Ancient Greek Advances in Anatomical Research

1074 Words3 Pages

Throughout ancient Greek history, great strides were taken in the medical, biological, and anatomical fields. Physicians experimented to reach new conclusions and further their general understanding of the human body. Animal dissection was common throughout the time period, although there were many cultural, religious, and moral taboos against human dissection. Human dissection was, and still is, useful in furthering anatomical research and has mainly been employed as a tool for learning in the modern era (Ghosh). While its usefulness is apparent, in ancient Greece, few people investigated this field due to cultural restrictions, and after its inception, human dissection was not practiced again until the 12th century. While there is a general
Both von Staden and Ghosh investigate these reasons by analyzing the cultural factors at play in Greece and in Alexandria, where Herophilus and Erasistratus practiced. In ancient Greece, there were many restrictions that prevented physicians, like Alcmaeon, from dissecting humans. It was believed that corpses polluted their surroundings and they were not human beings anymore. There were also taboos against cutting, as the Greeks believed that the skin was a symbol of completeness and integrity and should not be broken (Von Staden). These views would discourage any physician from taking a risk and opening a human cadaver because of the disapproval they would face from the general population. Herophilus and Erasistratus were able to overcome these taboos because they practiced in Alexandria. In this city, there was no democracy, so other scientists in the area could not patronize Herophilus or Erasistratus if they disagreed with their work. During this time, the Ptolemies were ruling in Egypt and had set a precedent of going against Greek cultural beliefs with their incestual relationships (Ghosh). Furthermore, Alexandria was a beacon for scientific innovators. Because of these reasons, thoughts on human dissection were more relaxed than in Greece. While other physicians were concerned with cultural restrictions, Herophilus and Erasistratus were able to thrive in a progressive climate. However, more research can be done to show the effect of their work on other physicians in Alexandria and on the development of human dissection there. Although Greece and Alexandria were closely intertwined economically and geographically, the varying cultural factors and the resources at hand allowed for a physical investigation into the human

More about Ancient Greek Advances in Anatomical Research

Open Document