Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spanish conquest perspective
Spanish conquest perspective
Spanish conquest in Latin America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spanish conquest perspective
To a certain extent, the conflict and defeat of the Aztecs were, unfortunately, unavoidable. For this reason, the Spanish had a greater chance of overcoming the numbers of the Aztec soldiers with their alliance with the indigenous neighbouring states. Even if Cortes was defeated, and brought shame to the king, he would send other conquistadors until Mexico was claimed, this was another valuable reason why the Aztecs would be eventually defeated. Not to forget the fact that the Spanish had a different sense of combat when it came to military strategizing and techniques. With the defeat of the Aztecs, this was a beginning to a whole new dimension in European history.
Alliance with other indigenous groups was one of the main factors that helped
…show more content…
Cortes overcome the Aztec army that led to a successful defeat. After two weeks of fierce battling with the Tlaxcalans, who were the people of an independent state neighbouring Tenochtitlan, the leaders of the group saw this as a the perfect opportunity to create an incorruptible alliance. Cortes saw this as a useful advantage, because in the end, the Spanish had a larger force to conquer the Aztecs. Not only that there were a vast number of allies, but deep hatred against the Aztecs made the warriors’ performance in battle more effectively. The reason that the Tlaxcalans hated the Aztecs so much was because of a tax system called tribute. It was a system of which conquered states were forced to pay a tax in the form of goods and labor. Since Tlaxcala was conquered by the Aztecs, they would have to give what they had every once in awhile. This included taking a large number of Tlaxcalans away from their families so the Aztecs would be able to bring back sacrifices to please their gods. With this alliance, the numbers of warriors gradually grew and overcame the Aztecs. If failed to conquer Tenochtitlan the first time, Spain would eventually send more conquistadors to return. For this reason, Spain was a country that did not give up easily until they achieved their goal. In this case, the Aztecs would still be able to carry their religious and dietary aberrations for a while longer, but would eventually be conquered by a more successful conquistador after Cortes’ failure. With this ability to sponsor more expeditions back to Mexico, the Aztecs would possibly be able to hold back, at least, two more waves of Spanish soldiers before accepting defeat. Theoretically, if the Aztecs were able to survive a century after Cortes’ attempt, Mexico would have been discovered already and there would have been a higher chance of other countries finding out about the wealth that the Aztecs had and lived on. Since other countries were greedy and would do anything to improve their economy, Tenochtitlan may turn into a bloody war zone and the city would be in more damage than it already was when Cortes conquered the Aztecs in 1521. The king’s thirst for gold and glory will drive Spain to conquer anything imaginable. With the techniques and strategies used by the conquistadors, the Spanish overpowered the Aztecs using multiple methods.
One of the methods included having powerful weapons as a technological advantage, such as muskets because this was a special device common in Europe, but unknown in Mexico. When the Aztecs heard firearms, they thought it was thunder and lightning sent down to Earth from the gods because they were angry. One way that the Spanish used their weapons was by doing what was called a volley line and shooting at their enemy simultaneously. This created the maximum effect needed because every time the Aztecs recklessly approached them, they would blast hundreds of musket pellets at the warriors. Even though the reload time was not efficient, they were able to make another volley fire line to give the soldiers that just fired, a chance to reload and refill their ammo. An animal that the Aztecs would never expect for the Spanish to bring in battle were horses. The Spanish soldiers that were on horseback amazed the Aztec warriors and the fact that they could not compete against the Spanish because of their multitasking skills of being able to control a horse’s reins with one hand while swinging a sword in the other. With the size, power and speed of these animals, the Aztecs were never able to have a classic battle on
feet.
"The Broken Spears" by Miguel Leon-Portilla gives a different perspective on the defeat of the Aztecs. Through reasons such as religion and culture beliefs, the Spanish technological advancement, and their strategy of gaining alliances in the new land contributed to the defeat of the Aztecs. The two factors that played the biggest roles were the poor leadership of Motechuhzoma and the timing of the plague. Those two factors were indeed what brought down this great Empire.
