Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The future of hydraulic fracturing
The future of hydraulic fracturing
The future of hydraulic fracturing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The future of hydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic Fracturing and Directional Drilling have allowed the production of oil and gas from “unconventional” resources, like shale gas and shale oil. Natural gas demand is increasing, in addition, is increasingly becoming an important role in meeting demand for energy in the United States. Thus Hydraulic Fracturing stimulated shale among the fastest emergent energy sources in the United States, a source that seemed impossible to few years ago. Natural gas, the cleanest burning fossil fuel, now provides approximately 40% of the country’s electricity generation [7].
Hydraulic Fracturing implicates the injection of large amounts of water, proppants (sand) and chemicals at high pressures and flow rates, several thousand feet deep into the rock
…show more content…
formations to access valuable oil and natural gas. The fluid is pumped at pressures greater than the minimum principal stress, to crack the formation layer, or enlarge natural fractures in the formation. Proppants are used to hold open the cracks, increasing the permeability of the formation so that natural gas or oil can flow to the wellbore and thus to surface. But then again, Fracking due to the methodical use from Oil Companies, public health, social impacts and most importantly environmental awareness of how the fuel is obtained has risen. It became the focal point of widespread and global public controversial discussion. Hydraulic Fracturing can be done incorrectly and accidents can occur, but if it is done correctly the only results are more domestic resources for Americans to use, while keeping drinking water clean. If shortcuts are not taken, and the engineered fracturing plans are followed, accidents do not take place. Oil and gas are precious resources that we use every single day and hydraulic fracturing simply provides a method to extract more than experts previously thought was possible. Since hydraulic fracturing can be done safely, as a nation, the United States should utilize it and reap the benefits that come with. Studies have shown harmful environmental implications, influencing air pollution factor, climate change, earthquakes and, especially, clean water supply. Fracking is affecting clean water sources in, as the practice requires massive amounts of water, to create the Frac fluid. In addition the practice opposed a threat to groundwater sources, as fractures can invade groundwater and contaminate the source. The problem addressed is the fact that because people have the idea that it is an environmental threat hydraulic fracturing has been banned from many places .However. This paper calls for a research plan to show the positive sides of hydraulic fracturing and establish the idea that the method is environmentally safe, if it practice safe and according the procedure. There are no human endeavors without risk; humanity have seen great disasters from other energy resources such as nuclear, coal, wood. All of those forms of energy have caused damaged to the environment. CURRENT SITUATION & SIGNIFICANCE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING Hydraulic Fracturing is not a new technique, the first fracturing experiment was in 1947 and the process was accepted as commercial by 1950 [1]. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Ground Water Protection Council and the Interstate Oil& Gas Compact Commission all have found hydraulic fracturing is nonthreatening to the environment or public health [4]. However, it recently prompted public concern of its impacts on the environment, due to recent advance of technology. The problem at hand is that hydraulic fracturing is currently viewed as a dangerous method to the environment. But then again, Fracking due to the methodical use from Oil Companies, public health, social impacts and most importantly environmental awareness of how the fuel is obtained has risen. It became the focal point of widespread and global public controversial discussion. Hydraulic Fracturing can be done incorrectly and accidents can occur, but if it is done correctly the only results are more domestic resources for Americans to use, while keeping drinking water clean. If shortcuts are not taken, and the engineered fracturing plans are followed, accidents do not take place. Oil and gas are precious resources that we use every single day and hydraulic fracturing simply provides a method to extract more than experts previously thought was possible. Since hydraulic fracturing can be done safely, as a nation, the United States should utilize it and reap the benefits that come with. In opposition, my research paper will aim to provide sufficient evidence, collected from existing research and studies, to explain the threats Fracking implies to the environment. The research proposed is essential as it would help people, and especially the other students in this class, to understand that Fracking can be a safe process and they would be more accepting towards it and it will continue to advance the oil companies in the future. The main task of the research is to examine previous researches and draw a conclusion, whether Hydraulic Fracturing is an unsafe practice and a thread for the groundwater sources. Furthermore, public concerns are many more, such as: air pollution, global warming effect and earthquakes caused by Fracking. Ground water contamination is the biggest risk taken when Fracking, thus my research will concentrated exclusively on it. The final task aims to provide to public a scientific analysis of the practice of fracturing.
