Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Primate evolution essay
Biology chapter 34 primate and human evolution
Biology chapter 34 primate and human evolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Primate evolution essay
Our hands are of immense importance as they are one of the prime differences between humans and the other species of primates on this planet. The formation of the human hand has allowed the human species to prosper and evolve in many ways. The complex engineering behind the five digits on our hands, including fingers and thumb that work together, are what allows our species to carry out imperative tasks such as specific gripping, communication, and defense among further manipulative capabilities. (Io9.gizmodo.com, 2018) The evolution of the human hand has been the cause of great speculation and dispute since fossils of the human anatomy were first discovered and though the human hand differs significantly from that of its primitive relatives, …show more content…
(ScienceDaily, 2018) This essay will include information on the differences between primitive and modern-day human hands, the distinctive structural aspects of the present day human hand and how they relate to tool making, and how evolution through selective breeding allowed for and led to the modification of the human hand.
It has long been projected that the hominid linage diverged from primitive chimpanzees around 6 million years ago (ScienceDaily, 2004). If this is the case, then why is there such a vast disparity between the human hand and that of the typical primate? According to the anthropologist Dr. Mary W. Marzke of the Arizona State University Department of Anthropology (2000), the characteristic that makes the human hand so particularly distinctive is the capability of being able to cup and securely clasp
…show more content…
A likely answer to this question lays in the article “Evolution of the human hand: the role of throwing and clubbing” (2003) by Richard W Young. Young states in his work that the use of stone tools as weapons and instruments for defense promoted reproductive success because it gave users of the tools an advantage over their opponents. The most capable weapon handlers were most likely the ones that had specific variations in the structures of their hands that would aid them during the use of those tools. Males in the hominid communities who were more aggressive and trained with stone tools such as clubs and throwing weapons, would be considered more dominant and would obtain access to a greater quantity of resources. Females in the hominid communities also possessing these hand variations would be able to protect themselves and their offspring’s using weaponry and would have a better chance of passing on these genetics. Since weapon-using males would be higher in the dominance hierarchy, they would be able to exert more power, govern other males, attain more food, and better protect the women and children. Females would find these attributes more appealing and as a result, the weapon-using males would be presented with more breeding opportunities thus furthering the selection of their genes generation after generation and ultimately altering the
: Finding a fingernail instead of claws was a huge surprise and it is considered a huge hallmark for our primate history. The paleontologist was actually expecting a huge claw at first and getting a small nail was a shock for him. Nails also make it easier for primates to gather food rather than claws which gives it a similar characteristic to us.
The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers. But with enough questioning, each loses its accountability to rhetorical science.
Did Jane Goodall’s research find the evidence about chimp’s tool making? Is the human the only species able to make the tool? How do you correlate this with human culture?
Male dominance has been prevalent ever since the hunter/gatherer social transformation. It continues to be so, in almost every culture, except of the apparent Amazons. Even today, in our post-Industrial era, males are still more dominant than females, especially in third world countries. The male gender were the ones to become leaders and determiners. They define what is acceptable for a woman ranging from one culture to the next. Whether it is the way a woman should dress, be treated, or how she should behave, it is all decided by the males in society. These decisions vary from female circumcision, or female genital mutilation, to anal sex as the initiation into womanhood, to women being whipping for a man to transition into adulthood.
I can only hold my mug with my thumb and little finger. I’m pretty helpless; only when a man has lost any fingers does he see how much he needs them for the smallest jobs. The best thing I can do with the little finger is to shoot with it. My hands are finished” ().