The author argues that the Spanish were completely at fault for the total destruction of the Aztec Empire. In Broken spears, the author explains how many factors other than Spanish power contributed to the downfall of the Aztecs. Not only did the Spanish have many advantages over the Aztecs, but also they also exploited them and took advantage of the cultural difference. The main key aspects to the Spanish victory, is that the Spanish were viewed as gods at first because of their appearance, the Aztecs welcomed the Spanish with gifts and festivities, which showed the Spanish had total control of people. The Aztecs also held a ritual ceremony for the arrival of the “god” that included a human sacrifice, which was seen by the Spanish as a disgusting act, this trigged Spanish hatred for the Aztecs. When the Spanish saw the resources that the Aztecs had, they quickly started taking advantage of the Aztecs weaknesses. The Spanish had more power; they were better equipped than the Aztecs and more advanced. The Aztecs’ leader Montecuhzoma was a weak leader, he was more of a coward, more concerned with his well being and safety than the safety of his people and kingdom so he quickly surrendered under pressure. The Spanish used surrounding enemy tribes to take over the Aztec lands, then began to massacre men, women and children. When the Aztec became angry and started to fight back, they were quickly wrecked by the diseases the Spanish ...
There were millions of Aztecs and only a few hundred Spaniards. How was it then that the Spaniards, even with their steel and guns, could overrun them? The answer lies in a number the Spanish had even more of: microbes, which no one counted on. Yes, the encounters destroyed the Indians’ homes and made them slaves, but they also brought in disease and unknown illnesses to the New World. Millions had died, and generations disappeared. 50 years after the Spanish conquest 88% of the Mexican population was destroyed and only up to 200 thousand natives survived the ordeal. Also, the second in the list of causes of death had become the commonplace brutal treatment and poor conditions during slavery, and the third was by war
August 13th, 1521 marked the end of a diabolical, yet genius group of leaders. They were referred to as the Aztecs. They were an extremely advanced ancient civilization. The Aztec’s were overthrown by the Spanish, yet we still haven’t forgotten the Aztecs. But since their culture was so complex it’s hard to know what is the most necessary thing to study when it comes to them, especially when their were so many things that defined their culture. The Aztecs were highly religious and believed in human sacrifice. They also had a complex method of farming called chinampas. This grew an extremely large amount of food per year by using canals. This was extremely successful because of how complex it was. When asked if historians should emphasize agriculture
Cortes was able to conquer the Aztecs for several very different reasons. In combination these reasons allowed him to have the upper hand in the conquest of Mexico. Arguably these reasons can be sorted into six different categories. The various causes for Cortes' success will be assessed in a climax pattern. To begin with the Aztecs had a harsh tribute system that was not popular among the people of Mexico. This cruel tribute system allowed Cortes to act as a liberator. Furthermore, with the Spanish brought several diseases into Mexico in witch they were immune to but the Aztecs were not. The spread of diseases such as small pox reduced the Aztec population and furthered Cortes' success unintentionally Also Marina was a tribal girl given as a gift to Cortes, she proved invaluable in translating local dialects in combination with Geronimo de Aguilar. Also an important aspect of his success was due to Montezuma's belief that Cortes was Quetzakoatl. A predominant reason for the Spanish success was due to their weaponry especially their armour and firepower. Perhaps the most important reason of all was that of Cortes' Indian allies such as the Tlaxcalans who made up the majority of his combined army. All these reasons worked together to allow Cortes, originally with 508 men to conquer the Aztec Empire of millions of people.
The downfall of the Aztec Empire was a major building block of the Spanish colonial empire in the Americas. Spain’s empire would stretch all the way into North America from the Southwest United States all the way up the Pacific Coast. The unfortunate side effect of this was the elimination of many nations of indigenous people. The three major themes shown in this conquest really give deeper look into the anatomy of this important historical event. Without context on the extent of native assistance given to Cortez in his fight with the Aztecs, a reader would be grossly uniformed. The Spanish conquest was closer to a civil war than an actual conquest. Until reading detailed personal accounts of the fighting it is difficult to judge the deadly effectiveness of the Spaniards technological superiority. Without it is difficult to imagine 500 conquistadors holding thousands of native warriors at bay. Once the greed of Cortez and greed in general of the Europeans one understands that if it wasn’t Cortez if would have just been a different man at a different time. Unfortunately fame and prosperity seem to always win over cares about fellow human beings
This argument has been revisited intermittently even in a British museum in London in 2009. They had an exhibit showing the war between the Spanish and the Aztecs. The evidence for either of them being more civil or more savage is overwhelming. This decision is honestly, possibly one of the hardest I’ve ever made in my life due to all the information. In ways, both were savage, both were civilized, and both were ruthless. With all the research I’ve done and all the information that has been provided to me, I can finally conclude that the Spanish were more savage and the Aztecs were more civil.
