The novel “I Claudius” it explains the journey of Claudius’ life, and his family’s. Claudius was alive during the Julio-Claudian dynasty as emperor in 41-54AD (Julio-Claudian dynasty). The first emperor of the Julio-Claudian line was Augustus, his grandmothers newest husband, who will be explained in more details later. A couple of things that stood out in the book was Claudius’ grandmother Livia. Her life adventures directly affect Claudius and the events that preceded him. Claudius explains how there are two different types of Claudians. He makes it clear that he is of the “good apple” Claudians, however, his grandmother is under the “crab apple” Claudians. (Vincent, l Claudius)Throughout my essay, I am going to compare and contrast “I Claudius” and what really happened during those times.
Claudius is blessed to be under the “good apple” Claudians, however his grandmother is not in the same category. In “I Claudius”, his grandmother, Livia, is known for being “manipulative and ambitious” (Vincent, l Claudius). She works towards manipulating her current husband, which did not work. She then has him believe she is pregnant with another mans child, so he will divorce her (Vincent, l
…show more content…
Claudius). Livia then marries Augustus who she is able to rule as she wished. Her hopes were to shape him into a king to have complete control over the religious system. To begin, the first situation presented was about the “good” and “crab” apples of the families. Although it was not specifically stated whether or not these were the exact words used, it is still obvious that their meaning is applied appropriately to the persons anyway (Flory). While researching this, it became obvious that the story of Livia faking who the father was to her baby was true. It was figured out that they were not Augustus’ children when he figured out he was sterile (Flory). Continuing about Claudius’ grandmother, she is more manipulative than previously thought. She wishes to chose the heir to continue the Claudian line. Augustus chose Marcellus to be his heir, however, that was not who Livia wanted. Livia wished to have Agrippa in heir (Vincent, l Claudius). Due to Livia’s disappointment, she turns Marcellus and Agrippa against each other, then attempts to make Augustus sick enough he fears death. Livia does this so that Augustus will chose Agrippa as his heir. However, Agrippa does not want to be involved and leaves through a “self-imposed exile in Syria” (Vincent, l Claudius). Eventually, there is a conflict between Livia and Marcellus’s mother, then Marcellus falls ill and dies. Claudius believes his death is tied to his grand-mother, Livia. To compare the history to real events, its true that Marcellus and Agrippa were hopeful heirs to Augustus’ power (Flory). To contrast this section of the book, its mentioned that there is no evidence that Livia had an influence on Augustus. Its stated that its not proven Livia had anything to do with his political plans, which is very opposite of what was said in “I Claudius” (Flory). This act directly influences Claudius’ life due to the fact that he is eventually in power under the same dynasty as Augustus. Meaning that the heir that was chosen by Augustus and Livia lead to the choosing of Claudius. To conclude, many things about history is carefully explained in the book, however, it does not always match what is said to of happen.
In order to compare and contrast this, the book and a primary source was needed. Its clear that some things about the book were true and that others were unclear and not directly said to of happened. There was an equal amount of things that were true and things that were not support or not mentioned, taking into consideration that if they were not mentioned, they probably did not happen. The first paragraph included truths about Livia’s manipulative behaviour and how Claudius’ family is. The second paragraph went into details about the type of manipulation Livia will get to. She is dangerous and devious towards others or situations she can not
control.
An Exploration of the Ways Shakespeare Presents the Character Claudius From Claudius’s first speech the audience gains the impression the character is political and educated. Shakespeare uses metaphorical language to emphasis this. Claudius’s first speech in the script is full of metaphorical language, and it shows a manipulating, persuasive character who can convince a kingdom that it was perfectly acceptable for him to marry his brother’s wife just a few weeks after his death. It is the language Shakespeare has chosen to give Claudius that can convince others that he is morally correct. He uses imagery of facial features to represent the kingdom as one body.
Claudius opens with a concession “Our dear brother’s death/the memory be green, and that it us befitted/To bear our hearts in grief”, indicating to his audience that he empathized with their feelings of pain. However, two lines later, Claudius declares “discretion fought with nature/That we with wisest sorrow think on him/Together with remembrance of ourselves.” Here Claudius introduces the idea that spending time grieving, “nature”, is at odds with practicality, “discretion”, and that for the citizen to become too absorbed in mourning would be to neglect their own well being.
