Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of scientific knowledge
Information overload and the internet
Information overload and the internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of scientific knowledge
We, as humans, are constantly on an ongoing journey to pack our knowledge hungry brains with more and more information. Almost demoting knowledge to a drug for the fact that we are continuously seeking more of it like an addict. Sometimes though, we can "overdose" on it to the point that we give ourselves a headache and are left in need of a break. Ironically, no matter how much information we cram into our brains, we are never fully capable of using our brains to its full potential, in a way defeating the whole purpose of expanding our growth for knowledge . Sadly enough Thomas Alva Edison, inventor of the light bulb, points out the reality that, "we don't know one-millionth of one percent about anything" (Knowledge 1). Amusingly coming from a man who yielded the knowledge to invent an array of iconic devices, ranging from the light bulb to the motion picture camera, it eludes the actuality of how even though we are always looking for new knowledge, we will never be able to really know everything. Similarly, by connecting points made in Yarrow Dunham lecture and in Carl Sagan's essay “Can We Know the Universe?” we see the same inferences as acknowledged by Edison. Through the lecture and the essay we can vividly see some of the fundamental implications that arise for the concept of knowledge.
Although a brain can accumulate vast amounts of knowledge over its lifetime, even it falls within its own limitations. Our brain has to be one of the best features humans poses that other species don't really quite have. Yarrow Dunham, in his lecture "What's in a name: Labels and the Development of Social Knowledge", explained how all species has a brain but a human brain has the complexity and the capacity to keep on learning and gai...
... middle of paper ...
...n is finally known. As presented by Dunham we have the knowledge to domesticate animals, use them for our gain, and poses the most unique jewel; the brain but by Sagan words it looks like we still have a longs ways to go to know well, everything.
Works Cited
"Knowledge Quotes - Quotations and Famous Quotes on Knowledge." Famous Quotes, Quotations and Proverbs in Proverbia.net. Web. 15 Mar. 2011. .
Dunham, Yarrow. "What's in a Name: Labels and the Development" of Social Knowledge". Auditorium, University of California Merced. 10 March 2011. Lecture.
Sagan, Carl. “Can We Know the Universe?: Reflections on a Grain of Salt.” Broca’s Brain:
Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York: Random House, 1979. 13-18.
.
Knowledge can be the key to success and can lead people to happier life. However, there are some instances that you can not gain any more knowledge because of how it would change your whole life. The drive of wanting more and more knowledge is best portrayed through two well -known books. In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, and in Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon, both the creature and Charlie are ostracized by society because they are different from everyone else but this distinction gave way for distinct fallouts because of their quest for knowledge beyond their reach to achieve happiness.
We as humans tend to have an unquenchable thirst for knowledge. We look for knowledge about everybody and everything that surrounds us in our day-to-day life. Sadly though, we must accept that in the grand scheme of life we (as a society) tend to put pleasure above our quest for knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge tends to take time and energy, two things we call invaluable, and it also shows us things that might depress us. Contrastingly, ignorance takes no time and energy.
Our knowledge is a key to our success and happiness in our life to give us personal satisfaction. Knowledge is power but not always. Sometimes our self-awareness and growth as an individual gives us negative thoughts that make us want to go back to undo it. Everyone wants to unlearn a part in our life that brought us pain and problems. Good or bad experiences brought by true wisdom can be used for our self-acceptance, self-fulfillment and these experiences would make us stronger as we walk to the road of our so called “life”, but Douglas’s and my experience about knowledge confirmed his belief that “Knowledge is a curse”. Both of us felt frustrated and sad from learning knowledge.
This paper will be covering what knowledge essentially is, the opinions and theories of J.L. Austin, Descartes, and Stroud, and how each compare to one another. Figuring out what knowledge is and how to assess it has been a discussion philosophers have been scratching their heads about for as long as philosophy has been around. These three philosophers try and describe and persuade others to look at knowledge in a different light; that light might be how a statement claiming knowledge is phrased, whether we know anything at all for we may be dreaming, or maybe you’re just a brain in a vat and don’t know anything about what you perceive the external world to be.
Krauss, Lawrence Maxwell, and Richard Dawkins. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing. New York, NY: Free, 2012. 7-8. Print.
