Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar (i.iii.142-148)
Julius caesar (i.iii.142-148)
Julius caesar (i.iii.142-148)
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius caesar (i.iii.142-148)
Quod natum est Imperii
In 27 B.C. The Roman Republic fell into disarray, in its wake, the great-nephew of Julius Caesar, Octavian. Later named Augustus when he became emperor, he would become the leader of the greatest empire ever built. This began the Pax Romana, the “Roman Peace”, and an empire was born. A period of turmoil and strife was being dissolved; peace and prosperity began to surge through the veins of Rome. Little did they know these veins would once again clot in the years ahead.
Tragedy at Teutoburg
Augustus became a god-like figure to the Romans. During Augustus’ reign, Rome expanded to its pinnacle of power and was flourishing in every area. Rome was now a goliath, the superpower of the ancient world, recently spreading
…show more content…
Ruling from 54-68 A.D, he is often portrayed as an atrocious ruler, yet also seen as a man of the arts and the people as some historians debate (Jarus) . Despite his good deeds, the list of atrocities he committed are near endless and often outweigh them. Among these acts lie: The killing of his own mother; sentencing his first wife, Octavia, to death for not giving him an heir, charging her of adultery to justify his actions; and personally strangling his young nephew for playing emperor, seeing it as a threat to his power. He was very self centered and determined to get his way. He went to the senate and proposed that he would rebuild a third of Rome to build the “Neropolis”, a collection of elaborate palaces. This is the reason he is blamed for The Great Fire of Rome of 64 A.D. It wasn’t long after this proposal that shops within the Circus Maximus caught fire, While this was relatively common in the hot summer months this fire had been different. Rapidly, the fire spread, eventually engulfing more than two-thirds of the entire city. The fire raged for six days until it was controlled; however, it re-emerged and continued to burn for three days,converting even more of the great city to ash, before it was finally tamed. Of the total 14 districts of Rome, all but four were damaged or destroyed; within the lost districts laid the ruins of two of Rome’s most eloquent religious sites - The Temple of Jupiter Stator and …show more content…
Most of the city was burned and many of the middle class men and poor had no place to go. The fire destroyed food, materials, arms, a multitude of religious artifacts, anything that Rome would need to survive, both spiritually and physically, was mostly burned. Nero needed a lot of money to rebuild the city and his palaces, which he ran out of relatively quickly. He decided that the best approach was to increase taxes across the empire, especially in the North. The barbarians who lived under Roman control would not take this lightly. But the taxation wasn't enough. Ordering his soldiers to steal the riches from the temples of the gods in order to pay for the costs. Most Romans saw this as sacrilegious. To steal from the gods was of the highest disrespect to the gods and Rome. (Ewhelan) In time, Nero’s support declined more and more. Eventually the praetorian guard thought that this was enough and publicly deemed Nero an enemy of the State. Nero committed suicide the next day. Leaving Rome without a leader, and angered populace and army, a terrible
Augustus was born in Rome on September 23, 63 B.C. He was originally named Gaius Octavianus, but when his great-uncle, Julius Caesar, was murdered, he took his name. Augustus’ real father died when his son was only four. Augustus was adopted in Julius Caesar’s will and was left to be his heir at the age of eighteen. Caesar was very fond of his grand-nephew and he sent him to the College of Pontifices at the age of sixteen. When Caesar was assassinated, Augustus was in Illyria, where he was sent to serve. It was only when he returned to Italy that he learned he was his great-uncle’s heir.
He cooled his temper by watching chariot racing, wrestling bouts and acting and singing competitions which was ‘appalling’ to the people of Rome. All of his executions were directed towards political opponents and unlike his immediate predecessors there is no reason to believe he enjoyed their deaths (Dennison, 2012). This however is very subjective as there are primary sources like Suetonius and Tacitus that say the opposite of this, that Nero did enjoy the executions of his rivals death. Nero reacted harshly to accusations of treason against himself and the senate and because of this people, if caught trying to overturn him, were exiled and executed ("Nero", 2017). One of the people Nero had executed was Seneca, Neros former tutor and mentor ("Who is Nero? Everything You Need to Know", 2017). By Nero executing his rivals, he made people scared to overturn him and changed future beliefs of emperors. It changed future emperors beliefs because they had less tolerance for conspirators making Nero an
Augustus Caesar spent his time as ruler making Rome a peaceful place. He died on August 19, 14 A.D in Nola, Italy. His last words to his subjects was “ I found Rome of clay; I leave it to you of marble,” but to his friends he said “Have I played the part well? Then applaud me as I exit.” Soon after that the Roman Senate officially declared their departed emperor, to be a god.
The fall of the Western Roman Empire was the first example in history on the collapse of a constitutional system which was caused by the internal decay in political, military, economics, and sociological issues. The government was becoming corrupt with bribery. Commanders of the Roman army turned their own army inward towards their own Constitutional systems, fueled by their own ruthless ambition. This paper will talk about how the violence and internal turmoil in 133B.C.-27 B.C. was what provoked the economic stagnation in the city of Rome and to the end of the Republic and the many corrupt politicians and generals who only thought of nothing more than personal gains and glory. The senate lost control of the Roman military and the reason they rose against the senate was because the senate were no longer able to help manage the social problems or the military and administrative problems of the empire. The economics of the Roman Empire soon hit rock bottom due to the high taxation to support the army. Gold was also eroding since Rome was no longer bringing new resources through the expansion. Emperors then tried to mint coins out of silver and copper instead and the end result was inflation and dramatic rises in
Over the span of five-hundred years, the Roman Republic grew to be the most dominant force in the early Western world. As the Republic continued to grow around the year 47 B.C it began to go through some changes with the rise of Julius Caesar and the degeneration of the first triumvirate. Caesar sought to bring Rome to an even greater glory but many in the Senate believed that he had abused his power, viewing his rule more as a dictatorship. The Senate desired that Rome continued to run as a republic. Though Rome continued to be glorified, the rule of Caesar Octavian Augustus finally converted Rome to an Empire after many years of civil war. Examining a few selections from a few ancient authors, insight is provided as to how the republic fell and what the result was because of this.
