Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criticism of mercantilism
The english colonization
European mercantilism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criticism of mercantilism
Asking which factor such as, religion or economics, is most influential to English colonization in North America is like saying “which is more important, oxygen or water”? Some would personally favor one or the other, and one might be of great importance in certain circumstances, but in the end they are inextricably linked and ascribing superior importance to one would not be necessarily impossible but very labored because we can’t quantify the effects of either. I presume that the answer of which had more impact, religious or economic factors in the English colonization in North America depends on how closely you look and on the time period. Therefore, in very broad terms religion was there and making an influence yet, economics were more …show more content…
practical in and making a much more prestige by mercantilism, triangular trade, and London Company. Primary, mercantilism was present during formation of English colonization in North America.
It had holds that a nation or an empire could build wealth and power by developing industries and exporting manufactured goods in exchange for gold and silver. While mercantilism was changing the economy, religion was arising and causing churches to avail. Mercantilism brought more than social life. It brought agriculture, development of industry, and money for investment was abundant. It encouraged monarchs to minimize imports from rival empires and build wealth in form of gold and silver. This caused vast changes to English colonization in North America by causing more than 90% of colonist living and working on farms and plantations. Religious factors had puritans and some later groups fleeing to American colonies to escape religion persecutions and restrictions. Same as mercantilism was bringing people to North American forming English colonization. For all that, mercantilism had offered different strengths to the empire as stated …show more content…
above. Alongside, triangular trade had also played a part of the formation by having enslaved Africans come to the Americas as part of a three-part voyage. This benefitted the economy by acquiring raw materials that would help form the colony. The trade pattern consisted of England, its colonies and West Africa. First, British ships loaded with manufactured goods shipped to Africa’s west coast. They swapped British manufactures, such as guns and cloth for enslaved Africans. Next the traders would carry enslaved Africans to the American colonies where they then sold the slaves for raw material, being sugar, timber, and tobacco. After everything the traders then went back to Europe. To me this development felt similar to the type of effect the Great Awakening had on the formation. The Great Awakening had the aspect of powerful preachers traveling from town to town giving sermons that were emotional and touched listeners. Even thousands of people came to listen to these powerful speakers just to be inspired. It did have a philosophical effect on colonies and led to churches being packed with inspired people. Triangular trade brought raw materials that I judged to be the most needed point in the formation of the English colonization in North America. The Great Awakening did bring a sense of togetherness but triangular trade brought more rational effects to this development. In economic terms, the growth of the English population and its wars with other nations taxed national resources, particularly lumber and food.
Colonization would not only address these issues, but strike at Spanish power as well. This led to the formation of the London Company (also known as the Virginia Company) which held a royal charter to establish and govern colonies in North America. It should be noted that virtually all other colonists, including the famed Puritans and Pilgrims fleeing religious persecution, operated under the domain of these royal charters as well. The ultimate goal of these charters was not to pursue human rights or alternative forms of government, but to turn a profit. Additionally, the religious persecutions in England frequently included economic restrictions, such as being forbidden to own land, hold public office, or teach. So, while certain colonies such as Massachusetts were strongly influenced by religious factors, economics was ultimately the reason for both the choice to leave England and the choice to colonize under her
rule. In conclusion, the question which, economic or religion, had greater impact on English colonization in North America is a very broad and challenging topic to cover. Basically, if you ask yourself, if we removed either religion or economics, what kind of colony would we of ended up with? Combining and looking at every factor closely such as The Great Awakening, social life, and religion and comparing them to mercantilism, Triangular Trade, and the London Company. It evoked me to believe that economic factors had greater and more crucial impact on the English colonization in North America.
Unlike the other two popular systems of government during the time, the Charter Colonies in which charters were granted to the colonists instead of the proprietors, and the Royal colonies which were directly ruled under English monarchy, the Proprietary Colonies stood somewhere in between. The Proprietary Colonies were originally founded in order to repay certain debts and favors and give leadership to those who were most trustworthy. Other Proprietary Colonies include colonial New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and the Carolinas. Proprietors, the governors of the lands, were given immense powers in order to create profitable enterprises in their given land. Some of these powers include the establishment of churches, towns, ports, and other public buildings, the creation of courts and laws, the ability to collect yearly land fees from those who had settled and purchased land in the colony, and much
The seventeenth century was a time of great change in colonial America. Virginia, the first colony in the Chesapeake region, was established in 1624. Plymouth, the first colony in New England, was established in 1620. These two regions developed in distinct ways, but were intertwined because of their ties to England. The Chesapeake colonies were established for economic reasons, as the Virginia Company of London looked to mass-produce cash crops in the new world. The New England colonies, however, were created to be a religious haven for those who opposed the English church. Both regions developed economic and political systems that catered to the desires of the respective populations and the geographical conditions.
Both the colony of Massachusetts and Virginia were founded by companies looking to make money off the New World, but the founding of Massachusetts was motivated more by religious goals and family dynamics. Erin Bonuso, author of “Colliding Cultures”,
During the colonial era, many mainly great colonies established based on the idea of social and religious freedom. “Throughout the Colonial period, economic concerns had more to do with the settling of British North American than did religious concerns.” This statement has some traces of invalidity but overall, it is very valid at many different points. Even though most of the colonies were established on the premises of religious freedom, however as time progressed, money became an issue and thoughts of money making aroused among colonial settlers. The economic concerns of the colonies out numbered the prominent religious concerns that arose that time, and subjugated colonial life up until the end of the British colonial period in colonial America.
