IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 3
“Perhaps the world progress not by maturing, but by being in a permanent state of adolescence, of thrilled discovery,” says Julian Barnes. Within the story Frankenstein, the author, Mary Shelley, portrays Victor Frankenstein as adolescence, seeking to find the thrill in creating life with his own hands while in another sense, the creature acts as an adolescence fighting for the attention of its father. The characters’ actions in the book almost correlate to Mary Shelley’s life. Mary Shelley was not an ordinary 19 year old teen. Born into a family of romantic poets, Shelley already had an idea of what her life would consist of. She started off studying her parent’s work, later falling into Gothic
…show more content…
novels. In 1814, she started a scandalous relationship with the then married Percy Bysshe Shelley, her dad’s political follower. The two went on an expedition to France. Upon their return, Mary was with child. Their child was born prematurely, resulting in an early death. They went through a roller coaster of obstacles, such as ostracism and constant debt, but they overcame the negatives and married in 1816 after the suicide of her husband’s first wife. The newlywed couple then spent the summer with some friends near Geneva, granting Mary Shelley with the idea of Frankenstein. In 1818, the couple left Britain for Italy, where she had another two miscarriages, but she did not give up there. She then gave birth to her last and only surviving child, Percy Florence Shelley. A few years later, another traumatic death happened. It was her husband. He drowned when sailing his boat in a very chaotic storm. A year later, she then returned to Great Britain with the goal of properly raising her son; however, she sadly failed at so because she died from illness of a brain tumor. Even though it is not explicitly written, the book, Frankenstein, has a lot to do with how Mary Shelley portrays her life. The Creature, Victor Frankenstein, and Mary Shelley all have IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 4 characteristics of one another and many of the events that happened in her life are more vividly stressed in her gothic novel. In the theories of language and acquisitions, is it reasonable to believe that the creature could learn to speak by listening to others and reading without any real human interaction, that Victor was solely responsible for the Creature’s actions, and that this is a story of redemption? It is reasonable to believe that the creature could learn to speak by listening and reading without human interaction. For starters, human babies are able to interpret what their parents are trying to disseminate with them even though the baby is not able to speak. In an article, Paul C. Holinger M.D., says, (2012) “During infancy, the baby and caretakers communicate through facial expressions and gestures and sounds…” In the early stages of childhood, kids are not really cognizant of what their parents are telling them; however, the tone in which the baby's parents say something can trigger a child’s sense on whether it is good or bad. For example, when a parent rejects their baby's request, the baby is aware that it is not getting what it wants, resulting in the baby pouting or crying. The baby knows that it is not going to get what it want because it can hear the tone in the voice change once the parents say no to the request. In another sense, if the parents approach the baby smiling and making googly eyes, the baby is aware and receptive of the love and affection given by the parents. Furthermore, not only can babies comprehend human language without speaking it animals can as well. In an online article, Simon Plant/Corbis explains, (2015) “It turns out that people who talk to their dogs may be onto IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 5 something. Studies show that the average dog can understand about 165 different words, in some cases more if you make a point of training them… Posture, context, and daily routines, as well as words, play an important role in a canine communication, according to Jessica Beymer…” With training pets, a lot of communication is needed. For example, when a dog owner wants to take their dog for a walk in the park, the owner can speak “leash” and the dog can understand that the owner is referring to a thick string to allow them to venture throughout the neighborhood. When owners put a word and an object together while training their dog makes it easier for dogs to understand what they are trying to say no only because of the tone of the word but also because there is an image that goes with it. In conclusion, within the book, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley vividly describes how the creature was observant of what the family, he was watching was doing. In Frankenstein, the creature says, (1818), “By degrees I made a discovery of still greater moment. I found that these people possessed a method of communicating their experience and feelings to one another by articulate sounds. I perceived that the words they spoke sometimes produced pleasure or pain, smiles or sadness, in the minds and countenance of the hearers. This was indeed a godlike science, and I ardently desired to become acquainted with it.” Here the creature becomes aware of the family corresponding with one another, which intrigued him to learn the “godlike science.” Therefore, he started to observe their actions and sounds, mocking them so he could then pick up their system of messaging. For example, in the story the more he paid attention to the family, he was observing, he soon learned the names of familiar objects, such as fire, milk, and bread. Once he mastered that, he taught himself how to speak and read IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 6 without an actual connection with humans, resulting in him learning the cottagers’ names, sister, father, Agatha, and Felix.
The creature soon began to understand human language, so he started to read the book he took from Victor Frankenstein’s lair, giving him the information on how he became. Fully understanding of things, the creature is now responsible for his sayings and actions.