In the early first century AD, the Roman Empire was subject to autocratic rule and the old Republic was long dead. Augustus had been ruling for forty years and most of that time he was loved and praised by the Senate and the people of Rome. Throughout his reign, Augustus had the one lingering problem of finding a successor to take over the role of Emperor. He had chosen 3 different heirs in his time of rule; however, they all passed before they had the chance to inherit Augustus’ esteemed power. His fourth choice, Tiberius, was the one to succeed Augustus. He was often referred to, by Augustus, as an outstanding general and the only one capable of defending Rome against her enemies. The statement, ‘Tiberius is condemned by many ancient historians (including Tacitus), and his reign is often portrayed as being detrimental to the welfare of the Roman Empire’ is invalid as he treated the senate fairly, created strong economics and security in the state and boosted the empire into an unprecedented state of prosperity. This hypothesis will be proven through this essay by analyzing factors such as Tiberius’ administration of the Empire, his relationship with the senate, his financial control, the effect of Sejanus over his rule and why were his last years as Emperor referred to as a ‘reign of terror’ by Tacitus.
Augustus created the office of emperor with the Augustan Principate, which was “to have no institutionalized authoritarian power, no perpetual dictatorship such as Julius Caesar had had himself voted early in 44, or anything like it (Stockton, 124).” Despite his wishes the people of Rome ended up giving Augustus eternal office, and powers to control the Senate with the rights to dictate agendas and veto (Stockton, 128). The people of Rome had created a position of absolute power, the exact thing Augustus was attempting to prevent. At the time the people of Rome could not have realized what they were creating in the office of emperor, for Augustus was a great man whose leadership created a great shadow over the shoulder of any future emperor.
His fourteen-year reign represented everything decadent about the Julio-Claudian period of the Roman Empire. His self-indulgent, cruel and violent affairs continued the economic chaos that had plagued the Roman citizenry since the days of Tiberius (Champlin, 1990). In the first five years as emperor, Nero gained a reputation for political generosity, promoting power sharing with the Senate and ending closed-door political trails. However, he generally pursued his own passions and left the ruling to his three key advisers – the Stoic Philosopher Seneca, the prefect Burrus and Nero’s mother Agrippina (Armstrong, 2012). Nero was a reckless and selfish adolescent when he ascended to Emperor, as highlighted by Suetonius within his historical scripture, ‘The Twelve
...eat. Every decision that Rome made had a great affect on the city itself and the rest of the world. Many foolish emperors weakened the city and eventually cause the many aspects of life to crumble. The social issues were that no one took interest into Public affairs. The Political issues were that because no one took any public interest in government jobs, because there were not looked at as something that was good. The Economic issues were that they had poor harvest. Food was scarce people needed food so they went after it. The Germanic tribes started taking over the western half of the empire.
“He is said to have been tall of stature… except that towards the end.” What was it that really led to the fall of the Roman Republic? There are a lot of different factors to consider when trying to determine what caused the collapse. By examining The Rubicon, The Life of Julius Caesar, and some accompanying handouts from class, this paper will discuss how the Roman Republic did not collapse because of one factor. The collapse of the Roman Republic was like that of a game of Jenga. Factors were pulled out of the Republican system just like a game of Jenga until the Republic could not stand anymore.
Octavian, or Caesar Augustus, was an effective ruler, implementing reforms that positively affected virtually all areas of life throughout the Empire. Social, economic, and political tensions that had led to so much violence in earlier years were calmed by Augustus's policies. Corruption and abuses of the people were also given attention by the Emperor. The borders of the Roman Empire grew dramatically under Augustus's rule, adding material wealth and manpower to Rome's already significant resources.
Ultimately, the Roman Republic’s downfall lay in its lack of major wars or other crises, which led to a void of honor and leadership. War united all of Rome’s people, and provided the challenge to its leaders to develop honor and leadership by their causes and actions. The lack of war allowed the Roman Republic to stagnate and become self-indulgent. By the end of the Punic Wars, which combined these elements, Rome was sure to fail. Without a common thread uniting its society, the Roman Republic unraveled because it had nothing left holding it together.
"Rome, History of Ancient Rome From Its Founding To Collapse." World History International: World History Essays From Prehistory To The Present. Web. 16 Dec. 2009. .
Reacting to nearly everything in mockery of the Roman values, the intentions of Nero’s positive displays of the values have been questioned throughout time. Following Nero’s suicide, in July of 69 CE while in Egypt gaining control of grain supply, Nero’s general Vespasian concluded the Year of Four Emperors with the eastern legions’ decision that he was to be Rome’s new emperor (“History”). Leaving for Rome that December and returning in 70 CE Vespasian’s removal of his own sandals upon arrival would stand out as one of his greatest examples of moral uprising over Nero. While Vespasian utilized the Roman values with approach to his personal affairs to better the empire by doing the greater good for the greatest number throughout his rule that lasted until his death in 79 CE, Nero’s concept of a greater good was hedonistic while his greatest number, he believed, was the number of one (“Nero”). Ultimately, Nero thought of himself as a