An interesting comparison between King Hamlet and Claudius is a biblical reference between Cain and Abel. Cain was the first person to be born and Abel was the first person to be killed. Cain was jealous of his brother who was younger yet he became a shepherd while he was a farmer. Whenever they would give offerings to god, Abel’s offering would be accepted while Cain’s offering wasn’t. Cain was jealous of his brother and angered that he was allowed such a better life than him. Besides being a shepherd, Abel’s wife which was decided for him was much more beautiful than Cain’s wife. On one fateful day. Cain invites Abel to the fields and then there Cain murders his brother. This biblical story is commonly associated with Hamlet. One brother takes the life of the other brother because they think that they are more deserving than the other brother. In both cases, the murderous brother is left to walk to their doom in the future and in a sense gets justice inflicted upon them.
Although playing what’s thought to represent a noble king, Claudius totally differs from that title. Claudius is a manipulative, under minding, selfish person: “That we wish wisest sorrow think on him,/ Together with remembrance of ourselves,/ Therefore our sometime sister, now our queen” (1.2.6-8). King Claudius kills the king of Denmark his own brother just to turn into the king of
In my opinion this book is not the evaluation of how approximately fifty million people from two thousand years ago thought about the world that they lived in at the time, but about how a few dozen men wrote about it, in a viewpoint illustrative of only a few thousand. In order to support her view, Edith Hamilton tries to bring these people together, threading together their common thoughts and ideologies. Save for the fact that this book only represents a handful of Roman citizens and the way that they saw the world in which they lived, I do feel like I got a better understanding of the “Roman Way” and the way that life was back then. Along with the history that I learned in class on the subject it makes me be able to picture it better in my mind’s-eye.
In the book I, Claudius written by the novelist Robert Graves is a fictional autobiography about a man named, Tiberius Claudius who lives in Ancient Greece. He has some tremendous conflicts within himself which the author shows through his use of characterization and imagery.
...and cautious nature, he had a cruel streak, as suggested by his addiction to gladiatorial games and his fondness for watching his defeated opponents executed. He conducted closed-door trials of leading citizens that frequently resulted in their ruin or deaths -- an unprecedented and tyrannical pattern of behavior. He had his wife Messalina executed, and he personally presided over a court in the Praetorian Camp in which many of her hangers-on lost their lives. He abandoned his own son Britannicus to his fate and favored the advancement of Nero as his successor. At the same time, his reign was marked by some notable successes: the invasion of Britain, stability and good government in the provinces, and successful management of client kingdoms. Claudius, then, is a more enigmatic figure than the other Julio-Claudian emperors: at once careful, intelligent, aware and respectful of tradition, but given to bouts of rage and cruelty, willing to sacrifice precedent to expediency, and utterly ruthless in his treatment of those who crossed him. Augustus's suspicion that there was more to the timid Claudius than met the eye was more than fully borne out by the events of his unexpected reign.
Firstly, the new King of Denmark, Claudius displays the sympathy for the dead King of Denmark, his brother’s death.
Peter Leithart in “The Serpent Now Wears the Crown: A Typological Reading of Hamlet,” considers the gravity of the main sin of offense of Claudius:
...ns his messengers they had “no further personal power to business with the King” than his articles allowed (1.2). This limitation reveals Claudius’ rigid authoritativeness. Thus, Claudius’ flamboyant use of language and his diplomatic foreign policy reveal his strong leadership qualities.
Tacitus for example, given his context and his dislike of Roman woman, writes that her relationship with Lepidus, that eventually led to the Gaetulicus affair, was a “means to power”, meanwhile Ferrero argues that Agrippina “could hardly have acted otherwise”. He notes in his own words that the Augustan family was “reduced to a state of exhaustion and virtually destroyed by the fatal discord between her mother and Tiberius and the quarrels between her brothers.” Barret, when writing about Agrippina’s relationship with Claudius, claims that “it is apparent that the mood and atmosphere of Claudius’ reign improved… during it’s later… much of the impetus for this change should be attributed to the influence of
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.
Claudius feels guilty about killing his brother. We can see Claudius;s remorse when he is talking to God and gives his monologue about his his murder. Therefore, Claudius says, "My stronger guilt defeats my strong intent(pg.165)." This quote proves that Claudius realizes that he made a mistake and he also realizes that he cannot put everything behind him as mich as he wants to. Everything reminds him about his brother, the kingdom, the queen and the crown.
the process. At the end of the novel, Boy acts rashly when Dunstan and Magnus
Claudius seduced Gertrude easily because of his ‘power’. Claudius manipulated her and his traits are not of any quality. Gertrude and Ophelia are easily impressionable, and were easily used to others’ advantages, proving their presence invaluable.