Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Queen Victoria's influence
Queen Victoria's influence
Queen Victoria's impact on British history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rulers not only have the pressure to gain the respect of their followers, but also the stress of trying to leave a significant impact on the lives of others. Queen Victoria grew up unaware of the fact that she would later become one of England’s longest to reign. At the time of Queen Victoria’s rule, the British Parliament established major restrictions on the power of the British monarchy. Slowly, the balance of political power tipped away from the monarch’s responsibilities. Unlike past rulers, Queen Victoria, known for her tenacity, did not allow others to restrict her from doing as she desired. Queen Victoria’s long reign demonstrated that although the British Parliament heavily restricted the British monarchy of power, a determined ruler …show more content…
could influence vital transitions. Dominating in popularity, self-drive and the domestic and international relations of the nineteenth century, Queen Victoria set a template for future monarchs to follow. Raised in an isolated environment, Queen Victoria grew up oblivious to the idea that one day she would not only become an efficacious rulers, but also one of England’s most looked up to. Only eight months after her birth, Queen Victoria’s father died leaving her to fall victim to her mother’s strict and cloistered ways (“Victoria”). With no father or siblings to show affection towards, Victoria led a despondent life as a child. Although her mother wished to raise her in the best manner, she failed to consider the long term effects she would have on Victoria. Excluded from receiving any form of delectation, Queen Victoria never enabled herself to pursue an earnest relationship with her mother, viewing her childhood as “a form of imprisonment” (Arnstein 21). By not establishing a connection with her mother, Victoria would ultimately develop no sentimental feelings towards her children in her adult years. Her mother continued to have a lasting impact on her throughout her reigning years. She enforced her rule to consist of a “rigid adherence to tradition,” which led her to stand apart from the predominant trends of the era (“Victoria”). By separating herself from prevailing trends, Queen Victoria displayed that rulers could diverge from set patterns and lead the country however they pleased. Although the British Parliament impeded Queen Victoria’s power, she overcame their dominance and implemented a traditional rule. Victoria’s mother’s strict upbringing evolved her to be a potent individual with a sense of determination that triumphed during her reign. Queen Victoria demonstrated to future monarchs that they could make major transitions in the institution of the British monarchy. Queen Victoria’s first few years in rule consisted of her attempts to fully comprehend the British Monarchy as well as gain the trust of the British people. When Victoria came to throne at the age of eighteen in 1837, the British Parliament continued to install severe constraints on the British monarchy (“Victorian Age”). The British Parliament wanted to cut off the monarchy’s power completely, but Queen Victoria had both the image and willpower to push past their demands. She had factors that would put her in advantage of past rulers; “her youth, her sex, and her already clearly formed sense of duty” (Briggs et al. 32). Contrary to her uncle King William IV, Queen Victoria displayed charisma and youthfulness that appealed to both the public and her prime minister Lord Melbourne.) Although the British Parliament forced restraints on her power, Queen Victoria continued to play a utilitarian role, along with a symbolic role in the government, appearing on the kingdom’s coins and postage stamps unlike the prime minister (Briggs et al. 32). Victoria, through her innocent image, gained the trust of her people, who exhibited eagerness for a ruler they could finally confide in. During this period of time, the Whig ministry held power leading for Victoria’s reign to be “identified with the theme of political reform” (Arnstein 33). While many did not approve of the Whig ministry, political reforms would allow for Great Britain to grow, revamping older laws and legislations. Queen Victoria’s contemporary way of thinking and stimulating image allowed her to gain the trust of many, which enabled her to claim back her direct political power. A certain individual had a major impact on the way in which Queen Victoria chose to think and act. (change transition) The marriage of Queen Victoria to her first cousin Prince Albert changed her completely by balancing her political power and bringing her a love that she had never experienced before. Together, Albert and Victoria formed a strong relationship, where Victoria always made sure to consult Albert, before making any decisions (Arnstein 68). Although Queen Victoria did not share a genuine attitude towards motherhood and family, she saw marriage as a necessity. Victoria, by marrying Albert, learned values from their relationship, such as how to be a public servant and how to treat everyone as equals (Arnstein 7). In order to gain the trust of her people, she had to understand the concept that everyone should be treated equally. Queen Victoria grasped this comprehension and it soon became a key to ruling that many monarchs succeeding her would come to accept. Albert strongly viewed himself as a servant, hoping to strengthen the British monarchy’s influence “as a symbol of morality and domesticity” while still remaining active in the government every day (Arnstein 67). Queen Victoria learned from Albert not only the meaning of true love, but the applicable way to rule and treat the British people. Albert demonstrated to future monarchs the importance of having a partner. Without one, a ruler would not have a source to confide in or trust. Queen Victoria experienced this loss when Prince Albert passed away from typhoid fever in 1861 completely altering the monarchy and sending Victoria into a state of depression for years to follow (“Victoria Majesty”). By losing the love of her life, Queen Victoria had also lost her ruling partner. His passing presented future monarchs with the importance of having a partner and learning to love as deeply as Queen Victoria once did. His influence enabled Queen Victoria to continue ruling England as it entered a period of transition and improvements. The Victorian Period, associated with the growth of the British Empire and the Industrial Revolution, revolutionized into an age of transition inundated with advanced improvements.
