Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Confucianism's weakness to morality
Confucianism and morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Mencius, the Latinized form of Meng Zi, a Confucian philosopher whose influence was second to that of Confucius, focused his theories and teachings on the subject of human nature. In D.C Lau's "Mencius", the dialogues between Mencius with the kings, military men, and other philosophers showed that Mencius had a strong view on human nature that he believed was intrinsically kind. While there were other Confucians who held opposing views about human nature, Mencius believed that every person was born with four main virtues that would only develop fully if nurtured and put to effect appropriately. He claimed that individuals who were not virtuous were corrupted by the environment, and Mencius integrated elements of Taoism into his theory that one’s natural tendencies were good to begin with. For one’s natural good tendency, one must work to uphold their good nature. Mencius says, “Every person has a heart-mind which feels for others” . He applies this to a popular example where if one observed a child falling into a well, it is not possible to not feel anything; people have a heart and mind that would be shocked or sympathetic, which may become a motivation to act and save the child. However, if one listens to their sense of desire, “I don’t want to be involved”, then they would stop themselves from helping others. From this example, he concluded “a man without the feeling of mercy is not a man; a man without the feeling of deference and complaisance is not a man, and a man without the feeling of right and wrong is not a man. The feeling of commiseration is the beginning of the feeling of love; the feeling of shame and dislike is the beginning of righteousness; the feeling of deference and complaisance is the beginning of wisdom. M... ... middle of paper ... ...He believed that these tendencies should be viewed as the content of human nature [Lau, 6A15]. We have reasons to reject Mencius’s position on human nature, if we believe that the heart (sentiments and emotions) and mind (logic) work separately, while there may be more reasons, based on Mencius’s theory of balance, that the heart-mind work together. While Mencius explains and identifies the four basic qualities of the heart with the four virtues, there is no quick conflict between “nature” and “nurture”. Mencius believed that biology and culture were mutually dependent upon one another in the development of the virtues to portray that human nature is good. Mencius paid attention to the observation of human relationships and moral feelings. I also believe that the universe is a moral one infused with Qi and that the "The organ of the heart can think.” [Lau, 6A15]
Outside Quote: “It was becoming clear to him that any system of morality-one of the things for which he had searched dur...
“I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe. If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other.”
Many people have different views on the moral subject of good and evil or human nature. It is the contention of this paper that humans are born neutral, and if we are raised to be good, we will mature into good human beings. Once the element of evil is introduced into our minds, through socialization and the media, we then have the potential to do bad things. As a person grows up, they are ideally taught to be good and to do good things, but it is possible that the concept of evil can be presented to us. When this happens, we subconsciously choose whether or not to accept this evil. This where the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke become interesting as both men differed in the way they believed human nature to be. Hobbes and Locke both picture a different scene when they express human nature.
Wilkes, K.V., (1978). The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle’s Ethics. Mind 87; repr. in A. O. Rorty, ed., Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley, 1980).
Inwardly examining his own nature, man would prefer to see himself as a virtuously courageous being designed in the image of a divine supernatural force. Not to say that the true nature of man is a complete beast, he does posses, like many other creatures admirable traits. As author Matt Ridley examines the nature of man in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the selfish and altruistic sides of man are explored. Upon making an honest and accurate assessment of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the trappings of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme it seems more accurate to describe man as a creature whose tendency is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival.
It is widely debatable whether humans are inherently good or evil. From the past, people had their own opinions on this topic, and the debate still goes on today. The Aphorism 17.2 “The Master said: By nature men are pretty much alike; it is learning and practice that set them apart.” from Confucius Analects conveys Confucius’s view of human nature. Confucianism was the most important philosophy of China throughout the history and it greatly influenced China. The relevance of Aphorism 17.2 to China’s many of history can be easily seen.