Throughout the story, Victor Frankenstein became less and less responsible for the creature’s actions. At the beginning of the creature’s life, Victor can be held accountable for the creature’s actions because he is the one that “birth” it. In the beginning of Chapter 5 of the novel, Frankenstein, Victor expresses how ugly the creature is saying, (1818) “How can I describe this catastrophe, or how delineate the wretch whom with such infinite pains and care I had endeavored to form? His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful!--Great God!” Victor created a hideous monster, not with the intentions on making him ugly. “Collecting bones from charnel houses; and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame” is how Victor brought this monster together; sounds like Victor is a child at play with his new toys, in a rush to put them together, resulting in the creature’s body becoming an ugly and botched together a disgraceful figure of nature as if it was a rag doll. It was just Victor’s fantasy of autonomy that he tried to make become
…show more content…
true. The creature’s looks are a violation of social norms, making people turn their noses up and being afraid of him, resulting in its loneliness. The monster’s ugliness exemplifies his impurities, which soon lead him to be a brutal and cold hearted killer. Further into Chapter 5, Victor IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 7 Frankenstein says, (1818), “Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room, and continued a long time traversing my bed-chamber, unable to compose my mind to sleep” This is the first action of abandonment by Victor. When the creature experienced this he began to act with a heart of hatred because he had no actual guidance in his life. He had no actual figure to teach it right from wrong. For example, once a son’s father leaves out of his life, which leaves the son with no guidance on how to be a respectful and responsible young man. Parents are needed in children’s lives to spend quality time in teaching them the facts of life and correct behavior. If Victor, the father, stayed to take care of his responsibility, the creature, majority of the deaths that happened in the novel wouldn’t have happened. The only thing the monster wanted throughout the story was accepted and a family that it could gain love from. That’s why he blamed Victor for his actions. Finally, in Chapter 10, the Creature says, (1818), “You accuse me of murder; and yet would, with a satisfied conscience, destroy your own creature. Oh, praise the eternal justice of man! Yet I ask you not to spare me: listen to me; and then, if you can, and if you will, destroy the life work at your hands.” In those lines, the creature makes it clear to Victor Frankenstein that he is the blame for all of his actions. The creature explains to Victor because of lack in raising him caused the creature to learn things on his own. Along the route of him learning who he was, a few people died, but that was because he was also fighting for the attention of his father. Frankenstein is held responsible for all the actions simply because he is the creator. Without the creature, majority of the issues caused by it wouldn’t have happened. He spent his precious time creating the monster; he should have spent just as much time perfecting it. However, the creature soon started to redeem himself and that’s how this is a story of redemption. IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 8 Throughout the novel, Frankenstein, the monster that Victor Frankenstein created badly suffered from being different.
However, it does try to redeem himself within Victor. At the beginning of the story when his loneliness was getting the best of him, but then he found the family, that he soon fell in love with. He admired them from afar because he was still too scared to introduce himself. In Chapter 12, it reads, (1818) “I had admired the prefect forms of my cottagers—their grace, beauty, and delicate complexions: but how as I terrified when I viewed myself in a transparent pool! At first I started back, unable to believe that it was indeed I who was reflected in the mirror; and when I became fully convinced that I was reality the monster I am, I was filed with the bitterest sensations of despondence and mortification. Alas! I did not yet entirely know the fatal effects of this miserable deformity.” In these lines, the creature speaks on how seeing the family creates a door for him to escape his state of depression, helping him to forget his problems. He visualizes them as perfect; however, when he gets a reminder of how he really looks it is like a reminder and a minor setback for him. So at this point, the family is like his therapy helping him to get to a normally happy state in his life. Soon thereafter, the creature builds up the courage to speak to the old man, resulting in the family fighting against him, rounding up their things, and running away from the monster. So
the monster then decided to seek out his creator to get unanswered questions answered. In Chapter 13, the creature distraughtly says, (1818) “Of my creation and creator I was absolutely ignorant; but I knew that I possessed no money, no friends, no kind of property. I was more agile than they, and could subsist upon coarser diet; I bore the extremes of heat and cold with less injury to my frame; my stature far exceeded theirs. When I looked around, I saw and heard of none like me. Was I then a monster, a blot upon the earth, from which all men fled, and whom all men disowned?” IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 9 After being abandoned by his intangible family, he sits and tries to think what he is to do next. He comes to a conclusion that the best thing for him to do is to look for his “father”. The creature went to look for Victor Frankenstein, and along the way, he came up with a plan so that he could have eternal happiness. The creature was going to blackmail Victor into making him a woman companionship. The