The Crusades of the middle ages introduced much innovative and formerly unheard of merchandise into Western Europe; however the scarcity of these luxury goods instilled Europeans with drive to find easier access to the Far East. Although desired "Northwest Passage" never was found, joint-stock companies, like the Virginia Company of London, settled colonies in the New World for untapped resources such as silver and other tradable goods. Many more corporations followed suit, settling mainly in the Chesapeake Bay area, their small settlements eventually developing into the Chesapeake colonies. The Chesapeake colonies were focused primarily on profitable enterprises. At the same time, the New England colonies were being settled with a whole different set of initiatives, principally religious freedoms and family. Governing bodies were established, with their success dependent on the quality of the settlers the colony attracted. The different motives for settlement affected the routine events in such a way that the New England and Chesapeake colonies differed very greatly from one another even though they were both mainly settled by the English.
The settlement of Jamestown was controlled by the London Company. The London Company, for the most part, had full control of the colony. Jamestown greatly needed to plant crops, but instead the Company, driven by money, ordered the settlers search for gold and other values. The directors of the Company had little knowledge of what really needed to be done in the colony, and they did not seem to care. Plymouth colony was also supposed to be controlled by the London Company, bu...
In the Chesapeake the motivation for colonization was largely due to economic issue. The colony were owned by royalty, corporate, and proprietary people who were looking to find fame or fortune. Thinking they would find gold or silver to bring back to England, instead they discover a different treasure. Tobacco was the cash crop that brought them wealth. Up north in the New England colony the motivation for colonization was to escaped religious persecution and set up a haven for people of their faith. Pilgrims and the Puritan was the main people that inhabit the land. The New England colonies also wanted to be financially stable but the main reason was to be free from the Church of England
One facet of this unique system involved the numerous economic differences between England and the colonies. The English government subscribed to the economic theory of mercantilism, which demanded that the individual subordinate his economic activity to the interests of the state (Text, 49). In order to promote mercantilism in all her colonies, Great Britain passed the Navigation Acts in 1651, which controlled the output of British holdings by subsidizing. Under the Navigation Acts, each holding was assigned a product, and the Crown dictated the quantity to be produced. The West Indies, for example, were assigned sugar production and any other colony exporting sugar would face stiff penalties (Text, 50). This was done in order to ensure the economic prosperity of King Charles II, but it also served to restrict economic freedom. The geographical layout of the American colonies made mercantilism impractical there. The cit...
Religion was a key component to the construction of the early American colonial society. It shaped the beliefs and actions of the settlers within the society in many ways. Originally, the newcomers settling on North American land had main motives of owning their own land, increasing their country’s empire and gaining personal profit. Alongside those motives came the sheer desire to spread their religion with whom they encountered in the new land of opportunity. As stated, settlers set out to convert others towards Christianity because they believed freedom was found in worshiping God. Socially, if a person identified as a Christian they automatically were placed higher on the hierarchy. In the same respect, religion and politics at this time were delicately intertwined. Being Christian also meant the government heavily favored you and your peoples since you were to be considered influential in society. In the Maryland Act Concerning Religion (1644), John Winthrop’s Speech to the Massachusetts General Court (1645), the Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637) and Roger Williams Letter to the Town of Providence (1655) one can notice the striking role religion plays both socially and
The establishment of colonies in America took place within distinct circumstances. Some colonies were founded for the purpose of political and religious havens and pursuit of individual freedom and happiness. People came to the New World expecting a place where the rules in the Old World, such as hereditary aristocracies and dominance of church and state, would not apply. Other colonies such as the Carolinas, and Pennsylvania were established by either proprietors, or individuals who had an ideal for a place that could embrace everyone with his/her own will. With people who sought liberty in believes and equality in rights and founders of colonies who were not under direct rule or servitude to the Kings and Queens in Europe, the English colonies
There were many reasons why the colonists came to North America. One reason was because they wanted to escape King Edward so they could fallow freely their own religion and to seek riches. Also the Puritans came to North America because they wanted a lace to practice their religion without fear of the government. Also that the religion they wanted to practice was considered more fundamentalist than what was being practiced from where they came. the English colonies were successful in North America was because the British tried so many times to get more money the colonists got mad and boycotted- refuse to use-the British goods. Then the British government kind of loosened their restraints and gave the American colonists some freedom.
Though the Puritans, as well as some later groups, fled to the American colonies to escape religious persecution or restrictions, the fact remains that the Puritans had been granted "a charter from King James" for their settlement. Thus, the colonists who came to America for religious reasons were serving the primary purpose of generating profits for the Mother country of England (Boorstin et al.
The motives of the founders of the colonies in each region played a significant part in the regions development. Sir Walter Raleigh and the Virginia Company, a joint-stock company, were among the first to try to develop settlements in the New World. Their motive to establish Roanoke and Jamestown in the Chesapeake region was primarily to make money. Thus the constant reminder that their first goal was to make profits influenced the settlers of Virginia. However, this conviction for making profits almost was the collapse of the colony for its settlers were more interested in finding gold then building shelter and growing food, finally found its outlet in the cash crop, tobacco, which John Rolfe perfected. Virginians were already greedy and self-centered. They were more concerned about personal gain than equality, and so the different levels of society appeared. Life centered on plantations, and so the rich planters were most important. Their constant need for labor source led to the introduction of land grants and indentured servants through the head-right system. In addition, the Carolinas, proprietary colonies created by Lord Berekley et al, was established strictly to profit the proprietor which they eventually did due also to cash crops.
In a similar economic revolution, the colonies out grew their mercantile relationship with England and developed their own expanding capitalist system. The idea of a set amount of wealth in the world and that if one were to become wealthy, he or she had to take from someone who is already wealthy, is basically what mercantilism means.
Many of England’s problems could be solved in America, and so colonization began. When the earliest settlers came, England had the responsibility to continue the Protestant Church, and prevent the Catholic Church from converting the entire Native American population of North America (Morison, p.105) A potential Protestant refuge could be based there in the threat of civil wars or a change of religion.