Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The advantages of the Griswold v Connecticut case
Griswold v connecticut case summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The advantages of the Griswold v Connecticut case
This essay will discuss the impact Human Rights Law has upon the aspects of domestic family law in the United Kingdom in relation to abortion. It will analyse and provide insight into how Human Rights Law has impacted, if at all, on the law of abortion, as a medical intervention, within the United Kingdom. This essay aims to use case law and legislation as a main source but other sources will be utilised to construct a logical argument on this topic. The essay will focus primarily on abortion law and decisions within the United Kingdom and several other European countries. With specific reference to the United Kingdom, the following Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights shall be considered;
Article 2 – The Right to Life and also,
Article 8 – The right to respect for private and family life.
The main weight of the essay shall focus on Article 2. It will also focus on case law where situations of the human rights law have developed the law on abortion. An overview of the United Kingdom position on abortion shall be considered before the Human Rights aspect is integrated into this work. The consideration of the European dimension is important in light of the European Convention on Human Rights, especially as research has concluded that, “In Europe, 30% of pregnancies end up in abortion”. Indeed, David Steel MP, who was responsible for the private member’s bill which led to the Abortion Act 1967, has stated that he, “never envisaged there would be so many abortions”. Good law requires statute to provide certainty, and whether or not human rights intervention has altered the domestic position shall be analysed within this work.
The United Kingdom and abortion
Within the United Kingdom, abortion is governed by the Aborti...
... middle of paper ...
...ly been violated in that her ability to implement a decision on whether or not to undertake an abortion had been denied. Similarly, as with the case of R. R. v. Poland, no such challenges under Article 8 on such grounds have been raised by a United Kingdom citizen, proof perhaps, that the intricacies and clearness of domestic law are sound law and compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Overall, the United Kingdom has faced challenges in respect of breaches of human rights elements under the European Convention on Human Rights and more recently, the Human Rights Act 1998. However, specifically on the area of abortion, this is one area that has remained relatively ‘unchallenged’ at domestic level, and as such, it would not be unreasonable or incorrect to assert that here at least, human rights law has not had any direct impact, negative or otherwise.
We can begin to see the error in this view by considering Thomson’s comparison of the right to life with the right to vote. Thomson fails to advert the fact that some rights vary with respect to place, circumstances, maturity, ability and other factors, while other rights do not. We recognize that one's right to life does not vary with place as does one’s right to vote…. But to have the right to life is have moral status at all (Lee and George 17).
In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy. Then appropriate responses to these objections. Concluding the paper I will argue that Thomson's 'violinist' argument supporting the idea of a mother's right to autonomy outweighing a fetus' right to life does not make abortion permissible.
The Human Rights Act of 1998 came into power in October 2000, and it represent an honourable epitome of ethical and moral ideologies. As for any idealistic expectations, one must query the effectiveness of the Human Rights Act of 1998 at meeting all its aims in the context of aiding, safeguarding and supporting those in need of assistances from the Social Services in the UK.
The current issues concerning a woman’s right to an abortion include the debates between pro-life and pro-choice groups that promote either restrictions or extensions to a woman’s ability to receive abortions respectively, along with debate about the role that the government should play in the process of limiting or extending rights. Pro-life groups argue many points against abortion including the beliefs that life begins at conception, adoption is a viable alternative to abortion, the procedures sometimes cause medical complications, a...
There are other factors in determining what rights a person has in a given circumstance. None of her arguments apply to pregnancy in which sex was voluntary and no effort was made to prevent pregnancy. She argues that abortion is permissible in three types of cases: (1) Rape (violinist experiment), (2) Threat to mothers’ life (death), (3) Cases where attempts were made to prevent the pregnancy (failure of contraception). At the end of her paper she says we must not fall below the standard of minimally decent Samaritans (MDS). However, she doesn’t really says what that standard
a woman has the right to an abortion. The court that day, however, did not rule
No doubt the mother has a right to decide what happens in and to her body. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to decide what shall happen to her body, and so outweighs it. So the foetus may not be killed and an abortion may not be performed (Thomson, 1971) In response to this argument, Thomson uses her Violinist analogy. You have been kidnapped by the Society of Music Lovers, and upon waking have found that your circulatory system has been plugged into a famous violinist who is suffering from kidney failure.
