Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Race in relationship to crime and violence
Essays on violence and religion
Violence in Christianity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Race in relationship to crime and violence
Homicide Influences: How culture, religion, and the economy affect homicide rates
Throughout American history, many have tried to identify how the human mind operates. Most have come up with a solution different from the last. This paper will focus on what effects homicide rates such as prejudices, law, morals, and, in general, upraising. The three areas focused on are religion, socioeconomic structure, and culture. Each may be widely varied, but at the same time quite connected. The idea is to show how each of these statuses can affect an individuals’ mind to commit homicide. Furthermore, we shall see how each of the above affects and individual’s mind on how they perceive the acceptability of homicide.
Religion is a collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to spirituality and moral values. (Edit spacing) Moral values are the standards of good and evil, which govern an individual’s behavior and choices. It is our moral values that dictate what another person is to be perceived as good or evil. Most of the time, these are considered in black and white views with no regard for the various shades of grey. In the grey area, we will find a true person. The moral code, we follow determines whether one should commit homicide or make the decision to do the “right” thing. The paper found on this topic revolves around the Southern region, but further research was done to understand the Northern take on religion to better grasp the United States as a whole. It is believed that the South hold God closer to the body than North does in that they believe the Bible is truly the word of God and should be taken literally. “Personal salvation through faith is the only escape from eternal damnation....
... middle of paper ...
...r. This applies to the culture aspect as well. The cultures that are viewed as the lesser class are punished more than those who consider themselves better.
In conclusion, there are many factors that can affect a person’s mind on the acceptability of homicide, as well as the capability to commit homicide. Religion, culture, and socio-economic status are just a few of the factors but play a major role. They are used as either a crutch or an ideal solution, depending upon their raising. Each of these factors changes how a person can perceive themselves and what they do. Basically, a person is controlled by past experiences and cultural, religious, and socio-economic status influences. Throughout this paper, evidence supports that a person does not just go out and kill someone, something in their life has influenced them to do such an atrocious act to another person.
Within the first article, Muhlhausen uses effective rhetorical strategies to prove his point. He discusses how the death penalty is appropriate for heinous crimes. To illustrate, he gives specific facts about Earl Ringo, Jr. who shoots “Poyser to death,” and forces Joanna Baysinger, a manager-in-training, to give him $1,400 in a restaurant robbery (1). The specific detail Muhlhausen uses demonstrates how cruel the crime is. Ringo did not have to shoot the victim and the small amount of money did not warrant the murder of two people, for certain. Furthermore, Muhlhausen uses strong logos to prove the death penalty can actually deter homicides. He uses studies by Drexel University economist Bijou Yang and Richard Stockton College psychologist David Lester which found a “deterrent effect” on the number of murders when the death penalty is used (2). The length of this study, from 1978 to 2005 helps to
Morals are usually the standards by one which lives in, whether them being good or bad. However, how about when religion influences ones morals? Religion isn’t or it doesn’t work for everyone, and that’s okay. But, there are many people out there that religion influences their morals; and the most common reason for that is that religion was influenced into them and into their morals as a child. Iri...
A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it. Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with numerous images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by means of force. Thus, indoctrinating a nation of individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems can be resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating the fact that we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for individuals to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an individual strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period of time, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the ...
In 2012, there were an estimated 14,827 murders and non-negligent manslaughter crimes reported by all agencies in the United States according to the Uniform Crime Report at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter are defined “as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.” A 1.1 percent increase occurred from 2011 to 2012. But it should be noted, this is a 9.9 percent drop from the figure for 2008 and a 10.3 percent decrease from the number of murders recorded in 2003. Of the murders that occurred in 2012, it is estimated that 43.6 percent were reported in the south, 21.0 percent were from the Midwest, 21.0 percent were accounted from the west, and 14.2 percent were from the northeast
Bowers, W, Pierce, G., and McDevitt, J.(1984), Legal Homicide: Death as Punishment in America, 1964-1982, 333
Mass murder is defined by the FBI as the killing of three or more people in a single event or in the same day (Petersen & Farrington, 2007). Mass murderers are complex and can be examined by the many factors that regularly appear among them, such as violence precipitating events, weapon of choice, and mental illnesses. The motivations and methods for committing mass murder are easily broken down into specific groups, and through the examination of these definitions and specific cases there is much to learn about the mind of a mass murderer.
