Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social norms in america
Social norms in america
Social norms in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social norms in america
It happens sometimes. Something infuriating occurs, and the only words flying out are curse words. However, the situation undergoes new scrutiny when a little kid stands there in shock, his or her jaw hanging slightly. People are divided whether or not it is okay to swear in front of children. Samantha Shanley, a writer for Romper, argues that using such language is highly inappropriate, while Benjamin Bergen, a writer for the Los Angeles Times, insists that cursing—in most aspects—has no ill-effect on children. Though there are clear clashes when cursing in front of children, both sides have a mutual agreement in regards to social boundaries and children’s awareness. In “I Don’t Curse In Front Of My Kids, & You F*cking Shouldn’t Either,” Samantha Shanley, a mother with an experienced potty mouth, encourages her readers to not swear in front of kids. She believes doing so is a sign of lack of control and crossing boundaries, …show more content…
reciting the time when “her tiger instincts kicked in” after nearly colliding with another car (Shanley). Shanley instead urges her readers to use substitutes and gives examples to her readers, such as growling or groaning. Additionally, she encourages setting boundaries when it comes to cursing to set a good example of being articulate and getting respect. At the end of her article, Shanely finishes it off with casual but directive tone: “say what you mean, man, and say it well.” In “Go ahead, curse in front of your kids,” Benjamin Bergen—who is a father, swearer, and scientist—explores why people discourage cursing, the studies pertaining to swearing in front of kids, and why it’s okay to curse when children are present. He acknowledges the social conditioning, the exceptions to “acceptable” curse words (slurs), and the problems that occur when children curse. However, Bergen also states that it is not technically wrong to curse, reminding his audience that “no there’s no… proof that exposure to ordinary profanity… causes direct harm.” Bergen instead suggests that his audience that they should coach their kids about cursing, specifically when and where it is not acceptable. As one can see, Shanley and Bergen have contradictory views on the topic.
Shanley holds a largely negative stance on the issue; she insists that swearing in front of kids was like “splashing red paint on a delicate painting.” With the help of imagery, she paints cursing as language with dire consequences and tries to convince her readers to avoid hurting children. On the other hand, Bergen supports the idea that cursing isn’t seriously damaging to children. He reminds his audience that despite the research supporting the negative effects of slurs on college students and middle schoolers, there is no study that proves that general swear words have an adverse effect on children (Bergen). By proving that there is no scientific evidence to back the claimed damage, the writer proves that swearing in front children is not as harmful as initially perceived, directly contradicting Shanley’s statement. Although both sides provide different evidence, they both directly contradict one another when it comes to describing how cursing affects
children. Despite their opposing views, Shanley and Bergen do agree on a few points—more specifically, children’s awareness and respect for boundaries. As Shanley continues her article, she reminds her audience that “[children] are learning and listening all the time.” Bergen adds on to this and tells his readers that kids are already learning about what’s appropriate in certain places; he further articulates by saying his kid is already aware that some actions are permissible in private areas (e.g. the bathroom) but not in public areas (e.g. the school). In their respective articles, both authors are fully aware of children’s capabilities. Additionally, both writers nod at the idea of boundaries. In “I Don’t Curse In Front Of My Kids, & You F*cking Shouldn’t Either,” Shanley states people should respect the boundaries pertaining to swearing. Berge agrees with that in “Go ahead, curse in front of your kids,” noting that people should teach that “some words are OK in some places, but not in others.” In these cases, both authors acknowledge there are certain places where cursing is unacceptable, such as public places or other’s personal space. Though the two disagree on the concept overall, Shanley and Bergen both agree on boundaries and children’s learning capabilities. When it comes to cursing with children present, Samantha Shanley and Benjamin Bergen have two opposing views but sometimes agree on a few points. Shanley largely opposes swearing with kids, saying that doing shows one’s lack of control and laziness. On the other side, Bergen believes cursing in front of kids is not as horrible as it seems; while he acknowledges it can be inappropriate, he argues that using swear words with children is technically not bad and that one should coach their kids on where to swear. Both authors disagree if swearing in front of children is damaging or not, but the two writers do agree on children’s learning capabilities and respect for other’s boundaries. So, if one happens to blurt out the f-word in front of small kids, he or she can remember that he or she treads along the gray area.