For many years in Canada and many other countries abortion has been a topic of debate. In Canada, there has been no legislation regarding abortions since 1988 as the previous laws were said to violate women’s Charter rights under Section 7 which states that Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Due to this, the Supreme Court of Canada considered abortion legislation to be a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Since then, no legislations regarding abortion has been changed. Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition
As one knows, some unwanted pregnancies could often be harmful and distressing for a woman. Women should have the right over their body to choose to sustain the fetus or not. In the past decades, women did not have their freedom of abortion in many countries of the world. There have always been controversies going on about abortion. Each individual has dissimilar views on the legality of abortion. Some people are against abortion for personal religious purposes and beliefs. For those who don’t believe in abortion, it is because they see it as killing a fetus, which is a human being. Others support abortion because they believe in women’s rights. Laws of abortion vary in each country, and abortion is not legal all over the world. It is illegal under any conditions but only permitted to save woman’s life if in countries such as Brazil, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates, and Ireland. However, abortion is legal without any restrictions in countries like Canada, Albania, and Italy. It the past decades Abortion was considered as criminal act in Canada. “If an abortion was carried out without such approval, the woman was liable for imprisonment for 2 years, an...
Over the course of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with regard to her reproductive rights.
This essay will be discussing liberalism and abortion legality. It will firstly present Stephen Bottomley and Simon Bronitt’s aspects of liberalism. Secondly, this essay will discuss the pro-legal abortion liberal angle; discussing the points of the female having the right as an autonomous individual in deciding morally to abort or continue her pregnancy, autonomous decision making, private liberty, the state’s actions through the liberal perspective, and the negative effects that children can have on their mother with respect to liberalism. Thirdly, this essay will present the pro-illegal abortion liberal angle; discussing the main counter-argument of protecting the liberties of developing embryo. This essay argues that through the liberal
It is saddening to see humans of the female gender, who find themselves in a situation that requires introducing a new life into the world; to abort such a precious gift. Many may wonder how these poor, innocent, unborn children are then discarded after the abortion procedure. One cannot fathom the reason of these gruesome murders that happens within these medical facilities. Babies are disposed in the red waste bins of these facilities, and later incinerated. Some may either be flushed down garbage disposals or even be sold off for research purposes. The issue of abortion is not just a social one, but also a human rights issue among the unborn children. I believe if the human rights of these children has been violated, then all other rights of humans are certainly meaningless.
The laws on abortion have developed varied in countries since there are different social and moral perceptions due to the different cultures. In Great Britain, only medical professionals are able to provide abortion(rethinking of abortion p13). While it comes to Northern Ireland and the Irish republic , the law only allow women to get information of abortion and have abortion outside of their states (rethinking of abortion p19).Abortion is always a sensitive topic when it is regarded as killing a person surrounding with social and political discussion. It seems that the debate between anti-abortion and the opponents is increasing heated (BEYOND CHOICE P19).Woman tend to choose illegal abortion when it is unavailable for legal abortion, even it is unsafe with poor conditions and unqualified provider (Berer, M., 2000). Traditionally, laws and medical ethics against abortion for mainly two reasons: first of all, it seems like killing a developing human being as fetus should h...
Article 3, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, states “everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of a person” (Goodhart, 379). This article creates cultural discrepancies that are rooted in interpreting undefined and ambiguous language. For example, there are cultural disputes concerning the definition of a “person”. In many monotheistic cultures, abortion is considered a crime. Advocates of this opinion support that a fetus is a human being from conception.
Abortion is a highly debated topic in many circles around the world. One where both sides can be considered truthful and strong. The article “Abortion and Rights” takes that stance that abortion should be prohibited and laws should exist to stop it in most cases. The article cites; Abortion goes against the fundamentals of human rights, fetuses are also human and should be treated as such, many woman part-take in abortion as a quality of life action which is not humane and finally allowing the act of abortions runs us the risk of treating people with disabilities and such as lesser in society. The author’s premises do hold ground in the debated but as presented in the article have flaws which leads to weakness in the overall argument which