If the homicide rates don't continue to decline, the beautiful city of Indianapolis will not just be known for sports and amenities but criminal homicides as well. However, this has changed tremendously over the past four years. The Department of Public Safety Crime Analysis section (DPS CAS) released the criminal homicide statistic rates for the years of 2007-2010. These statistical rates pack a hard punch, for the criminal homicides which took place in 2007 and 2008 which, broke even both years resulting in 114 homicides for those two years. The homicide rate for the year of 2009 is at 100 and for 2010 the homicide rate is at 94. There's also a current year to date statistic chart from, The Department of Public Safety Crime Analysis Office which states that, there has been 81 homicides in Indianapolis so far from the dates of January 1, 2011 to October 8, 2011. Hopefully, the criminal homicide numbers will continue to decrease as the year’s progress (DPS CAS, 2011).
Jurik, Nancy C. and Russ Winn. 1990. “Gender and Homicide: A comparison of Men and
Over the years we have witnessed various crimes through mass media and the news. As we view the horrific events, we become heartbroken for the victim and their family members. Then we find ourselves wondering, what could have triggered someone to act in such a manner. How could someone enter a school, business, or night club to take the lives of innocent people? This paper will explore the risk factors of becoming an offender, theories of criminal behaviors, and three types of offenders based upon the case studies.
What is the scariest thing that makes people terrifying? The answer is totally different individually. However, if someone takes the time to think deeply and confront our society today, the answer would be the human. People commonly hear about murderers through the media, so many people live in a horror and find it dreadful to come out of house. “We have met the enemy, and his is us” (Walt Kelly, Pogo). Like this, murder is a terrible part of today’s world. From now on, people need to know what kind of person specifically become a murder and the reasons why. There are three factors that include development disorder factors that effect to the murderer depending on atmosphere of the family. Also, specific emotions can make people kill other people like psychopath. Last factor is a spiritual that is the main root for this problem. Development disorder, specific emotions and spiritual factors contribute to someone becoming a killer.
What makes a person kill? What is it that drives a living human being to take the life of another? This troubling query has plagued societies since the beginning of time. Poignant to all social strata, homicide is a mystery to the poor and the wealthy, the young and the old, women and men. Every type of person can be a killer, no matter what background, race or gender, and this is what makes killing so puzzling. the phenomenon challenges every nation, and almost every notion(from greed and lust to envy and anger) has been proposed as reasons why human beings destroy one another, yet not one of them is a solid explanation, the single key that would unlock the enigma. The question persists: why do people kill?
...ve a higher likelihood of committing homicide on other ethnic groups due to disregard in their societal rate.
Murder is consider morally wrong by the vast majority of the human race, and it is punished by the harshest means possible. Despite the fact that murder is unacceptable to most people (which human morals are based on what the majority of the population considers acceptable anyways), it is often excused in situations when the death of an individual or a group results in something of positive benefits, such as war. Despite that however, even the most moral person wi...
There are several different types of murderers, with one of the most popular in the media being a serial killer. A serial killer is someone who kills at least three people at different times with time in between murder described as a “cooling off period”. After killing, they feel a sense of relief for awhile, but when it wears off they feel the need to kill again to release their stress. People often times ask the question of why do the perpetrator’s feel the need to kill to relieve the stress they are feeling, and why they continue to do it. There are some factors that link brain anomalies, damage, and faulty genetics to the cause, but other factors include include the childhood development of the killer. Researchers Ressler and Shachtman
Religion has been influential in shaping laws and codes that govern our lives dating back to the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Babylon (Matthews, Noble, & Platt, 2014). These civilizations illustrated an overlap between legal systems and spiritual settings” (Rothkamm, 2008). Our laws are an extension of societal values and morality; therefore, religious influence is evident. “Religious inspiration is not only vital for the content of laws, but also their enforcement” (Rothkamm, 2008, p. 308). Furthermore, freedom of religion is imperative in the advancement of American society because religion influences many cultures, which further fosters community relationships and interaction. Our government recognizes the importance for religious choice by including many laws to protect individuals based upon those beliefs. “The practice of religion is good for individuals, families, states, and the nation” (Fagan, 1996, n.p.).