Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of liberalism in international relations
Liberalism in international relations
Comparison of classic and modern liberals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of liberalism in international relations
This essay is going to explain the ideological approach of liberalism relating to the foreign policy applies that strongly influence on current world system. It will begin, with explanation of term liberalism, supported by relevant literature. Thus, liberalism represents several traditions that are extremely important to understand actions taken by the states including democracy, intuitionalism and constitutionalism. It may be true that since centuries created empires the physical and military force were dominant. Development of civilisation changed this trend dramatically and had incredible impact on existing world system and foreign policy practices. Then, it will focus on other approaches of liberalism that are considerable in foreign policy practices promotion of human rights, scientific rationality and freedom. The increasing significance of incorporeal factors such as knowledge and information had affected how global institutions and governments of the states behave and how needs of several actors may change to fulfil needs of the total. Finally, it will move on to explanation of liberalist approach that influence on foreign policy practices by establishments of judicial procedures and collective security. The establishment of the peace and harmony between states are extremely important for representatives of liberalism.
Currently, liberalism is a political ideology that explains foreign policy by interpretation of individual thoughts and how these thoughts are espoused (Doyle, 2012) According to this approach spread of democratic institutions worldwide is seen as inseparable action to promote peace internationally. The implementation of peaceful tough and an isolated peace have been achieved by the liberal states. So...
... middle of paper ...
... figures. [Online] Available at: http://europa.eu/about-eu/facts-figures/index_en.htm (Accessed: 10 April 2014).
Heywodd, A. (ed.) ( 2011) Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
Hill, Ch. (ed.) (2003) The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
Kelly, P. (ed.) ( 2005) Liberalism. Key concepts. Polity Press: Cambridge.
Moravcsik, A. (2010) Liberal theories of international relations: a primer. [Online] Available at : http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDgQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.princeton.edu%2F~amoravcs%2Flibrary%2Fprimer.doc&ei=q1FVU-CUGsXb7Aaq3IDgDQ&usg=AFQjCNF_7SE61W2mbDXTCnF7wg3UpP-60g&bvm=bv.65058239,d.ZGU (Accessed : 10 April 2014).
Vincent, A. (2010 ) Modern political ideologies. 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.
Liberalism is an ideology which advocates equality of opportunity for all within the framework of a system of laws. It includes a belief in government as an institution whose primary function is to define and enforce the laws. Furthermore, a Constitution, must be developed not solely by one ruler but by representatives of the elite groups. Therefore, liberalism invariably involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. The Constitution then defines ...
Walt, Stephen. "Top 10 Warning Signs of Liberal Imperialism." Foreign Policy. N.P, 20 May 2013. Web. 17 Mar. 2014. .
In the 21st century, there have been plenty of examples of potential competition to liberalism as seen by the emergence of social democracy and the push for welfare states as well as varying degrees of fundamentalism and nationalism all throughout the world. Fukuyama believed that all societies where converging towards democracy and capitalism and that the world was beginning to embrace the ideas and principles of western liberalism, capitalism and materialism. He argued that “liberal democracy remains the only coherent political aspiration that spans different regions and cultures across the globe.” (Mapping the political landscape p.323). Although Fukuyama believes that with the fall of communism and fascism, liberal democracy had finally assumed it rightful place as that right ideology in the world, he seems to have overlooked the overall flexibility of liberal ideologies as well as capitalism and materialism.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Shiraev, Eric B., and Vladislav M. Zubok. International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Silver, Larry.
John Ikenberry’s article “The Future of the Liberal World Order”, examines the past, present, and future of the liberal world order; he informs the reader of his thoughts and opinions on its current state. Ikenberry is very adamant in his position, and he does invoke some good arguments overall, but in the end he falls short. He is a neoliberal institutionalist, therefore his view is needless to say optimistic. His view and the article are both outdated. Since the publication of his article in 2011, many things have changed that contradict his view. For example, China’s position in the world order, the authoritarian regimes of the Middle East and the increase of armed conflict throughout the Arab world, and his obsolete “west vs the rest” (Evin
Mearsheimer J. J. (2010). Structural Realism. International Relations Thoeries, Discipline and Diversity (Second Edition), p.77-94
The liberalism and the realism approaches the international relations from very different perspective, and even though many of its views contrast from each other, the ...
During Ambassador Power’s speech, she discusses her beliefs about Russia as a threat to the international community and the United States by prominently expressing thoughts that are similar with the liberal theoretical tradition, additionally, due to intellectual pluralism, Ambassador Power briefly expresses thoughts that are similar to the theoretical tradition of realism. There are four basic assumptions that realism and liberalism share—states live in an international system based on anarchy, states seek power, states are rational actors, and states are the most born actors. However, these rational acting states have varying views of what anarchy is and they act in different ways to attain such anarchy. In this paper, I will explain how
On the other end of the spectrum, you have the liberals who soundly believe that the state should have a very limited impact in the international political economic arena. They feel that the states interest and their goals change along with the context of the I.P.E. situation. The liberal perspective also offers the idea of cooperation among negotiating states that oppose the realist view that cooperation has an underlining meaning behind it.
He then further explains the growth pattern between those eras which has led to the current ideology of liberal democracy. He believes that liberal democracy is the best ideology and that it is the final stage in human ideological development. He further suggested that human history should be viewed as a progression or battle of ideologies. With the current trend of universalization of liberal democracy and individualism, both characteristics of Western culture, he argues that Western liberal democracy has become the grand victor. He also asserts that despite the liberal democratic ideology has not completely been realized in the material world, the idea has been accepted and has triumphed over all alternate ideologies.
Liberalism is universalistic and tolerant. It believes that all persons share fundamental interest in self preservation and material well being. Each individual must be allowed to follow hi s or her own preferences as long as they do not d...
From the realist point of view, the international political system is considered as anarchic. There is a lack of external authority among states that ensures peace, stability and balance of power. In the analyzed document, the author's main thesis states that changes of the system would alter the international political system. However, changes within the system will maintain its anarchism. In order to support his thesis, the author replies to liberal critics, who consider the neorealism as obsolete taking into account three important arguments against the neorealism.
The democratic peace theory stems from the generally optimistic liberal tradition which advocates that something can be done rectify the effects of an anarchical system, especially when it comes to war or conflict. For democratic peace theorists, the international system should be one in which there is cooperation and mutual benefits of the states are taken into consideration. The theory depends on liberal ideologies of civil liberties, democratic institutions and fairly elected governments and claims that liberal democracies are different from other systems of government as they do not conflict with other democracies due to the very nature of the liberal thinking and the pacifying role that democracy itself plays. According to the theory, the thought process behind democracies abstaining from war is that...
Liberalism has contributed to the understanding of International Relations as an academic discipline and through organizations such as the United Nations, the European Union, the League of Arab States, and others in what many consider to be a very influential manner.
Liberal Perspective – The liberal perspective focuses on the need for repeated negotiations and compromise as well as bargaining in order to avert crisis or problems with other countries. This perspective focuses on common objectives as well as cooperation in order to avoid the use of force (Nau 2017, 23). The liberal perspective views reciprocal behavior and interdependence among other actors more important than how much power one has or one’s beliefs. (Nau 2017, 53).