When Victoria came to throne, the British empire along with the Industrial Revolution continued to rise, which allowed for the bankers and manufacturers rising to political power to repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, the Municipal Reform Act, and the Reform Bill (Briggs et al. 46). Both wealth and outraged pride proved to be demanded through these acts. The Reform Bill had transformed England into a constitutional monarchy, allowing for the absolute powers to become more moral than legislative. The industrial development allowed new machines for manufacturing and communication to be invented, leading to an increased amount of developments such as canals, roads, and railways. While Queen Victoria “cared little for the company of scientists,” she showed an interest in “the bravery of British troops in the Crimea” (Briggs et al. 38). Unlike most of the people, she stuck to tradition and did not completely approve of the new innovations. Queen Victoria’s “dismissal of growing demands for social reform” coincided with the era’s spirit of change (“Victoria”). Her resistance to change provoked the people of Britain to lose trust for her. Her ambitions for imperialism, particularly in India, allowed for her to maintain her popularity after Prince Albert’s passing, along with her support in colonial wars such as the Crimean War and the Boer War (“Victoria”). Due to Prince Albert’s passing and her adherence to tradition, people lost trust in Victoria, but her interest in imperialism and wars allowed for her to keep it. Rulers in the years to follow would learn from Victoria to always try their best to gain the approval of their people, regardless of how they may feel about a
situation. Although Queen Victoria lived during an age of international peace, she became known as a warrior queen, demonstrating support wherever needed. The queen’s reign coincided with something known as the Ninety-Nine Year Peace, an era between the French Revolution and World War One, continuing to take strong pride in national defense despite the stagnant war period (Arnstein 201). Queen Victoria took national defense to heart, always making it her dominant priority. She would go out of her way, always having “looked upon herself as a soldier’s daughter,” to make sure that the soldiers understood how much she appreciated their service (Arnstein 201). Even with no major wars being fought, the Queen made sure to show her support to the little wars, such as the Crimean War, being fought. She exhibited the importance of showing interest in meager occasions that actually mean a lot to others. Queen Victoria authorized the wartime nursing reforms instituted by Florence Nightingale, while also going to visit wounded soldiers in hospitals herself (“Victoria”). Her determination to remain active and disclose affection towards soldiers allowed for the British people to see her dedication to her country. Future rulers would learn to have the same dedication if they ever wanted to gain the respect of their people. Queen Victoria’s long reign demonstrates that a diligent ruler can prevent the draining away of direct political power. With determination and a sense of youth, Queen Victoria captured the trust of the British people, which she needed in order to gain back her power. She not only influenced major transitions in the British monarchy, but she also became an individual that many idolized. Through her late husband, Prince Albert, and dedication to show her support to soldiers, Queen Victoria learned to treat everyone as equals. Her long years in reign not only demonstrated the possibilities to overcoming the British Parliament, but also set a template for future monarchs to follow.
One monarch who faced limited royal power due to his relationship with parliament was Henry IV. This uneasy relationship was mainly down to the fact that Henry was a usurper, and was exacerbated by his long periods of serious illness later in his reign. Parliament was thus able to exercise a large amount of control over royal power, which is evident in the Long Parliament of 1406, in which debates lasted from March until December. The length of these debates shows us that Henry IV’s unstable relationship had allowed parliament to severely limit his royal power, as he was unable to receive his requested taxation. A king with an amiable relationship with parliament, such as Henry V, and later Edward IV, would be much more secure in their power, as taxation was mostly granted, however their power was also supported more by other factors, such as popularity and finances. Like Henry IV, Henry VI also faced severely limited power due to his relationship with parliament.
A1. England was run by a Parliament and per history had very limited involvement of the monarchy or direct rule by the king. As well as the colonial legislatures; members were elected by property-holding men and governors were given authority to make decisions on behalf of the king. This system our leadership and how it controls its people the reason many
Machiavelli wrote that a ruler should be both like “a lion and a fox” (The Prince, Chapter XVIII). By this Machiavelli means that a ruler should be like a lion to keep away the wolves that can get to the fox who finds the traps that the lion could get into. Essentially, a ruler should be cunning and powerful. Elizabeth I of England and Louis XIV of France fit these characteristics. Louis XIV acted as a lion in such ways as the Edict of Fontainebleau which took away the power of the Huguenots. Elizabeth I of England was like a lion because she married her country, not a man, therefore keeping all power to herself and frightening away the “wolves.” Louis XIV acted as a fox by getting away from the “traps” of the nobility by heavily taxing them because he did not want to relive the Fronde, a civil war where he was humiliated by nobles (Tom Richey, Louis XIV Rap 0:27-0:31). Elizabeth acted as a fox because she was religiously tolerant and kept England away from “traps” that could lead to wars.
