Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biological theory of crime causation
What are biological and sociological factors on why people commit crimes
The nature and causes of crimes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Biological theory of crime causation
“There is very little that is new in crime. Similar patterns of behavior will emerge time and time again. People commit the same crimes for the same motives. They get caught because they make the same mistakes, and when arrested they trot out the same excuses. If they get away with it, it is often a matter of luck. I have been able to come up with a few simple rules which should always be observed when one is contemplating murder.” [Linda Crime Notes] The difficulty with committing murder is the elevated danger of being trapped. Once decided that murder is defensible, the predicament of how to do it and how to keep away from being found out are your initial feelings. Unluckily, the cops have turned out to be very sophisticated in their examination but there are ways to trick the police and the coroner's office. If more people knew how to blow up a car with Drano, or reason an enormous heart attack devoid of any bodily signs of foul play. A large number of unsettled or mysterious deaths in which much life indemnity policy would be remunerated without question, are rising. Using any intoxicating drain clog remover to bluster up a car is very effectual, yet it is very hard to heave off. You don't have to be connected to a murder in order to be a suspect in a murder case. If they find a piece of hair they will take it to a lab, anything to find the murderer. They don't just trace murderers "connected" to a murder. It could be anyone. The first thing you must do is make sure your intended victim is nowhere in view one hour previous to the car is on track. The second thing is that rubber gloves are very important; you do not want to leave fingerprints on a burnt out car or on the drain opener bottle. Disposing the rubber gloves at a... ... middle of paper ... ... of questions to come from relatives, doctors and finally the POLICE. Do not read from signal cards. These cues may arouse instant doubt; have your story straight before you ever started to carry out the process. A perfect story for a perfect murder is all you need and to advance the process cry and cry hard as tears give the illusion of deep pain. You should try to view this death as if your world is coming to an end. Follow these steps with a fine precision. You can put your own creative touch on any of these procedures, but it is important that you do not deviate from the steps I have outlined: one mistake will cause suspicion. The steps I have outlined in the Drano and the heart attack methods are very affected in ending a life. References Linda Crime Notes. How to Get Away with Murder - or not, as the case may be. http://www.parmaq.com/truecrime/HowTo.htm
We were presented with many facts that all pointed to Mr. Washburn as the murder. In the house all of the entrances were thoroughly inspected by authorities, and they found no sign of ransacking. “[They] examined all the locking mechanisms, all the doors and windows. In [their] opinion there was no evidence of any forced entry” (P.81). When police looked for fingerprints, “They were all of the Washburn family and the maid” (P.81). There was no trace of an outside party; somebody usually in the Washburn house committed the murder. While in the living room, an officer found a drop of blood. The evidence technician was called the next night to run some tests. “He sprayed the living room carpet with luminol. It is a luminous spray, and when it comes in contact with blood it illuminates” (P.82). To both men’s surprise the whole living room was illuminating. After spraying further the men found a trail from the living room through the kitchen to the garage. In the closet the men found a wet mop, which was tested for blood and also came back positive. Somebody tried to clean his or her bloody mess, and try to save himself. The physical evidence proves the killer was somebody who was familiar to the Washburn household.
Although there is a significant amount of data found on murder, serial murder statistics are much more difficult to establ...
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
Mass murder is defined by the FBI as the killing of three or more people in a single event or in the same day (Petersen & Farrington, 2007). Mass murderers are complex and can be examined by the many factors that regularly appear among them, such as violence precipitating events, weapon of choice, and mental illnesses. The motivations and methods for committing mass murder are easily broken down into specific groups, and through the examination of these definitions and specific cases there is much to learn about the mind of a mass murderer.
Hundreds of books written throughout the years are about crime scene investigations. However, has anybody ever thought of real-life criminals that actually watch programs or read books are developing ideas on how to escape the police or how to make their crime more intense? The answer is no, but forensic shows and books coincidentally do give tips to criminals.