The negative public perception surrounding shale gas and hydraulic fracturing has stemmed from luck of technical awareness of how shale gas extraction occurs [2]. An engineering approach explanation of the direction fracture follows due to stresses exceeded in the formation. In Figure 1.1, a composite schematic of fracture treatments mapped by Pinnacle in the Marcellus Shale shows the fracture heights and the depth of groundwater aquifers. Each stage of fracture treatment is plotted with the red line representing the mid depth where the fractures originate. The shallowest point and deepest points are plotted. At the top, the blue is a plot of the deepest groundwater. As can be seen readily, the fracture treatments are well confined heights, at least a mile below the deepest groundwater. The chance of propagating a fracture upward into groundwater is nil. [6] In addition the public concern has risen due to disclosure policies of companies, not to release in public the composition of Fracking fluids, public arise a concern about what we actually pump in the formations. Fracturing fluids are typically 99.2% water and only 0.07% acid, as presented in Figure 1.2. [5]
My research will aim to investigate and provide more examples from previously established researches and examples as the two above to justify that Hydraulic Fracturing can be done in an environmentally safe
…show more content…
manner. Fig 1.1: Fracture height and groundwater aquifers, mapped in the Marcellus shale region Fig 1.2: Pie-Chart showing Fracturing Fluids components. TECHNICAL APPROACH/ PLAN OF WORK This research project intends to provide to the class and the public knowledge through an in depth analysis of the practice of Fracking. My study aims to review Hydraulic Fracturing’s technology and practices, and threats it’s posing to the environment as also to the public safety. A safe practice procedure and rock mechanics will be discussed and eventually a recommendation will be made regarding practices that could optimize Fracking's ecological cost-benefit balance. Research will be conducted based on previously established research using online databases.
One Petro, is a multi-society, unique library that provides a broad range of technical literature related to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, will be used throughout this research. In addition New Mexico Tech’s online Discovery database will be used to search for existing researches on the environmental impact of Hydraulic Fracturing. Discovery database performs search of all the Library’s database content, providing digital copies of academic reports, periodical articles, and research helpful towards to my research. For my research, SPE journals will be preferred to cover the theories and concept as also the concerns of Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE journals cover the theories and emerging concepts that will become the new technologies of tomorrow, it’s the most helpful resource for a Petroleum
Engineer. I. Methods: The purpose of this project is to provide a better understanding of the procedure of Hydraulic Fracturing. Exposed the dangers the practice implies to the environment, and analyze the magnitude of the danger. The Project will mainly concentrate on research and analysis of researched data. I aim to clear up the main controversy of groundwater contamination, and inform the public on what is taking place beneath the surface of their drinking water and homes. II. Task Breakdown • Depth of formations of interest, and stresses acting at those depths. Hydraulic Fracking is involved in depths of 6,000-8,000’, when groundwater sources are approximately from 500-1000’ depth. Explain factors controlling the length, orientation and height of the fractures. Analyze stresses acting on those depths and how those stresses affect the direction and magnitude of the fracture. Rock Mechanics. • Chemical composition of a hydraulic fluid. What is actually is pumped into the formation, and how hazardous it is. • Safe practice of Fracking. Explain reasons that might cost accidents and consequently Frac fluid invade the groundwater source. The tasks will be carried for a couple of months until there is sufficient evidence to conclude the research and be certain with the results. Some of the research will include Hydraulic Fracturing modeling using Fracpro, previously accidents occurred and cost to the environment, the engineering concept behind Hydraulic Fracturing through free diagrams showing stresses occurring in formation and provide detailed explanation. Each step will involve specific scientific work from the task force. III. Problem Analysis Potential problems could be having faulting results caused by malfunctions in the Fracking or that the time spent on working on the research won’t be a long enough time to have legitimate and desire results. I believe my sources are reliable and all the studies used towards my project are from accredited authors, as also the consistency of my findings are proving reliability. To perform further research on hydraulic Fracking, and prove that is an environmental safe practice, with minimal cost to the environment. The project will cover breaking down the components of hydraulic fracturing that are the most controversial and explaining them to expose that they are actually not harmful. The main controversy trying to disproof will be the unfair accuse of Fracking to cause contamination of groundwater sources, when the procedure was performed correctly without any accidents. No procedure is perfectly reliable, but if a data collection procedure is unreliable then it is also invalid. The other problem is that even if it is reliable, then that does not mean it is necessarily valid.