Albert Einstein once said “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” Knowledge can be good because it makes one successful. Then, it can also be very bad such as a criminal being too smart for the police, he or she can keep committing crime. Too much knowledge is dangerous because it may harm many, which means that many die or get scarred for life because of one simple guy with an excess of knowledge.
Knowledge is everything, it's what separates humans from animals. It allows us to question the world around us. Another key aspect that separates humans from animals is that each human is unique. We all have different beliefs and ideals that help us explain the infinite amount of questions that this universe has gifted us. In his lecture, Christopher Viney goes over the many shifts in the origin of life and how each time there is a shift people start to adept to the new shift.
Hawking, Stephen. “Our Picture of the Universe.” Fields of Reading. 6th ed. Ed. Nancy R. Comely et al. New York: St. Martin’s, 2001. (565-574)
Research completed on infants, children, and adults across a multitude of cultural environments proposes that no human mind is alike. Spelke found that the four systems on core knowledge are a basis for cognitive systems. This means that some humans learn things easily, while others learn with greater difficulty (Kinzler and Spelke 2007). The core knowledge theory can be seen as both a positive and negative topic. The possible fact that human beings, as well as other species, could potentially be predisposed to cognitive capacities instead of acquiring capacities through experience is an overwhelming and controversial topic. There is not enough research or evidence to deem the core knowledge theory to be an absolute fact, but a strong opinion could be derived. If these cognitive capacities are integrated into us before birth, that would create a strong foundation for building new skills or capacities; it would be difficult to imagine an individual starting their life without this foundation of core symptoms because problems may arise. The core knowledge theory is helpful when studying development because the idea has been apparent in studies since Jean Piaget and could eventually unveil the roots of an evolutionary
...t find anything new. This description points out the hindrances on humans’ acquisition of knowledge because of our finite biological capacities.
According to (Fromkin, Rodman, & Hyams2007) , "The brain is the messenger of understanding and the organ whereby in a special manner we acquire wisdom and knowledge"(p.43) .
Albert Einstein said, “We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.” This new manner of thinking should be based on pre-existing knowledge. This pre-existing knowledge is necessary because it is the catalyst that pushes the human race forward, making us want to discover more. Trying to discover completely new knowledge would not yield the same results. Basing your research off what you already know allows you to compare the new data that you collected to the old data that is already present. If you discover something new you will have nothing to compare it with. This does not allow you the luxury of seeing if what you discovered was an improvement. This essay will examine how important it is to discover new ways of thinking about prior knowledge than it is to discover new facts. I believe that using prior knowledge to push discovery is much more important than trying to discovers new data or facts.
"[H]uman knowledge is organized de facto by linguistic competence through language performance, and our exploration of reality is always mediated by language" (Danchin 29). Most higher vertebrates possess ‘intuitive knowledge’ which occurs as the result of slow evolution of species. However, the ability to create knowledge through language is unique to humans. According to Benjamin Whorf, "language…. is not merely a reproducing instrument from voicing ideas but rather is itself the shaper of ideas…. We dissect nature along lines laid down by language" (Joseph 249). In addition, the development and acquisition of language seems to be related to "complex sequential processing, and the ability to form concepts and to classify a single stimulus in a multiple manner" (Joseph 178). Antione Danchin suggests that the knowledge we create through language allows us distinguish ourselves from the rest of the world to produce models of reality, which become more and more adequate due to the "self-referent loop" which enables us to understand ourselves as objects under study. This "path from subject to object," which is common to all humans, Danchin claims, suggests the existence of a universal feature of language (29).
...elieve knowledge is extremely important as it also plays an enormous role in imagination. Without knowledge being shared, brilliant minds would not able to improve upon current situations. If Bill Gates had no knowledge in computing, knowledge that he acquired from other people through education, he would not have developed the Microsoft computer. The knowledge acquired from other sources fed his mind into imagining and developing the Microsoft computer.
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand” (Albert Einstein). Albert Einstein’s claim could be broken down into two segments; one is defining the term knowledge as being “limited to all we know” and the second defines imagination as “embracing the entire world.” His words are not meant to attack any other scientist out there, all he meant was that imagination initiates our curiosity which leads us to conduct studies that eventually reveal information that we know as knowledge. Come to think of it, all great breakthroughs in history came from these ‘Eureka’ moments instead of solely reason of logic.