Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proper communication techniques necessary in various criminal justice settings
Proper communication techniques necessary in various criminal justice settings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Doyle takes a risk by changing the point of view from memory to letters, but it was a risk well taken. By by adapting the point of view, Doyle can limit the amount of information the reader receives and makes it much easier to place in red herrings. The reader could be easily mislead and deceived through these letters, because some of the information given can lead to incorrect suspicions towards certain characters. Doyle makes the reader work hard by limiting the amount of information we receive, forcing the reader to infer much more. For example, the reader may infer that Barrymore could have been the killer because in Chapter 9, he sneaks off in the middle of the night to a remote part of the estate with a candle. But in later chapters he is proved to just be hiding the convict Selden. The letter format limits the amount of information the reader receives, but also gives them a clearer …show more content…
understanding of the information given. The extreme detail that Doyle gives in the other chapters, are not present in this chapter. The reader can infer that Watson would see no need to include the extra detail because Sherlock specifically asked for facts. Doyle does a great job in making the reader infer a lot of what the clues mean. Now that the reader is reading the story through an adapted point of view, they can begin to have more inferences than before.
Doyle had cut off the main information source, because Watson was now communicating through letters. He was looking back on the events, remembering them, and then writing them down. Some clues important to the story could have been easily looked over, and not added into the letter. Doyle leaves out the extra detail that he puts in the other chapters and leaves the reader with the cold, hard, facts. It is much easier to comprehend and follow along the plot through this format, but the reader is challenged through understanding the clues and inferring their meanings. Doyle then does not give us a full entry from the letter, in Chapter 10, the message is only an extract from the diary of Watson. Limiting the amount of information given even more. But even though Doyle does not give the reader Watson’s first reaction to the events, they get his analyzed reaction through writing. As a result, Doyle gives the reader filtered and focused
information. Doyle manipulates the story into having all the the six traits intertwine within each other. The specific example of point of view especially correlates with the pacing in the story. Up until now things are beginning to speed up and the story is beginning to escalate faster, but then suddenly Doyle drops a huge change on the reader. Leaving them behind, stuck in the slow-paced events. Through the letter the reader is forced to look back on events through Watson’s point of view, instead of focusing on the current events with him. This gradually slows the story down, because Doyle makes Watson focus on a few events and their importance. Essentially Doyle, uses point of view to change the speed of the story. So as a result the reader, has to take in events at the speed he wants them too. The modern day reader is used to books with fast-paced events right at the beginning of the story and continuing throughout the story and then escalating to “top speed” at the end. But The Hound of the Baskervilles is an overall slow-paced story that escalates quickly at the end. Doyle uses Watson as a tool to convey information to the reader, and then uses Watson’s writing to send facts to the reader. Doyle blends all of the six traits together, making every trait lead to at least one of the others.
Brian Doyle’s “Joyas Volardores” explores the life and emotions that come with being alive. This essay, even though it is written about hummingbirds, speaks about the hearts of many. To convey such emotion, Doyle intertwines long, detailed sentences with short and to the point ones all while telling a captivating story. In The Well Crafted Sentence, Nora Bacon describes a “both/and” (10) style of writing that can be used. This manner of writing showcases metaphor filled sentences that are seen as more pleasurable because they are paired with plain style sentences. By beginning his essay with compact, then leading into lengthy and descriptive sentences, Doyle accomplishes a both/and style of writing.
