Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of media in elections essay
Media influence on elections conclusion
Mass media bias
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of media in elections essay
Politics for the last of couple of modern areas have been infiltrated by the use of media. On a daily basis, through newspapers, television, and social media. The majority of the time we receive a glimpse of true events by being fed with scandals and negatives comments or news stories of politicians. For years now, politicians have abused the power of the media to muckrake opponent politicians in order to guarantee their opponents failure. The media has been polluted by bias; they set expectations on appearances, gives false representation of politicians, and that leads to us not trusting the politicians. The term muckraking has taken a whole new meaning in recent years. Yes, it has always meant “the action of searching out and publicizing …show more content…
We are entitled to create a television show or a radio broadcast as long as we ensure sufficient funds or find a lucky sponsor. Now it is more accessible, one can simply create a youtube channel and may exceed the skills necessary to influence an audience. However, the problem that arises is that in the case that a host or creator of the show or channel limits the voice of anti-political views especially since politics is such a controversial issue. One-sided opinions result through our own ignorance of bias. Heather Scatterfield, explicitly explains the idea by explaining this concept in modern word, “If you have a few hundred friends on Facebook, for example, and 90 percent of them agree on most political issues, the information you get will be filtered through this bias.”(Heather Satterfield). This is a serious dilemma and public voice is being filtered to potential bias. We enter this cycle of just hearing our own opinions and desire to be correct, we never take the other side into much …show more content…
Media can sometimes be good for politics but bad for the public and vice versa. The other two directions it can go is when talking about international affairs. Media’s coverage in international political affairs can be for the better or for the worse. For instance, media can cover up something a politician may have done. That would be bad for the public since they are holding information back from us. We want the reality of it however, if they took the public side and showed us that information, being a scandal or something else that the politician has done it will negatively affect politics. So in the end it just depend what and how the media exposes this information because it can either be seen as helpful or bias. Many argue if the media and politicians are withholding that information it is probably with good intent and as we know humans aren’t always the best at handling the truth. Media's involvement with international affairs is again a argument for or against politicians and the public. For years the government has been having problems with the media and their involvement. They have tried effortlessly to control what TV crews can see and/or report. The most infamous moment of this was during the vietnam war “ During the Vietnam war, people were all for it as first, but when reporters and television stations started showing what was actually happening the public turned against the war and against president
“The old argument that the networks and other ‘media elites’ have a liberal bias is so blatantly true that it’s hardly worth discussing anymore…No we don’t sit around in dark corners and plan strategies on how we’re going to slant the news. We don’t have to. It comes naturally to most reporters.” (Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News) This example is tremendously important in the author’s discussion because it proves that news stories do manipulate people through bias. Popular news networks are viewed by thousands of people every single day, thus making it have a huge impact on the public since they believe what they see. When news reporters present their news segments, it is natural for them to give their insights due to human nature being instinctively biased. “The news media is [sic] only objective if they report something you agree with… Then they’re objective. Otherwise they’re biased if you don’t agree, you know.” (CNN’s American Morning) In this quote, the readers are presented to current panelists agreeing that news consumers have a very hard time separating their own view of the news from the perspective of the news reporters because they are presenting their own opinions throughout their segments. This problem exists once again because of the bias that is contained in media
There is nothing wrong with muckraking. In fact, it certainly is an honor to be considered “Queen of the Muckrakers” as Mitford was titled. Being a muckraker means nothing more than exposing truth. The Bill of Rights guarantees free speech to all Americans, and muckrakers are not abusing their power if they simply write what they know. While those opposed to muckraking might claim that journalists are not writing the truth, they are mistaken because muckraking is not the spreading of lies. Muckraking is exposing hidden truths, going to whatever means necessary to do so. Adversaries of muckraking may argue that the journalists spread false stories, but that is entirely not the case. Muckrakers write and expose what they know, because that is what journalism is. But those who are against muckrakers will read muckraking stories and consider them lies because the story contradicts something they already know. What these adversaries don’t understand is just as there are two sides to every coin, there are two sides to every story. This idea can be illustrated by a disease called Synesthesia. Those affected by it experience their surroundings i...
Political discourse has suffered because of this change. We no longer focus on the issues in politics but rather the relatability of a politician or on certain aspects of their personal lives. Even though the internet has subsumed television in today’s society there are still instances where we see this in both mediums. On the television politicians are still using their personal appeal to persuade their audience and on the internet the lives of these political figures are readily available, also influencing our choices. A possible course of action to navigating this world of false advertisement and excessive insight would be to educate people of these unconscious influences on their decision making and reinforce that it is the quality of one’s beliefs that should matter upmost and foremost. In the end, it would be entirely up to the people to decide how easily subjective they will
Another controlling method that is diffused through television, radio and written publications; is any reported information about world politics and news. Powerful political groups narrow people’s views of what is going on around them by tainting and twisting information to their own device. They decide what to say and when to say it, revealing as much or little information as desired, in ‘befitting’ instances; thus enabling them to hide information they consider deleterious to themselves, from the public. It also permits them to depict opponents in overly negative terms.
Self-censorship is perhaps what is most ominous in these cases, journalists and editors do not keep track of notes that could affect business interests, the newspaper owners or their relative...
Many people have no interest in current events in the world or even their own country, and are more concerned about matters that are more trivial, and even if they were to pay a deal of attention, common news sources are often biased and don’t release information that would hurt a certain cause. It is in this way that the citizens are kept igno...
First, the role of the media is to represent the public and intervene between the public and the government. The media is a mirror, which re...
The media is often considered to be biased. The reason for this is because they do not act neutral on the things that they report on. They usually give their point of view and tend to warp the information so it’s easily digestible by the average person. This type of “nugget feeding,” can influence the judgment of some one who has no idea what is going on. The media tends to sensationalize the news by making it seem dramatic, and compelling. This hooks the viewer, and keeps them tuned in. The purpose of this is for ratings, and most importantly money. The media has become less professional, and their morality has gone down hill. The editors/gatekeepers decide what information is sent out for the public to see, and hear. This is another way that the news is shaped for our viewing pleasure.
Furthermore, media has a power connect government with nation It plays role of a liason between the two sides of country .It helps the public to aware the government of its opinion and feelings about any policy. on the other hand ,it assist ruler to communication with citizens. So this mutual relationship is strengthened by the media. Likewise, it can also uproot the corruption and promote good governance in a country. For instance, media can launch counter corruption programs on...
During these difficult economic times sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have taken over our T.V and internet screens as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a sort of escapism for readers. Although it may seem that sensationalism has just started making waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has been influencing viewers and contributing to media bias since the days of the penny press. Sensationalisms long history has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential to today’s reporting practices. With the influence over readers’ sensationalism’s media bias have and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come.
In turn, when votes are changed, different public officials are elected. The government officials are the men and women who make the laws and generally run the country. The mass media is at the beginning of a long chain, but nonetheless, the media has a powerful effect on politics in the United States. Works Cited
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,
The relationship between journalism and politics is a two-way street: though politicians take advantage as best
The media though is a really good thing. It helps us relay messages back and forth. It is a very good source of communication. It informs people of what is happening in our community and throughout the world. The media can also be a very bad thing however. It is sometimes used against people. It can relay a different message than what is being shown. It can make people seem like really bad people when they are really are just regular nice people.
People are using media to show the entire world the truth. Politicians are also using the media to make themselves look better and using Black PR to humiliate their opponents. In countries with communist or monarchy regime media is not an armed method to control people.