Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government intervention in trade
Thesis on mercantilism
Theories of mercantilism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Government intervention in trade
The Mercantilist theory was the first theory of international trade and is one of the foundation stones of modern economics. Mercantilism arose in England in the mid-sixteenth century and prevailed through the eighteenth century and it consisted in a political and economic system that purports that the strength of a country is directly connected to its capacity to maintain a positive balance of trade. Therefore countries should encourage exports and discourage imports in order to be economically and politically viable. Mercantilism played an important in the transition from feudalism to industrial capitalism.
In that period, the currency of trade between the countries were gold and silver. So, in the mercantilist thought, since maximizing
…show more content…
British Navigation Acts, which restricted other countries on trading with British colonies, is a great example of this type of policy and structure. This behavior and way of acting and thinking explicit a doctrine advocated by the mercantilists – government intervention in the economy to achieve a surplus in the trade balance.
Industrial mercantilist governments also enforced the importation of some raw materials, which could be transformed and manufactured into many other finished goods, carrying more value, thus costing more than the original raw material. In this case, the final product would be exported and sold for higher than the raw material was bought and the country would get more gold for it, increasing the nation’s treasury. Therefore, manufacturing was only important because it could result in an export
…show more content…
The biggest critic of the mercantilist system was Scottish philosopher, political and classical economist David Hume that in 1752, pointed out an intrinsic flaw in the doctrine proposed by mercantilism, later called specie-flow mechanism. The idea is that the trade surplus, the ultimate goal of mercantilists policies, and the accumulation gold and silver was unsustainable in the long run. He advocated the trade surplus, sets forces that tends to reverse itself. According to him. If a country has a surplus with another, the inflow of gold and silver would swell the domestic economy supply and culminate in inflation - there would be too much money for few goods, system operating in full capacity and money not being saved but kept circulating. In the other country, however, the outflow of gold and silver results in falling prices. The deficit country becomes more and more competitive, shifting the trade balance. That being said, Hume defended that a free flow of gold, would lead to an equilibrium in the balance of
There were many economic effects due to the global flow of silver. One of these
For example, the Navigation Acts of 1660 and 1663 specified a number of key trade related rules. First, they specified that all colonial trade had to be carried on ships owned by British or colonial traders. Secondly, all colonial goods bound for North America had to pass through certain English ports, in order to be taxed and monitored. Finally, enumerated goods such as sugar were to be shipped only to English ports. Despite these laws existing, the government in London did not enforce them strictly up until 1763. This policy is often referred to as ‘salutary neglect’ and it had the effect of introducing a perceived sense of autonomy and self-determination in the North American colonies. Following 1763, the British government began to enforce the Navigation Acts British lawmakers began to introduce more Acts which further restricted and monitored colonial trade and increased taxes. To the parliament in London this was just enforcing and building upon old laws, an opinion that was not shared by the
Encomiendas: An encomienda was a grant of Native American labor given to prominent European men in the Americas by the Spanish king. This grant allowed European men to extract tribute from natives in the form of labor and goods. The value of the grants was dramatically increased with the discovery of gold and silver in the Americas. The significance of this term is that although this system was eventually repartitioned, it initiated the tradition of prominent men controlling vast resources and monopolizing native labor.
Mercantilism -- an economic theory that holds the prosperity of a nation dependable upon its supply of capital, and that the global volume of trade is "unchangeable." Economic assets, or capital, are represented by bullion (gold, silver, and trade value) held by the state, which is best increased through a positive balance of trade with other nations (exports minus imports). Mercantilism suggests that the ruling government should advance these goals by playing a protectionist role in the economy, by encouraging exports and discouraging imports, especially through the use of tariffs. The economic policy based upon these ideas is often called the mercantile system.
