More handpicked essays just for you.
Mass media and its impact on social values
Mass media and its impact on social values
Mass media and its impact on social values
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hotel Rwanda
Throughout the film, we see many kinds of sins. Social sin of commission is when a group of people commit a wrong act. The most evident example of this sin is the Hutus killing the Tutsis. The Hutus are a majoirty and the Tutsis are a very small minority who are nothing more than the cockroaches of society in the eyes of the Hutu’s. The Hutus had been opressed by Tutsis long ago but had later been left in charge and wanted to seek revenge on the Tutsis. The Hutu’s were dominant, controlling, and cruel. Social sin of omission is when a group of people do not act or get involved in a situation often beacuse they are fearful for their own lives. Social sin of omission is very similar to the bystander effect in the way that
…show more content…
people do not personally commit the act themselves but they witness the crime and do not act upon it. An example of this sin would be when the United Nations came to the rescue for the white people and turned a blind eye to the persecution of the Tutsis. Personal sin of commission is essentially the same as social sin but it is an individual commiting a wrong act rather than a group of people. General Bizimungu would be an example of this sin because he carried out the mass killings of the Tutsis. Personal sin of omission is when an individual knowingly does the wrong thing. An example of this sin is displayed by George Rutaganda; George was the Vice President of the Hutu military. He encouraged the killings of the Hutus and took advantage of Paul. George supplied Paul with what he needed for the hotel but took advantage of him because he knew that Paul’s wife was a Tutsi and he would do anything to protect her. Mortal sin is one of the worst sins a human being can commit. Mortal sinning is when one cuts off all ties with God and violates his law’s. Examples of mortal sins include adolatry, and murder. Mortal sinning takes place during the entire movie although a specific instance would be when the Tutsi prostitutes are caged in and beaten by the Hutu’s. Another example would be the killing of innocent people that we witness from begining to end. Venial sin is when an individual makes the choice to hurt their relationship with God, themself, and others, but do not permantely cut the tie.
Humans have the power to be good and bad, unfortunately, this film displays the bad that nests within us. Hotel Rwanda demonstrates how corrupt the human race truly is and the lack of acceptance we have for eachother. Over the course of the movie, we see many instances that demonstrate the broken nature of humanity. An example was when Colonel. Oliver, a Canadian United Nations peacekeeper told Paul to look at the situation from a Western’s point of view. He told Paul that he and his people were dirt and stated "You're black. You're not even a nigger. You're an African.” The UN peacekeeper tried to have Paul look at the crisis from the eyes of another nation to justify why no one would help the Tutsis in their time of need. This shows an extreme lack of tolerance as well as the lack of empathy that we possess. Another example of how venal and unethical humans can be is when the reporter spoke of the catastrophe and claimed that there were genocide like acts taking place but that no one would intervene unless it was titled as a genocide. The fact that a horrible situation like that could happen and no one was willing to do anything to help because it wasn’t labeled as a genocide is
shameful and reflects poorly on our human nature. According to Oxford Dictionary, a prophet can be defined as a person regarded as an inspired teacher or proclaimer of the will of God and a person who advocates or speaks in a visionary way about a new cause or theory. Paul can be considered a modern day prophet because he deeply cared about his family and all the other Tutis. At the begining of the movie, he was more reluctanct to help others because he felt that he needed to save the favours to use for his family, but as the movie goes on, we see the selfless transformation that Paul makes. He promised his family, friends, and all the refugees that he would protect them and constanly reassured them that they would be okay. Paul used his hotel to house hundreds of people and in doing that, he saved over a thousand people. Paul spoke out against the Hutus, called people for help, brought awareness to what was happening in Kigali, and gave up all that he had to save his family and friends. Despite the crisis that was taking place, Paul was able to stay positve throughout most of the movie and didn’t want to worry people anymore than he had to. Paul was welcoming, passionate, hopeful, kind hearted and heroic.
To start with, the movie and the book show a plethora of differences conveying the perspective of the genocide. First, while ethnic bloodlines were mixed in the country, Immaculée was a Tutsi girl that was raised in her parents’ love, which originally blinded her from the negativity of racism and prejudice. This was proven when Immaculée stated “…In our home, racism and prejudice were completely unknown”. Paul Rusesbagina on the other hand was a hotel manager and a successful businessman, not to mention he was of Hutu origin. Also the movie focuses primarily on him and his family while conveying the genocide from the events that were most relevant to the storyline. This is proven in the movie as he was one of the first and reoccurring characters we see within the conflicts throughout the movie from when Paul stated “…I’m sure you can take some money for your hard work”, to the Hutu commander when he was first asked for identification and within several other instances throughout the movie. In short, because the purpose of the film was to entertain the audience, the two hour movie cannot convey with detail the slaughter of 800,000 to 1,000,000 Tut...
