Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frankenstein themes analysis
Frankenstein themes analysis
Frankenstein mary shelley literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frankenstein themes analysis
Frankenstein is a magnificent peace of literature written by Mary Shelley. Mary’s style of romanticism and gothic writings shed light on society and its effect on human nature. Her use of symbols and figurative language help the reader grow accustomed to the fact that society can ultimately change someone for the worse or for the best. The story consists of a being that was created by man who strives for acceptance and kindness from those around him. During this process the creature soon runs into certain conflicts, which could have been avoided if only society hadn’t shunned him. The creature born from limbs of others and created by man was doomed when he first took breath. Children who are often nurtured by loving and responsible parents grow up to be kind and welcoming to others, but those with parents of a different nature, ones who neglect their own children can only help lead to their child’s ultimate defeat of not being accepted by society. Born as a child with no idea who or what he …show more content…
was, the creature turned to his creator, Victor Frankenstein. Mary shows how a parent’s nature can leave an impression on a child through Victor‘s reaction to his new living creation. “…I had selected this creature as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath…his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same color as the dun-white sockets in which they were set…Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room…”(43 Shelley). Mary’s use of descriptive words allows the reader to foresee societies reaction to the creature’s appearance and how they too will refuse to accept him. After Victor laid eyes on the creature he no longer referred to him as his creation throughout the story, but as a “monster, wretch, or demon.” Words such as these are significant, for they show societies reaction to the creature’s monstrous appearance. When the monster was still a child, not yet shunned by society, he contained a positive outlook on life. He enjoyed helping others and the feelings that certain parts of nature gave him. Overall his human nature was that of a child who was willing to learn and receive teachings from others. “Spring advanced rapidly; the weather became fine and the skies cloudless. My senses were gratified and refreshed by a thousand scents of delight and a thousand sights of beauty.” (104 Shelley). Shelley’s use of romanticism, which is importance of nature in art, allows the reader to observe the creature’s true nature. He finds bliss in simple things, such as a change in weather, such as, the transition from winter into spring. Spring brings pleasure and happiness to the monster even when things become tough. The creature also finds joy in observing a family of cottagers. They influence him greatly with their act of kindness that they portray to one another. The creature’s only wish is to live amongst them, appreciated and loved. While observing the family the monster decides to help them by doing their chores. He also refuses to hurt the cottagers. “I had been accustomed, during the night, to steal a part of their store for my own consumption, but when I found that in doing this I inflicted pain on the cottagers, I abstained…” (99 Shelley). Even with the kindness enacted from the creature, society seemed to have trouble opening its arms. The monster had a vast amount of hope that he might be able to befriend the cottagers through first befriending the blind grandfather. While trying to befriend the grandfather the other cottagers walked in and due to the creature’s monstrous appearance was attacked and cast out. Upon observing the monster the cottagers decided to never return. In response to the abandonment of the cottagers the monster became vengeful towards man and Victor. The reader can observe the creature’s reaction through an allusion written by Shelley. “The cottage was quickly enveloped by the flames, which clung to it, and licked it with their forked and destroying tongues” (123 Shelley). This was the end of the creature’s hope for he no longer had faith in man or his creator who left him to fend for himself in a cruel world. The monster wasn’t always evil and obsessed with revenge.
He was a kind creature who longed for acceptance and love from others. Sadly, society only saw him as a wretched being who should be cast aside. The monster, in order to implement his revenge on Victor, kills those closes to him, his brother, friends, and wife. These deaths could have been prevented if only society could have accepted the creature. “…I am miserable, and they shall share my wretchedness. Yet it is in your power to recompense me, and deliver them from an evil which it only remains for you to make so great, that not only you or your family, but thousands of others, shall be swallowed up in the whirlwinds of its rage” (87 Shelley). This quote shows the true nurture, which he received, from society. His own creator wishes to never see him again and to listen to him, so the monster blatantly mentions that if Victor does not listen then the rage he feels towards man and Victor will cause death to befall
all. The main theme addressed in this book is nature versus nurture. Throughout the entire story of Frankenstein the reader can observe clues, through direct quotes from characters or the use of Shelley’s style and literary devices, that society can cause someone’s human nature to change. Society plays a big role on human nature. If someone is shunned by society they are left only two options, to take revenge or die. This is evident throughout the creature’s strive for affection and acceptance. The monster wasn’t naturally evil; he had no rage to live by until society cast him aside and left him to fend for himself in a world so cruel.
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley indicts man for his determination to master nature, suggesting that human arrogance will inevitably result in destruction and death. Using rich imagery, permeating symbolism, and consistent foreshadowing, Shelley has written a cautionary tale of man’s collision with the natural world that eradicates beauty and corrupts the human spirit.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, values of society are clearly expressed. In this particular society and culture, a great value is placed on ideologies of individuals and their contribution to society. In order to highlight these values, Shelley utilizes the character of Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein is the main character of the novel, and with his alienation, he plays a significant role that reveals the surrounding society’s assumptions and moral values of individualism and use in society. This is done through Victor’s actions of self-inflicted isolation.
In a world full of novelty, guidance is essential to whether a being’s character progresses positively or negatively in society. Parents have a fundamental role in the development of their children. A parent’s devotion or negligence towards their child will foster a feeling of trust or mistrust in the latter. This feeling of mistrust due to the lack of guidance from a parental figure is represented in the relationship between Victor Frankenstein and his creation in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein. The creature created by Frankenstein was shown hatred and disgust from the very beginning, which led to its indignant feelings toward his creator and his kind.
