Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between the natives and the colonist
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It was on the 4th of August 1972 when the president of Uganda Idi Amin ordered the expulsion of his country’s Asian Minority giving them not more than 90 days to get out if his country. The ethnic cleansing of Indians in Uganda was conducted by the government which claimed that the Indians were hovering and hoarding the wealth and goods of Ugandan and for that they were bringing down the Uganda economy. Many of the British Asians were brought to Uganda during the imperial period of the British empire. These people were brought to do clerical work in imperial service or unskilled manual labor such as construction. In the 1890’s, 32,000 laborers from British India were brought to south east Africa under indentured labor contracts to work on …show more content…
According to Uganda’s history with the British, on Tuesday October 9, 1962, Uganda gained its independence from Great Britain as a parliamentary democratic monarchy with traditional kingdoms meaning that the British should have never had control of who and how the Ugandan wolf street should have been handled but that was never an issue since the Uganda people had never really had a power figure that was Ugandan prior to that. Many Indians in southeast Africa and Uganda were in sartorial and banking businesses where they were being employed by the British. Knowing that Uganda was in a time of need whereby they were trying to rebuild their country after their fight for independence, president Idi Amin got tired of people that weren’t Ugandan holding higher positions that they Ugandan people. When the British starting giving Indians better jobs and made sure they held higher position in jobs that weren’t even that high, it started to cause a social division and stereotyping of the common minority races. I% of the population yet they were receiving a fifth of the national income meaning that the one percent that weren’t even Uganda or hadn’t fought for the Ugandan independence, were making twice as much money as a regular working born …show more content…
This led to a more segregated Uganda where the Asians felt very segregated against now that they were being limited on the roles that they would be able to hold in Uganda. Not to mention, the Asians were the same people that were fine with having a more segregated Uganda whereby they held the higher and more respected jobs while the average Uganda born would suffer and work twice as hard to be able to afford a living but as soon as the tables were turned, they felt segregated. President Idi Amin’s exploitation of pre-existing indophobia spread propaganda against Indiana’s which involved stereotyping and a minority scapegoating. Indians were starting to be categorized as “always cheating, conspiring and plotting” and trying to subvert Uganda. Which was true because before the Indians were brought into Uganda, these people knew nothing about stereotyping each other because this is a county that filled with people of the same color that work the same jobs and live in the same communities but when the Indians came to Uganda, all that changed. There was more tension for jobs that want there before the Asians came to Uganda. President Amin felt like Asians were only in Uganda trying to be greedy and acting like the
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. No. 3 (1965): 524-540. http://www.jstor.org/stable/612097 (accessed December 1, 2013).
Prior to the 19th century, the Europeans traded mainly for African slaves. It turns out they were not immune towards certain diseases and therefore had an increasing risk of becoming sick. For years to come this continued, but not much land was conquered. Eventually, conference between only the Europeans was held to divide up the land appropriately, and the scramble for Africa began. The driving forces behind European imperialism in Africa were expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
When the Age of Imperialism began in 1875, it effected Africa in many ways. Nowhere was the competition for colonies more intense than in Africa. Europeans went after North and South Africa splitting up the continent. Egypt and Sudan were taken over by Britain to obtain the Suez Canal. Imperialism helped to develop Africa’s economy and turned it into a continent of colonies.
Raffaele, Paul. "Uganda: The Horror." Smithsonian (Vol. 35, No. 11). Feb. 2005: 90-99. SIRS Issues
"Uganda - African Economic Outlook." African Economic Outlook - Measuring the Pulse of Africa. 06 Nov. 2011. Web. 12 Dec. 2011. .
New African Vol. 1.492 (2010): 14. History Reference Center -. 2010 - EBSCO Industries, Inc. Web.
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
Having said that, many Ugandans would today accept that their country had at some stage to be brought into contact with the modern world, and even that they were comparatively lucky in being colonised by the British rather than by, for instance, the Belgians whose brutal rule in the Congo was far crueller than that of the British Protectorate in Uganda. Moreover, the fact that the arrival of the British in Uganda was not accompanied by the theft of African land for white farmers - as it was in Zimbabwe or Kenya - meant that some of the bitterness and resentment felt about European rule in some African countries was not a feature in Uganda. So race relations, even today, are more relaxed in Uganda than in many parts of the Continent.
Idi Amin was Uganda’s violent dictator. Killing more than 300,000 innocent people, from children to elderly, he dictated all of Uganda. At an early age, Amin joined an army under, Prime Minister Obate. After Uganda’s independence in 1962, Obate asked the British Government for support in becoming the Prime Minister of Uganda. After becoming Prime Minister of Uganda, King Mutesa II was put in complete charge of a part of Uganda. Soon, Obate began to dictate Uganda, with the help of his army. Of the members of the army, Idi Amin caught his eye, and he was in charge Uganda’s army. Knowing how valuable he was to Obate, he soon took advantage him, becoming the dictator he was known for today. Idi Amin had a ruthless and violent behavior since early in his life, when becoming the dictator he showed even more violence to the people of Uganda. With the help of neighboring countries he was later stopped, and exiled. Estimates for the number of his opponents who were either killed, tortured, or imprisoned vary from 100,000 to half a million. He was ousted in 1979 by Ugandan nationalists, after which he fled into exile.
Having a past history of discrimination and jealousy towards the Tutsis because of the Belgians caused hatred within them that later on grew. The small ethnic differences they had stirred up the conflicts; however political and economical issues added on to the problem which made the problem huge. Hatred from the past with Elite Hutus wanting power and control and an economic collapse causing massive poverty added led to one of the deadliest genocides. Around a million innocent Tutsis died within the span of three to four months. I believe the Belgians discriminating the Hutus and favoring the Tutsi based on their physical appearance had the greatest impact on the starting of the Genocide because if they were treated equally from the beginning they would have no reason to hate and blame the Tutsi for their problems. The political and economic issues however, added on to the conflict and made it a much more difficult situation. No one should be discriminated for their physical looks and/or appearances because it is something they can not control. On the other hand, no matter how bad the economy or hatred is, no one should have to go through or be involved in a genocide or mass killings. It is injustice and inhumane ot be killed for reasons that are not in your control. The Rwandan genocide was a very complex conflict that has many factors that influenced
The history of imperialism influenced the ethnic division and political conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi because of Belgian and German influence. The colonial powers had created a system of Tutsi dominance, creating lasting resentment. It caused a racial rift between the Hutu and Tutsi. The Hutu were considered inferior to the Tutsi and the Tutsi were seen as the superior being.
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.
The Europeans colonized Africa without considering where different ethnic groups lived. This was very bad for the countries that were colonized. After the Europeans the left, violent conflict was unavoidable because the different ethnic groups were fighting for control of the country. In the text page 188, Sudan had two civil wars between the north and the south,and millions were killed. This shows that the violence in Africa was unavoidable.
Indians such as Kalidas Mehta and the Madhvani family are well known Asians who have contributed immensely to the economy. For example one company alone, the Madhvani Group, accounted for 12% of Uganda’s national output, and many others have excelled. The number of the Ugandan Asians on the rich list is sizeable; Sudhir Ruperelia for example is the wealthiest Asian industrialist in Uganda today. Their settlement should then be considered a positive rather than a negative impact on East Africa and Uganda in particular.