Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The epic poem The Iliad and the poem Beowulf both present the idea of revenge and its effect on an individual’s moral values. Both Achilles and Beowulf go on a journey of seeking revenge, which lets the readers see further into their characteristics before and after seeking revenge. Homer illustrates Achilles as a renowned warrior who goes on to kill Hector to avenge his friend, Patroclus, becoming infamous for his villainous acts. Similarly, Beowulf, also goes on a journey, voluntarily, to save fellow citizens from horrible monsters using brutal measures. Therefore, the desire for revenge causes a character to forget their sense of morality in both The Iliad and Beowulf.
Both poems use various characters to present the idea of aggressive and
…show more content…
violent behavior present in an individual when seeking revenge. In The Iliad Homer shows the effect of revenge on an individual’s morals by showing Achilles’ unforgiving side. Achilles portrays this behavior when, Hector has begged him to spare his life, but he says, “‘Beg no more, you fawning dog—begging me by my parents! Would to god my rage, my fury would drive me now to hack your flesh away and eat you raw—such agonies you have caused me! […] The dogs and birds will rend you—blood and bone!’” (Iliad 22.407-410, 417). Homer uses diction, repetition, and tone to emphasize the unremorseful attitude Achilles have. In the phrases, “you fawning dog”, “hack your flesh” and “eat you raw”, Homer uses diction, more specifically negative connotations to point out the merciless behavior Achilles is presenting towards Hector. The phrase “fawning dog” shows how Achilles is degrading Hector’s standards as a warrior and as an individual by calling him an animal who portrays very obsequious behavior. Additionally, Achilles is displaying very vicious and hostile behavior when he wishes to “hack [Hector’s] flesh” and “eat [Hector] raw” because these words show a very animalistic behavior that is present in Achilles, which can be the cause of revenge taking over an individual. The repetition of the word “you” emphasizes Achilles’ unjustified accusations towards Hector. This highlights the idea of Achilles’ angry and unforgiving tone towards Hector. Consequently, Achilles’ sense of decency is forgotten by him because even though Hector has already lowered his standards, begging Achilles to refrain him from killing him yet because of Achilles’ focus on vengeance, he is unable to show justice and pity towards Hector showing his inability to refrain from excessive cruelness because of his goal to achieve revenge. On the other hand, in Beowulf, the author uses not only humans but also non-existing creatures to point out the idea of brutality that is introduced in a character. This idea is revealed through the dragon, who starts to create havoc, upon realizing that an individual has stolen one of his belongings, a goblet. For example, in Beowulf, the narrator describes the destruction the dragon is causing to Beowulf’s kingdom, “The dragon belch out flames and burn bright homesteads; there was a hot glow that scared everyone, for the vile sky-winger would leave nothing alive in his wake” (Beowulf 2312-2315). The author uses diction and kennings to highlight the idea of belligerence depicted in the dragon. The author’s usage of the phrase “belch out flames”, shows the presence of diction and it shows as to how destructive and evil the dragon is, spewing out fire that “burn bright homesteads” causing everyone to fear him and his malicious tactics. The author also uses a kenning, more specifically a hyphenated kenning, “vile sky-winger”, which describes the dragon as being a character who is horrible and extremely unpleasant, destroying everything by being merciless just like Achilles and this provides a very spiteful and malevolent characterization of the dragon. Lastly, this shows as to how an individual can forget their sense of morality because the dragon has been at peace for more than 50 years and finally anger and revenge replaces his mind when someone steals his goblet, similarly, Achilles was known to be a very powerful and respectful warrior but he lost all his honor and decency when he treats Hector savagely and letting the idea of revenge be his driving force. Another approach the authors of both poems take to show the effect of revenge on a person’s morals is by describing the lack of consideration they develop towards others while seeking revenge.
