Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification of capital punishment
Arguments for and against capital punishment
Arguments for and against capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justification of capital punishment
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is defined as the pre-meditated or planned taking of a human life by a government in response to a crime committed by that legally convicted person. It has been discussed extensively over the years by many people. There are many reasons to agree or disagree with capital punishment, but the reasons against it completely outweigh the ones that support it. Many of the justifications for affirming the death penalty either do not apply wholly to our justice system, are misunderstood, or just do not make sense. There is no justification for killing other human beings and all of the arguments cannot change this. Since 1976, over one thousand people have been executed by the government.
In his essay, H.L. Mencken, claims that the death penalty should be used as a means to katharsis or a way of revenge. This does not, however, fit in to our justice system as a whole. Our justice system is set up to give convicted criminals a sentence that adheres to their crime, yes, but it is not a complete eye for an eye system. We sentence people to time in jail or probation or some other sort of retribution that we have predetermined fit to punish these criminals. The justice system does not sentence a rapist to be raped, nor does it sentence someone that has mutilated another person to be mutilated themselves. Instead they sentence these people to jail or community service of some sort. It would not be logical or moral to only punish one type of criminal with a different form of punishment. It does not make sense to make to jail sentence continually worse and then just jump to a new form of punishment for something society considers the worst.
Society is the only determining facto...
... middle of paper ...
...et our society on the rightful track. Our government needs to lead by example and stop. There is just no real justification for killing any person.
Works Cited
Death Row Fact Sheet. Florida Department of Corrections, 2011. Web. 12 April, 2011.
Facts About the Death Penalty. Death Penalty Information Center, 2011. Web. 13 April, 2011.
King, Coretta Scott. “The Death Penalty Is a Step Back.” Muller 148-150.
Mencken, H.L. “The Penalty of Death.” Muller 145-147.
Muller, Gilbert H., ed. The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008. Print.
Radelet, Michael L. and Marian J. Borg. “The Changing Nature of Death Penalty Debates.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 43-61. Annual Reviews. Web.
The Case Against the Death Penalty. American Civil Liberties Union. Web. 13 April, 2011.
Jacobs, David and Jason T. Carmichael. 2002. “The Political Sociology of the Death Penalty: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis.” American Sociological Review 67: 109-131.
Radelet, Michael L. and Borg, Marian J. “The Changing Nature of Death Penalty Debates.” Annual Sociology Review. 2000: 43-57. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 November 2013.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is when someone convicted of a crime is put to death by the state. This practice has been around for centuries. The death penalty has evolved from acts like public hanging, to the more “humane” lethal injection used today. Many people view this as the only acceptable punishment for murderers, mass rapist, and other dangerous crimes.
In the article “The Penalty of Death”, written by H. L. Mencken, utilitarian principles are used to cover up for a system that wants results. All of the reasons that Mencken gives as justifications do not give concrete evidence of why the death penalty should continue as a means of punishment. The article states, “Any lesser penalty leaves them feeling that the criminal has got the better of society...” This statement alone demonstrates how he believes the death penalty brings justice and satisfaction to the people. Mencken creates the points he makes in his article in order to give society a way to make the death penalty seem less intrusive on moral principles and more of a necessary act.
Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights meant so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes. If a person is so uncompassionate for human life and not care what happens; are sick enough to harm someone else, they should also pay the price with their lives.
Presently, a driving ethical debate in the United States is the decision to embrace or abolish the death penalty. This debate is notable because it impacts several different segments of society. Capital punishment can prove to be beneficial to our community because practicing the death penalty, both appropriately and efficiently, can produce advantageous results. Consider the amount of government money being hemorrhaged into the justice system; as well as, the poignant...
While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that capital punishment is being used for vengeance or as a deterrent. Capital punishment has been used worldwide, not only by the governments to instill fear, but to show that there are repercussions to ones actions. From the time we are born, we are taught to learn the difference between right and wrong. It is ingrained in our brains, what happens to people that do bad things? Capital punishment is renowned for being the worst thing that could be brought amongst ones life.
“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.
Capital punishment is the sentence of death, or practice of execution handed down. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. The main question surrounding this form of punishment is “should the death penalty be legalized in all states?” My answer is “yes,” and that is for a few reasons I believe that it should be legalized in all states. It is morally defended by lex talionis, which derives from the Babylonian law code of ancient Mesopotamia called the “Code of Hammurabi,” prison overcrowding is becoming a burden to the United States of America, and it is a primary deterrence of criminal behavior.
Capital Punishment is a practise in which prisoners are executed in accordance with judicial practice when they are convicted of committing what is known as a “capital crime”. Capital crimes are crimes so heinous that they should be punishable by death. People may also use the term “death penalty” to refer to Capital Punishment. Worldwide, this practise is extremely controversial, with a variety of concern ranging from human rights to economic efficiency being raised in discussion about Capital Punishment.
...it makes people no better than those murderers. The practice of death penalty makes society murderer which also makes us murderers.
Ethics and morality are the founding reasons for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, leading to the highly contentious nature of the debate. When heinous crimes are com...
More than 607 people were executed worldwide due to capital punishment, only 22% less than in 2013. While death from capital punishment has gone down, people still believe we have the right to take a living person’s life away. If that person committed a crime that was equivalent to the punishment of death, should society continue in its ways of ‘an eye for an eye’; or move onto a more civilized solution? The death penalty is shown to be a more barbaric thing for some people in the U.S., and Europe, but in other countries, like in the Middle East, it is considered a way to assert dominance over other countries of political leaders that you would go as far as to kill someone for a petty crime.
The death penalty is by far the most controversial topic in today 's society. However, there are many people who supports the death penalty, yet there is also a great amount of people who believe the death penalty is wrong. The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the punishment of execution that is administered to someone who is legally convicted of a capital crime. Although opponents of the death penalty believe that it is against human rights, capital punishment is appropriate with the support of the fifth amendment, it is morally acceptable, and gives Justice to the victims and their families.
Capital punishment is the punishment of death for a crime given by the state. It is used for a variety of crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and treason. Many countries also have the death penalty for sexual crimes such as rape, incest and adultery. The lethal injection, the electric chair, hanging and stoning are all methods of execution used throughout the world. Capital punishment has been around since ancient times; it was used in ancient Rome, and one of the most famous people to be crucified was Jesus Christ. Capital punishment is now illegal in many countries, like the United Kingdom, France and Germany, but it is also legal in many other countries such as China and the USA. There is a large debate on whether or not capital punishment should be illegal all over the world as everyone has a different opinion on it. In this essay, I will state arguments for and against the death penalty, as well as my own opinion: capital punishment should be illegal everywhere.