35 million miles away from the only planet humans have ever known, lies Mars. Within the red planet’s thin atmosphere of carbon dioxide, ferocious dust storms kick at the barren terrain. It is eternally cold; temperatures range from -120 to 25 degrees Celsius. Among the assortment of channels, plains, and canyons, Olympus Mons stands at twenty-one kilometers high, the tallest planetary mountain in the solar system. At its potentially active status, it could erupt at any moment. The gravity on Mars is only thirty-eight percent of what it is on Earth. Living on Mars would be drastically different to the comfort Earth provides, yet many are not deterred in the slightest. Projects in motion have been detailing the colonization of Mars, but it is not a good plan. Humans should not colonize Mars. …show more content…
An estimate of over 100 billion dollars would be necessary for a manned mission of six people sent to Mars, and that does not include the actual settlement onto the new planet. Scientists expect the expense to continue to rise. Simply put, colonizing Mars is too costly. “Establishing a colony on Mars is incredibly technically challenging and expensive,” explained Aaron Ridley, University of Michigan. A permanent station is not worth the price tag in this moment of time. It would be unnecessary and inefficient as it is not an answer to overpopulation, and it lacks economic motivation to accrue the finances in the first place. The money that would be used could be allocated into different missions that may yield similar innovation and
Olympus Mons is a volcano located on Mars that is around three times larger than mount Everest. The height is a difference from Earth and Mars. There are a few other volcanoes near Olympus Mons called Arsia Mons, Ascraeus Mons and Pavonis Mons.
Starting with Mars being too dangerous. Colonists could be exposed to radiation which can result in cancer, brain damage, tumors, sickness, or death. Secondly, Mars has a lower gravity than Earth which means over time colonists would lose bone mass, have a weaker immune system, and have a weaker heart and body. Lastly, colonists would be in a closed environment for a long periods of time which could lead to mental problems according to NASA and Mars One.
Mars’ gravity is about 38 percent of Earth’s gravity, so too much gravitational pull wouldn’t be a problem, (Mars One, 2017). Cosmonauts experience no extremely negative impacts in zero gravity,(Mars One, 2017). A cosmonaut named Sergi Avdev even spent 438 days in zero gravity and was fine afterwards. SpaceX and NASA are doing tests as we speak to see if people really can inhabit Mars. So far, the tests have resulted in being successful and colonization is able to happen.
The best argument for exploring and colonizing on Mars can be summed up in one colloquial phrase, “don’t put all of your eggs into one basket.” To elaborate, all of humanity is on Earth. Earth is enormous, but it is still just one place. A medium-sized earthquake in Japan was enough to cause millions of dollars in damage and end thousands of lives. And when Mt. Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD, the ash clouds blocking out the sun all around the entire planet for weeks.
Who knows what kind of opportunities can come from Mars? We can use the many resources that have already been found on this planet, it could help us in many ways beyond space exploration, and it could even be a new place for us to live. That’s why I believe that the government should fund space exploration to Mars.
...egular people, believing that if someone was to go to Mars they might have been able to survive A variety of organic compounds present may mean a life is probable. Also, if the trip to Mars in 2023 turns out to be a positive one, then it will prove to everyone that in the future more and more people will move to this other planet. A lot of people will find it unnecessary to stay on Earth if they can start a new life somewhere else in the galaxy. Even though the trip will have America paying billions and billions of dollars, it truly is worth it. A life on Mars could mean living to an older age and being healthier. The point of going to the Red Planet is to find out if there is a better life somewhere other than on Earth. Just like NASA astronaut, Buzz Aldrin said, humans will most likely reach Mars and when they do humans will turn into a two-planet species.
Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.
Mars Colonization Have you ever wanted to go to space? Do you ever wonder what it is like in space? Maybe you will be the first person to step foot on an unknown planet! What if you had the chance? The time is getting closer and closer to when humans will be able to go to Mars, and start a colony.
A manned mission to mars is too dangerous. First, it's cold. For instance, the average temperature is -61 degrees Fahrenheit. Since, it’s too cold it’s dangerous. Second, earth’s gravity harms the human body. For example, bones and muscles get weaker and the body produces less blood. Since, your bones and muscles get weaker and the body produces less blood this shows you that a manned mission to mars it too dangerous. Third, traveling is dangerous. For instance, traveling in a spaceship because minimeterorites can kill you. Since, minimeterorites can kill you this tells you that it's way too dangerous. In conclusion, a manned
To conclude, traveling to and colonizing Mars is very necessary for the human race and should be our goal as a species. Traveling to Mars would be a step in the right direction if we want the human
Mars Exploration Do you care about your generations after? The people who think that Mars exploration is worth it, are changing the lives of all the children to come! We are filling up the Earth with our growing population and using up all our resources. Humans should explore Mars because the new discoveries improve the quality of life on Earth, ensures the survival of our species, and we can discover how life adapts there.
Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost? I personally do not think that space exploration is the most important thing to focus on at the moment. To me, there are more important things to focus on. For example, people are living on the streets, but we want to learn more about space so we could live there someday, but in the meantime some people don't even have shelter on earth.
... The problem with the gravity of Mars is that weightlessness can make you sick. Meaning that because humans are so adapted to the conditions here on Earth, such a drastic change will make them sick. Adaptation will have to occur, meaning that the stations on Mars might have to somehow mimic the conditions of Earth. Works Cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming_of_Mars http://www.universetoday.com/9497/magnesium-could-be-a-source-of-fuel-on-mars/. http://www.mars-one.com/faq/health-and-ethics/will-the-astronauts-have-enough-water-food-and-oxygen.
The cost to launch a rocket or spacecraft, man it from Earth, pay workers and astronauts, build a spacecraft, and ensure it is safe is tremendous. As well said by Russell Roberts of Source H, “As much as I like space and the idea of people on Mars, I don’t see the care for using taxpayer money to get it done. Don’t tell me about all of the spin-off technologies… Leave the money here on Earth”. The cost of space travel is boundless; Roberts introduces the idea that the money could be better spent on Earth. This is important to consider because of all the issues currently on Earth; there are health crises, wars, droughts, and food shortages.
Doeden stated, “Estimates place the cost of a crewed Moon mission at $100 billion. A crewed Mars mission could cost five times that much” (Doeden 40). The U.S. is already trillions of dollars in debt, and a mission to a possibly uninhabitable planet would just add to that toll. Doeden describes the alternatives to the money spent on the Mars endeavor on page 40. Many potential investors could find fault with funding such a venture, considering they could argue that our country has other existing problems that could use the funding of a half-trillion dollars more so than on a single mission to Mars.