A Fierce Discontent by Michael McGerr delves into the revolution of values from the victorian era to the progressive within the late nineteen century to the early twentieth century. McGerr’s major argument is the contrast between this set of values. The gilded age which McGerr focuses is the period where progressive values begin to take form and societal change ensues. The victorian values are values which epitomizes the British culture as just the name of the era is derived from queen Victoria. Alternatively the progressive era was a political reform focusing on anti corruption, women suffrage, and fixing the social problems plaguing society. McGerr argues that the victorian era and progressive era strikes few similarities within the
The Austrian, Habsburg Empire and England faced issues common to many European nations of the time. Religion and leadership were at the forefront of these crises. What set the two nations apart and ensured England’s survival was that England, not necessarily consciously, made improvements to their government while they addressed their smaller individual problems. With each growing pain came compromise. Through compromise, the English developed into a Constitutional Monarchy; this representative type of government, guided by a Bill of Rights, established checks and balances that inherently support a strong, unified nation as opposed to the self interests of individual factions.
In England, the parliament because of this need, grew to have power over the king and cause great toleration of people's
"THE RELIGION OF THE QUEEN - TIME FOR CHANGE." University of Queensland Law Journa (2011): n. pag. Web.The British monarchy is a system of government in which a traditional monarch is the sovereign of the United Kingdom out of the country territories, and holds the constitutional position of head of state. According to the article, the Queen's powers are exercised upon the suggestion of her prime minister. Moreover, she firmly reserves powers which she may exercise at her own discretion. The Queen has many theoretical personal advantages and disadvantages. One disadvantages was that UK prohibits her from get married with a catholic member either being a roman catholic. However, with the exception of the appointment of the major minister, which is done with every prime minister, there are few positions in modern British government where these could be justifiably exercised; they have rarely been exercised in the last century. These powers could be exercised in an emergency such as a constitutional
He had to make sure at all times that all rules or laws were followed and if not he had to make punishments for them. George was a king so whatever decision he made went, and nobody else could change his mind. Usually, Parliament is there to help guide the King and his decisions, but King George took many things upon himself numerous times without guidance from Parliament. King George had many disagreement with Parliament. The population in Great Britain at the time was fairly high, and George had many responsibilities. King George went through rough times as being King but always found a way through the problems. He took and controlled Great Britain through many battles and wars including the American Revolution. King George was the man behind the American Revolution, and the fighting between the colonists and the
The British Monarchy of Henry VII led England into a new path of modernism through politics, culture and social aspects. His addition of more modern, while keeping the good from the former style helped him build his monarchy the way he wanted. Henry didn't just bring renovations but a nonviolent environment for everyone. King Henry VII influenced a positive change between the Lancastrians and Yorkist and expanded the British monarchy. He accom-plished his purpose by being the change he wanted to see in England.
The Victorian Era in English history was a period of rapid change. One would be hard-pressed to find an aspect of English life in the 19th century that wasn’t subject to some turmoil. Industrialization was transforming the citizens into a working class population and as a result, it was creating new urban societies centered on the factories. Great Britain enjoyed a time of peace and prosperity at home and thus was extending its global reach in an era of New Imperialism. Even in the home, the long held beliefs were coming into conflict.
The monarchy symbolizes unity and traditions, which is unique and treasured to the nation. The monarch universally known as head of the Commonwealth, she is voluntarily recognised as the Head of State to 54 independent countries (The British Monarchy, 2013) The Queen to modern Britain, is an icon, who cannot simply be swapped for an elected politician. The British monarchy has played huge importance in British history, which is integral to our national identity. The Queen reined for 61 years and she provides an existing connection between the past, present and future. This is exactly what a politician could not offer to the public; for instance, Tony Blair, prior to 1997 was unknown on a state level, as he had done nothing significant for the British public. The monarchy’s traditions are famous not only in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the ruler of sixteen other countries including Britain. Whilst the queen receives many privileges as head of state, it does come at a personal cost. Her privacy is limited as she is consistently scrutinized from t...
"History in Focus." : The Victorian Era (Introduction). Institute of Historical Research., Apr. 2001. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
The challenges to the power of the Monarch was by the reign of James I (1603-25) the monarch was faced with an increasing effective Parliament, culminating in the temporary abolition of the monarchy in (1625). Consequently, the monarchy’s powers were eroded by both revolution and by legal challenges, which included the case of Proclamations (1611) , the monarchy could not change the law by proclamation. The law of the land, which required that the law be made by Parliament, limited the prerogative. In the case of Prohibitions Del Roy (1607) the Monarch had no right to act as a judge, and in the case of the Ship Money Case (1637), although th...
...ed heavily on public subsidy, and the gas and electricity companies had in many cases developed as municipal undertakings. They seem of proper national concern. The iron and steel industry proved more controversial, being denationalized and renationalized in subsequent years. In international affairs the Attlee government introduces a major change of direction, beginning the dismantling of the British Empire. The empire becomes gradually transformed into a Commonwealth of independent nations, capable of accommodating republics as well as monarchies.
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?