Sherwood states,” Wing Biddlebaum talked much with his hands. The slender expressive fingers…became the piston rods of his machinery expression.” (Anderson 1,4). Both characters use their hands to express their feelings. Wing fear his hand because he got in trouble in his past because of it. In “A Jury of Her Peer” Mrs. Wright is nervous when Harry question her about her husband dead, “[P]leatin’ at her apron.” (Glaspell 4). She is using her hand to show that she is nervous. Besides the main characters, Mr. Wright uses his hand to show how angry he could get it. ‘“Somebody wrung its neck,”’ Mr. Wright kill the only company that his wife
The idea that early hominids were powerful players in the ancient is slowly slipping away. Evidence is emerging that our ancestors were not great hunters, but scavengers that roamed the savanna looking for leftovers. Pat Shipman, discusses how it would be possible for early hominids to survive as strangers and how this method of cultivation affected human evolution. Shipman, uses the marks that stone tools, and teeth would make on the bones of prey animals as evidence for her hypothesis. She theorizes that early hominids weren't mighty hunter, but cunning scavengers.
Hopkins, W. D., et al. "Handedness For Tool Use In Captive Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes): Sex Differences, Performance, Heritability And Comparison To The Wild." Behaviour 146.11 (2009): 1463. Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
108), however in the M-group, in Mahale, that the grooming hand-clasp appeared in at least one captive chimpanzee colony (Uehara, 2004, p. 108). The importance between the different types of hand-clasp grooming is crucial to determine the behaviors among cultures in primates. The objective was to test Mcgrew and colleagues’ idea that the palm-to-palm hand-clasp is custom of K-group and not of M-group (Uehara, 2004, p. 109). In some cases during the grooming the primates would stretch their arms and hold hands (palm-to-palm hand-clasp), but the primates also used other methods of grooming, such as stretching their arms and holding their wrists, or draping their arms over each other during the grooming process. (See images in (Uehara, 2004, p. 109). The study was to show whether or not those who used the grooming hand-clasp with three different partners demonstrated the same tendencies regardless of the partner (Uehara, 2004, p. 109). The results showed the majority of the K-group performed the palm-to-palm hand-clasps more often than M-group. During the observation, “the angle of the wrist in most cases concluded as either straight of flexed in approximately 91% of primates. In the Angle of
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
Throughout the human evolution fossils have been found and each bone discovered demonstrates how the early hominids to the modern human features have changed. Each bone showed off different stories and new facts. Even the inner ear bone has changed in shape and in size throughout the early hominids. Over time the littlest things have changed but it seem like it helped surviving better, by helping to be able to be bipeds and tool making. The early hominids are truly amazing and indeed have been an important part of modern humans and the human evolution its self.
The purpose of this paper to examine the evolution of the human brain that distinguishes them from other species based on the traits that humans possess: such as language, emotional complexity and consciousness. The significance of traits are due to adaptations in humans to promote the survival of our ancestors. Professor Hamilton (2012) discusses that the evolution of the human brain starts with the idea of the Triune brain, proposed by MacLean, whereby the human brain is made up of three parts: Reptilian, Paleo-mammalian, and Neo-mammalian. Animals with the neo-mammalian brain have a more complex brain compared to the other parts, since this is where the neocortex evolved. Humans essentially have this higher brain function which is responsible for our ability to think, make decisions, promote agency, and the ability to relate with each other. This concept fits into the evolutionary process since it shows how the complex the brain has become through evolutionary processes. In essence, as humans, we “have a rich, evidence-based understanding of our behavior that can lead us to plan to be ‘better’ or ‘more successful’ people” according to Professor Hamilton (2012). Thus, shows how evolution plays a significance in understanding human behavior and comparing humans with other species.
... patriarchy proved to be a strong one. The suppression of women through objectification worked to influence the attitudes of both men and women. The husband was head of the family, a symbol of power and respect. Females were raised to become wives and women who had sex outside of marriage or did not marry were not the norm. By constructing society into small organized groups where men are the head, women are never given the chance to hold power since they can not even lead their families.
Evolution is the complexity of processes by which living organisms established on earth and have been expanded and modified through theorized changes in form and function. Human evolution is the biological and cultural development of the species Homo sapiens sapiens, or human beings. Humans evolved from apes because of their similarities. This can be shown in the evidence that humans had a decrease in the size of the face and teeth that evolved. Early humans are classified in ten different types of families.