Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of Social Media in American Politics essays
Social media and election influence
Social media and election influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Role of Social Media in American Politics essays
Social media is a powerful tool, it offers an online medium that has the ability to bring millions of individuals together daily. Due to instant connections available through social media, information is moving faster than it ever has before.The American Marketing Association found that in 2015 there were 1.96 billion social media users with an estimated 2.44 billion users to be in 2018 (“ Number of Social Network Users Worldwide). Politics is one topic that users of social media can not stay away from. Networks such as Twitter and Facebook have been mediums for the discussion of politics for years. Social media influencing voter participation, strengthening the relationships between voters and politicians, as well as affecting individuals …show more content…
Politicians want to see the masses get out and vote in their next election. Social media has means to help the issue of low voter participation within the campaign. Research involving social media and its relationship to voter turnout was conducted by Elizabeth Housholder. The study "Political social media engagement" involved 1,628 internet users, who were subject to surveys regarding online participation with politics and its relation to real world participation. The study analyzed these individuals amount of social media engagements with politics, such as following or liking politicians pages, starting political groups, or participating in online political activities. That data was then compared with the dependent variables of whether an individual donated to a political party, whether an individual volunteered for a campaign online, and vote choice in the election. It was found that those individuals who did engage with a campaign through social media increased their likelihood of voting by three times, and it was also found that interacting with a campaign on social media positively predicted vote choice. It was stated in the study's conclusion that "social media efforts produce both online and offline benefits that can help achieve key campaign goals." (Housholder and Lamarre) This study uses quantitative data to suggest the effects that social media can have on real world politics and directly relates …show more content…
A political leader expresses their views and plans for reform in the system, while millions of Americans look on either in person, or through a television. Things have changed as social media allows for back and forth interactions of individuals. To share thoughts and ideas between politicians and voters, as well as voter to voter is a great way to spread information and further politics. A favorite can express agreement for a statement while a retweet spreads the message even further. Political leaders also hold these online profiles, President Obama holds the third most followed twitter page in the world racking in 65.6 million followers. Tweeting to power is a book which looks at the power of social media and politics. Jason Gainous and Kevin Wagner speak of how audiences have changed from being passive, to being able to participate in the discussion through the power of social media. It is stated that social media allows for "interaction without regard to geography." (Ganious and Wagner). Within minutes thousands of people may have seen a message or a post and may interact with these post expressing their own views. Through social media, back and fourth connections are made possible. Politicians are brought down from being giant unreachable celebrities, to everyday people with a Twitter profile. Individuals no longer have to wait for the next political debate or a rally to take in
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
The purpose of this article is to persuade the reader that social media is the new alternative to mainstream big money ads for politicians. Cary’s intended audience is politicians, political campaign managers and politically engaged citizens. The tone of this article is informative but slightly opinionated. While Cary does back up her claims with notable quotes and statistics the main support for her argument is her professional opinion. Cary was formerly the
In the current time, it seems like one cannot go a day without using at least one social media website. This might be especially true among groups of teenagers and young adults. Social media became a vital part of daily life that feeds people with several types of information constantly. Political news is a type of information that can reach the people through the means of social media. Since presidents are constantly seeking new strategies to increase their communication with the public in order to spread their political message, they utilize the different social media websites. Hence, social media became a platform to spread political message. It is not surprising that now the majority of political officials and candidates have social media accounts more than ever before, such as a Twitter account.
The main purpose of this article is to examine the correlation between how often a politician’s name appears on social media and the subsequent electoral results. The article looks at 542,969 tweets mentioning electoral candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2010 and 2012 elections, and compares this data to the candidates’ electoral performance.
Another way that social media impacts the political dialogue that happens in Canada is simply through information. People who use social media are notably far more likely to be aware and informed about important issues (Borgida & Stark, 2004). This shows that many people who have eschewed mainstream television based news are still getting information; they are just getting it from social media channels instead. This has obvious advantages and obvious disadvantages as well. By providing people with information it theoretically leads to a more informed public, with the average voter knowing more about politics and being able to make a better informed decision as a result.