Hydraulic fracturing, also called fracking, is a technique designed to release the gas and oil from shale rock hidden underneath earth’s surface. The term fracking itself is referring to the point at which the shale rock is broken open by a high-pressure mixture of water, sand, and chemicals. Oil and gas fracking can be dangerous to the environment and also to humans. “In 2011, energy company Cuadrilla suspended test fracking operations near Blackpool, in Lancashire, after two earthquakes of 1.5 and 2.2 magnitudes hit the area. A subsequent study found it was highly probable that shale gas test drilling triggered the tremors” (BBC). Although these tremors were too small to do any damage above ground, this was still a test drill. If an oil rig were to become operational, the tremors could increase in magnitude, causing significant damage both above ground and underneath the earth’s
In today's global economy, energy is one of the most crucial and sought after commodities. Who supplies it and how much they supply determines how much influence they have over other countries as well as the global economy. This is why hydraulic fracturing is currently such an important and controversial topic in the United States. Hydraulic fracturing, more commonly known as "fracking" or hydrofracturing, is the process of using pressurized liquids to fracture rocks and release hydrocarbons such as shale gas, which burns more efficiently than coal. This booming process of energy production provides a much needed economic boost, creating jobs and providing gas energy for Americans. The efficiently burning shale gas reduces carbon emission from electricity production plants, reducing carbon footprints on the environment. However, the process of hydraulic fracturing uses millions of gallons of pressurized liquid, which contains toxic chemicals, and some of this water is left over undealt with. The air near fracking sites is often also polluted and unsafe for nearby community residents. Injecting millions of gallons of water laced with toxic chemicals into the rock thousands of feet deep can cause earthquakes, causing a safety hazards for all nearby areas. Hydraulic Fracturing makes rare natural gases easily attainable, boosting the economy and reducing carbon emissions. However, the negative side effects such as contaminated water and air, make hydraulic fracturing a process that may not be worth the benefits.
Hydraulic fracturing, also commonly referred to as fracking, is a type of drilling for natural gas and oil that started in the 1940’s. In the beginning, when a well was slowing down, dynamite or TNT were placed inside the well head and detonated to help the flow of gas and oil by expanding natural cracks and veins in the earth. This method of fracking was used extensively for almost fifty years in the United States until the easy to mine and profitable oil had been almost completely tapped. A new form of hydraulic fracking was created in the early 90’s to help capture the less available oil and gas pockets remaining in the United States. The current method of fracking begins by drilling a vertical shaft lined with several piping layers and an outer layer of cement up to 10,000 feet deep. After achieving the appropriate vertical length a horizontal shaft is cut off of the vertical shaft that can stretch to lengths up to one mile long. A mixture of sand, water, and chemicals are injected in the shaft fracturing the shale formations and release pockets of oil and natural gas. The water is brought back to the surface where the gas and oil is separated out. The issue many people have with fracking is the possible side effects of chemicals used and water contamination. With the use of fracking helping American’s reach energy independence, economic benefits, and a bridge to help attain a clean energy source; fracking should be expanded in the United States.
