Violence has remained desirable throughout human history as great pleasure is received from inflicting pain on others. In the Lord of the Flies, William Golding creates a world of increasing violence. He establishes this violence through the setting of the novel, the characters, and the theme.
To begin, William Golding incorporates a world of increasing violence through the setting of the novel. When the setting is first described, an Eden-like island is presented. The island has a “shore... fledged with palm trees”(9) and a lagoon. This island is inhabited and untouched by mankind. However, a scar is formed on the island by the boys' plane crash, representing the mark of human arrival. Here, William Golding shows how mankind's actions affect nature. He implies that mankind's innate evil and savagery causes destruction, and
…show more content…
true to this, the island gets vulgarized and completely burns down.
“Behind him, the whole island was shuddering with flame”(201). At this point, Ralph gets hunted down by Jack's entire tribe and is portrayed as a pig. William Golding uses the setting of this novel to show the two opposing forces on the island. The state of the island mirrors the boys. When the boys first arrive on the island, they are civilized and moral. As they become more violent due to hunting and fighting, they become barbaric savages. The island gradually advances from a paradise, to a hell because of the violent actions between the boys. It can be implied that Golding creates a world of increasing violence through the setting of the story.
Furthermore, it is clear that William Golding creates a world of increasing violence when taking accountability of the momentous characters in his novel. In the Lord of the Flies, Golding creates two characters who portray violent inclinations; Jack and Roger. Roger initially exhibits his hunger for violence when he “gathered a handful of stones and began to throw them”(62) at Henry. Yet, he threw them around him not to hurt him
because, "Roger's arm was conditioned by a civilization that knew nothing of him and was in ruins."(62). The taboo of the old life and the civility within him withdrew him from harming another human. Jack is also shown to be civilized when he first hunts a pig but is unable to kill it “because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood”(31). Jack invests his time into trying to kill a pig, and when he finally does, he descends into savagery. His first kill becomes an integrated memory. “His mind was crowded with memories; memories of the knowledge that had come to them when they closed in on the struggling pig, knowledge that they had outwitted a living thing, imposed their will upon it, taken away its life like a long satisfying drink”(70). Golding connects Jack’s actions with the feelings of power and supremacy. He imposed his will upon the pig instead of trying to work for the good of the boys. He states that the boys need meat in order to survive, but it becomes apparent that hunting satisfies his primal instincts of violence. Roger also shows his loss of civility when the boys engage in the pig hunt. Roger prodded his spear “right up her ass”(136), indicating rape. The violence that Roger possesses becomes completely apparent when he pushes the boulder off the cliff and kills Piggy. Jack and Roger both evolve into ruling by violence. William Golding intentionally creates the two characters who start off as civilized school boys and depicts their spiral descent into violence. In addition, Golding uses the themes to create a world of increasing violence in his novel, Lord of the Flies. He uses the theme of civilization versus savagery to build a world of developing violence. It is showcased how man drifts away from civilization and results in savagery. There is conflict between Ralph who represents civilization, and Jack who represents savagery. Ralph utilizes his power to create order and democracy, and to maintain the civility and morality that the boys possessed. Jack, on the other hand, is more interested in dominating the other boys to satisfy his desire for power. Jack takes leadership of his tribe, who worship him and view him as an idol. "Power lay in the brown swell of his forearms: authority sat on his shoulder and chattered in his ear like an ape."(150). The uncontrollable desire that Jack has for power mirrors that of a totalitarian government. The more savage Jack becomes in nature, the more he is affiliated with brutality and death. "Then Jack found the throat and the hot blood spouted over his hands"(135). Jack becomes a total savage and completely disregards any logic or rationality, and exercises violence instead. “There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws”(153). In the end of the novel, civilization has been completely eradicated and replaced with savagery. The boys resort to violence to solve issues, which showcases that Golding uses the theme to create a world of increasing violence. Embedded in this theme is the true nature of evil. The boys present their potential for evil through many different circumstances. The boys fear the "beast" which promotes their brutal and violent actions. The irrational fear that the boys have of the beast leads to complications, and prevents them from using any logic. They are unable to recognize the innate evil within each of them, which furthers the theme that the beast is present within all humans. This evil is ultimately exhibited when the boys mistake Simon for the beast and brutally murder him, therefore showing that Golding uses the theme of the novel to create a world of increasing violence. With the use of the setting, the characters, and the themes, William Golding creates a world of increasing violence. It is presented that humanity is infected with evil that leads to corruption and destruction. Humans are innately evil, and society is the only thing preventing the beast to emerge from within us.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
In the Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses characters to convey the main idea of his novel. The story begins with a war, and a plane carrying several young boys, who are being evacuated, is shot down from the sky. There are no adult survivors; however; the boys were brought together by Ralph blowing on the conch shell. They formed a tribe to stay alive. Slowly the stability and the sense of safety in the group started to deteriorate, similar to the downfall of societies during World War II. They are not only hunting animals now, but they are killing each other like savages in order to stay alive. This action of killing is like Hitler during World War II and his persecution of Jews during the Holocaust.
...religious allegory. He depicts a story in which the boys are stranded on an island and need to fend for themselves. However, instead of focusing on rescue and building a fire, the boys ultimately shift their priorities to hunting and killing. They turn a once beautiful and majestic island into a place of terror and evil. Additionally, they maul and kill their only hope of ever changing, Simon. Lord of the Flies is reminiscent of the television series “Lost.” Just like in Golding’s world, “Lost” is staged on a remote far away island after a plane crash. However, these people are not children. They are adults, which makes the story even more chilling. These adults eventually succumb to murderous acts and violence, further proving the point Golding sets out to make. Humans are inherently evil, and without any system to keep them in line, they will destroy the world.
William Golding depicts the island the novel ‘Lord of the Flies’ is set on as a paradise that takes on an idyllic nature. It is pure and completely undamaged before the arrival of the boys and the scar created by the plane crash that brings the boys on the island. Much like the group of boys that are stranded on the island themselves, the island has two sides. The novel begins with the side that is seemingly innocent and free of evil but grows into the more dangerous, stormy side that implies further wounding and damaging. The sinister side of human nature is foreshadowed in the novel through the boys’ descent into savagery, the beast within mankind that gives anyone the capacity to do harm and the natural development of violence in the boys’
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
Violence is a key component to the development of the theme in the book, The Lord of the Flies. The boys enter the island with a sense of freedom, and even though they are stranded on an island, there is a sense of happiness which is shown through a violent scene. The scene being when the boys kill the pig. Even though there is a sense of joy this scene also represents a turning point in the boys and adds to the theme of the book, being a society with no rules will destroy itself. This theme is brought home by the most violent scene in the book, when the boys crush Piggy with the rock. This ruleless society is destroying itself from the inside and the author uses scenes of violence to show that the boys have turned to savages and are going to end up killing each
In 1954, William Golding published the highlight of his career, The Lord of the Flies. The Lord of the Flies demonstrates the depraved nature of humankind by telling the tale of a group of boys stranded on a desert island. After a tragic plane crash, the boys come to realize that they are the only survivors, and begin organizing to build shelters, find food and water, and signal for help. Led by a boy named Ralph, the boys soon build a signal fire and establish a routine for civilized life away from adults. However, the peace established by Ralph is soon compromised by the hunters of the group, led by a boy named Jack. Jack challenges the leadership of Ralph and, through appeal to selfishness and fear, captures the allegiance of most of the boys. Following the ascension of Jack to power, the story quickly turns for the worse as human nature begins to tear the boys’ sense of order to pieces and drive them to savagery. Though Jack’s role in the group initially starts as one of cooperation, the end of the novel leaves more beast than human. In The Lord of the Flies, Jack’s progressive decent from an envious to a demonic self parallels how human nature drives men to savagery and war.
In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding the main concern in the novel is the concern between two competing impulses that exist within all human beings: the instinct to live by rules, act peacefully, follow moral commands, and value the good of the group against the instinct to satisfy ones immediate desires, act violently to obtain power over others, and enforce one’s will. Throughout the novel, Golding associates the instinct of civilization with good and the instinct of savagery with evil. The idea of savagery is central in the novel and show cases in several important symbols, most notably the conch shell, Piggy’s glasses and the dead parachutist.
One’s carelessness for those around them can accentuate the evil nature and barbaric side that is in all of us. In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, the boys’ descent into savagery is emphasized by their lack of care for one another. The boys’ lack of care is shown when Jack is physically violent with Piggy, and when the boys kill Simon.
Evil is not an external force controlled by the devil, but rather the potential for evil resides within each person. Man has the potential to exhibit great kindness or to rape and pillage. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding deals with this evil that exists in the heart of man. With his mastery of such literary tool as structure, syntax, diction, point of view and presentation of character, Golding allows the reader to easily identify with each character and explore the novel's main theme, the constant internal struggle between the forces of good and evil.
conduct an experiment with his students. William left his students in the classroom by themselves, allowing the students to control themselves. The entire experiment rapidly escalated as the students were on the brink of murdering each other, and the entire classroom turned into utter anarchy. This experiment became the inspiration for William Golding's Nobel Prize winning novel, Lord of the Flies. Golding once said, “Lord of the Flies was an attempt to trace the defects of human society back to the defects of the individual, the moral is that the shape of society must depend on the ethical nature of the individual.” In the novel Golding uses symbolism
In the book “ Lord of the Flies” William Golding shows that human nature is basically evil through the symbolism he uses. The entire novel is full of hidden meaning, and many of the items and people are facets of human nature. The preponderance of the symbols represent either virtuous or wicked characteristics, and because the theme of the novel is evil human nature, the symbols that represent evil become more prevalent than the ones that represent estimable traits. The symbols that represent good properties include: the conch and the platform. The representations that have evil connotations are: the Pig’s head and the beast.
William Golding was born in the 20th century roughly around the time World War I was taking place. He went to Oxford and shortly after starting his studies as a natural scientist, changed his focus to English Literature. In 1940 however, Golding joined the Royal Navy to fight in World War II. As to many other soldiers, being in a war can deeply affect one’s view of humanity. The experience of war may have had a profound effect on the Golding’s view of the evils humans are capable of commiting. Lord of The Flies was written in 1954, after the war. It is based on the Golding’s interpretation of humankind, which is violent in the natural state. After crashing on the island, the boys start by making rules and electing a leader. However, as time passes and the boys remain on the island, some start descending into savagery by doing things such as rituals and to the extreme case of murder. Even the most civilized of them all eventually
People are fundamentally savage, so war and death are inevitable. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding, the author of this book, portrays savagery throughout the story. He indirectly proves his point that all human beings are primitive by nature environment.