to that, and you have to be thinking cognitively about how things you post are going to be viewed, but not when it’s …show more content…
Examples of this behaviour include Intel and Microsoft, who monitor track their users without their knowledge. [6] Often, in doing so these companies violate their own privacy policies. Law enforcement officials also prefer some sort of traceable characteristics in pseudonymity, so as to apprehend a violator.
Discussion: Although anonymity on the web has had positive influences, it has it’s dark side as well. The creator of the anonymous social site 4chan, Christopher Poole mentions in a TED talk, “saying whatever you like is powerful, but doing whatever you like is crossing the line”. The border between what action constitutes to illegal and legal but offensive use of anonymity is a fine line.
From disruptive communication to pedophile contracts, there is a portion of the web that is so evil in intentions that it is appropriately named the Dark web. Here, everything from child pornography, black market sale of arms and ammunition, sale of fake identities, drug trafficking and money laundering, all funded by anonymous people with anonymous crypto-currencies. A whole underworld lies underneath what the general public actually sees. [4] The dark web is part of the deep web, which means it is not visible to search engines like Google, and needs special software like TOR to access
Rosen portrays our society as completely exposed, giving up all privacy to join, and fit in with the “naked crowd”. Rosen claims that we willing give up all power of privacy in order to fit in with society and be accepted as someone that can be trusted through exposure. He claims that image is the key to establishing trust, not through a relationship or conversation. His thesis presents his views on the subject, “has led us to value exposure over privacy? Why, in short, are we so eager to become members of the Naked Crowd, in which we have the illusion of belonging only when we are exposed?”(Rosen) he states that we value exposure over privacy, and will give away privacy to fit in.
In the article The Flip Side of Internet Fame by Jessica Bennett, Internet harassment is thoroughly made aware to inform active social network users of its solemnity. Real life scenarios of people who suffered from public humiliation or social desecration are presented. Bennett makes her argument conclusive by addressing her audiences' pathos and ethos appeal, sourcing credible individuals throughout the article and stressing the agony and ignominy that the listed individuals perceived. Furthermore, the author demonstrates how critical it is to be conscious about the possibility of not recovering from a fatal encounter on a social network and also raises the question: “What's to stop a person from posting whatever he wants about you, if he can do so anonymously and suffer no repercussions?”(115). Bennett tries to enlighten the reader of “the dark side of Internet fame”(113), showing how publicity may not always be marvelous.
The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide
Over the years people have all safeguarded their personal identities for the risks of emotional pain that others can cause, the recent use of the online identity being another fortification to this protection. However this has lead people to confuse which identity is their personal one and which is their online one, because of the development of taking technology with you. This can harm one’s relationships with close friends and family that sometimes get confused for the others. With the consequences of bring aspects of online identity into personal identities, many people find it hard to maintain the boundaries of these two. The first step is to understand the problem so one can better see how each identity can fix into its place and still be able to protect them from any positional emotional scarring.
..., websites and online marketers do find ways around users’ precautions to gain personal information. There are many people out there who want to use personal information like credit card numbers or addresses to cause harm to others. These cases are the extremely negative ones that people want to and should avoid. The case of companies and third parties tracking browsing history and other information for advertising purposes hover over a finer line between good and bad. For some people, tracking can be considered convenient in terms of shopping for what they are interested in, and others may be uncomfortable with the thought of being tracked without knowing. As stated in the beginning, complete privacy is unlikely, but being informed about the tactics of the Internet can help one protect themselves and others in their care to be as careful and private as possible.
When you think of the internet, usually what first comes to mind is social networking, online marketplaces, and other places that don’t sound that bad. Look deeper and you’ll find that the internet isn’t as nice as you thought it was. This “dark side” of the net is comprised of everything looked down upon in the real world – drugs, weapons, false identities, and even hit men for hire exist in this rough-and-tumble darknet. Not just physical products, but virtual products float around as well; from term papers to file sharing and even e-currency populate this dark area.