For those individuals that choose to look into the philosophy of Confucius, Confucianism recognizes that the quest for virtue is ordinary and providential. However, in this quest of moral aptness Confucius tried to offer other people the fervent self love that he had greatly embodied. To actually make oneself as perfect as possible was the central concern of life. Al...
...ut more importantly Mencius' core conception that human nature is also aware of its actions, and considers the well-being of others and that people are morally obligated to do so is also key to attaining our full potential. This conception of human nature and proper order together is what has shaped East Asian political and social thought for centuries. It is credited with creating an East Asia that is economically robust, and socially coherent and once again will be the center of human society in the decades to come. And contrary to popular Western belief, East Asian political thought does appreciate the necessity of the individual in defining society. In fact the only way to attain our human nature is to healthily self-cultivate ourselves morally and materially so we can reach our highest potential and in that way be a valued and contributing member to society.
Following the Way in the pursuit of goodness leads people to the status of “gentleman.” However, this status can only be achieved from a lifelong pursuit, which if accomplished by many, will eventually lead to innate goodness within the entire society. Confucius reveals the amount of learning and time required for achieving such status of “gentleman” in book two, chapter four, where he states, “At fifteen, I set my mind upon learning. At thirty, I took my stand. At forty, I had no doubts. At fifty, I knew the will of Heaven. At sixty, my ear was attuned. At seventy, I follow all the desires of my heart without breaking any rule” (Analects, in NAWL, eds. Martin Puchner, et al., 3rd edition, vol. A, 1335). Confucius presents the achievement of the “gentleman” status in a superior, yet moderate manner. He does not motivate by promising personal gain or achievement; he instead teaches to always place what is right and morally correct as top priority. It was believed by Confucius that moderation led
Confucianism is based, mainly, on five virtues: sincerity, benevolence, filial piety, intelligence, and propriety. Sincerity, the first of the five virtues, meant that one was to be truthful and straightforward in speech and in action. A sincere man, according to Confucius, obeyed all of the rules inwardly as well as outwardly. Benevolence, the second virtue, meant that one should help others in times of need. It also meant that one should be concerned with the well being of others. Filial Piety, the third virtue, was considered one of the greatest virtues. This virtue says that a son should honor and respect his parents. This virtue also extended to four more relationships: that of the ruler and subject, the husband and wife, the elder brother and younger brother, and that between friends. The fourth virtue is intellect. The Confucian philosophy highly regarded education, saying that men attained virtues through learning. The final virtue is propriety. This virtue encompasses behavioral conduct and etiquette and is commonly summarized as "teaching men to do the right thing."
Confucius, the founding philosopher of Confucianism, never explicitly details what he believes to be the inherent nature of humans. However, through his teachings and writings, his opinion can be understood to be that humans reach good nature, through self-cultivation and self-improvement. He believes that humans are improvable and teachable, but lack virtue. “Confucius
Pope, in his Essay on Man, takes the religious approach when thinking about the common man. In the epistles, Pope suggests that the common man is ungrateful of God. He claims that man only blames God for their hardships, but does not thank him for their bounty. Pope brings to light a theological theory that man attempts to claim that they are better than God, to which he responds with scathing regard. Pope regards the common man as disrespecting because of their blasphemous lack of appreciation of their lord. In this philosophical poem, it could be seen that his distaste for the common man’s disregard of God is relates to Pope’s presentation of his view on the Universe; that no matter how imperfect, complex, inscrutable and disturbing the Universe
Confucius is known for stressing that human nature is intrinsically good. He stresses that human beings are born with the ability for differentiating between wrong and right. A person may not be aware from infancy which acts are tolerable and which acts are not, but all offspring feel shame, and once the children learn which deeds are bad or good, they have a normal tendency to consent of the former and criticize of the latter (Van and Bryan 27).
to man himself, delving into the moral and mental nature of man and dealing with
Not only did this piece demonstrate his unconventional beliefs about the codependence of good and evil, it also exemplified a classic romantic tenet which dealt with the contradic...