Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The social classes in charles dickens
The social classes in charles dickens
Charles Dickens and the social
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The social classes in charles dickens
Imagine living in the 1700s surrounded by an era of revolution. You are poor, and survive off of whatever you can find on the streets. You live on the verge of death everyday, and you can do nothing about it. The little money you’ve earned goes to different types of taxes from the church, to the government, and even the lord. Around the world the exact same thing is happening, and it is destroying humanity. Chaos fills the streets, and the peasants demand blood. This is because less than one percent of the people living in France control all the money, and these nobles are corrupt. In chapter eight of A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens, he describes society and the people during that time. He express his views on the society by showing that the nobles are corrupted by power, and the common citizens have nothing. Charles Dickens suggests that society is broken, and that it is run by those who do not deserve the power given to them. Dickens starts with a metaphor describing society. He talks about the landscape “with the corn bright in it, but not …show more content…
abundant.” This is referring to the nobles that essentially rule society in France. They are the best type of crop, but they are so few in numbers, referring to the class division being imbalanced and unfair. He then goes on with “patches of poor rye where corn should have been...patches of most coarse vegetable substitutes for [corn].” These patches of other crops represents the rest of society, weak and poor. Not only that but the patches represent the broken societies and imbalance between class. The other crops are inferior and not needed, just as the nobles look down on the citizens as a waste of space. Dickens uses this metaphor as a way of showing classes of society and the segregation of these two types of people. The main character featured in this excerpt is Monsieur the Marquis. Dickens uses this man as a symbol of corruption, which is demonstrated in a few ways throughout the passage. He is wealthy enough to travel by carriage (which is one of his many carriages), and have staff go with him. The setting sun stains him crimson, which is symbolizing all the blood on his hands. The crimson effect has another meaning, “the sun and the marquis going down together.” This is foreshadowing the death of the Marquis. Dickens uses him as a way to show the downfall of many other nobles in france and around the world. The people are starting to fight back to fix their country, and end the tyranny of nobles. Dickens puts a lot of emphasis on the word poor in the second half of the passage to give readers a taste of the 1700s.
He describes the setting by referring to it as a “broken country.” The village has “one poor street...poor brewery...poor tannery...poor tavern...poor stable...poor apartments…[and] it had its poor people too.” The tone dickens provides is harsh and disturbing. The people live on nothing, and even eat whatever edible leaves and grasses they can find just to stay alive. Dickens then goes on to state why they are poor. “The tax for the state, the tax for the church, the tax for the lord, tax local and tax general.” All of the money they own goes to tax, so they don’t have to go to jail. Dickens then states that this is “life on the lowest terms that could sustain it...or captivity and Death in the dominant prison.” You can either choose to barely survive, or rot away in prison until you
die. Dickens does not stress enough the imbalance between classes, and the corruption in society. His attitude is represented throughout the poem by his somber tone provided. He uses the Marquis and crops as metaphors to nobles and segregation. Dickens does not agree with the fact that people give all their money to taxes just to barely stay alive a little longer. When the nobles do nothing and the rest of the population does all the work, yet they get nothing for it is disturbing. Dickens believes that this needed to be stopped and changed, because the nobles are corrupt and wicked, and will do nothing about the society that is falling apart and getting worse day by day.
Dickens describes the conditions of the village with a pathetic tone; throughout the passage, the village, and its people are described with uses of anaphora to emphasize the conditions that he so despises. Furthermore, the passage uses short descriptions to summarize the pathetic that he has. For example, the first paragraph ends with: “... [T]he men and women who cultivated it, a prevalent tendency towards an appearance of vegetating unwillingly--a
Power can allow one to make decisions for others than will benefit them, but too much power can cause one to become corrupt. In the novel, A Tale of Two Cities, the author, Charles Dickens, views power as a way in which corruption arises. Throughout the novel, Dickens speaks about three characters who starts to abuse their power as time passes in the novel. Dickens portrays the characters of the Monseigneur, the Marquis of Evermonde, and the revolutionaries as characters who goes through a change as a result of power.
Dickens used his great talent by describing the city London were he mostly spent his time. By doing this Dickens permits readers to experience the sights, sounds, and smells of the aged city, London. This ability to show the readers how it was then, how ...
To most, Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities is that book about the poor people and the French Revolution that isn’t Les Miserables where he ravages the rich people, calling them “tigerish,” (Dickens 33) following the lord “ignorancem” (Dickens 33) and saying that they “held life as of no account,” (Dickens 221) right? Wrong. Yes, A Tale of Two Cities is a book by Dickens mostly about the poor people and the French Revolution (that isn’t Les Miserables) wherein he makes metaphorically eviscerates the rich people, but these are all references to the poor, the downtrodden, the little guy, in short, the people we and Dickens are supposed to root for. Dickens, for a genuine friend of the poor, as shown in his books A Christmas Carol, Great Expectations, and Oliver Twist, and as someone who wrote to the masses, disparages the poor quite a bit in A Tale of Two Cities. In the words of Frederick Busch “[Dickens] fears revolution, … the downtrodden in revolt become, to Dickens, downright revolting.” It is not that the gentry in A Tale of Two Cities are the protagonists; rather, that the poor are antagonists as well. To sum, when blood rains from the sky, no one’s hands are clean.
Dickens portrays London as a places crawling with sickness and death. Dickens having lived in London during this time period would know what he was talking about. He shows us the horrid treatment of the poor at the workhouse, especially in Chapter III when young Oliver is locked up for a week up, simp...
