Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors affecting human population growth
Human factors affecting population growth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Population growth affects the earth just as much as it does the people. With the population continuously growing at an alarming rate, earth can’t keep up with the resources needed to survive. Eventually we will run out of oil, land to build houses, and air. The reasoning behind running out of air is if the world is covered in houses, there is no room for trees – which supplies our oxygen. The factors effecting population growth are: fertility rates, life expectancy, migration, and death rates. More and more people are migrating to North America because of the high life expectancy, average fertility rates, low mortality rates, and of course, job opportunity. Even though population growth isn’t as high as it used to be, overpopulation can still …show more content…
The structural-functional approach sees the way different parts of the society work together like parts in a machine. “A framework for building theory that sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change” (Macionis, 2013). If one part of the machine didn’t work, the rest of the machine wouldn’t work until that part was fixed and working again. Growth becomes necessary for the society to stay stable. Everyone added to the population serves a purpose to the community. Whether they become teachers, doctors, or scientists – they benefit the society further. The social conflict theory views society as unequal that creates conflict and wants for change. “A framework for building theory that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals” (Macionis, 2013). This perspective can be seen in those living in poverty struggling to survive. While the earth is pushed to its limits of providing food and shelter, many people suffer from starvation and are exposed to the elements of Mother Nature while others live extremely comfortably in posh living conditions. The symbolic interaction approach sees individuals are creatures of habits. “A framework for building theory that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals” (Macionis, 2013). If an individual lives in an urban population, they are more accustomed to heavily populated areas with access to many businesses at hands reach. Vice versa, if an individual from an urban population goes to the city, they are more likely to revert to their small quiet city away from everyone. Urban and rural populations must intertwine so they can receive the benefits of both societies. People usually go along the lines with what they were raised around. The environment they grew up in is the basis to how they live the rest of their life. Occasionally there is that
The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominan...
The functionalism theory claims that society is a system of interconnected parts. This theory emphasizes the importance of stability and solidarity into society. The ideas from this theory try and identify the various parts or structures of society to see how they work and or function. With the functionalism theory, homelessness is considered a “must” for the society to operate. Every individual in society has a specific role. Homelessness is just looked at as nothing more but a social class which is needed. Most believe, that once someone is homeless, they will remain in that class for as long as he or she lives. If one ever does get the chance to move up in class, the change will be slow and gradual. The functional perspective is a perspective in which all different parts of society come together with the other social classes. This perspective is needed for society to go on. The conflict theorists view the society from a hierarchical point of view. In this perspective, individuals are subordinated to
With structural functionalism, change is viewed as threatening or disruptive (Larkin, Ch.2), but there is constant change (whether it be technology or new discoveries). Also, society is deals more with competition over power or resource rather than how people work together as a unit. Symbolic interactionism focuses too much about roles; not everyone has a role because there is homeless and ill people that may not be able to benefit or play a role in society. According to Larkin, symbolic interactionism doesn’t see society as a whole but by the interactions that share a meaning. Conflict theory is more realistic to the world today because it is based on the challenges people go through and does not focus on relying on one
Structural Functionalism is the sociology theory that emphasizes how everything and everyone has a purpose in society. That each and every one of us is a puzzle piece that comes together in order to form a society, any missing puzzle piece would result in the downfall or shortcomings of the whole society. Whether this may be religion, education, economy, etc, all of these structures much work together in order to have a flourishing society where everyone works uniformly. Stability is achieved when everyone fulfills their duty is society.
.... These effects are more or less temporary compared to other effects as it has been shown that natural geomorphologic processes will rapidly re-establish themselves, this was proven in the “lost” cities such as Angkor in Cambodia (Zalasiewicz). Some of the more permanent changes that humans have established on the earth is radioactive remains. Humans have affected the distribution of isotopes than anything else, these changes in the distribution of isotopes will be permanent ( Brown). A substantial effect of the population boom is that now that there are more people there is a bigger demand for food, this increased demand has resulted in over fishing. Humans are bottom trawling the oceans in search of food and the consequence of this is that fundamentally we are plowing the ocean floor. This will be evident in future geological records( Brown). While it is easy to
In the textbook Sociology chapter one talks about three sociological theories: functionalist, conflict, and interactionism. All three sociological theories have something to do with each social institution. Functionalist perspective is a sociological approach that emphasizes the way of which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability (Schaefer, 24). Functionalist applies to the education sociological institution by teaching knowledge and skills, cultural transmission, social control, and some agents of structured change. All of these are important in making sure that education is structured to maintain its stability. The conflict perspective is a sociological approach that assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of tension between groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation (Schaefer, 24). Conflict applies to the education sociological institution by reproducing social order, using hidden curriculum, intolerance and inequality, credentialism, and status. Using hidden curriculum refers to standards of behavior that are deemed proper y society and are taught subtly in schools (Schaefer, 315). Status refers to standardized testing, tracking, public/private, gender, class, and role. And then there is the interactionism perspective. Interactionism perspective is a sociological approach that generalizes about everyday forms of social interaction in order to explain society as a whole (Schaefer, 24).
Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.
A structural functionalist would say that society is not working together and that the problem is that we all don’t share the same values and that the bullies who obviously are not socialized property should be removed from society and that would solve the problem. A social conflict theorist believes in nine things society is like a pyramid, The elite are at the top of the pyramid and the masses are at the bottom, those on the top of the pyramid hold all the power, Those with the power determine the values for society, the glue that holds society together is force, societal members learn the values of the powerful through the socialization process, society is always in a state of conflict, different people and groups will always be struggling to gain power, those with the economic and political power will shape society to their advantage. A social conflict theorist would say that this topic proves that society is always in a state of conflict because people don’t get along and that different people and groups will always be struggling to gain power because the different people are the masses which are at the
While functionalist and conflict perspectives are represented through societal cohesiveness and societal engagement symbolic interactionism shows the signifigance of it all. Society is symbolic interactionism. It's emphasizes of how society mingles and intertwines within itself through conflict and resloution every moment of everyday. Without interaction we would all be hermits or living in underground bunkers fading away. It would all become nothingness and it's history would be a distant
Structural functionalism explains that society is a whole with different structures that contributes to the whole and that is how society functions. In Lagaan, society was supposedly unified by the British through taxes and keeping the Indians at bay from rebelling, but when Bhuvan and his team won the match against the British, the functionalistic world started to dissipate. The British ruled India started to dissipate, while the new free India started to appear and the structures for that society started to form themselves to make a solid society. Social class and race are both considered to structures in a functionalistic society; because that is one way we are seen by others. We are picked out by our social class, our race, our family status, etc. We are then pushed to see if we can work through our class and make it higher or plummet to the lowest. Functionalism shows us the nitty gritty of each society and how the structures of each society
The structural-functionalist perspective looks at society as a complex system composed of various parts much like a living organism. Each aspect of society contributes to society's functioning as a whole. Social institutions play a key role in keeping a society stable. All societies need certain things to survive (Newman 2010).
I believe overconsumption of resources is the most significant impact that human population size and growth have on the environment. As population size gets bigger, people's need of food, water and services also increases. Forests are being destroyed because of human's need of wood, different kinds of animals are getting killed because human's need of goods and food and fossil fuels are being used because of human's need for electricity and transportation. As a result, many habitats and species are lost, which impacts ecosystem a lot.
We are contaminating the earth with “Pesticides, fertilizers, industrial chemicals and wastes, fossil fuel emissions, and residential runoff have polluted much of our fresh water supply. Thirty-three percent of the lake acreage and 15 percent of the total river miles within the U.S. are so contaminated with mercury, PCBs and other chemicals”(Lehman p15) this is detrimental to our health and we should be more catcious. The effects of overpopulation are rather severe. The first of these is the depletion of resources. The Earth can only make a so much water and food, which is falling short of the existing needs. Most of the environmental harm being seen in the last fifty years is because of the fast development in population on the planet. They are cutting down trees, hunting wildlife in a reckless manner, and causing pollution. It has placed great demands on resources and land, leading to widespread environmental issues in addition to impacting global economies and standards of living. As resources become scarce this creates competitive demands on the vital life-sustaining resources and contributes to an incredible decline in the quality of
Human population growth is becoming a huge issue in our world today. The population is increasing rapidly. The reason that it is becoming a concern is because it has affected the economic, environmental, and social aspects of our world. In the film Frontline: Heat, we can see how there might not be a future for our planet unless we are able to reduce the emissions and make our world a safe place. Not only for the present but also for future generations so that they are able to live long and healthy lives.
There are various systems in handling population rates and its various issues that connect with threatening our environment. The population and environment debate will forever be a back and forth problem because there is possibly no way to completely stop carbon emissions but ease its production. To help the environment, we must incorporate all potential solutions in governing population such as family planning and governmental involvement and practice renewable resources and stop on using nonrenewable resources, as well as ways to tackle overconsumption to support our corrupting environment.