At first, it seemed like the Spanish had total control of the city, but trouble soon broke out. In May 1520, Cortes briefly left the city. Ignorantly, his men, for some odd reason, attacked the Aztec. "Those Idiots!" I bet Cortes would have exclaimed as he came back to find his men being besieged in Moctezuma's palace. Cortes, being quite the intelligent thinker, thought that calming them would be the best way out of the situation.
The Aztecs were defeated by the Spanish after a riot that put the city-state in a state of confusion
The Spanish defeat of the Aztecs has been extensively criticized for many years. Religion was a motive for discovery, enabled the Spanish to enter the heart of the empire, and was used as justification for torture of the natives. The centrality of religion as a force in Spanish conquest is undeniable. Virtually all of Aztec culture was destroyed and the Spanish victory has had lasting effects for both natives and Europeans up to and including the present-day.
The Spaniards didn’t destroy the Aztec civilization all by their self another factor which helped the Spanish were the disease that they brought over to the Americas from Europe and Africa. The introduction of diseases like syphilis, measles, smallpox, malaria, mumps and yellow fever are just some sickness that plagued the Budhu 2 Aztecs. Also the introduction of different species of animals and plants caused a ecological imbalance (Plagues and Peoples 176-199). All these are some reasons to why the Aztec civilization was destroyed. With the arrival of the Spanish in Mexico rumors started to reach
Hostilities started on April 24th, 1846, 2000 Mexican cavalry crossed the Rio Grande and attacked an American troop of 63 men. This was called the Thornton Affair, 11 troopers were killed and the rest were captured. After that, the Mexicans started bombing Fort Brown, the United States sent General Zach Taylor with 2400 men to relieve the fort. The Mexican general Mariano Arista with 3400 men rushed out to meet them. When the congress heard of the news, they declared ¡§American blood has been shed on American soil¡¨ and they declared war on Mexico. The Americans used a new artillery method called flying artillery, in which mobile light artillery was mounted on horse carriages and the cannoneers were mounted too, in addition, the shells exploded on impact, devastating the Mexican artillery, the Arista tried to route the Flying Artillery with the Mexican Cavalry but did not succeed. The American Artillery demoraliz...
The Rise and fall of the Aztec Empire is possibly the most important area of study in the modern world. Of all of the nomadic tribes who migrated into Mexico, the Aztecs were one of the last. At first driven away by established tribes, the Aztecs slowly began to develop an empire of immense wealth and power by the late fifteenth century. Due in large part to the accomplishments of their ruler Itzcoatl, the empire expanded to include millions of people from a number of different tribes, including the Cempoala, who would later aid the Spanish in defeating the Aztecs. Because of the "melting pot" within the empire, the Aztecs had a very diverse culture. However, this immense Aztec Empire would soon be brought to its knees by the doings of one man and his army.
In this essay I will tell how the Aztec and Inca empires ended, and also I will compare the fall of both empires, using for a point of departure the arrival of the Spanish conquistadors in the land of Mexico. Wherever the Spanish went always the same thing happened, from my point of view. Innocent people were killed for no good reason, cities were massacred, civilizations were destroyed or forced to convert to Christianity. And so, I think now is the time to reevaluate the actions of the European explorers who subjugated the native American peoples and their civilizations. Undoubtedly the most glorified and heroically portrayed of these figures of the European conquest of the New World were the conquistadors, the Spanish conquerors of Mexico and Peru in the 16-th century. These men, under leaders such as Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizzaro nearly eliminated the Aztec and Inca peoples. Surely many of these soldiers were extremely cruel and intolerant of the native populations. But it is important to consider, with the push of both sides toward territorial expansion, how these groups (European and American) could remain isolated from each other. Furthermore, with meeting of these two imperialist cultures, it must be considered whether it would be possible for the two to peacefully coexist.
middle of paper ... ... The Aztecs were defeated, partially because they had been weakened by smallpox, but also because the Spanish fought together as a single force, while Aztecs fought as individuals (Schweikart 6-7). These three civilizations were focused on their religions, causing some similarities. They all built cities as religious centers.