Frederick Douglass once said, “Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe.” He meant that if people are oppressed, one day they will pass their breaking point and fight back. As a consequence neither side will be safe or secure as violence and terror would corrupt them both. In A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens, the author employs satire, symbolism, and irony to emphasize the social/economic inequality between the wealthy and the poor. The inequality is revealed by Dicken’s satirical description of the lifestyles of Monsignor of Chocolate and the Marquis Evrémonde. In contrast with the people in the wine cask scene; the scene indicates that the people are on their breaking point. Finally, the irony of the trials emphasizes Dicken’s warning to the upper class of England during the 1850s; if they abuse power then vengence will be sought. If action is not taken, England will be engulfed in violence and both the aristocracy and the peasants will suffer.
As we know, in the book, Charles Dickens tries to demonstrate how the protagonists are trapped between two worlds. The two worlds shown in the book are the upper-class and the lower-class, and, when contrasted, we can see just how different these two worlds are. The well-off upper-class is somewhat of a superficial setting where people have to project an image of wealth because they are judged by their material possessions. Therefore, people become prone to accumulating a good amount of debt. The characteristics of the upper class aren't all negative, however.
In the opening Dickens uses a narrator who speaks in the first person. This brings the reader straight into the scene, immediately catching th...
In his extract, Dickens is able to display the repeated idea of class by having all the people making their way to work be of lower and/or middle class occupations. Similarly, Kureishi creates the theme of class when he is comparing the close towns in the city of London that give the impression of being two completely opposite worlds. Kureishi brings out the theme of society by simply describing the characteristics and occupational norms of the people that live in specific areas in
Our Mutual Friend, Dickens' last novel, exposes the reality Dickens is surrounded by in his life in Victorian England. The novel heavily displays the corruption of society through multiple examples. These examples, that are planted within the novel, relate to both the society in Dickens' writing and his reality. In order to properly portray the fraud taking place within his novels, Dickens' uses morality in his universe to compare to the reality of society. He repetitively references to the change of mind and soul for both the better and the worst. He speaks of the change of heart when poisoned by wealth, and he connects this disease to the balance of the rich and the poor. This is another major factor to novel, where the plot is surrounded by a social hierarchy that condemns the poor to a life of misery, and yet, condones any action that would normally be seen as immoral when it occurs in the aristocracy. It expands on the idea that only an education and inheritance will bring success in society, with few exceptions. Lastly, Dickens expands his opinions of society through his mockery of ...
Throughout his lifetime, Dickens appeared to have acquired a fondness for "the bleak, the sordid, and the austere."5 Most of Oliver Twist, for example, takes place in London's worst slums.6 The city is described as a maze which involves a "mystery of darkness, anonymity, and peril."7 Many of the settings, such as the pickpocket's hideout, the surrounding streets, and the bars, are also described as dark, gloomy, and bland.8
Therefore, any citizen that opposed the social hierarchy was perceived insolent. For example, the protagonist of the novel, Oliver, simply, did not grasp the absoluteness of this social structure. In this passage, Dickens draws the reader in with the assumption that the reader has a concrete understanding of the historical and social constructs of Victorian society as well as the overwhelming naiveté of Oliver Twist. This is illustrated when the boys are whispering amongst one another and winking at Oliver in effort to encourage Oliver, “child as he was, he was desperate with hunger and reckless with misery”, when he rose from the table advancing to the master with his basin and spoon in hand and boldly declared “please sir, I want some more”. Therefore, Oliver’s action unintentionally defied the social hierarchy extending his social status for a moment far above his actual rank on the social totem pole. Oliver’s behaviour was perceived to be outright audacious and unnatural, this is highlighted when; “The master gazed in stupefied astonishment on the small rebel for some seconds; and then clung for support to the copper. The assistants were paralysed with wonder; the boys with fear.” This quote emphasizes Oliver’s insubordination when he daring requests for “more”. Dickens uses diction to accentuate the overwhelming disbelief of Oliver’s behviour as a
History has not only been important in our lives today, but it has also impacted the classic literature that we read. Charles Dickens has used history as an element of success in many of his works. This has been one of the keys to achievement in his career. Even though it may seem like it, Phillip Allingham lets us know that A Tale of Two Cities is not a history of the French Revolution. This is because no actual people from the time appear in the book (Allingham). Dickens has many different reasons for using the component of history in his novel. John Forster, a historian, tells us that one of these reasons is to advance the plot and to strengthen our understanding of the novel (27). Charles Dickens understood these strategies and could use them to his advantage.
can be seen in Oliver Twist, a novel about an orphan, brought up in a workhouse and poverty to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the upper class people. Oliver Twist shows Dickens' perspective of society in a realistic, original manner, which hope to change society's views by "combining a survey of the actual social scene with a metaphoric fiction designed to reveal the nature of such a society when exposed to a moral overview" (Gold 26). Dickens uses satire, humorous and biting, through pathos, and stock characters in Oliver Twist to pr...
Throughout the novel there are two very prominent themes: the notion that industrialization has a mechanizing effect on human beings and the recurring battle of fact versus fancy. However, the latter can be seen as subordinate to the first. Forthwith in the novel Dickens establishes the emphasis on facts and statistics (“The One Thing Needful”), using a monologue to introduce his novel: “Now, what I want is, Facts. […]Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else.” (Dickens 3). Immediately the stage is set, with Dickens creating a character whose sole belief could no doubt be proved using further statistics and facts. What Dickens has also done by the end of the first chapter is describe a character who possesses qualities common to many industrialists and of that era, a character who himself appears to represent a part of the industry, one who was “inflexible, dry, and dictatorial” (Dickens 3). Given the prevalence of utilitarianism in the time of writing, it is apparent why Dickens chose to embody the main theme in a character that is so “eminently practical” that he comes off as cold as the great hulking...