Humanism Of Banking

“Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat. This is the "banking" concept of education, in which the scope of action allowed to the students extends only as far as receiving, filing, and storing the deposits. They do, it is true, have the opportunity to become collectors or cataloguers of the things they store. But in the last analysis, it is men themselves who are filed away through the lack of creativity, transformation, and knowledge in this (at best) misguided system. For apart from inquiry, apart from the praxis, men cannot be truly human. Knowledge emerges only through

It will deal instead with such vital questions as whether Roger gave green grass to the goat, and insist upon the importance of learning that, on the contrary, Roger gave green grass to the rabbit. The "humanism" of the banking approach masks the effort to turn women and men into automatons -- the very negation of their ontological vocation to be more fully human. – Paulo Freire” This is just as if students were being taught 2+2=4 in class but when it came to the pop quiz or the test the questions would say something like “If john had 2 cars and bought 7 goats how many bananas does he have?” and then everyone in the class is looking at the paper very confused because this is not what was taught in class. The teacher is sticking to a script strictly out of the book that they were given. So when 90% of the class fails and the teacher is very upset because they got in trouble because their fail numbers are so high they take it out on the students. But the teacher is only going out of the book and the students are only receiving what is being taught to