For instance, in the battle between Sarpedon and Patroclus, the two warriors are so ignorant of their surrounding because they are focused too much on killing each other, that they kill an innocent horse standing by, “But Sarpedon hurled next with a flashing lance and missed his man but he hit the horse Bold Dancer, stabbing his right shoulder and down the stallion went, screaming his life out, shrieking down in the dust as his breath winged away” (Iliad 16.553-557). Homer uses imagery, diction and symbolism to emphasize the careless mistake Sarpedon had done to an innocent bystander. The words “hurled”, “hit”, and “stabbing” causes the reader to picture as to how the spear hit the horse and the words “screaming” and “shrieking” lets the reader hear the extreme pain that the horse is in after getting attacked by a spear. The dark connotations in the phrases “screaming his life out”, “shrieking down in the dust” and “his breath winged away” portrays the horse’s helpless and suffering situation causing the reader to pity him. Homer used the horse to symbolize as to how when people’s attention is in achieving revenge, they tend to ignore the harm they can cause to the innocent people around them. The author of Beowulf also presents the idea of lack of sympathy in Beowulf’s decision to kill Grendel’s mother, “So the Shieldings’ hero, hard-pressed and enraged, took a firm hold of the hilt and swung the blade in an arc, a resolute blow that bit deep into her neck-bone and severed it entirely” (Iliad 1563-1567). The author uses diction to highlight the idea of hostility in Beowulf. In the words, “hard-pressed” and “enraged” show the extreme anger and hatred that is built up inside of Beowulf causing him to take harsh actions towards Grendel’s mother. The phrases, “resolute blow”,
“bit deep” and “severed it entirely” shows how brutal and pitiless Beowulf is of Grendel’s mother and his inability to comprehend the justified motive of Grendel’s mother: to avenge her kinsman, Grendel. The only motive that drove Grendel’s mother to attack Heorot was to avenge her son, Grendel, which appears more justified than Beowulf’s motive in punishing a grieving mother without considering the pain and agony present in her. This shows as to how a warrior’s sense of sympathy towards an individual disappears when it comes to getting revenge and fulfilling their satisfaction. An individual’s forgotten sense of morality is the result when that individual’s main intention is to seek revenge. This is present in both The Iliad and in Beowulf using various characters to show the brutal measures the characters take and the loss of justice and kindness they present towards others. The authors’ intentions of using various characters to show this idea, lets the reader see the different aspects of the effects revenge has on morality.
Beowulf is an Anglo-Saxon folk epic written by an unknown author. It was written sometime during the eighth century. Oedipus Rex is an Ancient Greek tragedy written by the playwright Sophocles sometime around 430 BC. Although the two works were written during two different time periods, in two different places, and are different kinds of literature, they contain many similarities in the manner in which they depict a hero and the depiction of government.
Evil exists naturally in the world, and there are many acts that are considered evil. As a result, evil is often a theme in literature. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe each rely heavily on evil to portray a message. Out of all of the evil acts that exist, exacting revenge is the evilest act that a person can make, for a person’s rash decision to exact revenge will ruin their sense of morality. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes in “Hamlet” each commit terrible acts of revenge, as does Montresor in “The Cask of Amontillado.”
Have you ever wanted to avenge a wrong doing done unto you? Well, the characters in Beowulf will stop at nothing to achieve vengeance. Revenge is so immensely practiced that it is a common act to pay of a deed done by an offender. However, a payment or truce does not satisfy the desire for revenge in the Poem. Every time a Character precedes to make peace, it eventually falls apart by a desire to avenge loved ones. This desire is usually upheld until someone is no longer left to be avenged or no one is left to avenge those whom they loved. This, although it may not seem so, happens commonly in this epic.
The choices we make define the destiny of our lives. Since the beginning of time, man has always been an imperfect being full of flaws. Man is faced with different situations that can end up bringing disgrace to himself and his family if the situations are not well handled. In the texts Book II of the Aeneid by Virgil, Antigone by Sophocles, Oedipus the king by Sophocles, and Book XXII from the Iliad by Homer; Creon, the Trojan people, Hector, Achilles, and Oedipus embody what can lead to a man’s downfall through their own choices. Through these texts we are able to learn from the mistakes people made in the past and lead good moral lives. The texts illustrate how pride, lack of empathy, and ignorance lead to the destruction of man.
The characters Oedipus and Beowulf represent two different types of heroes. Oedipus is a tragic hero and characterized by its standards. He was an influential man of stature who had a tragic flaws. While he contributed to his own downfall, Oedipus was not entirely responsible for it. He also learned a lesson from his mistakes which ultimately creates a catharsis in the reading.
One of the main topics discussed in lesson one is the fact that heroes over time and overseas all heroes have something in common; which is true in the case of King Arthur and Beowulf. It is obvious that they are similar in the fact that they are both heroes, but what makes them an idol of their time and in their culture are poles apart. There are many things that are different about Beowulf and King Arthur, but the ones that stand out the most are what kind of hero they are and what actions they did to make them heroic. Both heroes possess qualities that others do not have, but it is what they do with those abilities that prompts someone to write a story about them and idolize them in time.
known in the Bible as Erech (now Warka, Iraq). According to the myth, the gods
The Iliad by Homer and the Women of Troy by Euripides are both Greek works of literature that look at the Trojan War from different perspectives. Book 6 of the Iliad illustrates that the ultimate glory is to fight for the city with no regard to the impact on the family. The Women of Troy focuses on the negatives that war causes, especially towards the soldier’s wives and children. Whereas the Iliad focuses on the battle itself and centers on the warriors, the Women of Troy focuses on the wrath the war brings upon the families left behind. The central theme in both the works is the Trojan War and they both offer perspectives of the duty of a person, the role of predetermined fate, and the role of women.
