Humanitarian Response Paper

1452 Words3 Pages

1. Introduction After reviewing the two articles: The systematic examination {evaluation} of the humanitarian actions were intended to draw lessons learned---in order to improve disaster and emergency management best practices, to make efficient public policy-decisions, and to enhance future accountability during preparedness, response, mitigation, and short/long-term recovery phases. The typical systematic evaluation process ought to involve the affected populations {i.e., victims, survivors, or beneficiaries}, as well as, the Whole Community {individuals, families, communities in neighborhoods, businesses---the private and nonprofit sectors, faith-based and community organizations, schools and academia, media outlets, state, local county …show more content…

Thus, disaster humanitarian program must be evaluated with reference to already identified objectives and agreed to minimum standards to measure humanitarian overall appropriateness, efficiency, coverage, coherence and impact on the affected population group{s} in the community. The survivor outcomes {i.e., needs, life-saving and life-sustain supplies}should form the basis for disaster humanitarian program. The result of each evaluation exercise should be used to improve future practices for maximizing the disaster survivor …show more content…

{see the know-how via "Public Administration Methods". Interviews: Chapter 9. Eller, Gerber, and Robinson. P. 149-173} Second, the collection of information for evaluation purposes ought to be independent and impartial. For example, The United Nations Humanitarian Charter and some minimum standards in Disaster Response should be a product of the collective experience of many people {victims or survivors}and the 3rd World governmental agencies. The evaluation reports should not be seen as representing the proprietary views of any one agency or organization. Third, We need a public policy directive to hang on the disaster and emergency programs in the nations of societies. Then, the Assessment of humanitarian program performance outcomes can be measurable and tracked to show resilience in the Rwandan communities in their Republic of Rwanda. We are seriously learning this disaster management expertise and best practices through this CPP 520. More so, the humanitarian effort was not built on the laws, ordinances, and regulations of the Rwandan Government. NO GOVERNANCE for threats/hazards and disasters and emergencies in the Republic of Rwanda and anywhere else in the 3rd World

More about Humanitarian Response Paper

Open Document