Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mind-brain identity theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mind-brain identity theory
Melvin Snoh Intro to Phil Professor Wetzel April 6, 14 Prompt 1 The identity theory of mind holds that states and processes of the mind are identical to states and processes of the brain thus particular psychological states are identical with particular type of physical state. Many objections have been lay out by philosophers who have evaluated this theory one objection that is particularly strong is the Martian and octopus criticism which state that if identity theory is true, than these species should not feel pain, but if they do feel pain than identity theory is not true. Pain according to identity theorist is psychological states that can be reduced to a brain state or physical state. When a human says he or she is experiencing pain according to identity theorist they are experiencing c fibers in their body. If pain is experiencing c fibers in your body then according to Identity theorist an Octopus and a Martian can not experience pain because the make up of their brains are different from a human brain, but that can not be true. Just because your brain is different from my brain does not mean you can not feel the same stuff that I feel. Thus when we think about the human mind in relation to the body we should think about what is the relationship between psychological state and physical state that realizes it. Alien and Octopus pains are identical with the brain state too a brain state that is totally different than the human brain state. When we say this we have to qualify the type of identity we are using, we are saying that pain and other psychological states are identical with particular state of the body, but the state of the body that they identical with can vary from species to species such as human to a Martian, Mar... ... middle of paper ... ...ction is similar to those of a human to move or jerk away from something that is to hot. So if you see the same type of behavior in an octopus and Martian such as shrinking and jerking or jerking away that would suggest that the octopus and Martian can also experience pain because it is in a state that is functioning exactly as human pain. In Conclusion the identity theory state that states and processes of the mind are identical to states and processes of the brain can not be true because in the example of a Martian and Octopus we see that it is possible for other species to experience pain even though the make up of their brains might be different than ours we know this because when we examining their behavior and how this react to certain things that causes pain they manner in which they reacted to those things is similar to the manner in which human would react
Identity is a group of characteristics, data or information that belongs exactly to one person or a group of people and that make it possible to establish differences between them. The consciousness that people have about themselves is part of their identity as well as what makes them unique. According to psychologists, identity is a consistent definition of one’s self as a unique individual, in terms of role, attitudes, beliefs and aspirations. Identity tries to define who people are, what they are, where they go or what they want to be or to do. Identity could depend on self-knowledge, self-esteem, or the ability of individuals to achieve their goals. Through self-analysis people can define who they are and who the people around them are. The most interesting point about identity is that some people know what they want and who they are, while it takes forever for others to figure out the factors mentioned before. Many of the individuals analyzed in this essay are confused about the different possible roles or positions they can adopt, and that’s exactly the reason they look for some professional help.
The ego lies within the conscious and unconscious realm and seeks to satisfy the id’s
In terms of the mind, mental states globally supervene on physical states, meaning that there are no changes in the mental without changes in the physical. Identity theory is a
...m, and what is it doing? I will continue to believe, until I see otherwise, that there is a "mind" or "soul" that science will not be able to find in their search to concretely assert that brain=behavior. If it is indeed something intangible, then for at least a great many years, if ever, science can not find I-function within a mass of tissue cells in the brain.
In David Lewis’ article “An Argument for Identity Theory” Lewis defends the psychoneural identity theory, arguing that mental states or experiences are neural states. In his main argument, he argues that physics can explain the causal relationship between mental states or experiences and physical phenomena. He uses an analogy of a cylindrical combination lock to explain the causal role that mental states play in producing physical phenomena. In order to put the lock into a state of being “unlocked”
Pain is a complex and subjective phenomenon that involves biological, psychological, social factors, and cultural. It is interpreted and perceived in the brain. Each individual responds differently to pain because every person has different pain thresholds and tolerances. According to Porth (2009), pai...
