Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chris mccandless character traits, personal philosophy, and beliefs
Chris mccandless character traits, personal philosophy, and beliefs
Analysis of into the wild
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Upon first glance, Into the Wild looks as if it were about another idealistic man turning insane, by simply separating himself from the rest of humanity. However, upon further inspection, the novel is truly an intricately-woven metaphor symbolizing the inescapable order of the world and the possibility to choose one’s path in life, so long as one is determined enough to make that happen (Krakauer, 146). Furthermore, the film The Falling Man, directed by Henry Singer, explores a very similar concept: How can one control the final moments of their life? Singer uses 9/11, an infamous terrorist attack on the World Trade Center Towers in New York, as a medium to express himself and his desire to discover and delve into the amount of control humans …show more content…
have over their own deaths (Singer). He delves into the choice the people in the North Trade Center Tower had to face: To jump and meet a swift end, or to suffocate and burn alive. While both of these mediums for expression analyze a variety of concepts, a major chord struck by both of pieces is life choices. Not only do both works evaluate the ways in which people live their lives, but they examine how victims choose to meet their end, and the reactions of the people around them upon realizing that their choice has been made. When people go through life, they make choices everyday; and while the outcomes of those choices may never be known, people must continue making them, for without choices, one does not truly live.
This is shown many times throughout history, most notably through a man named Chris McCandless (Krakauer, 203). In fact, sometimes one is even allowed to choose how they die, and while to most that is to be feared, to others, it is a beautiful thing to be able to choose to die painlessly (Singer). While most people will not interpret making choices to mean running away and living in the wild with little to no supplies, that is how both Chris McCandless and Jon Krakauer interpreted it to be (Krakauer, 143). However, on the other side of the spectrum, there is the concept of choosing how to die (Singer). On the fateful day of September 11th, 2001, hundreds of people had to make an impossible choice: be burned alive in the growing fire, or fly for a few seconds, and meet their end painlessly on the ground (Singer). While it is certainly a horrifying and gruesome way to die, when there is no other options left, most find it a necessary choice to make (Singer). Being human means having self control and the ability to resist blind acceptance of outside influences. Singer explores this concept through interviews with the spouses of those who passed in the North Tower, and creates an atmosphere that truly questions the decisions made by those souls on 9/11. One man stated that he thought his wife experienced a sensation akin to flying, and hoped she died knowing her family loved her
(Singer). With that being said, both writers place a heavy emphasis not on life or death itself, but how exactly an individual chooses to reach those destinations. Some might not agree with McCandless or the jumpers on the day the World Trade Center Towers collapsed, but what was important was that it was their decision, and every decision has its own consequences. Both authors build up the literal concept of choice, how it affects us in our day to day lives, and our inevitable deaths. While life and death are both drastically different, how one gets to those points depends only on them. Some might not agree with McCandless’s actions (Krakauer, 71), but what was important was that they were his own. Some might shiver at the thought of falling over 100 stories to the ground and would much rather prefer the fire and smoke, but that was not their decision to make. Everything a person does, everything they choose to do, is their decision alone, whether it ends with living or dying. In his novel, Into the Wild, Krakauer discusses the personalities and hardships of the people that Chris McCandless met on his journey to Alaska, in order to invoke emotions in the reader by showcasing their thoughts. However, in the movie The Falling Man, Singer leaves the identities of the falling men and women a mystery, as this makes them symbolic of the horror and destruction of 9/11. Containing symbols in his film opens up his audience to a much broader range of people, and causes his film to have many themes. One of those themes was that while making choices is inevitable, it is a type of freedom that is incredibly valuable (Singer). The idea of choosing how an individual lives and dies is in of itself a priceless thing. Usually, people do not have an option in choosing how they die, and while that is not exactly something to be joyous about, it it still manages to provide a gratifying sensation. Some poor people in the World Towers were not trapped next to a window and had no choice but to suffer being burned alive or slowly suffocated (Singer). This brings up the notion that both works, in their own strange ways, state the exact same thing: Choice is the most human thing we can do, and without it, we are not human, but we are simple-minded animals. This overarching idea expands into the many plot points of Into the Wild, such as when Krakauer decided to hike up the mountain, despite his colleagues and father telling him that it was nearly impossible and he might die in the process (Krakauer, 142). Moreover, in The Falling Man, Singer expresses that the people