Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
George orwell rhetorical essay on totalitarianism
George orwell rhetorical essay on totalitarianism
George orwell rhetorical essay on totalitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: George orwell rhetorical essay on totalitarianism
Ideology or Freedom?
What would you give for happiness? For safety? What if I told you that you had to give up your freedom or what you believe? Would you take that deal? This is one of the most important questions posed by Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Both of these books take place in a London that seems outlandish but really isn’t so different from our own. Brave New World is set in a futuristic society with a strict social structure, decided by biology, that determines everything about a person’s life. 1984 is set in more contemporary times in an authoritarian society controlled by a powerful elite that keeps the masses in check. Both of these stories look at the importance of ideology
…show more content…
All members of the party have to wear blue overalls (2), which is the uniform of the party. Party members are expected to volunteer their time and recreation centers while their children are meant to take part in the Party Youth League. The family is one of the few areas where the party allows for someone to be an individual but even this is greatly diluted. Marriages must be approved so that the party can make sure that spouses do not truly love each other and that these relationships are only for producing more children for the party. The Party Youth Leagues brainwash children to put the party first over their families and their parents. Winston’s neighbor Tom Parsons is an idealist who strongly supports the party, willingly giving up his thought to whatever the party decides, but his downfall turns out to be his children. Instead of being disappointed that his child betrayed him, Parsons says that “in fact I am proud of her” (208). Ingsoc is so effective in destroying individualism that the party is able to train kids to spy on and rat on their own parents. This is a sign of a society that is very much controlled by the elite where the idea of free will has become so convoluted as to be turned on its head. The party also uses telescreens and mics to constantly spy on its citizens to root out any thought crime. Thought crime is a major part of the party’s ideology. It is any idea that goes against the party, Big Brother or any narrative that the party has put forward. This, along with the Ministry of Love, is the most important way that individuality has been stamped out. Instead of individuality just being seen as something bad, it has become completely criminalized to the point where one can be put to death for having the slightest thought against the
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the “utopia” and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform – often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the state’s relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything. This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the ‘absurdity’ of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the state’s abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance.
Propaganda also plays a central role within the Party's infrastructure and it is used to gain support for Big Brother, stir patriotism and induce hate towards the chosen "enemy" country. Workers in the Ministry of Truth work to change the past, making Big Brother seem to have always been right. Also, the Party seeks to stifle any individual or "potentially revolutionary" thought by introducing a new language, Newspeak, the eradication of English and the deployment of "Thought Police" who terrorize Party members by accusing them of "Thought Crime" (ie. to think a crime is to commit a crime). The introduction of this new language means that eventually, no-one is able to commit thought-crime due to the lack of words to express it.
Invasion of privacy is shown in the “Youth League”. Children who are young and persuading are being brainwashed into believing every single word Big Brother has to say. They are told to spy on their own family to assure their loyalty to the party. While the inner party is busy making propaganda and re-writing history, the proles are left like animals. Free.
The novel Brave New World written by Aldous Huxley has been reviewed over time by many different people. Neil Postman is a man who has read Huxley’s novel and came to conclusions himself about the comparison between the novel, and the modern day problems we have in today’s society. Postman has made many relevant assertions as to how our modern society is similar to what Huxley had written about in his novel. The three main points I agree on with Postman is that people will begin to love their oppression; people would have no reason to fear books; and that the truth will be drowned by irrelevance. The first assertion Postman made regarded people loving their oppression.
In order to keep this power and help it keep growing, the Party has organized the Junior Spies League in which they train kids to become spies for the government. The Party’s goal with this organization is to turn in anyone who seems suspicious. Winston’s neighbors, the Parsons, have two kids who are part of the Spies and they are very loyal to it. Winston went to their apartment one day and the kids started attacking him and yelling “‘You’re a traitor!’” (Orwell
George Orwell’s haunting dystopian novel 1984 delves into the closely monitored lives of the citizens of Oceania as the Party tries to take control of society. In totalitarianism, propaganda and terrorism are ways of subjugation with a main goal: total obedience. He aimed to create a “what if” novel, what would happen if totalitarian regimes, such as the Nazis and Soviets, were to take over the world. If totalitarianism were to happen, the leader would be the brain of the whole system. Orwell emphasizes the theme of individualism versus collective identity through Winston, the protagonist, and his defiance to the Party and Big Brother, with a frightening tone, surreal imagery and a third person limited point of view.
