Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on wolf reintroduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on wolf reintroduction
The wolves beat the hunters in the recent, and highly contested, wolf and coyote derby in Salmon, ID. Wolves eluded the participants for the entire two-day hunt, but 21 coyotes were not so fortunate. The absence of any wolf kills, however, has not lessened the intensity of the controversy, nor the temperature of the debates. Wolves are a touchy subject, no matter the stance; as with most hotly contested issues, there is an abundance of information, but not all of it is correct.
So are the wolves predators that destroy livestock other wildlife, creating devastating losses for both ranchers and hunters? Or are they prey? Misunderstood, maligned and victimized only for what comes naturally to the species? Do wolves contribute significantly to the spread of parasites to elk and cattle, and can humans get these same parasites? Are the wolves found in the Idaho mountains the same wolves that were here before, or are these wolves truly different from the ones they replaced?
And the biggest question of all - can wolves, and humans get along?
These are not the same wolves who were here before.
This is really a trick statement, and the answer is not very straightforward. Yes, they are the same wolves who roamed the Idaho mountains in great numbers at one point in history, but at the same time, they're not. The reason is they are both of the grey wolf species, but different subspecies. The former inhabitants were the Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves, or Canis lupus irremotus. These wolves are one of the largest subspecies of the grey wolves, weighing anywhere from 75 - 150 lbs., and standing at 26 - 32".
When their numbers dwindled down to almost nonexistent, their cousins, the McKenzie Valley Wolves, were...
... middle of paper ...
...t just a "kill them all" or "let them all run free" stance.
Besides, if wolves were truly as dangerous as people make them out to be, they wouldn't be so popular as pets; same with coyotes and fox. And, despite the rhetoric of "the wild animal will take over, and it will turn on you," personal experience with the latter two proved quite the contrary; both were loving, loyal and gentle. Furthermore, as far as livestock is concerned, a pack of unkept dogs can do just as much damage, if not more, than any wild animal.
The truth is the battle is about far more than wolves; it is about a lack of discussion and understanding between two entities, both with strong convictions about what is right - for themselves, their families, their communities, and for the wolves. Considering the battle fought over one Wolf and Coyote Derby, that conversation is nowhere near happening.
After reading "scared to death" and "wolf family values" I think the second article gave better reasoning behind why we should protect the wolf population. Both articles talk of the wolves return to Yellowstone national park, but the first essay "scared to death" by Ed Yong focuses on the wolves effect on the elk population. The second essay "wolf family values" by Sharon Levy focuses mainly on the wolves and their population and changes of their behavior because of hunting and trying to manage the population. it also focuses on the effects they have on the environment in general.
...I think that repopulating wolves in an area where they might have to deal with people is kind of a feeble-witted idea. Wolves are not an animal with a great reputation, even though they might not deserve that reputation most people do not like. I think that people as a whole would probably rather have deer in their back yard rather than wolves. Therefore, the questions what can happen, what should happen, and what will happen, with the deer problem all three have different answers. These answers will differ due to the area that the deer are in and the peoples' feeling towards these deer. It is too bad that there is not one perfect solution to the deer problem. Maybe in the future there will be, but until then we will have to deal with each problem that comes up individually.
The wolves’ were hunted in late 1800 s’ and early 1900‘s in the United States because farmers wanted more land for their cattle’s to graze upon. As farmers were moving out west they felt threaten that the wolves would hunt their cattles so the farmers thought that the best solution would be to take them out of the picture. This was possible because at the time there were no government regulations on hunting....
When the reintroduction of wolves began in the state of Wisconsin, a goal of 350 wolves was set, and this number was reached successfully in a short amount of time. Once this was reached, however, the population continued to rise dramatically and exponentially, and is now in the upper 600s (Allen). The problems now come down to a few simple questions that have complex answers. Will a regulated hunt get out of control, and a repeat of the past begins? Are the wolves posing any sort of threat in the present? Who or what would a hunt benefit? First, the issue of the past must be addressed. Back in the earlier years of the United States, wolves roamed free, and when farmers moved their livestock into what was then the wolves' territo...
The history behind the extirpation of the grey wolf in the United States dates back to the very first European settlers that colonized eastern North America in the late 16th century. The killing of gray wolves was done primarily out of fear in an attempt to protect livestock, and, in some cases, to protect human life within the colonies. As more settlers expanded West, the practice of killing wolves was considerably increased to protect livestock that included cows, pigs, and chickens. As waves of European settlers expanded westward, they began to deplete the deer, moose, and elk populations. The gray wolves food source continual depletion gave rise to wolf populations actively targeting the settler’s livestock, causing great financial loss. The fiscal loss of livestock became such an issue to wealthy ranchers and settlers that they began to offer cash rewards for wolf pelts. This practice gave birth to a lucrative cottage industry of professional hunters and trappers. As the wolves began to move further West, and into Wyoming, they began to diminish the elk and moose population. To respond to this threat, Congress approved funding in 1914, to eliminate the native gray wolves from
Part of the problem with the wolves now found in the Idaho wilderness is the fact that they are not native to Idaho, as the indigenous populations had all been nearly wiped out. These wolves are from Canada, and are much larger and stronger than those native to the state. Not only that, but the ...