The ethical issues regarding hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas in the Karoo are abundant and complex. Although it is not a new procedure with new technology, South Africa and especially the Karoo is not use to this term and what it entitles. There is no reason why the shale formations should not be developed to its full potential but the crisis is balancing the development and not effecting the residence living there in a negative manner. Communities was built where water was availability, industries contaminating that supply is simply unacceptable (Potter & Rashid, 2013).
The United States relies on imports for about forty percent of its crude oil, which is the lowest rate of dependency since 1991 according to the U.S Energy Information Administration. Today our country is trying to keep on track in becoming less and less dependent. When it comes to the topic of the future ways the United States will get its fuel, most of us readily agree that the United States should become more independent by using natural gas that is already here on our land. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the question of the consequences drilling for natural gas brings. Whereas some are convinced drilling is safe, others maintain that it is actually in fact dangerous. Hydraulic fracturing or "fracking", the terms for drilling for natural gas, is dangerous to our public health and to the environment because of the water contamination it causes. Therefore, it is not something that should become a project for alternative fuel used by the United States.
In the past couple of years the word fracking has been prevalent in the media whether its been mentioned in the news or in the movie Matt Damon stared in titled “Promised Land”. Many people know it as a method of extracting gas from the earth and don’t inquire further into what hydraulic fracturing actually is. Before the process is explained we should understand why it has become prevalent in the last decade. The reason Hydraulic fracturing has become so popular in the last couple of years is because of the passage of the energy policy act of 2005, which contained the Halliburton loophole. The Halliburton loophole stripped the Environmental Protection Agency of its authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing (New York Times 2009). Allowing Hydraulic Fracturing allowed companies to finally access the abundant sources of natural gas legally. This act made it possible to access the vast amounts of natural gas contained in the Marcellus Shale, which created a boom in hydraulic fracturing. What exactly is hydraulic fracturing? Hydraulic fracturing is a method of extracting oil and gas, that is not accessible by conventional drilling methods. The process, injects chemically treated water and sand at high pressures into shale rock to release the oil and gas (Pritchard 2013).
Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics [Fact sheet]. n.d. - n.d. - n.d. Retrieved from Agriculture and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University website: http://wayne.osu.edu/topics/agriculture-and-natural-resources/gas-and-oil-lease-information/2011-wayne-county-oils-and-gas-lease-meeting-resources/Marcellus_Shale_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Fracking: The New Global Water Crisis? (2012, March).
Hydraulic fracturing is a controversial process. You have multiple sides weighing in on the issue, from an environmental, economic, public and private views. However only one view is the correct one and it is an ethical choice between hydraulic fracturing being safe or not. The act, by the engineers, of allowing continuation of hydraulic fracturing is unethical because the process uses vast amounts of fresh water that directly affect the public health and welfare. Hydraulic fracturing leaves frac fluid deep underground where it is trapped and does not recharge the overall water cycle of the earth. Further research is needed to see how to contain and minimize potential effects of deep underground additives on soil and how to reduce the amount of freshwater used in the fracturing process.
Environmental and socioeconomic debate over an alternative method of extracting natural gas thousands of feet below the surface using horizontal drilling and hydraulic “fracking” has risen in last twenty years. Fracking is the technique of drilling deep wells under high pressure with sand, water and a variety of chemicals to crack open rocks to release natural gas (hydrogen carbons) and oil from shale or coal bed methane deposits. Townships in Colorado like Lafayette and Fort Collins, voted on a moratorium to ban fracking within city limits. Environmental organizations like the Clean Water Action and Sierra Club claim that that fracking causes environmental degradation, health issues and impacts negatively on communities and their infrastructure. Whereas organizations like the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA), Halliburton and other oil and gas industry and construction groups, and some local, state and federal politicians, claim that fracking is a safe method of onshore drilling. By burning natural gas which is considered a clean fuel reduces the amount of greenhouse gases that coal does as well as lower carbon energy use in the future. Fracking decrease dependence on foreign oil and gas, improves ability to generate electricity and heat home cheaply. Fracking supports local economies and provides much needed jobs (energyfromshale.org).