Social media is a revolution, which we are currently experiencing. It has changed the way people communicate and interact with one another, and opens up many more avenues to share news, information, and just general chit chat. Social media is relatively quiet young, but is here to stay for the foreseeable future. We are now at a point where online, we can share, read and react to lots of individual information being posted on microblogging websites, such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, Tumblr and more. Twitter in particular has been widely embraced, and will centre most of the discussion.
The data found has suggested “that as teens become more comfortable discussing and engaging in politics online, there is a positive relationship between that online action and the physical forms of civic engagement offline.” (Oden). They found a correlation between those who are comfortable with sharing political ideas online with taking action and accountability in their ideals offline as well. While this correlation seems to hold water at first glance, we must take into account that they are using a specific group of people to prove this point. The data was
The use of social media in the Presidential campaigns has a big impact on the presidential election. This case study analyze how the Republican and Democratic Presidential candidates, Mr. Donald Trump and Mrs. Hillary Clinton used social media to help deliver their parties platform and to help them to possibly become the 45th President of the United States of America.
While this initial stance kept politicians on the defensive, enough time has passed that individual politicians and even entire governments are starting to use social media to connect with their communities in new, open ways (Sniderman, 2011). However, as these social platforms are becoming more pervasive in society, studies of their influence on our lives has grown but have not kept pace with the use in government. Because social media is a relatively recent phenomenon, research on social media use in government is limited. Literature on the effectiveness of social media and government has increased but only in some areas. The purpose of this review is to understand governance through citizen engagement and provide a working context of the term social media. The literature review will provide a basis for what is known about the use of social media by government, in particular at the local level.
The changes in social media implied that many people got in touch with the political candidates either directly or indirectly. The people watched their potential leaders of the nation and were able to question them (Mutz 2001).
“More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior” an article by Joseph DiGrazia from the department of sociology at Indiana University, shows research explaining how social media may be an indicator of political behavior. This research will help explain if social media does effect political behavior. In the research, data will be extracted from social media to study its effects on offline behavior. I feel that this research is important because it will help explain how important social media is and also could help predict future election winners by analyzing the effective social media coverage on each candidate. The finding from the research shows that reliable data about political behavior can be extracted from social
With technology being the main source of information for the younger generation it was only a matter of time before politicians jumped on the bandwagon to sway voters in their favor. Social media has been around for awhile and it was used in passed elections it never had the same rating as it did in 2014 were politicians and campaigns were creating Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and other site pages to up themselves amongst the people. It has been averaged out that teenagers and young adults spend around twenty-seven hours a week on social media sites and during the midterm elections 28 percent of young Americans received candidate information from online sources, so it was seen that around seven hours and forty-five minutes or so were spent solely on the midterm election. Which is the most amount of time covered on social media involving the elections for example in 2010 the coverage and usage on social media sites for the midterm election then was 13
The purpose of this essay is to develop a further understanding of the impact of social media in regards to the political debate. By looking at the topic of social media and the use of rhetoric in response to politics in the 21st century, a deeper understanding of the issue can be established. Social media has become a primary source for the discussion of politics by the average citizen whether through the sharing of articles, “memes”, advertisements or personal expository statements. As a result, large sums of information and ideas are spread rapidly across a wide variety of subjects. However, much of this information may not be accurate and could be misinterpreted.
The future of the United States government, policy structure, and elections will evolve around the emerging social media. How well politicians and government officials use the technology could shape the policies of our country.
Over the years the media has made citizens major role players in politics. Ross Perot opened eyes by putting the 1992 Election in the media and thereby allowing voters to become directly involved in politics. The Internet, the new form of mass media “has turned into a major political and media industry” (Grossman 16). Because of the rise the Internet has taken, the idea of direct democracy has risen. The foundation of direct democracy is in self-government. The claim is that the presence of the Internet will increase citizens’ involvement in political issues by allowing them access to more information. This is significant because it takes a look at the impact of technology on society and politics, as well by looking at politics from the average persons’ perspective. It is my position, however that although the Internet will make citizens more informed this would actually work to deter people from participating in politics. Through the greater establishment of community and trust among citizens will we find the desire to participate in government and politics.