Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important of labelling theory definition
Two theoretical approaches as applied to deviance
Compare and contrast theories of crime and deviance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Important of labelling theory definition
Labeling Theory
The Labeling theory (social reaction theory) was first proposed during the 1950’s in opposition to normative theorists. Some of the major contributors of this theory were Howard Becker, Edwin Lemert, and Frank Tannenbaum. Lemert, although not directly regarded as a labeling theorist, introduced the concept of primary and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is behavior that causes initial labeling of one as deviant. Once labeled, subsequent behaviors are referred to as secondary deviance. Clearly one can draw from Lemert that his contribution is prolific as he helped spearhead the inception of the Labeling theory. Howard Becker provided an acceptable definition for the Labeling theory, which is used today after many years. Tennenbaum (1938) contributed to the theory by arguing, that the process of tagging, defining, identifying, segregating, etc.
…show more content…
L., & Sellers, C. S. (2009). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of Behavior Modification. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York, NY:
Free Press.
Garfinkle, H. (1956). Conditions of Successful Degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420-424.
Hardin, D. (2009). Violence, Older Peers, and the Socialization of Adolescents Boys in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 74, 445-464.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Siegel, L. & Welsh, B., (2008). Juvenile Delinquency the Core. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Siegel, L. (2010). Criminology: Theories, Patterns, and Typologies. Belmont, CA:
Cengage Learning. Southerland, E. H. & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott. Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the Community. Boston, MA: Ginn &
Criminology. The. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Print. The. Shakur, Sanyika.
Lilly, Robert J., Francis T. Cullen, and Richard A. Ball. 2011. Criminological Theory: Context And Consequences. 5th ed. California: SAGE.
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
To correctly apply the Labeling theory, we have to look at how the theory can give a positive and reinforcing label. The model can explain two major turning points for the brothers, first when the city supports them causing them to start killing. And second, when they have don...
Akers, R, & Sellers, C. (2009). Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation, and application. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
Laub, J, & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Winslow, R. W., & Zhang, S. (2008). Contemporary Theories of Crime. Criminology: a global perspective (). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Wilson, James and Herrnstein, Richard. "Crime & Human Nature: The Definitive Study of the Causes of Crime" New York: Free Press, 1998.
Muncie, J., and Mclaughin, E. (1996) The Problem of Crime. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
The Labeling Theory is the view that labels people are given affect their own and others’ perception of them, thus channeling their behavior either into deviance or into conformity. Labels can be positive and/or negative, but I’ll focus on the negative aspects of labeling in high school. Everybody has a label in high school whether it is the “slut”, “pothead”, “freak” or the “jock”; it is one of the most apparent time periods in which individuals get labeled. Students have the mentality that whatever label is placed on them is going to be stuck with them forever, which then leads into a self-fulfilling prophecy. This, I feel, is a fear of being a “loser” that has been instilled throughout years by the principals, teachers, etc. An example of this is the pressure students are given to get a good grade. In order to get into an honors class they need to pass a certain test, should they not get into honors class the following year, then all throughout the rest of their remaining school life, they’ll never be able to be in honors class. They’ll then no longer be seen as the “smart” students they were “before”(even though they still are), they’ll now be labeled as “dumb” and eventually start to believe, and become their label. Another example of this is being labeled a “slut”. When a girl has been labeled a slut, early or in the middle of her school life, the label sticks with her all throughout her remaining school years. At first, she could reject this label, and try to “change”...
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
Williams, F., & McShane, M. (2010). Criminological Theory, (5th Edition). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bridges, K. M. Banham . "Factors Contributing to Juvenile Delinquency." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 17.4 (1927): 531-76. scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.