In the article excerpt, social critic Neil Postman describes two dystopian novels: George Orwell’s 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Postman compares which novel is more relevant to today’s society, and leans more towards Brave New World. When both novels are compared side by side, it is evident that Huxley’s world is indeed more relative to modern day civilization.
Imagine a society in which its citizens have forfeited all personal liberties for government protection and stability; Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, explores a civilization in which this hypothetical has become reality. The inevitable trade-off of citizens’ freedoms for government protection traditionally follows periods of war and terror. The voluntary degradation of the citizens’ rights begins with small, benign steps to full, totalitarian control. Major methods for government control and censorship are political, religious, economic, and moral avenues. Huxley’s Brave New World provides a prophetic glimpse of government censorship and control through technology; the citizens of the World State mimic those of the real world by trading their personal liberties for safety and stability, suggesting that a society similar to Huxley’s could exist outside the realm of dystopian science fiction.
The nonstop supervision of the people abolishes instinct and promotes fear, which conditions the people. First, the Party takes away the natural impulse to think freely. To do so, the government set in place a group called the Thought Police. Their main role is to expose any thoughts that are disloyal to Big Brother, “It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place… the smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety… anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide.” (Orwell 1.5.145) The Thought Police creates a rising paranoia in the society so that citizens are willing to turn against each other in hopes of keeping on “good terms”
In Huxley’s Brave New World, the lack of freedom is apparent in all aspects of society. “There was something called liberalism. Freedom to be a round peg in a square hole” connotes, through the analogy of ‘a round peg’, that freedom is a disruption to the social equilibrium; it is “inefficient and miserable”. This is ironic as the preconditioned happiness provided to the individuals is ‘miserable’ as evident in “the infinitely friendly world of soma-holiday”. In addition, “what would it be like if I could, if I were free—not enslaved by my conditioning?” subverts, through the rhetorical question combined with the personal pronoun of ‘I’, the ideals of the government and their intent to control the masses.
What if there was a place where you did not have to, or rather, you could not think for yourself? A place where one's happiness was controlled and rationed? How would you adapt with no freedom of thought, speech, or happiness in general? In the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, there are many different attitudes portrayed with the purpose to make the reader think of the possible changes in our society and how they could affect its people.
The Party is a totalitarian government. Neither the Outer Party nor the proles (proletariat) have any influence on the direction of their country or the rules that govern their lives. The Inner Party manipulates the media and infiltrates citizens' private lives to gain complete control over every aspect of human existence, including love and sex. When the propaganda, deprivation, and rigid guidelines
This dream of forming and maintaining a utopian society was immortalized in two novels dealing with the same basic ideas, 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Both of these novels deal with the lives of main characters that inadvertently become subversives in a totalitarian government. These two books differ greatly however with the manner in which the government controls the population and the strictness of the measures taken to maintain this stability. This essay with compare and contrast the message and tone of each novel as well as consider whether the utopia is a positive or negative one.
Comparing Orwell's 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World. In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley’s Brave New World, the authoritative figures strive for freedom, peace, and stability for all, to develop a utopian society. The Utopian society strives for a perfect state of well-being for all persons in the community, and over-emphasizes this factor, where no person is exposed to the reality of the world. As each novel progresses, we see that neither society possesses family values nor attempts to practice them.
In the two dystopic novels, The Handmaid's Tale by Margret Atwood and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, they lack essentials freedoms that are necessary for a functioning society to exist. In these novels, each individual in the society has been deprived of their freedoms by their government Their particular government has made sure to control every aspect that makes us human such as our individuality, knowledge, and the relationships we from with others. Both of these governments share a common goal, which is to create stability in a weak society.