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
The fact that Frankenstein’s creation turns on him and murders innocent people is never overlooked; it has been the subject of virtually every popularization of the novel. What is not often acknowledged is the fact that Frankenstein himself embodies some of the worst traits of humankind. He is self-centered, with little real love for those who care about him; he is prejudiced, inflexible and cannot forgive, even in death. While some of these traits could be forgivable, to own and flaunt them all should be enough to remind a careful reader that there are two "monsters" in Frankenstein.
A predominant theme in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is that of child-rearing and/or parenting techniques. Specifically, the novel presents a theory concerning the negative impact on children from the absence of nurturing and motherly love. To demonstrate this theory, Shelly focuses on Victor Frankenstein’s experimenting with nature, which results in the life of his creature, or “child”. Because Frankenstein is displeased with the appearance of his offspring, he abandons him and disclaims all of his “parental” responsibility. Frankenstein’s poor “mothering” and abandonment of his “child” leads to the creation’s inevitable evilness. Victor was not predestined to failure, nor was his creation innately depraved. Rather, it was Victor’s poor “parenting” of his progeny that lead to his creation’s thirst for vindication of his unjust life, in turn leading to the ruin of Victor’s life.
Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.
...ions toward one another. However, Frankenstein’s uncaring, negligent-parent approach to his creation who emotionally resembles a lost child, allows Shelley to establish the conflict between scientific discovery and moral consequence, as well as the greater conflict between right and wrong. She allows the audience to question who the true villain is in the story, and allow each reader to determine for themselves if the “parent” Frankenstein or the “childlike” monster is truly to blame for all the evil deeds that occur. Today, our society should view Frankenstein as a cautionary tale of the possibilities and consequences of scientific discovery mixed with greed.
Society saw him as a repulsive monster that had no other intention that to harm people. This led them to shun him away from everyone. The creature himself also chose some decisions that were not the best options. Victor is responsible for taking care of hi creation. Most people in the world has one person that loves them, but if not one person does, mentally they can fall apart. People need to know that they may be contributing to the problem without even knowing it. All in all, everyone was at fault in some ways or another which led to the creature becoming a monster.
Mary Shelley uses irony in the development of Frankenstein and the creature in order to create more dynamic and complex characters who are foils of one another.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley portrays an individual in a unique situation trying to overcome daily interactions while being faced with inconceivable misfortunes. Created by Victor Frankenstein, who set out on a journey to bring life to scrapped pieces of waste, he was then abandoned and left to fend for himself in a world he was abruptly brought into. After being abandoned by his creator for his less than appealing looks, this then sparked his inevitable desire for revenge. Eventually leading to the destruction of those associated with his creator. Knowing that he will never fit in, the monster began to act out in hopes of getting back at his creator for what he did. His vulnerability due to missing guidance and parental figures in his beginning stages of life contributed to his behavior. The books and article Family Crisis and Children’s Therapy Groups written by Gianetti, Audoin, and Uzé, Victim Of Romance: The Life And Death Of Fanny Godwin by Maurice Hindle, and Social Behavior and Personality by Lubomir Lamy, Jacques Fishcher-Lokou, and Nicolas Gueguen support why the monster acts the way he does. The monster’s behavior stems from Victor’s actions at the beginning of his life and therefore is not to blame. The creature in Frankenstein is deserving of sympathy even though he committed those murders because the lack of parental guidance, lack of family, and lack of someone to love led him to that. All in all his actions were not malicious, but only retaliation for what he had been put through.
The creature experiences the worse kind of consequence, he is never fully satisfied, when seeking revenge and committing all of the hateful and vengeful murders, he never finds what he is looking for, someone’s acceptance of the monster. In the end, his acts backfire on him, only making himself less appealing than he already was. I question that even if Victor had
The key figure in the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is a monster who “was benevolent and good; [but] misery made [him] a fiend” (Shelley 84). The monster is originally created to possess love, kindness, and other human characteristics, but after years of solitude due to his inhuman ugliness, his life is left in ruins. Humans’ normal response to being alone or feeling like no one cares about them, is to curse others and the world. The monster has the same reaction after he is physically and emotionally rejected by society and his creator. Frankenstein explores the journey of a monster and how he deals with his human emotions when he is let out into the world to fend for himself. The monster’s response to his isolation from society is
Since Victor did not help mold the creature into society and explain the basic principles and why he may not be accepted, he is to blame for the deaths of his family.The creature said “My daily vows rose for revenge- a deep and daily revenge, such as would alone compensate for the outrages and anguish I has endured” (Shelley 129). In this situation Victor can be viewed as society's outlook upon the creature because his actions of judgement and ostracizing is what led the creature to become the way that he is. If Victor would have had an open mind about how his creation may not be perfect then the creature may not have acted out in the way that he did. The creatures determination to be noticed and loved by society and his creator is the reason all of the bad is happening in Victor's life. The creature states “Frankenstein! You belong to my enemy-to him towards whom I have sworn eternal revenge” (Shelley 130). The recurring theme of acceptance is one that can be talked about over and over again to why the events of the book happened in the first place. The creatures realization that he will never live a normal life and never be accepted into society leads him down a path of rage and death when in reality if Victor simply stayed with the creature and acted like an appropriate creator/parent all of the death could have been avoided. In the end of Victor's life, he had nothing else to live for because he let society drive him mad for knowledge and let the creature torment his life from his own wrongdoing. Victor states in his dying breaths that “I shall no longer feel the agonies which now consume me;or be the prey of feelings unsatisfied, yet unquenched” (Shelley 209). Victor realizes in the end all of the harm that he has brought upon the earth but still does not really care for anything except to becoming famous for his work. He knows the desires