woman companionship is wanted to fill that hole that Victor Frankenstein bolted into the creature’s heart. The fact that Victor knows this is the only reason he originally agree to it; however, after giving it some thought, he soon decides not to create another creature. He thinks well if this one has so many insecurities and problems, why make two? This sets the creature off. The creature that was once on the road to redemption quickly intertwined with the killer monster. In Chapter 2, Victor tells Frankenstein, (1818) “You can blast my other passions; but revenge remains—revenge, henceforth dearer than light or food! I may die; but first you, my tyrant and tormentor, shall curse the sun that gazes on your misery. Beware; for I am fearless, and therefore powerful. I will watch with the wiliness of a snake, that I may sting with its venom. Man, you shall repent of the injuries you inflict.” The creature, here, promises to place torment and fear on Victor until the day he dies. The creature soon ends up killing everyone that Victor truly cares about. The creature has already killed William, Victor’s younger brother, and Justine, Victor’s adopted cousin. He has now killed Clerval. Not only does he kill Clerval, he sets Victor up as the murder. So Victor doesn’t k now that Clerval is dead until he is taken into police custody and questioned of his whereabouts. Victor then breaks down mentally. Victor starts to fear everything. He starts to hallucinate and think that everything is the creature. He feels as IN THE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE 10 though everywhere he goes the monster is creeping behind him. He feels so guilty that he never again has a conscience mind. He dies telling his story as the monster watches from afar. The novel Frankenstein, tells that without human contact a person can still learn how to communicate, the deaths in the story all lie on Victor’s shoulders, and that the story could have been a story of redemption. Throughout the story, Mary Shelley leaves the readers open to ask many questions. For example, what if Frankenstein had created another creature so that the Creature could have a companion? If he had and the womanly creation turned out to be 10 times worse than the original creature, do you feel as though the original creature would have become jealous? Then, a war among the two broke out? However, Frankenstein was still in the mix because he was the creator. Mary Shelley leaves so many doors open for the readers to imagine and assume conclusions throughout the novel that it becomes insane. In the story, Victor is to blame for the creature’s action; however, if that’s the case, why is Victor the most desired character in the story. Victor has the love, the family, the knowledge, and the girl that the creature dreams of, but he doesn’t put it to use. Victor could have prevented all the misfortunes that soon stood upon him if he had taken care of his responsibilities, but he didn’t.
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
The creature seeks revenge for the misdeeds committed against him, but also feels immense remorse for the things he has done. This revenge seems monstrous because it is committed by someone “hideous.” If it was committed by any other human in the book, it would be viewed differently. It is a very human thing to seek revenge for being wronged. Often, humans commit acts against their own kind for lesser reasons and with less provocation than the creature. In some instances, like the case of Victor’s brother, William, the creature did not mean to harm him, he did not know his own
After the monster is born and he has a fit, we see the lowest point so
“I now hasten to the more moving part of my story. I shall relate events that impressed me with feelings which, from what I was, have made me what I am” (Shelley 92). Frankenstein’s Creature presents these lines as it transitions from a being that merely observes its surroundings to something that gains knowledge from the occurrences around it. The Creature learns about humanity from “the perfect forms of [his] cottagers” (90). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein offers compelling insights into the everlasting nature versus nurture argument. Her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote, “Treat a person ill, and he will become wicked.” Shelley believes that the nurture of someone, or something, in the Creature’s case, forms them into who they become and what actions they take. While this is true for Frankenstein’s Creature, the same cannot be said about Victor Frankenstein.
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
Although the Creature later went on to commit crimes, he was not instinctively bad. Victor’s Creature was brought into this world with a child-like innocence. He was abandoned at birth and left to learn about life on his own. After first seeing his creation, Victor “escaped and rushed downstairs.” (Frankenstein, 59) A Creator has the duty to teach his Creature about life, as well as to love and nurture him. However, Victor did not do any of these; he did not take responsibility for his creature. One of the first things that the creature speaks of is that he was a “poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but feeling pain invade me on all sides, (he) sat ...
“Allure, Authority, and Psychoanalysis” discusses the unconscious wishes, effects, conflicts, anxieties, and fantasies within “Frankenstein.” The absence of strong female characters in “Frankenstein” suggests the idea of Victor’s desire to create life without the female. This desire possibly stems from Victor’s attempt to compensate for the lack of a penis or, similarly, from the fear of female sexuality. Victor’s strong desire for maternal love is transferred to Elizabeth, the orphan taken into the Frankenstein family. This idea is then reincarnated in the form of a monster which leads to the conclusion that Mary Shelley felt like an abandoned child who is reflected in the rage of the monster.
