Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding social norms
Relationship moral theory
Social norms theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding social norms
Ideal reciprocity
Reciprocity is the idea that people would treat others the same way that you would like to be treated. Children begin to show their understanding of the idea of reciprocity between the ages 10 to 12 years old. They demonstrated this by showing appreciation of equality among their peers. They start to learn that they need to treat others well in order to be treated well themselves. This concept of fairness is called reciprocity. Initially youths ' understanding of reciprocity can be very literal and simplistic. For example, last week James, age 11, lent his brand new video game to his good friend Mark. This week, it is Mark who has a new video game. James is likely to insist that Mark should allow him borrow
…show more content…
For example stereotypical images encourage children to behave a.s people expect them to in order to blend in with society. An individual may ask what I have to do to be seen as a good girl or boy to be socially acceptable. They learn to judge actions by the intention behind it. For example if a person means well, he or she will judge the behavior as acceptable. At this level an individual acts to get approval of others such as family, group and nation. Good behavior and values are what helps an individual and establishes loyalty into a group. A person wants to be respectable and have a good standing in the community, so it is a common sense that everybody would do the …show more content…
For example, a family could have a routine of ordering pizza on Saturday nights. Young children, at an earlier time period of their development, could have incorrectly assigned a personal choice to be a moral imperative, but by middle childhood, they begin to recognize the differences between personal preference and societal expectations for morality.
References
Kohlberg, L. (1972). Relativity and indoctrination in value education. In Lawrence Kohlberg, Collected Papers on Moral Development and Moral Education (1973), p. 285-310.
Kohlberg, L. (1972). A cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. In Lawrence Kohlberg, Collected Papers on Moral Development and Moral Education (1973), pp. 13-16.
Kohlberg, L. & Hersh, R. H. (April, 1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, Vol.16, No.2, Moral Development, pp.53-59. Retrieved August 19, 2009, fromhttp://academic.udayton.edu/jackbauer/Readings%20595/Kohlberg% 2077%20his%20theory%20copy.pdf
Kohlberg, L. & Turiel, E. (1971). Moral development and moral education. In Lawrence Kohlberg, Collected Papers on Moral Development and Moral Education (1973), pp. 410-465.
Power, F. C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg’s Approach to Moral Education. New York, NY: Columbia University
He explains that cognitive education would be a much easier method to work with than that of the moral one. He expresses his difficulty that moral education in teaching. "I have no idea how to get my students to build a self or become a soul. It isn't taught...we've never evaluated a candidate on how well he or she should accomplish it." (Pinker, 2014) Brooks observes the same problem. "…authority no longer feels compelled to define... moral, emotional, and spiritual growth...as Pinker put it, they don't know." (Brooks, 2014) Pinker and Brooks both agree that moral growth is a difficult task to teach an individual. This difficulty lies primarily in lack of knowledge and lack of focus in building a student's unique selves. Overcoming this problem would lead to the moral growth of students in higher
McNeel, S. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
The most successful way to instill righteous and moral behavior and thoughts is by demonstrating our respectable interactions and honest problem solving approaches during difficult times of our lives. “As adults we should dare to be adults that we want our children to be”. They learn by watching and are quick to mimic our behavior with their peers outside of home. The author writes that “we should strive to raise children who: engage with the world from a place of worthiness, embrace their vulnerabilities and imperfections, feel a deep sense of love and compassion for themselves and others, value hard work, perseverance, and respect, and also move through our rapidly changing world with courage and a resilient spirit” (214, 218-219). All of these elements will help to transform the way we live, love, and
“Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior” was based significantly off of the findings of the study done by David De Cremer called “Why Prosocials Exhibit Greater Cooperation then Proselfs: The Roles of Social Responsibility and Reciprocity.” Both studies preliminarily tested the college students with a social value orientation test to classify the participants as either prosocial or proself. Next, the participants participated in series of “games” that differed in each study. De Cremer used scenarios that allowed the participant to decide how many chips (a made up source of perceived value) they wanted to contribute to either a group or partner, followed by an inquiry as to how responsible they felt to “further the collective interest.” This study aimed to understand the different behaviors and feelings associated with being prosocial or proself. For example, it was found that a prosocial feel more socially responsible and want to restore equality in outcomes of situations, therefore increasing their tendency to behave cooperatively. The “Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity” study went through scenarios in which the participants would participate in “dictator games” in which they were given two opportunities to help another person, once in public the other in private. This study aimed to explain why certain people behave in prosocial ways. For example, the study found that altruists were more likely to
(2012). Vygotsky from ZPD to ZCD in moral education: reshaping Western theory and practices in local context. Journal Of Moral Education, 41(2), 225-243. doi:10
The moral development of children can depend on many factors. Parenting and upbringing of the child, their environment, social environment, gender, and race are all aspects that can contribute to how a child develops their moral standards and expectations. Many psychologists have tried for several years to develop a theory of how morality is developed. One in particular is Lawrence Kohlberg (1958). His moral development theory is based on the cognitive development of children and it is thought that moral development proceeds and changes as cognitive development occurs (Arnett, 2012).