There are many disadvantages associated with starting their own branch in India. First is that this option is the most expensive. They would have to pay for all the marketing, equipment, building, manufacturing, production, and staffing that they would need to operate. Mercan Systems would not be able to share any costs with another company. The financial investment needed would depend on the number of regions they choose to operate in (two, four, or nationally) and if they use a direct salesforce or dealers, but it would still be significantly higher than any other alternative. Starting another branch in an international market that they do not already have a location in, is a large change and project to take on. It requires an immense amount
One facet of this unique system involved the numerous economic differences between England and the colonies. The English government subscribed to the economic theory of mercantilism, which demanded that the individual subordinate his economic activity to the interests of the state (Text, 49). In order to promote mercantilism in all her colonies, Great Britain passed the Navigation Acts in 1651, which controlled the output of British holdings by subsidizing. Under the Navigation Acts, each holding was assigned a product, and the Crown dictated the quantity to be produced. The West Indies, for example, were assigned sugar production and any other colony exporting sugar would face stiff penalties (Text, 50). This was done in order to ensure the economic prosperity of King Charles II, but it also served to restrict economic freedom. The geographical layout of the American colonies made mercantilism impractical there. The cit...
Peter instituted the policy of Mercantilism from Western Europe to stimulate agriculture, industry and commerce. The state dominated all forms of industry. The state was the sou...
When comparing and contrasting the Northern and Southern colonies throughout their development, it is vital to fully understand that each colony differed as a result of their reasons for settlement, geographic setting, and economic establishment; however, the colonies were additionally equivalent with regards to their social perceptions and standards of mercantilism.
Trade was important to the Maritimes. Up to 1846 Britain had provided the British North American colonies with a market for their goods, but then began a policy of free trade. Because there were no tariffs placed on any country the colonies lost a sure market for their goods. Many colonists were concerned that some might consider union with the United States and the British North American colonies was brisk with large amounts of lumber and grain being imported by the U.S. When the Americans ended the Reciprocity Treaty in 1865, many Maritimers became uneasy about the economic future. It became apparent that in order to develop thriving trade; new economic links would have to be developed. 3
In a similar economic revolution, the colonies out grew their mercantile relationship with England and developed their own expanding capitalist system. The idea of a set amount of wealth in the world and that if one were to become wealthy, he or she had to take from someone who is already wealthy, is basically what mercantilism means.
Up until Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, this was the dominant economic belief. Smith’s work would challenge the dominant theory of the time and push towards a free market approach with its premise reliant on individual rights and laissez faire economics. The push and belief in free-markets was innovative due to its belief that all parties benefit from a voluntary exchange, much different than the mercantilist view that only one party is beneficiary of trade (Rothbard 1). A simplified example of this is that of buying a painting from a painter; the buyer benefits from the gratification of looking at the painting, while the painter is benefitted
The role of mercantilism played a major role in the development of British North America. Mercantilism made it that the colonies would supply raw materials to the mother country, which led to many trade restrictions, this stunted the growth and freedom of colonial business. Britain passed the Navigation Acts, laws that were to make American colonies more dependent on England. Certain goods could only be sold to England, such as sugar and tobacco. For a period of time, Edmund Burke created an idea of Salutary Neglect, which meant that England would leave them alone, and they were able to do rule how they wanted, as long as they remained profitable and abided by English rules, this ended however with the end of the French and Indian war.
In the pre-World War I period the data show us that the majority of the international trade were represented by dissimilar goods traded between developed and developing countries. More precisely, home developed countries like United Kingdom or Spain who owned enough capital for manufacturing, traded with developing countries (colonies) that were rich for natural resources but lacked the capital for manufacturing. The majority of the international
The time of exploration was a significant period in history, in which the desire for expansion of one’s prosperity was established. Claiming new territories not only broadened a country’s empire and power, but it also opened new doors of opportunity through trade. During this time, Western Europe was having great difficulty keeping up as they relied on subsistence agriculture from neighboring countries to prevent its population from starving (Henretta, pg. 17). The residents of Europe who were not particularly wealthy or of noble birth struggled with many hardships in their daily lives. However, when the economic revolution began, Europe evolved, and the success of trade brought in many positive aspects such as the ability to tax goods
Another economist, Douglas Irwin, wrote a book titled “Against the Tide”. The book is an Intellectual History of Free Trade. It is an interesting, educational account of how free trade appeared and of how the concept of free trade has coped with two centuries of attacks and criticism. The behavior of an economy is reflected in the behavior or nature of the individuals and firms that make up the economy. So by studying how the individuals and firms act, we can be able to understand the economy.