For instance, when Miss Strangeworth gets to her house,“She decided that she would like to write another letter, perhaps to Mrs. Harper...Miss Strangeworth never concerned herself with facts; her letters all dealt with the more negotiable stuff of suspicion” (347). Dramatic irony is shown through the quote because Mrs. Harper and other people that receive Miss Strangeworth’s letters don’t know that it is her. In addition, the letters aren’t factual but are rather based off of rumors, thus making them only to stir up conflicts. Miss Strangeworth is a gossip and troublemaker as shown through her actions. Her underlying characteristics develop the central conflict in the plot. Also, when Miss Strangeworth goes to mail her anonymous letters, “The third caught on the edge and fell outside, onto the ground at Miss Strangeworth’s feet… “It’s for Don Crane,” the Harris boy said, “this letter. She dropped a letter addressed to Don Crane. Might as well take it on over.”...they wandered off down the dark street, the Harris boy carrying Miss Strangeworth’s pink envelope in his hand. Miss Strangeworth awakened the next morning with a feeling of intense happiness and, for a minute, wondered why, and then remembered that this morning three people would open her letters” (350). Miss Strangeworth didn’t know that she dropped the letter, and the characters don’t know what the contents of the envelope are; by giving it to Don Crane,
Throughout The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne attempted to expose the varying ways in which different people deal with lingering guilt from sins they have perpetrated. The contrasting characters of Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale ideally exemplified the differences in thought and behavior people have for guilt. Although they were both guilty of committing the same crime, these two individuals differed in that one punished themselves with physical and mental torture and the other chose to continue on with their life, devoting it to those less fortunate than they.
British playwright W. Somerset Maugham agrees that there are no set standards to writing, and it is up to the author to find which creative elements help them portray their idea in the way they find most effective. With authors Brian Doyle and Anne Carson, both take unconventional approaches to writing to create an effect unable to be explored with a classically styled narrative. In Joyas Voladoras, Doyle uses extended metaphors and seemingly randomly inserted facts to draw importance to certain parts of the essay. Meanwhile Carson uses perspective as a tool to find the meaning of her seemingly random short stories from Short Talks.
Detective fiction always ends with a successful resolution because law and order is restored. Once moral and social order is restored this impacts the reader as they are still trying to figure out how it happened and how did Holmes solve the crime. The reader also feels relieved when a crime is solved especially if it was Victorian readers.
Hyatt H. Waggoner in “Nathaniel Hawthorne” testifies that Hawthorne’s ambiguity has proven to be an asset in the contemporary era when readers like such a quality in fiction:
“To the untrue man, the whole universe is false,--it is impalpable,--it shrinks to nothing within his grasp. And he himself, in so far as he shows himself in a false light, becomes a shadow, or, indeed, ceases to exist.” (Hawthorne 115) Throughout the hostile novel The Scarlet Letter, author Nathaniel Hawthorne used contrasting settings to represent opposed ideas that were central to the meaning of the work. Some have argued that when it came to the theme that secrets have a destructive effect on the secret-keeper and truth, by contrast, was natural, a character evaluation would best advocate these differences. However, two settings, Dimmesdale’s house and the secrets that lie within, and the scaffold representing the truth, better embody the adverse ideas posed by the point at issue.
In the movie adaptation of Doyle’s story, the audience is not limited to only reading or listening to dialogue to progress the story’s plot as it is in the book. In the written version of the story, Helen Stoner’s testimony is what sets up the scene and describes the events that led to her seeking
It was said that Jack the Ripper would leave letters exclaiming him as the murderer. Sometimes the letters were put in poetic form, while others exclaimed in detail what he had done. The letters were neatly crafted and found pleasantly disturbing, but no one knew who they were from. Investigators and many others thought the reason for these letters was to scare or even play with the emotions of the victim’s family and friends. It is said that all the murders had a letter teasing the officers into outrage. (Fido…10)
I know this because in the story, he included all the dates and times, and spoke about the mystery very precisely and specifically. Also, he always mentioned what he was doing or thinking at a specific time. At the beginning, as the client came in, Watson, from his point of view thought in the story that “he had no keener pleasure than following Holmes in his professional investigations. Because of this evidence I have found, I know that the story is written from Watson’s point of view.