Hydraulic fracturing aka “fracking” is the mechanical process that uses fluids and other macro sized materials to create small fractures in the shale and bed rock under surfaces of the earth. The fractures, usually no more than an inch wide, allow the highly pressurized oil and natural gas to flow freely to the pipe to the pumped back to the surface. The first known commercial use of hydraulic fracking first came about during the 1940s but dates all the way back 1865 during the Civil War. To increase their available water supply, which in some cases meant the difference between life and death, soldiers would drop sticks of lit dynamite down dry wells or those with low water levels. They hoped by doing this that that explosion from the dynamite would deepen or loosen the ground to allow water to permeate to an accessible point.
Natural gas extraction and consumption has risen over the past thirty years. Also known as hydraulic fracturing or fracking, a tremendous amount of uproar is being made in the environmental and political communities. Natural gas use is a great source of energy worldwide, only in America have we had a gold rush affect when it comes to extraction. Natural gas provides less dependence on foreign oil, less need for coal plants, and a more affordable energy source worldwide. There are many advantages to using natural gas but the way in which it is being extracted has caused many people to become sick. The detrimental environmental impacts caused by hydraulic fracturing continue to rise. Not to mention the political pull on big corporations and water quality standards. Currently in the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and the Barnett shale in Texas, the air and water quality have diminished over the past years since drilling sites ran rampant. Natural gas is natural in terms of how it came to be, but not natural in how they extract it and the problems it is causing everyone involved. To make aware the dangers of hydraulic fracturing, environmental impacts, water quality and air emissions, must be considered.
Throughout the past three decades, energy has been a perennial issue in United States politics, economics, and media. The main concern surrounding this topic is the idea of energy independence and how the United States should proceed into the future. Energy independence relates to the goal of reducing United States dependence on importing foreign oil and other foreign energy sources. This desire aims to maintain energy dependence domestically so the United States can avoid reliance on any unstable countries and be detached from global energy supply distribution. It is currently being speculated that the United States might not be too far off from this goal. America’s dependence on foreign oil has gone down every single year since 2007. In 2010, the U.S. imported less than 50 percent of the oil the country consumed -- the first time that’s happened in 13 years -- and the trend continued in 2011 (Zhang.) Experts credit new technology as the reason the United States is within several years of again becoming the biggest oil producer in the world, and perhaps two decades away from full energy independence. Hydraulic fracturing, fracking, is the “lead” technology in this technological revolution. Fracking is an economically more feasible way of drilling for oil or gas in harder to reach geological formation. Within the past decade or so, combining hydraulic fracturing with horizontal drilling has opened up shale deposits across the country. It has brought large-scale natural gas drilling to new regions that may not have had accessible deposits in the past. These areas have greatly benefited from the addition of this industry to their local economies. Certain are...
Hydraulic fracturing is not a dependable resource because of all the environmental impacts. There is only one Earth and humans are destroying it and causing permanent damage, as well as using too many resources too quickly. Although Natural gas has the word “natural” in
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is the process of drilling and injecting a fluid mixture of water, thousands of gallons of chemicals, and sand into the ground at an extremely high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release the natural gas inside. Up to 600 chemicals are used in fracking fluid, including known toxins and carcinogens. Sometimes fracking can happen extremely close to homes or drinking water supplies. There are plenty of health risks such as air pollution, destroying habitats and landscapes, contaminating water supplies, etc. But these can be insignificant compared to the benefits of fracking.
I will like to carry out my research work under the supervision of Dr. Garagash who has done extensive research in the area of hydraulic fracturing. I believe with his guidance I will be able to advance knowledge in the area of hydraulic fracturing for unconventional reservoirs.