If this is the case, then we can also bring to mind the idea that if having a body is not necessary for personal identity then perhaps multiple identities could produce effects from the same body, in a sense that is supported by functionalism. We will continue this train of though momentarily. It is also noted in the dualist point of view that in the absence of bodily and brain continuity, such as having no memory of an event the individual was a part of, personal identity is not held. This contributes to the explanation of multiple identities as it provides an argument as to why the different personalities can be considered distinct from the host and from each other. As reported, in many cases of dissociative identity disorder the host experiences lost time, when one of the alternates may be in control. Thus, without this continuity the host cannot be considered identical with the alternate and so they are two, or more, distinct
The ‘Sensation-Brain Process Identity Theory’ posed by J.J.C. Smart is the view that a sensation is a just a brain process. In the strict sense of identity a sensation and a brain processes are two names for one thing. Similarly, the one thing people refer to when they talk about ‘the morning star’ or ‘the evening star’ is Venus. There exists only one physical component to this world from which we derive other statements like ‘the morning star is the last star you can see in the morning.’ ‘The morning star’ happens to be Venus. A sensation happens to be a process. A brain process more obviously is also a process. When we talk about sensations or a brain process we are talking about the same process. The one particular process being referred to ‘is’ in the strict sense a single thing like Venus. When we talk about a sensation or a brain-process we do so to designate one and the same component of living humans.
The mind brain identity theory states that there isn’t any difference between the mind and the brain; they are essentially the same thing. This theory also says that all psychological properties have identical physical properties. I think that the humans in this video could be classified as mind brain identity theorists. Because mind brain identity theorists believe that each psychological property has an identical physical property, they would have a hard time accepting that robots and humans are the same psychologically, yet physically made up of completely different elements. This could explain why they were so against the robots becoming equal members of society; because they genuinely didn’t believe that robots could have the same mental process as humans.
What is personal identity? This question has been asked and debated by philosophers for centuries. The problem of personal identity is determining what conditions and qualities are necessary and sufficient for a person to exist as the same being at one time as another. Some think personal identity is physical, taking a materialistic perspective believing that bodily continuity or physicality is what makes a person a person with the view that even mental things are caused by some kind of physical occurrence. Others take a more idealist approach with the belief that mental continuity is the sole factor in establishing personal identity holding that physical things are just reflections of the mind. One more perspective on personal identity and the one I will attempt to explain and defend in this paper is that personal identity requires both physical and psychological continuity; my argument is as follows:
Describe what evolutionary psychologists mean when they employ the term ‘theory of mind’. Use examples and research studies from Book 1, Chapter 2 to show why this theory is important in evolutionary psychology.
Scientifically, it has been established that lightning is an electrical discharge. Science was able to show that a phenomenon, which previously seemed to defy physical description can now be understood within the framework of the law of physics. According to the Identity Theory, the scientific discovery that lightning is the same thing as an electrical discharge is an a posteriori truth that could be found only by observation and experiment. Unlike Cartesian Dualism, in this theory, there is the advantage of testability. For instance, the brain can be seen and examined through scientific/medical experiment; it is possible to make one experience certain mental states and see which part of their brain lights up. Hence, the strength of Identity Theory rests in its testability. So far, we have seen that the Identity Theory has argued for its solution to the mind/body problem by describing progress that science has made; it also predicts that science is yet to reveal what exactly is this physical sate which is identical with those of
Materialism theory expresses everything is related to physical properties. Mental states are numerically identical with a physical state. Physical states would be referred to the brain or nervous system. If this theory were to be proven true, parts of the brain would have a segment for feelings, beliefs, etc. Identity theory is another way of expressing such, due to the direct one-to-one correlation. This futuristic thinking hasn’t been developed from scratch, it is mirroring off of older theories.
Davis, Tom. The Theories of the Mind Lectures. Ed. G. Baston. Birmingham University. 9 Nov. 2000
The fifth stage, according to Erik Erikson psychoanalytic theory of development is the Identity Vs Identity confusion. The stage occurs during adolescence in the ages between 12 to 18 years. At this stage, the adolescents try to find a sense of personal and self-identity by intensely exploring their personal goals, beliefs, and values (McLeod, 2017). Notably, the adolescence is between childhood and adulthood. Thus, their mind is between the morality learned during childhood and the ethics they are trying to develop into adulthood. The transitioning from childhood to adulthood is the most important development for a person because the individual is becoming independent and is focusing on the future regarding career, relationships, families