Jeff Jarvis is a journalist, professor, and public speaker. In his book, “Public Parts”, Jarvis’s own opinions on “publicness” are stated plainly. He sees both social and personal benefits to living a totally public life on the internet. David Kirkpatrick is a technology journalist and author. He offers no opinion of his own on subject of total public disclosure. He has written two books on the social media giant Facebook. Kirkpatrick’s book “The Facebook Effect” was reviewed by David Pogue in The New York Times, Sunday Book Review. Pogue wrote, “You come away with a creepy new awareness of how a directory of college students is fast becoming a directory of all humanity — one that’s in the hands of a somewhat strange 26-year-old wearing a T-shirt and rubber Adidas sandals.” His book may leave readers more cautious than ever about what information they themselves are uploading to the
“Human beings are not meant to lose their anonymity and privacy,” Sarah Chalke. When using the web, web users’ information tend to be easily accessible to government officials or hackers. In Nicholas Carr’s “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty,” Jim Harpers’ “Web Users Get As Much As They Give,” and Lori Andrews “Facebook is Using You” the topic of internet tracking stirred up many mixed views; however, some form of compromise can be reached on this issue, laws that enforces companies to inform the public on what personal information is being taken, creating advisements on social media about how web users can be more cautious to what kind of information they give out online, enabling your privacy settings and programs, eliminating weblining,
Catherine, P. (March 2008). The Anonymity Experiment. Writing in the Writing Disciplines, 11(3), 387 – 396
Part of the allure of the Internet has always been the anonymity it offers its users. As the Internet has grown however, causing capitalists and governments to enter the picture, the old rules are changing fast. E-commerce firms employ the latest technologies to track minute details on customer behavior. The FBI's Carnivore email-tracking system is being increasingly used to infringe on the privacy of netizens. Corporations now monitor their employees' web and email usage. In addition to these privacy infringements, Internet users are also having their use censored, as governments, corporations, and other institutions block access to certain sites. However, as technology can be used to wage war on personal freedoms, it can also be employed in the fight against censorship and invasion of privacy.
For instance, while displaying one’s identity through gregarious media sanctions the utilization of different media than traditionally used such as status updates, photos, and videos to construct identity, the media does not always accurately portray our true selves. By posting specific photos and comments, individual's highlight certain characteristics of themselves while also omitting or hiding other facts and characteristics. In an example, if a college student posts only pictures of themselves attending bars and parties while also posting comments on friends’ walls about such activities, they will highlight their “identity” of partying and debauchery. Conversely, they would be debasing all other aspects of their lives that comprise their identities, such as schoolwork, family, and personal relationships. This use of social media can create a false identity, portraying a “person” to the outside world who may not truly exist or may be more complex than the “person” one portrays through their social media sites. This is how, as Roberts suggests, one ultimately creates an “empty identity
The issue on privacy is extremely controversial in today’s world. As the United States’ use of the internet, a global web of interconnected computer networks, expands, so does its problem with privacy invasion. With the U.S. pushing for new laws governing internet use, citizens are finding their privacy being pulled right from underneath them. Web users are buying and selling personal information online as well as hacking users for more information. One may argue that there is no such thing as privacy on the internet, but privacy is a right among Americans, and should be treated as such.
Privacy on the Internet is a widely discussed issue in today’s world. Many journal articles and books have been written based on this subject. One of these materials is Privacy Lost: How Technology is Endangering Your Privacy, which was written by David Holtzman and foreword by Senator Evan Bayh. Since it is divided into six parts, and each part consists of chapters that grasp an organized list of ideas, the book is very easy to follow. You don’t have to be a technologist in order to understand it.
As technology penetrates society through Internet sites, smartphones, social networks, and other modes of technology, questions are raised as the whether lines are being crossed. People spend a vast majority of their time spreading information about themselves and others through these various types of technology. The problem with all these variations is that there is no effective way of knowing what information is being collected and how it is used. The users of this revolutionary technology cannot control the fate of this information, but can only control their choice of releasing information into the cyber world. There is no denying that as technology becomes more and more integrated into one’s life, so does the sacrificing of that person’s privacy into the cyber world. The question being raised is today’s technology depleting the level of privacy that each member of society have? In today’s society technology has reduced our privacy due to the amount of personal information released on social networks, smartphones, and street view mapping by Google. All three of these aspects include societies tendency to provide other technology users with information about daily occurrences. The information that will be provided in this paper deals with assessing how technology impacts our privacy.
Many people have never heard of one of the most dangerous places in the world, and it is not on land. The Dark Web, also considered the Deep Web, is a hidden part of the internet which is undetected by search engines like Google, Yahoo, Bing, Etc. The dark web not accessible without special browsers. The Dark web is estimated to be 4,000–5,000 times larger than the web that everybody knows about. (Finklea 2015) Although the Dark Web is good for being anonymous, the dark web is being used by too many people for illegal issues. These include: drugs, guns, murders, hitmen, and a numerous amount of other issues. Some people who use the Dark Web believe is it good because it keeps you anonymous. However, a person has to be smart about