in the North Tower had to choose whether to die painfully, or to die quickly. This ties into Into the Wild due to its emphasis on the matter of human choice, and the fact that without, our lives are controlled by our environments, and not ourselves (Krakauer, 47). “But he did not confront his parents with what he knew, then or ever. He chose instead to make a secret of his dark knowledge and express his rage obliquely, in silence and sullen withdrawal,” (Krakauer, 123). This section of Into the Wild refers to McCandless deciding to keep to himself about the intimate knowledge he had learned about his father having cheated on his mother. This perfectly encompasses Krakauer’s theme of having to make human choices and sacrifices in order to keep ourselves and our peers happy. However, this also signifies the darker theme of having to decide whether or not to make a decision based upon the reactions of those around you. When discussing a topic as deep as the prospect of human choice, an author’s style plays an extremely key role in their delivery of information. Into the Wild is structured in a way that presents big ideas first, instead of a series of events in chronological order. Furthermore, Krakauer uses simple diction to ensure that a person of any age is able to understand his ideas. This causes Into the Wild to be a thought-provoking novel for a person of any age, and bridges the gap between Krakauer’s purpose in writing the novel and the level of writing that it works at. Krakauer uses style to portray his purpose, which is to inform his audience of why adventurers leave the comforts of their homes, and how they survive in the wilderness. n the other hand, The Falling Man uses dramatic diction to portray a scene of chaos and turmoil. Singer’s style of direction leads him to make his film use interviews with the spouses of families and to organize them in such a way that they overlap in their ideas and emotions (Singer). All of this aids Singer in portraying his purpose, which is to inform the reader of the horrors of 9/11 and to discuss the importance of making choices, as they may be our last. As we go through our lives, we make choices each day, some of them good, and others bad. According to Jon Krakauer and Henry Singer, in order to be human, we must make choices, and without choices, we are nothing. Into the Wild uses descriptive words to denote emotions and actions, and the book attempts to appeal to the emotional side of us, which makes it an ethos-based work. On the other hand, there is The Falling Man, which relies extremely heavily on ethos to invoke understanding for the characters in the film, and then uses logos to display the reasoning behind the choices that most people made when the North Tower fell. Even though we make choices all throughout our lives, it is necessary to truly reflect each day on the choices that one made, and decide if they were truly the right thing to do, because they might have made or broken another’s day.
Into the Wild by John Krakauer is a rare book in which its author freely admits his bias within the first few pages. “I won't claim to be an impartial biographer,” states Krakauer in the author’s note, and indeed he is not. Although it is not revealed in the author's note whether Krakauer's bias will be positive or negative, it can be easily inferred. Krakauer's explanation of his obsession with McCandless's story makes it evident that Into the Wild was written to persuade the reader to view him as the author does; as remarkably intelligent, driven, and spirited. This differs greatly from the opinion many people hold that McCandless was a simply a foolhardy kid in way over his head. Some even go as far as saying that his recklessness was due to an apparent death-wish. Krakauer uses a combination of ethos, logos and pathos throughout his rendition of McCandless’s story to dispute these negative outlooks while also giving readers new to this enigmatic adventure a proper introduction.
When Jon Krakauer published a story about the death of a young man trekking into the Alaskan frontier in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine, the audience’s response to Christopher McCandless’s story was overwhelming. Thousand of letters came flooding in as a response to the article. Despite the claims, especially from the native Alaskans, questioning McCandless’s mental stability and judgement, it soon becomes clear that McCandless was not just "another delusional visitor to the Alaskan frontier" (4). As Krakauer retells the life of Christopher McCandless and gives his own take on the controversy around McCandless’s death in Into The Wild, the reader also creates his own opinion on both McCandless and Krakauer’s argument. Krakauer
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
In John Krakauer’s novel Into The Wild, the reader follows the life of a young man who, upon learning of his father’s infidelity and bigamy, seems to go off the deep end, isolating himself by traveling into the wild country of Alaska, unprepared for survival, where he died of starvation at 67 pounds.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
The novel “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer goes into great detail to describe the main character, Chris McCandless, who died traveling alone into the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless, whom in the novel renamed himself Alex, left his home and family to travel to Alaska in 1992. In Alaska McCandless planned to live an isolated life in the desolate wilderness, but unfortunately he did not survive. This non-fiction novel portrays his life leading up to his departure and it captures the true essence of what it means to be “in the wild”.
