Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of social media on people
Psychological impact of social media
Effect of social media on people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When a person thinks of neurobiology of their brain they often don’t connect it to politics and how it can polarize a person, but what if they were greatly connected in many ways? Few people see this connection between their brain and politics because it is not obvious, but may not agree with it and believe there is another and bigger cause to our polarization. They believe this cause is social media. Experts say polarization in America has become an underlying problem in due to the persuasive social media, and the dominate neurobiology of our brains. Sources believe social media is a large aspect to why Americans are drastically polarized today. In an article by Nicholas Carr called “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics” Carr states “The …show more content…
That can cause the opposing party to see the information and automatically resent it and shut it out thus becoming more polarized. Another article named “Divided We Now Stand” by Susan Page states information that explains social media and how it makes Americans more polarized. Page states” A majority on both sides say politics are more divided because both parties have changed: Democrats becoming more liberal and Republicans more conservative.” This statement that Page made is due to social media which she talks about in the article. Social media does have an effect on a person’s political view because people often are …show more content…
In an article by Brian Resnick named “How Politics Breaks Our Brains, And How We Can Put Them Back Together” he describes “A team of British scientist published a paper and found that brain structures correlated with political orientation. Specifically, conservatives tended to have larger amygdala areas—brain matter that plays a role in fear conditioning—than liberals.” These findings make a lot of sense to people because it’s the way a person believes from when they are young. Also, many people will stand firmly behind what they believe in because they are often surrounded by people that have the same beliefs about politics. In a video by Hannah Holmes called “Red Brain, Blue Brain: The Neurobiology of Political Values” she states “In Personality testing the brains are very different. In the brain function there are differences. In the brain structure there are differences.” With this statement she is talking about how different the blue brain, other known as the Democratic brain, is from the red brain, other known as the Republican brain. Holmes also claims “A red brain perceives emotions that are more threating and dominate than a blue brain sees.” This statement although not always necessarily true makes Americans feel a sense of
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
Because the most polarized individuals are often the most politically active, they have the most influence on the government, which results in the election of polarized candidates and policies.
Sean Blanda’s, “The Other Side Is Not Dumb”, uses cultural examples concerning the younger American generation involving, the medias influence and peer pressure vs the actual facts and proof, involved while forming a personal opinion. The author emphasizes how the effects of pressure from our surroundings, such as: friends, media, and more, adjust our view of political and social subjects. He includes multiple cases of where your own ignorance can hinder your learning and interaction with others. If you continue to have a negative outlook on people who disagree with you, you’ll never be able to consider yourself a curious person and participate in social media. “We cannot consider ourselves “empathetic” only to turn around and belittle those that don’t agree with us.”- Mr. Blanda
The first example that was discussed was the radio. Before the radio, the people of America got information pertaining to politics via newspaper. The information they got was always written down. When the radio was invented, they people could hear the politicians giving speeches and could hear the emotion in their voice. With the addition of being able to hear the emotion, the people would be more inclined to back what the speaker is saying more than if they were to just read it on a newspaper. The next invention that changed politics was the television. With the television, people were able to see the politicians as if they were near them. Now the people can see the politicians and their appearance. With social media, the politicians’ personality is what’s being looked at. Instead of the normal politician personality, their personalities have to stand out or grab attention. Also, social media is short so the speeches that politicians say have to be shortened and have be
The purpose of this article is to persuade the reader that social media is the new alternative to mainstream big money ads for politicians. Cary’s intended audience is politicians, political campaign managers and politically engaged citizens. The tone of this article is informative but slightly opinionated. While Cary does back up her claims with notable quotes and statistics the main support for her argument is her professional opinion. Cary was formerly the
John Chambers of the University of Florida measures the difference between "actual" and "perceived" polarizat...
In conclusion, I believe that polarization exists in the United States. I agree with many of the points that Wilson brings up in his article, as states previously. The gap between liberals and conservatives is getting wider and wider, leaving nowhere for those with moderate views to be in the mix. Polarization is detrimental to our two party dominated republic, and it is difficult to determine what may fix our political system.
As the mind matures and grows, new opinions are formed with the help of the revolutionizing consciousness of humanity. The human conscious allows humanity to develop individually and gain unique cognitive patterns and thinking processes. However, these opinions can be manipulated by environmental sources, like the media. The media’s puppet strings can be used to influence the minds of the masses and control their overall thinking process. It takes away an individual’s freedom to think for themselves and form their own opinions. Manipulation is a key ingredient in attaining support for a side of an argument. News networks have this ability to twist the minds of their listeners and unconsciously force them to believe in their words. Two of the
Therefore, I try to figure out a connection between those political controversy and human’s behavior. I don’t actually think different opinions are scary at all because speech is the right bestowed by the first amendment and what determines who we are. But by showing how misleading words can be through Planned Parenthood issue, I want to use this research to emphasize how important it is for an audience to think critically when faced with controversy and dissenting voices.
Laurence Steinberg, a distinguished University Professor of psychology, specializing in child and adolescent psychological development, wrote an article Should the science of adolescent brain development inform public policy: neuroscience has made tremendous progress in studying the adolescent brain, opening opportunities--and raising challenges--for using the knowledge to inform a variety of public policies for Issues ,Science and Technology, Spring
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
Political socialization begins early on in life and is an ongoing process affecting individuals throughout. It is how people eventually identify personal beliefs and expectations in American politics. These political views can include our level of patriotism, faith in the democratic system, standards by which we hold governing bodies, and opinions regarding public policies. From the playground to the classroom, the office to the dinner table, much of our lives affect our political opinions. The most easily identified agents of this are family, schooling, peers, mass media, political parties and religious influences. Furthermore, these means indoctrinate us in the political society through four basic methods: latent, manifest, affective, and instrumental socialization.
In other words Political psychology does not only deals with psychology nor it is just political science; in its place, it is at the largest part and on a general level an application of what is known about the psychology of human to the study of politics.(Jervis, Huddy and Sears, 2003) Therefore it brings together multiple researchers as political scientists, sociologists, psychologists, communication researchers, educators, anthropologists and psychiatrists. The important thing that binds these researchers together is their common interest in explaining individual level political phenomena in different aspects of analysis like social or psychological.
Despite the drawbacks, social media has grown at a rate where it is inconceivable that things will change anytime soon. The field of research into changing brain patterns based on our increasingly umbilical devotion to social media platforms is still very much in its infancy, but will be a fascinating one to keep an eye on into the future. We are living in a brave new world, and advances in technology are only going to create even more ways of connecting and communicating with each other — virtually, at least.
The future of the United States government, policy structure, and elections will evolve around the emerging social media. How well politicians and government officials use the technology could shape the policies of our country.