Moral standards of behavior differ between peoples because the goals, norms, beliefs, and values upon which they depend also differ…because of variations in the religious and cultural traditions and the economic and social situations in which the individuals are immersed (p. 3).
In Lord of the Flies, the boys take into account the context they are acting in. Upon realising their freedom from the rules of society, they defy morality by giving in to their human desires of violence and power. Nurture limits these unscrupulous desires, but human nature overrides nurture when nurture lacks constraints. This pattern occurs within any society. Whether the norms of a society are ethical or unethical, the beliefs are enforced upon that particular group. Society norms make an immense impact on individual
Reciprocity is symbolic of creating, maintaining, or strengthening social relationships as well as satisfying the material needs and wants of someone in need. It refers to the exchange of objects without the use of money or other media of exchange. It can take the form of sharing, hospitality, gifts, or bartering. Anthropologists identify three forms of reciprocity.
Lawrence Kohlberg conducted research on the moral development of children. He wanted to understand how they develop a sense of right or wrong and how justice is served. Kohlberg used surveys in which he included moral dilemmas where he asked the subjects to evaluate a moral conflict. Through his studies, Kohlberg observed that moral growth and development precedes through stages such as those of Piaget’s stages of cognitive development. He theorized that moral growth begins at the beginning of life and continues until the day one dies. He believed that people proceed through each stage of moral development consecutively without skipping or going back to a previous stage. The stages of thought processing, implying qualitatively different modes of thinking and of problem solving are included in the three levels of pre-conventional, conventional and post conventional development. (2)
What is moral development? In a nutshell, it’s the progression of morality throughout one’s lifetime by means of different stages. There are six of these stages, developed by Lawrence Kohlberg, that help to explain our moral choices and cognitive skills relative to our approximate age. Furthermore, as Kohlberg suggests, everyone reaches stages one through four: Punishment and Obedience, Instrumental Purpose and Exchange, Interpersonal Expectations and Conformity, and Law and order, respectively. Stage1 is characterized by the threat of punishment and the promise of reward. Stage 2 actions are
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
The principle of reciprocity simply means you are more likely to comply with a request if it comes from someone who has previously done something for you. According to this principle, human relations tend to be reciprocal. People tend to treat others in the same way they are being treated. If an individual is treated with respect and cordiality, he will respond in the same way. Also, if he receives a gift or benefit, he will feel the need to correspond it.
According to Kohlberg, individuals progress through a series of stages in the evolution of their sense of justice and in the kind of reasoning that they utilize to make moral judgments (Feldman, R., 2013, p. 426). His work modified and expanded from Jean Piaget’s previous work to form a theory of cognitive development that explained how pre-adolescent children develop moral reasoning (Cherry, K., 2014, October 12). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focuses on children’s ability to distinguish right from wrong based on their perception. His theory claims that individuals progress through the levels morality in a fixed order and
Goodlad, J. I., Sirotnik, K. A., & Soder, R. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass