In his 2008 novel, The Graveyard Book, Neil Gaiman breaks down the boundaries between the world of the dead and that of the living. Gaiman presents an irony in his novel by endowing the dead residents of the graveyard with a caring nature. He depicts the graveyard as a safe place that nurtures innocence in contrast to the living world. Silas, one of the chief characters, remains shrouded in mystery throughout the novel, and his existence is not stated very clearly, neither amongst the living nor the dead. However, the novel offers evidence pointing toward Silas’s undead state of existence –, a life caught between the worlds of life and death. Silas is a reformed version of a vampire, who is travelling through the darkness of life in search …show more content…
of light. First and foremost of my arguments in support of the above-mentioned statement is that vampires usually consume human blood to survive. Sanguinarine vampires and psi-vampires are the two types of vampires that are categorized as real monsters. Sanguinarine vampires usually survive on human and animal blood. It is very clear throughout the novel that Silas never consumed the blood of any creature. For example, “Silas consumed only one food, and it was not bananas” (Gaiman, 2008, p. 27). Though Silas’s food habit remains a mystery throughout the course of this work, I believe that he falls under the category of psi-vampires. Psi-vampires do not consume the blood of any creature, or food for that matter, but feed upon small amounts of energies from other souls (Whitten, “What do vampires eat”). As he traveled through the world of the dead and the living, it is possible that he was feeding on the energies of the dead and living souls who crossed his path. Silas accepted the role of the guardian of the living boy in order to protect him from any evil. And further it is mentioned that “Silas was regarded with the certain wary awe by the graveyard folk, existing as he did on the borderland between their world and the world they have left” (Gaiman 29). The pronoun ‘their’ in the above statement reflects to me, that the existence of Silas not in the living word and not even in the dead world of graveyard folks. His existence as a vampire is confined in-between the border lines of the living and the dead world in order to search the light in the darkness of his life. Furthermore, Silas never appears during the daylight or sunlight throughout the novel. Psi-vampires only relies on the energies of souls. The vampires rely on the processed life-force and sun is an unprocessed celestial energy (Ankhape, “Vampirism Forum”). Sun is a symbol of light and rebirth, and vampires are not categorized even in dead and livings. Hence, vampires dislike the bright rays of sunlight. For example: “he would be there waiting at sunset, just before Silas awakened” (Gaiman 37). This reveals that Silas do not like the sunlight and he always meets with Bod after or before the sunset. His day begins after the sunset and ends before the sunrise. Likewise, when Silas awakes before the time and want to meet Bod in the chapel, it is clearly stated that he does not like the remnants of light (Gaiman 177). He was standing in the shadow of corner to protect himself from the daylight. This shows that Silas is a vampire. Vampires are the undead beings, who never categorized in the living and dead world and this is justified by the statement of Silas during the occasion of macabray dance. As he said to Bod that “you must be alive or you must be dead to dance and I am neither” (Gaiman 149). It is the first plot in the novel, when Silas actually puts his existence in-between the living and dead. Therefore, the existence of Silas is stated unclearly as a reformed vampire, who is seeking the path of light in his life. Moreover, Silas does not have any reflection in the mirror.
As I have mentioned above that vampires are the undead beings and they don’t have any soul, which gives them an identity as a living or a dead. Mirror is a symbol of self-realization and one’s reflection of life and the person without soul have not any reflection in the mirror. Thus, one could speculate that the vampire had no soul, had nothing to reflect in the mirror. The mirror forced the vampire to confront the nature of his/her existence as the undead, neither living nor dead." (Melton 407). For example: Silas saw the cruel reality of Ifrit in the mirror and cover the mirror with his coat in order to not see himself in the mirror (Gaiman 238-239). This shows that Silas is afraid to see the reality of his life in the mirror. Though he was invisible in the mirror, but the reality of his existence as an undead being realize the emptiness of his life. Silas is a reformed version of vampire and a responsible guardian. There is another example of Silas as a bat in the novel, when he came to release Bod from the hands of policemen. For example, --- “Something huge was flying through the air, above the car and to one side, something darker …...and bigger than the biggest bird. Something man-size that flickered and fluttered as it …...moved, like the strobing flight of a bat” (Gaiman 201)………………………………………. These linse reveals that Silas has the ability to change his forms. The bats are the symbol of darkness and always associated with the vampires. The bats also consume the blood and they can only see in the darkness. Silas is a vampire of reformed version, who was ashamed of his previous evil deeds of life (303). Silas was on the path of repentance to seek the light of righteousness in his
life. To conclude, there is always a hope of light in the darkest moments of our life. though the reflection of the outer image of Silas is monstrous and evil, but inside he is blessed with the gift of wisdom and knowledge. He teaches the Bod about the realities of the life in the graveyard, which the material world cannot able to teach him. Silas is self-abandoned and caring vampire. The darkness always reinforces the person on the path of light and goodness.
J. Gordon Melton, in the excerpt “Sexuality and the Vampire” published in his The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead (1998), explains that vampires have a sexual appearance that started from their origin in Dracula. Melton supports his statement by analyzing the monsters' transition to sexual beings through the stories of Dracula’s desires, multiple countries’ erotic tales revolving around vampire-like beings, the manifestation of sensual themes in literary, stage, and screen works, and their current evolution of the once terrified immortals to loved heroes. The purpose of this essay was to outline the seductiveness of the written immortal creatures in order to explain the fanged-mammals’ appeal beyond their terrifying monster abilities.
James Parker essay “Our Zombies, Ourselves,” informs readers that the zombie has almost outranked the vampire, and why they’re so popular. This undead monster originated from a Caribbean folk nightmare and was adapted over time by, the Halperin brothers, William Seabrook and George Romero and numerous others. Much like the vampire, zombies owe their fame to the progressiveness of technology, allowing them to consistently invade various media forms. The zombie has infested countless tv shows, movies, video games, and books, throughout the 21st century. Zombies themselves are soulless corpses who were regurgitated back into the world of the living. This making them rejects from the underworld, this presents the zombie as rejected yet inexpungable. What makes the zombie so popular, however, is that symbolizes everything that is rejected by humanity. “Much can be made of him, because he makes so little of himself. He comes back, He comes back, feebly but unstoppably” (Parker). The zombie represents humanity itself as well as what is rejected by humanity. Much like individuals today, the zombie is burdened by life’s demands, converting to nothing but a rotting, groaning human shell that stumbles through life without a purpose. The zombie is symbolizer of the real world, and all things irrepressible, whereas the vampire is a symbol of an alternate world and all things
In a world with ghosts, monsters, demons, and ghouls, there is one being that resonates in everyone’s mind. The idea of these creatures can be found in almost every culture on the planet in one form or another. They prey on the weak and they feast on the blood of their victims. They are compared to a fox for being quick and cunning, but also rather seductive in their nature. With their unholy existence one can only describe them as almost demonic. So what is this horrid creature? Well it is none other than the vampire, a creature as old as time itself. Throughout history there have been many different variations of the vampire, each with their own unique abilities. But one cannot help but mention
In novels it is not uncommon for characters to be identified as morally ambiguous. It can be extremely difficult to identify a character as purely evil or purely good. In the novel Dracula, Bram Stoker presents a morally ambiguous title character, Dracula. Dracula can be seen as evil by the obvious: he is a vampire that bites people to get their blood. But on the other hand, Dracula can also be seen as good. Dracula is not purposely trying to kill people, he is just trying to protect himself. Lots of people believe that they can understand and analyse other people and try to come up with conclusions on how that person is but Stoker shows how in some cases, analyzing a person cannot easily be done. Most people are not black and white. Their
While the character of Renfield is ostensively extraneous to the central plot of Dracula, he fulfils an important role in Stoker’s exploration of the central themes of the novel. This paper will examine how Renfield character is intertwined with the three central themes of invasion, blood and otherness. Firstly, through Renfield’s inner struggle we learn that he is ‘not his own master’ (Stoker, 211). The theme of invasion is revealed by the controlling and occupying powers of Count Dracula. Secondly, the reoccurring theme ‘the Blood is the Life’ (Stoker, 121), is portrayed throughout the novel and has been interpreted through Stoker’s character Renfield. Then finally, a look at the social construction of the ‘other’ in Dracula and how, through Renfield, who is ‘unlike the normal lunatic’ (Stoker, 52), the Count emerges as the ‘other’ of all ‘others’.
Carmilla is an example of a woman who loves her food far too much. Carmilla is consumed entirely by her food, even sleeping in a coffin of blood: “The limbs were perfectly flexible, the flesh elastic; and the leaden coffin floated with blood, in which to a depth of seven inches, the body lay immersed” (Le Fanu 102). There exists a unique relationship between the vampire and their victims. Food becomes defined in terms of victimhood, distinctly separated from humanity’s general consumption of meat. The need for human victims makes hunting synonymous with courtship, as intense emotional connections are established between the vampiress and her food. As seen in the intense relationship developed between Laura and Carmilla, the vampire is “prone to be fascinated with an engrossing vehemence, resembling the passion of love, by particular persons” (105). For Carmilla, cruelty and love are inseparable (33). The taking of the victims’ blood for sustenance is a highly sexualized exchange of fluids from one body to another. The act of consumption is transformed into an illicit carnal exchange between the hunter and the hunted.
Dracula is a mythical creature designed to wreak havoc on the lives of mortals through the terror and intimidation of death by bite. Vampires are undead beings that kill humans for their blood to survive. Human blood is the vampire’s sustenance, and only way of staying alive. Throughout time, humans have come up with ways to repel vampires, such as lighting jack-o-lanterns on All Hallows Eve, placing garlic around the neck, a stake through the heart, sunlight, etc. Both beings have a survival instinct, whether it be hunger or safety, both are strong emotions. In the novel Dracula by Bram Stoker, the characters Lucy, John, and Van Helsing strive for survival, therefore killing Dracula.
While studying the diabolical figures in the devil, the idea of presenting Dracula came to mind. Dracula represents the devil in many similar ways. Dracula remains as a character in many diabolical movies and films. For instance, Van Helsing provides a good interpret of how Dracula remains noticed in the past and in present day. Although Dracula’s character obtains different views in every movie and film, he plays an important role in Stephen Sommers Van Helsing movie. In the movie, he acts as many different things. Demonstrating both the kind and evil inside, Dracula portrays his character as a mystery. Different views of Dracula throughout the movie include harsh, strong, powerful, evil, the devil, and unstoppable. The studies of Dracula
Count Dracula has been the frontrunner for the modern day vampire lore and legends since being printed back in 1897, pop culture took the vampire traits from Bram Stoker’s Dracula and twisted them. In modern portrayals of vampire lore, each author chooses an original aspect from Stoker but then creates a little bit of their own lore in the process. Count Dracula appears to be a walking corpse from the pale and gaunt visual aesthetics to the coolness of his undead skin (Stoker). In some cultures, the vampire is able to transform from the body of a human being to that of a fellow creature of the night, a bat. In the novel Dracula more than one town was easily visualized through the detailed descriptions throughout the novel, thus
Bram Stoker’s Dracula is the story about how the small company of men and a woman lead by Professor Abraham Van Helsing combats against Count Dracula, who moves from Transylvania to England in order to manipulate people as “foul things of the night like him, without heart or conscience, preying on the bodies and the souls of those [they] love best” (223). Stoker employs an epistolary format in this novel and nowadays, Dracula becomes one of popular literary works representing epistolary novels written in the nineteenth century. The term “epistolary novels” refers to the novels composed of different types of documents, such as journals, letters, newspaper clippings and so forth. One of the effects created by using an epistolary format is providing the characters’ inner state throughout the story, which “focuse[s] on a broader exploration of the insights that made up the conscious self by and [the broader context]” (Ştefan 73). Consequently, Stoker’s use of fragmentary narratives delivers the main characters’ emotions and thoughts in more picturesque ways. In Dracula, the epistolary format of the novel increases terror and suspense, which derived from tension when the story alters after alluding characters’ insecure future and immense power of Dracula affecting not only the main characters, but the third parties who are irrelevant to them.
Humanity has always been fascinated with the allure of immortality and although in the beginning vampires were not a symbol of this, as time passed and society changed so did the ideas and perceptions surrounding them. The most important thing to ask yourself at this point is 'What is immortality?' Unfortunately this isn't as easily answered as asked. The Merriam Webster Dictionary says immortality is 'the quality or state of being immortal; esp : unending existence' while The World Book Encyclopedia states it as 'the continued and eternal life of a human being after the death of the body.' A more humorous definition can be found in The Devil's Dictionary by Ambrose Bierce:
Throughout The Graveyard Book, by Neil Gaiman, there are many different tactics used to show how intense and suspenseful the book really is. Neil Gaiman does an excellent job of creating a nail-biting mood during the duration of the book. Intense events and exquisite details contributed to Gaiman’s success of the doing this. The situations Nobody Owens finds himself in also helps, to make The Graveyard Book, a classic suspenseful fiction book.
While vampire lust is prominent throughout the novel, human lust also contributes to the eroticism that readers are confronted with throughout the story. Some characters, such as Mina Harker, were focal points within the story due to the lust that followed them. For instance, throughout the story, readers were able to notice Dr. Van Helsing’s lust arise for Mina Harker. In Dracula by: Bram Stoker, Dr. Van Helsing is captivated by Mina and her body when he says, “She was so fair to look on, so radiantly beautiful, so exquisitely voluptuous, that the very instinct of man in me, which calls some of my sex to love and to protect one of hers, made my head whirl with new emotion” (320). He did not lust after her because of her personality, but for
Simply searching through articles, databases, and other resources, vampires are depicted as malicious and monstrous creatures. First off, the vampire is famous for its dark and mysterious image affiliated with fear and death. In many ways, “the vampire can be seen through its most basic characterization as the bringer of death”(Stevens par. 3) and evokes a “marginal world of darkness, secrecy, vulnerability, excess, and horror” (Stevens par. 6). Obviously, the vampire has adopted a dark, fearful, and mysterious image. Next, vampires are famous for their unique characteristics. Dictionary.com defines the vampire as “a preternatural being, commonly believed to be a reanimated corpse, that is said to suck the blood of sleeping persons at night”(dictionary.com). Vampires are also known for their distinct weakness suck as “various tailsmans and herbs”(Funk and Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia) but the only way to kill a vampire is “only by cremation or if a stake is driven through their hearts”(Funk and Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia). Another distinct and commonly known characteristic of the vampire is their fear of the light as it could potentially kill them. Emotionally, the vampires are almost viewed as sex symbols as they “indulge in their desires ...
Argument #1: These series has a high ranking and got awards The Vampire Series almost has got 5 million viewers in U.S.A in just one episode. This means that people really loved and enjoyed to watch these series and I consider being one of them and hopefully you could become one. It only got 5 million viewers in just one episode and it ranks about 118- 160 (episode 1-8) unlike the other series like The Original. This only shows that it is one of the best series that you should really watch.