This paper explores three criminological theories as to why Jeffrey Dahmer committed his crimes. Although these approaches vary in terms of defining the cause of crime, one thing is certain, there is no single cause of crime; the crime is rooted in a diversity of causes and takes a variety of forms depending on the situation in which the crimes occur. However, the published articles vary in their definitions and uses of Criminological Theory. Rawlins (2005) suggest that the criminal phenomenon is too complex to be explained by a single theory. Other theories suggest differently and; therefore, have varying explanations. This paper examines the Psychological, Biochemical, and Social Process theories to slightly explain Jeffrey Dahmer’s actions.
As you can see there is no perfect crime. The littlest piece of hair or paint or anything left behind can be found. Suspects often miss these tiny peieces of evidence and while they looked over it, it is still lurking at the crim scene. It is guarenteed that a Crime Scene Investigator will find this evidence no matter how small and use it to find, prosecute, and convict a criminal.
Serial murder investigations are the most difficult cases for investigators. Serial murder investigations can become wide spread, and can include many challenges that will require time, money and resources. An example of the commitment required to investigate a serial murder case is that of Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber. One investigator worked the investigation full time for 11 years. The day he made the Arrest was the day he retired. Serial murder is one of today’s most terrifying crimes. The killing of multiple people within various jurisdictions can alter everyday life for people residing within these communities. The result is intense pressure from the public and media placed on investigators to track down and apprehend these killers who commit such horrific acts to unsuspecting victims.
Keeney and Heide (1994) define serial murder to be the premeditated murder of three or more victims committed over time, in separate incidents, in a civilian context, with the murder being chosen by the offender. In recent years, there has been a considerable amount of research conducted in order to better understand and profile both male and female serial killers. With this new research in the law enforcement system, more information about female serial killers and how they tend to differ from their male counterparts is more accessible. The differences between male and female serial killers vary in many different areas such as victim damage, victim torture, weapon/method, stalking versus luring behavior, crime scene organization, reasons for murder, substance abuse history, psychiatric diagnosis, and household composition (Keeney and Heide, 1994). These differences, along with information describing the social background of the perpetrator, provide researchers and individuals in the law enforcement system with substantial signs that can be used to prevent further serial murders....
Serial killers have captivated the attention of scientists from the first signs of their existence to modern day. Interested by these killers’ inhumane actions, researchers set out to determine the cause of such graphic, horrific crimes. The brain has been brought into question regarding the motivation of these cold blooded killers. After extensive research, abnormalities of both the chemical composition and material makeup have been identified within the brains of numerous serial killers. These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.
When somebody passes away, the demise should be pronounced or confirmed by an expert. This typically implies you should call the ambulance or the appropriate authorities’ office so that a medical expert can affirm the demise and make it official. In the event that the demise comes about because of an accident or any other serious mishap, the deceased will either be declared dead at the scene or later at the hospital. For some unforeseen demises brought on by mishaps you don't have to call authorities' office since medical experts will be present and ready to claim the demise instantly.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
Organized killers often appear to many as socially normal. They typically plan their kills in advance, have some way of transportation, and carry a ‘murder kit’ with them which contains various tools necessary for their crimes. They also often cruise public spaces for victims which includes prostitutes, the homeless, teenagers, students walking on campuses, or active night spots such as bars and clubs. Additionally, their victims tend to fit a specific profile. The victims usually have the same hair color and are of the same race and ethnicity.
In conclusion, there are many factors that can affect a person’s mind on the acceptability of homicide, as well as the capability to commit homicide. Religion, culture, and socio-economic status are just a few of the factors but play a major role. They are used as either a crutch or an ideal solution, depending upon their raising. Each of these factors changes how a person can perceive themselves and what they do. Basically, a person is controlled by past experiences and cultural, religious, and socio-economic status influences. Throughout this paper, evidence supports that a person does not just go out and kill someone, something in their life has influenced them to do such an atrocious act to another person.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.