Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis jane austen
Make a brief analysis of Austen's writing style
Jane austen analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey has been praised by countless critics as the perfect balance between satire and realism. The novel, a light-hearted comedy full of humorous situations and entertaining wit, has enticed countless readers with an unprecedented writing style which combines elements of gothic and satirical literature. Although the novel has captivated readers over the years, the story has received its fair share of criticism. Tara Ghoshal Wallace, for example, claims that the novel’s storyline was inconsistent due to Austen’s use of satire, and Carole Gerster accuses Austen of disrupting the novel’s narration to integrate her own voice.
Though the novel’s satirical elements make the reading more enjoyable for readers, select literary
…show more content…
critics insist that Austen’s use of satire in Northanger Abbey is too far fetched. In her critical novel, Jane Austen and Narrative Authority, Tara Ghoshal Wallace claims “Northanger Abbey refuses to yield a stable vision, either moral or aesthetic” (Wallace). This is a valid statement as the novel’s storyline admittedly has no real consistency. Throughout the novel, elements such as satire and comedy corrupt the story’s plausibility. For example, Catherine, the protagonist of the story, is seen as perfectly rational throughout the first half of the novel. In fact, she is described as never “asserting at one moment what [she] would contradict the next” (Austen 64). However, upon her arrival at Northanger, Catherine loses her sensibility due to Austen’s attempt to integrate a comedic storyline. As Catherine’s “fearful curiosity [grows] greater,” her character, who had been previously established as having sound judgement, becomes foolish, focusing more on imagination than reality (Austen 156). Though it makes for a humorous storyline, Austen’s use of satire contradicts Catherine’s pre-established character and disrupts her character development. In short, while satirical elements do make the story entertaining and fun to read, it does so at the expense of the story itself. Austen also makes interesting choices in regard to the novel’s structure.
Throughout the novel, she tends to vacillate between writing in the voice of Catherine, the protagonist, and writing in her own voice. In the words of critic Carole Gerster, “Austen places herself in the midst of an ongoing dialogue,” making it difficult to recognize the novel’s true narrator due to a “mix of varied and opposing voices” (Gerster). Throughout the novel, Austen sometimes steps out of the persona of the narrator, writing what reads as a message from herself to her readers. She often uses these excerpts to clarify or foreshadow upcoming events. For example, at the start of the novel, she describes Mrs. Allen and Catherine’s first meeting, foreshadowing later events by telling readers that Mrs. Allen’s “actions will hereafter tend to promote the general distress of the work” (Austen 20). Though Gerster insists that Austen’s input interrupts the story, I quite enjoyed these directives. Austen’s input makes it feel as if she herself is communicating with her readers, such as when she writes: “It may be stated, for the readers more certain information… that [Catherine’s] heart was affectionate [and] her disposition [was] cheerful and open” (Austen 19). While Gerster claims that Austen’s different voices made the story difficult to follow, I thought it was quite easy to distinguish Austen’s own voice from that of the narrator. In fact, in some cases, her personal input made the story
easier to follow, clearing away any misconceptions as to what was going on inside a character’s mind. This stylistic choice, while somewhat audacious, works well with the text of the novel. Overall, Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey was quite the unique novel. Not only did the story blend writing styles which had never before been combined, but Austen also made bold stylistic choices, writing in rather unprecedented ways. Though the novel occasionally contradicts itself due to Austen’s strive to include unique writing styles and techniques, I believe it makes up for itself with its originality. In short, though Northanger Abbey has almost as many weak points as it does strong suits, it is nevertheless an entertaining read.
...iece, with lengthy, persuasive essay-like chapters throughout the text. Austen compresses her commentary and the narrator does not dominate the discussion. As it concisely conveys its message, Austen's work represents a development from Fielding's inflated treatise on the subject. The issue of the novel as respectable or as art was clearly an important issue of debate; the greatest speakers for both novelists were the "authors" of their respective texts.
Austen creates a scenario where she allows the reader to identify a variety of persons, each of
“In Defense of the Gothic: Rereading Northanger Abbey.” Jane Austen and Discourses of Feminism. Ed. Devoney Looser.
Jane Austen completes her story with a “Cinderella ending” of Catherine and Henry marrying. However, her novel is more than a fairytale ending. Although often wrong and misguided in their judgments, she shows the supremacy of males that permeated throughout her society. Jane Austen takes us from a portrayal of men as rude, self-centered, and opinionate to uncaring, demanding, and lying to downright ruthless, hurtful, and evil. John Thorpe’s and General Tilney’s total disregard for others feelings and their villainous ways prove Austen’s point. Whether reading Northanger Abbey for the happy ending or the moral lesson, this novel has much to offer.
Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen expresses the powerful narrative voice. The narrative voice that she uses is different from other novels. Most authors try to hide their presence in their novels but Jane Austen does not try to hide her presence. Her presence in the novel is so clear. For example, “The advantages of natural folly in a beautiful girl have been already set forth by the capital pen of sister author, and her treatment of the subject I will only add” (Austen 81). She tries not to trick her reader as he/she reads the novel. Instead she informs the reader that the book itself is just a novel. Her purpose is not to convince the reader and correct her story, but to understand the imperfection of language because language does not always tell the truth or enough for the truth.
In her popular book Emma, it is the first time that an author writes in a third-person point of view, shares a character 's judgments, and follows the path to their decisions. This technique opened up a new world of opportunities, combining the internal and external world of a character in a novel (Mullan, 2015, How Jane Austen’s Emma Changed the Face of Fiction). Jane Austen had Although writings were fictional she used precise incidents and described her own life with extraordinary detail. Her writings were creating a window into the thoughts, actions, relationships, and morality of daily life.
Jane Austen Society of North America, Inc. A Brief Biography. jasna.org. 26 April. 2014.
Defining the novel is a challenging prospect because the act of naming means to circumscribe a genre that defies rigid codes. The novel's elasticity and readiness to incorporate other genres makes it slippery and untidy; nevertheless, the novelness of a text allows us to recognize a novel and distinguish it from other genres. As readers, we approach the novel with the expectation that it will possess novelistic attributes and judge the novel on its ability to master these. With this focus in mind, this essay explores how the following features in Jane Austen's Persuasion contribute to (or persuade us as to) the novelness of the text: the extensive treatment of its characters, a sense of cohesion and continuity present in a work of long prose fiction, and a vivid portrayal of the social order on the micro-level of the domestic scenes of everyday.
Austen: A Collection of Critical Essays, Prentice-Hall Inc, USA
Pride and Prejudice, one of Jane Austen’s masterpieces makes use of satire to promote social change, because the English society of the 19th century only saw marriage as a ticket that would help you move upward on the social ladder. Throughout the book, the reader gets front row seats as Austen mocks both the conservative middle class and upper class, giving the dissentient characters a chance to be seen in society with a better image. Austen expresses her feelings on why social changes must occur to her audience by making use of satire to describe Mrs. Bennet, Mrs. Hurt, and Miss Bingley in comparison to the way she develops characters such as Elizabeth Bennet and the wealthy gentleman Fitzwilliam Darcy. Furthermore, while the reader gets to witness dramatic moments from Mrs. Bennet, Mrs. Hurst, and Miss. Bingley as they strive to comply by the traditions of the 19th century, Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy play a significant role in trying to demonstrate to the reader on why love should be the chief reason for marriage.
Austen uses letters throughout the novel to further the plot, the letter Mr. Darcy hands Elizabeth is primarily used to alter Elizabeth’s prejudiced views about Mr. Wickham and to advance the plot of the novel. Elizabeth’s reaction to the letter is gradual “stedfastly was she persuaded that he could have no explanation to give,”. The third-person narrative creates Elizabeth’s limited and prejudiced views of Mr. Darcy lead her to believe that he was a cruel and selfish man, however as she continues to contemplate Elizabeth’s views changed “She grew absolutely ashamed of herself… she had been blind, partial, prejudiced, absurd.” Through the descriptive language, Austen expresses that society creates prejudiced views towards individuals without context and thus encourages audiences to challenge the ways of society. Weldon also uses epistolary in her work; her novel follows the structure of a series of letters.
But what does it say about narrators? Austen has oft been criticised for the shifting moods and tones in Northanger Abbey: “Generally critics are forced to conclude that while brilliant in many of its parts, the book as a whole lacks a sufficiently consistent technique or unified form to make it a coherent work of art.” but it could be said that each shift in narrator style attracts the reader’s attention to a different fundamental aspect of the novel. For example, Henry Tilney acts as “surrogate ironic commentator for the author and object of her irony” and his introduction leads us the what Frank Kearful refers to as the transformation into “a novel of education”. Catherine must undergo a series of
...Emma’s voice in order to relate the inside ideology, while simultaneously using a somewhat ironic third-person narrative voice in order to provide critical social commentary on the social attitudes of the Highbury society depicted in Emma. Emma’s voice allows the reader to gain an unadultered insight into the lives of the people of Highbury, providing the narrative with a Austen uses a somewhat similar dichotomous technique in Persuasion, in which she splits the novel into two halves -- one in which advocates for the traditional system of formality, and another that works to eradicate the very same system that she extolled so highly in the first half. Under the deceptive guise of “political inaction,” Austen actually provides commentary on the underlying social and political issues that pervade the novel through the literary technique of heteroglossia (Parker 359).
Everyone has to enter into a new and unknown environment at some point in his or her life, but how would one expect a young, naïve girl, who has always lived a plain life with a poor family, to enter into a new, elegant, and cultured society? This is the situation that Jane Austen depicts for readers in Northanger Abbey and manages to present with appropriate satire and amusing humor. The young lady that Austen writes about is Catherine Morland; though she is well into her youth and almost a young adult, she is still immature and ignorant. Jane Austen successfully portrays and develops Catherine Morland toward maturity, heroism, and self-knowledge through having her leave her family for the first time, adapt to the sophisticated society of Bath, learn what life is really like outside the fictional novels she reads, and forge relationships with new people. “It,[Northanger Abbey], is the herald of Jane Austen's development of the theme of the heroine's transition from girlhood to womanhood” (Cummins).
Jane Austen's writing style is a mix of neoclassicism and romanticism. Austen created a transition into Romanticism which encourages passion and imagination in writing instead of a strict and stale writing style. It is very emotional and follows a flowing not structured form. Mixing these two styles was one of Austen's strongest talents, which gave her an edge in the literary world. No other author in her time was able to create such a strong transition between writing styles. Austen used her sharp and sarcastic wit in all of her writing including in one of her most famous works; Pride and Prejudice. She could create a powerful and dramatic scene and immediately lead it into a satirical cathartic scene. We see these in various locations in Pride and Prejudice. She was able to use her experiences as well as her intense knowledge to create meaningful insights into her words, regardless of what topic she would be discussing. She often talks about marriage, or breaking the roles of what a person should be. She made controversial works that praised imperfections which praised the...