This frustration acted as a vehicle for her to gain a desire to be more
A video is put on, and in the beginning of this video your told to count how many times the people in the white shirts pass the ball. By the time the scene is over, most of the people watching the video have a number in their head. What these people missed was the gorilla walking through as they were so focused on counting the number of passes between the white team. Would you have noticed the gorilla? According to Cathy Davidson this is called attention blindness. As said by Davidson, "Attention blindness is the key to everything we do as individuals, from how we work in groups to what we value in our classrooms, at work, and in ourselves (Davidson, 2011, pg.4)." Davidson served as the vice provost for interdisciplinary studies at Duke University helping to create the Program in Science and Information Studies and the Center of Cognitive Neuroscience. She also holds highly distinguished chairs in English and Interdisciplinary Studies at Duke and has written a dozen different books. By the end of the introduction Davidson poses five different questions to the general population. Davidson's questions include, "Where do our patterns of attention come from? How can what we know about attention help us change how we teach and learn? How can the science of attention alter our ideas about how we test and what we measure? How can we work better with others with different skills and expertise in order to see what we're missing in a complicated and interdependent world? How does attention change as we age, and how can understanding the science of attention actually help us along the way? (Davidson, 2011, p.19-20)." Although Davidson hits many good points in Now You See It, overall the book isn't valid. She doesn't exactly provide answers ...
“Don’t Look Behind you” is filled with suspense as Mike the hetman tries to kill the father. The author use of imagery contributes to the story. Duncan’s story was able to contain many of SOAPSTone elements. Duncan wrote “Don’t Look Behind You” in a teenager perspective as her life changed dramatically. The use of suspense to create the mystery element in the story as the Corrigan goes in hiding to run away from a hit man. Don’t Look Behind You” have a speaker, occasion, audience, purpose, subject and tone.
In the book “There Are No Children Here” by Alex Kotlowitz, the author followed the lives of two young brothers (Lafayette and Pharoah) while they grew up in the harsh streets of Chicago in the late 1980’s. The author uses the story of the two boys’ lives to discuss the social divide in our very own society and to persuade readers that there is a major problem in “the projects” of the United States.
"Las Papas" by Julia Ortega is a story that tries to convey a simple yet a very realistic message. The story tries to reveal the fact that how over the years, as generation changes, we lose touch to our family values, our history as well as our very own culture. Las Papas is a Spanish word for Potatoes. The story is based on a man and his son. The man tries to pass on his family culture and history to his son, which in this story is more of connected to potatoes. Potatoes in this story symbolizes the memories and history of his family and his motherland Peru. This story highlights the fact and difficulties relating to the migration of people from one country to another, the hardships they face to adjust and settle in new place and how over the course of time, in the process of
“Let Them Talk!” written by Wayne E. Wright is an article that focuses on the idea of promoting English Language Learners (ELL) oral-language skills in the classroom instruction time to improve their literacy and academic achievement. Too often are an ELL’s speaking and listening skills overlooked and not given enough attention to, even though it is one of the most important parts of communication. Wright encourages teachers working with ELL students to allow time for the student to adjust, not to pressure them into their language development, respect their various stages, bring them into whole class and small group discussions, correct simple language errors in speaking that impeded comprehension, and have them interact and communicate in the classroom for meaningful purposes.
Lynda Barry’s One Hundred Demons is based on the idea of drawing a “demon.” It is an assortment of seventeen short comics, containing themes of Barry’s childhood. Barry got the idea of drawing demons from a painting practice used by a Japanese monk from the sixteenth century, who painted demons on a hand-scroll (Barry 9). By making the decision to paint them in the form of comics, the demons come out in what she calls an autobifictionalography (Barry 4). The autobifictionalography tells the many stories of Lynda Barry’s childhood and teenage years through part autobiography and part fiction. Barry was often unaccepted; she has very few friends and got involved with sex and drugs at a young age (Barry 71). The relationship with her mother was very weak, but she had a very strong bond with her grandmother (“Lynda Barry”). To combine fact and fiction in her memoir is something you don’t see often. I consider Lynda Barry to be not only an author; but a story teller, artist, and very unique individual as well. Many books we read are very easy to predict; they tell a true story, mystery, adventure or maybe even a biography. Lynda Barry’s One Hundred Demons is a memoir of some truth facts and some made up ideas. When writing a memoir many authors give facts on what has happened in their life good or bad. Although Barry states many factual events in her life, she also states many fictitious events. Lynda Barry presents fact and fiction throughout her memoir in a very responsible manner. She has presented it in a way that reflects her way of life or the events she believes will happen throughout her life time.