Revenge is best served cold or so says the well-known expression. This idea of revenge that they seek is usually to restore a balance and take an “eye for an eye” as the bible says. Revenge, if by chance everyone were in Plato’s perfect utopia, would be in a perfect form, where justice and revenge would be one, and the coined phrase an “eye for an eye” would be taken literally. By taking an eye for and eye, and punishing those who did wrong equally as they did wrong, there is justice. However, this revenge sometimes goes to far and is consequently not justice. This notion of Revenge and justice is often in literature, one of the better-known being the novel The Count of Monte Cristo, written by Alexandre Dumas. However, literature is not the only time that revenge and justice is discussed in. Works and Rules and real-life events that took place like the Bible, Hammurabi’s code, Twelve Tables, and others each have something different about the topic. More religious texts seem to forbid violence, while laws, such as the Hammurabi’s code, recommend revenge, but equal revenge. By judging from literature, it can be concluded that most authors have different opinions on the matter at hand, and revenge is sometimes justice, but usually not, and tends to lead to violence that was not intended.
Over the thousands of years that the epic story the Iliad has survived, there has no doubt been some form of alteration to Homer’s original. Last May, Wolfgang Petersen directed a movie based on the Iliad. This movie, Troy, has proven to be a very loose adaptation of Homer’s original, as are almost all stories that are made into movies, unfortunately. With its timeless storyline, amazing scenery, gorgeous actors/actresses and most of all, its reported two hundred million dollar budget, it is easy to see why Troy was hyped up to be a box office hit. However, the film critics were harsh on this movie, as they had every right to be, and it ended up being a total flop. Compared to Homer’s Iliad, Troy is rather disappointing. But, to be fair, one must keep in mind the limitations of a movie compared to those of a book, and the fact that the title is Troy, not the Iliad. It really is not as bad as expected. Troy is Homer’s Iliad gone to Hollywood. There probably are just as many similarities as differences from the original. The three major upsetting differences in Troy compared to the Iliad are the absence of the Gods, the weak character and plot development, and the addition, exclusion, and reversal of key points.
In the Iliad, revenge is the cause of many problems. There are main concepts that lead to having revenge in which it is pride, rage and emotional charged. Pride can lead to revenge by disbelieving in someone’s dignity. Rage can also result in having revenge by making a person become full of anger to the point that they can not hold it back any more. Emotional charges can result in revenge by someone who is very emotional and starts to have a negative aspect to what has happened.
Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and even the American culture. This is shown throughout many ancient greek epics. Throughout these two epics, what is just revenge and what the action of revenge is are much different than what Revenge is seen through today’s society. Revenge is the main theme in The Iliad, with Achilles’ revenge on Agamemnon and Hector, and in The Odyssey, with Poseidon’s revenge on Odysseus and Odysseus’s revenge on the Suitors, and these epics define how revenge was seen in the ancient Greek world.
Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche once declared, “It is impossible to suffer without making someone pay for it.” In other words, when one is suffering, the desire to reap revenge without consideration as to who is being harmed in the process is innate. This is a common theme within the poem The Epic of Gilgamesh, Euripides tragic play, Medea, and Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Hamlet. Characterization is used in these three works to exemplify the revenge seeker’s disregard for anyone but themselves in order to take vengeance on those who committed an act against them.
Homer’s “Iliad,” Euripides’ “Trojan Women,” and Pitre’s Fives and Twenty-fives all include some form of revenge. The most prominent concept of revenge occurs in the Iliad and stems from the wrath of Achilles. In the “Iliad”, The Achaeans seek revenge against the Trojans for taking Helen, the wife of Menelaus, the Greek king. Apollo and Chryses, a priest of Apollo, seek revenge because Agamemnon refused to return Chrysies, the daughter of Chryses, who was taken as a war prize. Achilles seeks revenge against Agamemnon for insulting him
Violence, it is a part of the Iliad and Odyssey; it is portrayed in nearly all our movies and literature. The numerous battles in the Iliad constantly described the grotesque deaths of warriors. "He brought him down with a glinting jagged rock, massive, top of the heap behind the rampart’s edge, no easy lift for a fghger even in prime strength, working with both hands, weak as men are now." Giant Ajax hoisted it high and hurled it down, crushing the rim of the soldiers four horned helmet and cracked his skull to splinters, a bloody pulp…" 435-443. Violence, the many scenes of war in the Iliad reminded me of the first battle scene of Saving Private Ryan. The extremely violent images of men crying out for their mothers, the intestines spilling out of a man’s belly, and the many pictures of bullet wounds. I believe that if Homer had lived in the 20th century, that the battle scenes of the Iliad would resemble those of the many gruesome films and books written in this century. A specific example of senseless violence was during the fall of Troy; Hektors young child was thrown off the high walls of Troy. It obvious that every society throughout time has appreciated virulent violence.