In the novel, A Hero’s Journey, Joseph Campbell, an American mythologist, writer, and lecturer, states that “every decision made by a young person is life decisive. What seems to be a small problem is really a large one. So everything that is done early in life is functionally related to a life trajectory” (Campbell). In mythic criticism, the critic sees mythic archetypes and imagery connecting and contrasting it with other similar works. Certain patterns emerge, such as a traditional hero on a journey towards self actualization. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer portrays this hero’s journey. The protagonist of the novel, Chris McCandless, hitchhikes to Alaska and walks alone into the wilderness, north of Mt. McKinley. He had given $25,000 in savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. He thought that the reality of the modern world was corrupt and uncompassionate, so he went on this journey in order to find a life of solitude and innocence that could only be expressed through his encounters with the wild. During this ambitious journey to find the true meaning of life, Chris McCandless exhibits a pattern like the type explained above. In Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris McCandless follows this mythic pattern, seeking to be the traditional hero who spurns civilization, yet he discovers that modern heroes cannot escape their reality.
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
There are many ideas about the way things are suppose to be, they guide people in the way humans approach life and how people go about achieving our goals. Unfortunately people do not always accomplish these ideas they have for ourselves but the truth often times is what we really need. In the Shakespearean drama, Macbeth, he writes of a once cherished leader, Macbeth who is approached by supernatural being and acts out erratically to fulfill what prophesies he desires which lead to his eventual demise. Macbeth has difficulty perceiving idealism from the truth, in other words what he thinks should happen and what actually happens. The prophecies are the catalyst for his irrational thinking and from then on Macbeth becomes addicted to knowing what his future could be and taking it to the extreme of needing to create it then and there. Down this path he also has his wife Lady Macbeth who pushes him further to act on these prophecies to achieve the ultimate goal of the crown. She too has an obsession with doing whatever it takes to be Queen and have that authority to her name. These two characters take to the extreme what it means to need truth but desire their idealism and how this leads to their eventual demise.
...ghout the novella is that even though we are humans and not animals, if we continue to repress each and every aspect of our own primitive needs and instincts, we will completely lose them. We will not be able to function in any world except the one we live in, making us extremely and very dangerously vulnerable. We need to, instead, embrace these instincts as our ancestors did to help them survive in their own unique, yet brutal environments. We can never revert fully back to Primitivity as Buck did, that would cause absolute chaos. We do however, need to utilize certain aspects of these natures, the ones that can help us survive, give us special intuition, and allow us to come closer to ourselves and understand what it means to be a truly free and independent human being in a world that is entirely too dependent on altering everything that humans need to embrace.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
Truth and idealism can lead individuals onto an enlightened path, however, with questionable ideals an individuals life can be persuaded inaccurately. In the Shakespearean Drama, Macbeth, the main characters experience misguidance from their own mislead ideals, which created significant disorder among themselves and the country of Scotland. Ambition combined with the unrighteous forces of Macbeth and Lady led them predominantly to deadly consequences. Macbeth and his wife are engrossed by the witches prophecies which directed them both to irrational thinking and absurd actions. These actions defined both characters throughout the play and impacted their demise tremendously. The ideals of the powerful couple, along with their overbearing ambition, lead their reality into an unconscionable future and their eventual death.
With a dramatic dialectic style, Fichte expounds his subjective idealism which seriously undermines claims of an external world and which ultimately borders on solipsism. Beginning with the question of Free Will, Fichte concludes that there is none before engaging a mysterious Spirit in a philosophical dialogue over the nature of Fichte's knowledge. In the end, Fichte curses the Spirit for revealing the grim truth: "all reality is transformed into a fabulous dream, without there being any life the dream is about, without there being a mind that dreams."
“In the place where idealism and realism meet, that is where there is the greatest evolutionary tension.” Idealism prioritizes ideals, social reforms and morals, by wanting to benefit not just yourself, but the world around you, believing people are generally good. On the contrary, realism gives priority to national interest and security with emphasis on promoting one’s own power and influence by assuming that people are egocentric by nature. Based on the definitions stated above, idealism and realism are significantly different from each other and their divergence of thought is more apparent when various proponents of each such as Woodrow Wilson, Henry Lodge, Barack Obama and George W. Bush have varied outlooks on comparable issues in politics. Subsequently, an idealist’s reaction to a particular issue would be a lot different than a realist’s response. Therefore, idealism deals with normative ideas and allows for improvements in the progress of not only a single state, but the whole world, however realism solely focuses on the benefits of one’s own nation.