Some readers might argue that curiosity is one of the many themes of the book and one can not deny that there are various themes to this book. Nevertheless, curiosity is the best theme that should be recognized because curiosity is shown throughout the course of the whole book. In chapter six, paragraph two, Mr. Utterson almost gives in to curiosity, “A great curiosity came on the trustee, to disregard the prohibition and dive at once to the bottom of these mysteries; but professional honour and faith to his dead friend were stringent obligations; and the packet slept in the inmost corner of his private safe.” Curiosity is so very powerful in this book because Mr. Utterson's curiosity almost drove him into looking at a letter he legally was not suppose to look at. In chapter six, paragraph thirteen, it shows the difference of what curiosity can do to you, “It is one thing to mortify curiosity, another to conquer it; and it may be doubted if, from that day forth, Utterson desired the society of his surviving friend with the same eagerness.” The quote is expressing that it is one thing to have curiosity but it is another to let it control your life. Once you let it control you it is hard to revert back to being free. Also in chapter six, in paragraph fourteen, it shows that without curiosity, and being intrigued, sometimes you have no motivation to keep you returning, “Utterson became so used to
In the story The True Confession of Charlotte Doyle, there are many conflicts that lead up to a theme. One conflict is on page 9 “ Did you say Captain Jaggery?” The porter demanded. “ Are you addressing me?” Mr. Grummage inquired, making it perfectly clear that if so, the porter had committed a serious breach of decorum.” This piece of text is a conflict because the Mr. Gammage is a higher class than the porter and low-class people are not supposed to talk to people like Mr. Grummage. Also, the porter was just paid to carry lunge and nothing else. Mr. Grummage is technically telling the Porter to keep his mouth shut because he was just paid to carry luggage and doing nothing else. This conflict has a possible theme of upper class does not matter.
After a slow week Watson observes that Ms. Stapleton saying to go back to London to Watson. Watson puts that into his first memo to Holmes. In his second Memo he had put in that there was a convict on the moor. Also during that memo he mentioned that he heard the howl of a strange animal. He also adds the description of all the suspects. One night they follow Barrymore into a room where he has a candle up against the window. Watson found out that the convict on the moor is Mrs. Barrymore’s brother and they were feeding him. Watson and Sir Henry decided to go catch the convict that night. That night they chase the convict to run from the moor when they see a shadow of a man in shape somewhat like Holmes. Later that week Barrymore gives Watson some critical evidence of who could have killed Sir Charles. Barrymore gives Watson an end of a burnt letter with the initials L.L. The next day Watson goes to everyone in the moor who has the initials of L.L. He finds out it was Laura Lyons and goes to her the next day.
Likewise, changes have been made on the level of the character in pursuance of the strong bond between Holmes and Watson. For instance, due to plot change some character have been removed, but John H. Watson and Sherlock Holmes the heart of the whole story indeed are kept. For instance, Sherlock Holmes is portrayed as Watson describes him in the “he was as sensitive to flattery on the score of his art as any girl could be of her beauty” (Doyle 38). Also, Holmes calls himself a “consulting detective” just like the title he gave himself in the novel. Indeed, Holmes as one of the main characters of the story needs to show similar characteristics of the original Holmes, or else the show would have lost its meaning. Although Holmes’ deductive skills are shown pretty clearly in the show, his expertise in cigars are not mentioned as in the book the detective says he “‘can distinguish at a glance the ash of any known brand either of cigar or tobacco’” (Doyle 37). Yet the writers of the show, might reveal Holmes’ expertise later on in the show since they have the 60 different
Arthur Miller states that the story has to have living characters. In The Scarlet Letter, the main characters are Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, Pearl, and Roger Chillingworth. Nathaniel Hawthorne successfully brings these characters to life by showing us human nature and by making them breathe and cry and have emotions that only real people can feel. Hester has real emotions as Hawthorne shows us when he tells what is going through her head when she is on the scaffold in the first scaffold scene; “…she saw her own face, glowing with girlish beauty…” He also shows us Dimmesdale and the guilt he endures “…the judgement of God is on me…it is too mighty for me to struggle with!” He shows us how Pearl’s darkness throughout the book, “Hester could not help question…if Pearl was a human child…. deeply black eyes…” Hawthorne brilliantly portrays these characters as living.