Violent Media is Good for Kids, by Gerard Jones, is an article which makes many claims to support the argument that a controlled amount of violence could be beneficial for a young, developing child. Even though the topic of this article can be controversial, the claims serve to support the argument in many noteworthy ways. It is written in such a way that it tells a story, starting when the author was a child and working its way to adulthood. In this case, the author uses, what I believe to be just the correct amount of rhetorical strategy, and fulfills his goal of writing the article. This argument is interesting and, at the same time, effective.
his goal is to bring back proof of the wolves decimating effect on the northern
Swearing has the ability to get someone in a whole load of trouble at the dinner table with their mother but could also be their choice of words when they accidently stub their toe on the coffee table in the living room. Natalie Angier discusses this controversial topic of words that shouldn’t be said in her article feature in The New York Times, “Almost Before We Spoke, We Swore”. Provoked by a recently proposed bill to increase fines for using swear words on television, Angier analyzes not only the impact of swearing, but also where the desire to speak obscene words comes from. She references many credible studies and sources as she unfolds her argument. She uses a diverse slew of studies, experiments, and famous pieces of literature and
...ssibly help more than harm. Experience has taught me that when a child walks in fear of expressing their feelings they bottle up all of their emotions; simply because they’re afraid of the consequences. Teaching children to appropriately use and appreciate violent media will help them build confidence, “power, and selfhood.” (Jones 287) He successfully executes the use of rhetorical methods and offers solutions to the opposing viewpoint. Jones’ consistent use logical and emotional appeal entices the reader and effectively persuades; this clearly substantiates his deserving of the top persuasiveness prize.
When determining what is good poetry, the analysis does not need to be conducted by experts of poetry. The goal of poetry is to provide a means of communication from the author to the reader or listener, so those on the receiving end of poetry can measure the success of this communication. However, these opinions are inherently subjective. Even if two people agree that a certain poem is an example of good poetry, they may disagree on what makes this poem exceptional. Personally, I believe that good poetry expresses sophisticated thoughts, while also creating a songlike sound when read or heard.
As a culture, again with religious fundamentalist and perhaps politically-correct feminist exceptions, we pretty much take these literary forms for granted in terms of their violent and seemingly antisocial content. Parents lovingly read their children to sleep with images of forced drudgery, painful mutilations, and vengeful retribution. Teachers and preachers alike use these quasi-historical and metaphorical tales of aggression and hostility to inspire and enlighten. Little thought, if any, is given to the possibility that we are putting dangerous ideas into the heads of our youth that will result in violent displays of antisocial mayhem. And, in fact, there seems to be little evidence that this true. For the most part, our children seem to have a healthy relationship to these stories in which the violence and sexuality does tend to help th...
Although students should read novels that they are mature enough to understand and comprehend, Lohmiller explains that by allowing all middle school students access to read novels with profanity and Christian derogatory, it is not certain that all students are mature enough to not have their daily language influenced by it. While children should read material that they are mature enough to comprehend, censoring material in schools because of language and Christian derogatory does not take away student exposure to any of the censored issues, but instead takes away student exposure to a learning environment that would teach meaning and context. The use of "hell" and "damn" and other Christian derogatory in novels is necessary in furthering the storyline and depicting a realistic illustration of the environment. It is necessary to expose children to the evils in novels because "[a]n uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict...A world without books is a dystopian world" (Censoring the Pages of Knowledge 1). This explains that student exposure to profanity and Christian derogatory in schools would allow the youth to be educated on the evils and be the gateway for conversations that the students would benefit from later in life. Banning controversial novels for the evils within will create ignorance in the youth of America today, as they will not be educated on the usage in novels, but of the evils through other means that are not explained and understood by youth. By teaching and allowing students to struggle with profane language and controversial topics in schools, it is ensured that students will be educated on the meaning and reasons behind usage. For example, Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that satirizes and challenges censorship in modern society by depicting the effects of that censorship on a future society where all books are burned. By the use of profanity and Christian derogatory as a means of critiquing the society,
Whether you do or don't cuss simply depends on your reasoning and logic behind the idea. To begin let's take a look at why people believe that cussing is wrong. The first main reason for this belief is because cussing is seen in society as morally wrong. First off we are taught from a young age that we should not bring others down which is the intent of curse words. Society puts a lot of focus to make sure that a child in schooling does not become a bully.