In the film Hotel Rwanda and 1947 Earth you see many similar features such as tensions between 2 or more parties, friends betraying one another, rioting and military coups. Though rooted in different times and nations the two share very common attributes. And with respect to the viewer each story is told through the eyes of neutral parties such as Paul and his Hutu heritage and his wife’s Tutsi heritage, and Lenny-baby and her neutral Parsi family.
He places a lot of his emphasis on fear and intimidation as the main drivers of the violence and says that no matter what reason perpetrators gave for their individual participation, there was one main rationale that drove genocidal violence. That one rationale was that the violence occurred in the following way: “the RPF killed President Habyarimana; RPF soldiers had invaded to kill Hutus; all Tutsis were RPF supporters or potential supporters; ergo, Hutus had to kill Tutsis to prevent being attacked by them” (Straus 153). The most common reason respondents stated was the cause of the genocide was the death of their president, but some said it was because elites desired power. As a reader, it is hard to understand why perpetrators chose to kill people who did not pose any immediate threats when the perpetrators themselves feared insecurity. The Hutus believed that the Tutsis wanted to take back their power so the Hutu extremists had a goal of terminating them, but it is still difficult to interpret the happenings of the genocide because there were so many dynamics. But regardless of all that went on, in sum, The Order of Genocide maintains that three dynamics lead to the killing: war, race, and power. Without a war in Rwanda, the genocide may have just been unable to take place. But the war resulted in “fear, insecurity, rage, revenge, and self-defense” and tensed up the country to perform violent acts of killing (Straus, 173-174). Race allowed all Tutsis to be labeled as the enemy. And finally, power gave hardliners an ability of control to issue the elimination of all Tutsis and authorize the
The ethnic division within the Rwandan culture played an integral role during the genocide. In 1918, Belgium is given the authority to govern the territory of Rwanda-Urundi under the Treaty of Versailles. Under Belgian rule, the traditional Hutu-Tutsi relationship was morphed into a class system favouring the Tutsis over the Hutus. The Belgians eventually created a system of ethnic identity cards differentiating Hutus from Tutsis. This would become a central driver of the Rwandan genocide. In the movie there are many instances where Rwandan citizens are asked to show their identity cards. In most cases, those who were not Hutu would be punished. Another example of the geopolitical struggle between these two ethnicities was illustrated through the media. Media is used as a platform to convey a message that influences the thoughts and actions of individuals around the world. Since Hutus are the majority in Rwanda, they were able to exert their influence over the Tutsis through mechanisms such as the media. Throughout the country, local Hutu power radio stations were aired calling for the extermination of Tutsis. The station would often find ways to dehumanize the Tutsis. In most cases they would refer to Tutsis as ‘cockroaches’. In order to create an accurate portrayal of the genocide, the film used the exact recordings from the Hutu power radio.
...he Hutus being to care more about the benefits than thinking of the consequences of what they were actually doing. Ultimately, Machete Season, allows the killers to speak, and within their own words, we’re able to see what could really drive one to kill and commit genocide. Narrowing the reasons for the Rwandan genocide down to economic reasons may seem overly simplistic, but through killing their neighbors and thus looting them, the Hutus are able to deal with their underlying jealousy toward the Tutsis and take what they believe is theirs and that they deserve. This idea of the Hutus committing mass genocide of the Tutsis for economic reasons, and to get ahead in life seems scary in how simple it is. In a sense, one can begin to imagine how others could be driven to do whatever it takes to get ahead in life and get what they want; even it means they have to kill.