The Creature, after learning what it is to love, requests that Victor creates a companion for him. Victor rejects the creature’s proposition, as Victor now understands the consequences of animating what shouldn't be alive, the Creature wants nothing more than for Victor to suffer, to feel the pain that he, as a wretch, faces. The Creature does so by devoting his life to the destruction of Victor’s. In chapter 24, the Creature states “But it is even so; the fallen angel becomes the malignant devil.” The creature is viewed as entirely evil by the characters of the novel, despite the scenes in which his benevolent nature is shown. It is ironic that Victor and his creature are foils of one another, yet they suffer a similar fate: their desire to destroy one another led to their ultimate
The idea for the novel of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein came to her one night when she was staying in the company of what has been called ‘her male coterie’, including Lord Byron and her husband, Percy Shelley. Mary Shelley’s whole life seems to have been heavily influenced by men. She idolised her father, William Godwyn, and appears to have spent a good part of her life trying very hard to impress both him and her husband. There seems to have been a distinct lack of female influence, her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, having died weeks after her birth, being replaced by a neglectful step-mother. These aspects of her life are perhaps evident in her novel. The characters and plot of Frankenstein were perhaps influenced by Shelley’s conflicting feelings about the predominately masculine circle which surrounded her, and perhaps the many masculine traits that we see in novel were based upon those of the male figures in Shelley’s own life. In this essay I will attempt to show some of these traits.
People are defined by their environment and how they react to their environment. Environments that appear to be perfect on the outside may very well be the cause of misery in man's life because one must be able to cope with their environment. Victor could not cope with his environment and lashed out at the world by trying to attain power. However, things do not always go as planned, and sometime this may be beneficial. One should not judge by external appearance alone. It is what is on the inside that counts. Had Victor Frankenstein been taught ethics such as this, his life, as well as the lives of those he loved, could have been saved. Also, the life of the creature could have been free of pain and hatred. The monster is a symbol for the outcasts and rejected of society. He is also a reflection of Victor, meaning that Victor was also considered an outcast. The reality of an animated object reflecting something that one does not want to see, combined with being alone in the world, is enough to drive man mad. The monster, in some ways, creates a harsh reality for Victor. Either love what you create or be destroyed by it.
The monster does not resemble Victor physically; instead, they share the same personalities. For example, Victor and the monster are both loving beings. Both of them want to help others and want what is best for others. Victor and the monster try to help the people that surround them. Victor tries to console his family at their losses, and the monster assists the people living in the cottage by performing helpful tasks. However, Victor and the monster do not reflect loving people. The evil that evolves in Victor’s heart is also present in the monster.
She was an avid reader from a young age, therefore quite smart and literate. Young Victor was evidently a bright person, as he went on to University, and developed into an extremely enthused scientist. Many things in Shelley’s life seemed to be prefigurations to events which were to be later written in Frankenstein, as did, also, events in the novel seem to occur later to Shelley in life. In the Frankenstein novel a young girl drowns, due to the appearance of the monster.
Even when Victor rejects him, the monster still seeks love from society and performs unselfish acts. He seeks the love from others. Longing for company, the monster stays in the cottage without revealing him and watches the family that lives there. By watching them he learned how to speak and read. The monster tried to understand the meaning of “beauty”. He somewhat understood why people he had interacted with had treated him ill and he realized that it was because they were frighten by his hideous appearance. “The absolute other cannot be selfed, that the monster has properties which will not be constrained by proper measure”(Spivak). This goes back to the idea of “other”, now the monster himself understand that he 's different from human, that he doesn 't have the properties as human do so he must be interior to them. Furthermore we see that by watching the family in the cottage, the monster soon starts to love the family. He liked the way they had affection and love they had for each other. “The gentle manners and beauty of cottagers greatly endeared them to me; when they were unhappy, I felt depressed; when they rejoiced, I sympathized in their joy”(Shelly100). This shows that the monster was very loving and caring towards the family as would a innocent
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.
As a romantic novel Victor is responsible, because he abandoned his creation. As an archetype novel, Victor is the villain, because he was trying to play god. Finally, Victor as a Gothic novel, Victor is at fault, because, he and the creature are two different parts of the same person. If Frankenstein is looked at as a romantic novel, Victor, not the creature, is truly the villain. When Victor created the creature, he didn't take responsibility for it. He abandoned it, and left it to fend for itself. It is unfair to bring something into the world, and then not teach it how to survive. The creature was miserable, and just wanted a friend or someone to talk to. On page 115, the creature said, "Hateful day when I received life! Accursed the creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust." This line shows the agony the monster was in, because of how he looked when he was created which led to even Victor running away from him. If Victor didn't run, he could have taught the monster and made his life happy. After the creature scared the cottagers away he said, "I continued for the remainder of the day in my hovel in a state of utter ...