During 70 years of absence from the Rockies, the Grey Wolf had been protected under the Endangered Species Act that was passed in 1973. Since the wolf is under the protection of Endangered Species Act a person could be punished with up to a $100,000 fine and up to 1 year in jail for killing a wolf. Back in the 1850's there was a major population increase of the wolves in America, this was due to settlers moving west. These settlers killed more than 80 million bison, the wolves started to scavenge on the carcasses left behind.
A lot of people think that humans are the only ones killing Arctic wolves, but that is not the case. Arctic wolves most dangerous threat is humans, but they are also being killed by gobal warming for melting there habitat to water and since there are less of them now polar bears have a bigger advantages to hunt them down.
Wolves were once also native from Iowa. They remain on the endangered species list because of their low numbers. We have records saying that the last wolf that lived here was all that way back in 1925. There has only been one wolf seen since then and it was shot all the way down in Buchanan County. That was the first wolf seen and killed since 1925 that we have on record. The wolves are no longer here because in the 1900’s people were killing them off for their pelts that they used for currency or trade. We also killed them because people were very scared of them because they were mean and they usually run in numbers, known as “Packs”. There’s also a little creature from Iowa. The river otter once was full in this river. They weren’t just killed off here it was large parts of central and western part of The United States. That took place during the Mid-twentieth century. The otter’s were abundant during the European settlement. We killed them off again only for their pelts. After about 1890 in iowa they only existed on the mississippi river of
Gibson, J. William. "The New War on Wolves." Los Angeles Times. 08 Dec. 2011: A.25. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
However, the hunters would not keep all of the wolves that grew up from the cubs they had. Keeping a wolf that became overly aggressive towards them, or if it had little practical use, would have been both pointless and dangerous to their group. They most likely would have killed those types of wolves or left them behind to fend for themselves. The hunters would have chosen semi-tame wolves and those with the most desirable traits and abilities and bred the two together, repeating the process until what resembled a dog today. The first bones found which ...
The goal that the authors, Taal Levi and Christopher C. Wilmers, are trying to accomplish is to show their audience how the abundance of three species, wolves, coyotes, and foxes, can impact each other and the ecosystem in Minnesota, USA in three different habitats, forest, transition fields, and farmland. The question that I believe that this journal is asking whether or not predation or the lack of it can act as a domino effect if wolves suppress coyotes in an environment, then that could possibly save the fox population and maybe other species along the way.
The wolf has often played an arguable role in people’s mind; however, in some cultures like the Native American one, the wolf is seen as a guide who can show humanity the way to get closer to their roots. In some other cultures, the wolf has been seen as the villain or as the wolf who tried to eat children or even as the one who is wearing a sheep suit to rule the real sheep to be able to eat them. However in indigenous or Native cultures, the wolf has been given a lot of great qualities. The wolf can be the pathfinder, way shower, and community builder, showing qualities like loyalty, protection, and companionship. The wolf has also been seen in the role of teacher, and healer. It is said that he can lead humans to discover their deep inner self and help them get closer to their spiritual totem. These aspect may be quite controversy to the stereotypical characteristics which were given to the wolf in some cultures. However, the power of the wolf stand still and the general public has become more open to the positive aspect and nature of this sumptuous animal. Today, it seems that one cannot go anywhere without seeing the emblem of the wolf on various items. People shall ask themselves, « Why is the wolf getting so popular? ». However, before discussing this hypothetical question in more details, let’s discuss the role of the wolf as it has evolved throughout history, beginning with its place in indigenous cultures.
One of the first animals that captured my attention in the Hall of North American Mammals was the wolf. In Shore of Gunflint Lake, Minnesota by moon glow and the shimmering Northern Lights, a pack of wolves speeds after a dear. Wolves are highly social animals that live in packs. The pack is the nucleus of the wolf life. Most packs consist of a mating pair and their offspring. The mating pair is the dominant male and female. One of the key privileges held by the alpha female aggressively prevents other adult wolves in the pack from mating by snap or snarl at them. The alpha male is the leader and the decision maker, decide when the pack will travel and hunt. To ensure group hunting, he will block members from leaving the pack. After all, there some spilt off could happen to form packs of their own whereupon they become the competition. The adult males weighs from 65 to 175 lbs. (30-80 kg) and the adult females weighs from 50 to 120 lbs. (23-33kg). The average litter consists of one to eleven pups. Wolves have the widest natural range of any land other than humans and once occupied most of the Northern Hemisphere. Their numbers are improving after decades of persecution. Wolves eat deer, wild sheep, wild goats, small mammals, bison, moose and caribou. It's amazing of how deep snow helps wolves make successful kills. Deer are heavier than wolves with narrower feet, so deer sink further as the...
Wolves have been around for as long as anyone can remember, but the sudden need to decide on whether wolves should be endangered is a somewhat new topic to discuss. We have always known wolves to be a crucial part of wildlife preservation, but soon they became something we should fear. Even though wolves help the environment by living in their own territory, the wolf population has been steadily increasing since 2010, more than doubling the predetermined amount of 350 that were expected in Wisconsin (Wolves In Wisconsin, 2018). With these kinds of numbers, and the fact that the wolf population is still growing, should they be considered an endangered species and is there a need to fear them?