Poetry has a way of making us feel every range of emotion, in some cases better than other forms of entertainment. Unlike a novel, which gives a wide field of vision on any subject, poems have a more focused look mostly on the raw emotion of any one topic. Understanding poetry is an art onto itself, to be able to peel back the words and feel the emotions within them is truly its own work. Harder yet is the ability to dissect and explain these ideas to another person (in this case through an essay)and have them feel and see the poem and the topic it brings to light in the same way that you do. The poem that we will explore is powerful and thought provoking, because it brings the ugly subject of oppression to the front of your mind and forces you to engage in a conversation that you have no control over. It makes you feel hopeless and angry at the same time. In the poem Unwanted by Edward Field we are going to explore the parts of the poem but mainly we will
The state-sponsored massacres of Hutus by the Tutsi-dominated Burundian army in 1972 was one of the most significant post-Holocaust genocides and as such received appropriate levels of international attention due to a lack of political distractions within western nations. The genocide broke out as a Hutu-lead rebellion in which Hutu insurgents massacred Tutsis and resisting Hutus in the lakeside towns of Rumonge and Nyanza-Lac. As many as 1200 people killed in this initial incident, the Tutsi-dominated government responded by declaring martial law and systematically proceeded to slaughter Hutus (Totten 325). After hundreds of thousands of Hutus had been massacred by the Burundian government, the neighboring nation of Zaire aided the Hutus in a counteroffensive attack on the Tutsi-controlled army. Having succeeded in their effort, the genocide was quickly brought to international attention within a few days. The United Nations invested $25,000 from the World Disaster Relief Account’s fund...
...the hills of Rwanda will never be forgotten, and neither will the unspeakable horrors that took their lives. Every single person in this world must realize that we are all humans, we are all the same, and we all must work to promote peace. Above all, we must never let such violence, massacre, and bloodshed recur.
...war broke out in Rwanda between the Tutsi minority and the Hutu majority. After the Rwandan president Juvenal Habyarimana was killed and his plane was shot down, it sparked the organization of violence against the Tutsi across Rwanda. Between 800,000 and 1 million died. Since the 1989 overthrow of the Sudanese government by a military coup led by current President Omar al-Bashir, the second phase of the Sudanese civil war the government had bombed civilians and gave local militias the power to attack civilians across the country. From 1983 to 2005 an estimated 2 million Sudanese died due to combat tactics and famine. Why don’t we listen? Why doesn't the world look around and end these genocides? It’s because people care more about world domination than world peace. “When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.” -Jimi Hendrix
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
There are several ethical issues surrounding the decision by the Hutu politicians to start the genocide. It is unfair and unethical for the Hutus to blame the entire Tutsi tribe for the president’s death. The Hutu politicians are so much driven by hatred that they fail to consider the innocent lives to be lost in the planned genocide. Instead, they organiz...
When the Belgian colonizers entered Rwanda in 1924, they created an ethnic classification between the Hutu and the Tutsi, two tribes who used to live together as one. After independence in 1962, there was a constant power struggle between the two tribes. Former Canadian Prime Minister, Jean-Pierre Chrétien described the situation as “tribalism without tribes.” (Destexhe, 1995) There were many signs leading towards genocide, yet the nations in power chose to ignore them. From April 6, 1994 until mid-July, a time spanning approximately of 100 days, 800,000 people were murdered when the Hutu attacked the Tutsi. No foreign aid came to the rescue until it was too late. Ten years after the genocide the United Nations was still involved in Rwanda, cleaning up the mess that was left behind because of man’s sinful nature. Could the Rwandan Genocide have been prevented, or is it simply a fact of life? Even though the international community is monitoring every country and race, such an event as the Rwandan Genocide could occur again because the European colonizers introduced ethnic classification where it did not exist and the nations in power chose to ignore the blatant signs of genocide.
... involved led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Rwandan people. The UN's involvement in Rwanda is considered to be a prime example of the ineffectiveness of international law and the UN's inability to deal with conflicts.
In 1994 in Rwanda, a million members of the Tutsi tribe were killed by members of the Hutu tribe in a massacre that took place while the world looked away. "Hotel Rwanda" is not the story of that massacre. It is the story of a hotel manager who saved the lives of 1,200 people by being, essentially, a very good hotel manager
Throughout history the region of Africa, presently known as Rwanda has seen a major rivalry and political instability. From the early 14th century to the 20th century the Hutu’s and the Tutsi’s were foraged into the perfect ingredients for a ticking time bomb. The political structures set up along the way by the earliest settlers and the German and Belgian colonists ultimately lead to a divide and hatred between the two groups. This hatred built up and eventually caused a massive genocide. This genocide could have been prevented if the political structures didn’t bring on favoritism and political divide.