Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the oj simpson case
A summary of o.j. simpson's case summary
How might DNA help to solve crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the oj simpson case
Death scenes are often times extremely complex and no two are ever alike. The pieces to the puzzle lie on and around the body, and it is up to the death scene investigator to put those pieces of the puzzle together. The investigator needs to find the pieces of evidence that are necessary to crack the case open. These pieces of evidence will be crucial in determining the cause and manner of death, injury types, patterns, and the source of the injury/injuries. There is perhaps no case more infamous and studied than the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Brown, the ex-wife of O.J. Simpson, was nationally recognized and instantly drew attention to the case. A case that is still discussed to this very day due to the failures of everyone …show more content…
involved ranging from the officers, detectives, and medical examiners. Everybody that was involved was going to have their hands full with this case, all under the watchful eyes of the nation. This case begins on June 12th, 1994. It is on this day that Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were stabbed to death outside of Brown’s condo, which is located at 875 South Bundy Drive, Brentwood, California. It is believed that they were stabbed to death a little after 10 p.m., although the defense would claim that the incident did not take place until after 11 p.m.. Brown, 35, and Goldman, 25, were discovered around midnight by a neighbor and the first police officers arrived at the scene at 12:13 a.m. Being that the murders took place in Brentwood, Los Angeles, the law enforcement jurisdiction belonged to the Los Angeles Police Department. As for the medical examiner jurisdiction, this belonged to the Los Angeles County, Department of Coroner. Every death scene is unique in its own special way, and as a result, no two scenes will ever be the same. For this reason it’s important for investigators to photograph and document every single piece of evidence that they find so that no piece of evidence will be forgotten or lost. The photos will help the jurors have a basic understanding of the general scene as well. In this case it was especially important for the investigators to have all their facts and information documented due to the high publicity surrounding the case. According to the investigator’s report, “Nicole Simpson’s body was found at the foot of the stairs at the gate to her condominium. The body was in a fetal position with a ‘large sharp force injury to the neck’. She was wearing a black dress and no shoes. Goldman’s body was slumped in the dirt nearby, his back against a tree stump. Near his right foot, a ‘business-size white envelope contained a pair of eyeglasses” (Spolar). The eyeglasses that were found by Goldman’s foot belonged to Brown’s mother (Spolar). In addition to the envelope, there was also a blood-soaked left handed leather glove which was believed to have been the perpetrators (Velasquez). Blood prints were found on the ground, not only footprints but paw prints as well. The paw prints were identified to have come from Brown’s dog, and they led from Brown’s body to the street (Johnson, Velasquez). The footprints however led in the opposite direction, going away from the bodies towards the back of the property towards the alley and it’s believed these prints came from the perpetrator (Velasquez). Although there was a lot of evidence and facts obtained from this scene, it did not come without controversy. For starters, “police used a blanket which came from inside the house to cover Nicole Brown’s body, contaminating the body and anything surrounding it” (crimemuseum.org). In addition to that, the police were careless in how they maneuvered around the scene and the LAPD ended up causing more bloody shoe prints than the perpetrator themselves left (crimemuseum.org). The cause of death for both Brown and Goldman was determined to be from multiple sharp force injuries (lectlaw.com). Specifically in Brown’s case, it was due to or as a consequence of I. Incised wound of neck, II. Multiple stab wound of neck and scalp (total of seven), III. Multiple injuries of hands, including incised wound, ring finger of right hand (defense wound), and IV. Scalp bruise, right parietal (lectlaw.com). Goldman’s death was due to or as a consequence of I. Sharp force wound of neck, left side, with transection of left internal jugular vein, II. Multiple stab wounds of chest, abdomen, and left thigh: Penetrating stab wounds of chest and abdomen with right hemothorax and hemoperitoneum, III. Multiple incised wounds of scalp, face, neck, chest, and left hand (defense wound), and IV. Multiple abrasions upper extremities and hands (defense wounds) (lectlaw.com). One thing we see here from the autopsy reports is that there were more defense wounds on Goldman’s body than on Browns. Dr. Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran, a medical examiner on the case, states how a bruise on the right side of Brown’s head caused either by a blow from a fist or a knife handle, could have potentially left her unconscious and unable to defend herself (Seigel). If this were to be the case, it would make sense why Brown’s body would have fewer defense wounds, as she would’ve been unable to fight back after getting knocked out. As for Goldman, Dr. Sathyavagiswaran says that he was cornered by his assailant in a tightly enclosed area, had no means of escape, and that the wounds he suffered were probably inflicted in less than a minute (Noble). This opinion based off the facts of the autopsy from the medical examiner would make sense as to why Goldman had more defense wounds on his body, as he would’ve been stuck in the enclosed area with no other option but to fight. In addition to that, photos of Goldman from the scene show his shirt pulled up, especially in the back, which could potentially be indicative that Goldman was indeed physically fighting with the perpetrator before giving in to his injuries. The manner of death for both Brown and Goldman was ruled as “Homicide”. The injury types that are present in this case are sharp force injuries and blunt force trauma. There are far more sharp force injuries in this case when compared to just the one sign of blunt force trauma. Both victims were stabbed/cut numerous amounts of times as we see multiple abrasions, incisions, and penetrating stab wounds in both victims (lectlaw.com). The one instance of blunt force trauma comes from Brown, who had a contusion (bruise) on the right side of her head which was caused either by a blow from a fist or from the knife handle used in the attack (lectlaw.org, Siegel). The source of injury for both Brown and Goldman was a knife, however, the knife used in the attack was never actually recovered.
Dr. Sathyavagiswaran believed that all the slash wounds to Brown’s body could have been left by one single-edged knife about 6 inches long (Siegel). Sathyavagiswaran also stated that a double-edged knife could’ve left some of the smaller wounds, but those wounds could also have been attributed to the tapered tip of a single-knife (Siegel).
Injury patterns were also seen in both deaths as they were both repeatedly stabbed and cut by the assailant. On Brown there were four stab-wounds in a close-set pattern that would suggest that she was held in some way and gave little struggle (Siegel). Further reinforcing the belief that she was possibly knocked unconscious and unable to fight for her life (Siegel).
Nicole Brown Simpson was identified as the owner of the residence. Brown was able to be identified so quickly as she was recognizable due to the fact that she was O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife. Goldman however, was identified through his identification card which was found in his back
…show more content…
pocket. This case required the use of many forensic and investigative techniques, although some of these techniques and practices were executed rather poorly. For starters, several items of evidence were never logged or entered into the chain of custody (crimemuseum.org). There were also issues with the photography techniques. Photos of critical evidence were taken without scales, and several items were being photographed without ever being labeled or logged in (crimemuseum.org). They also packaged wet items before they could dry and several pieces of evidence would be packed together at times allowing for cross contamination to take place (crimemuseum.org). There were however times where proper forensic and investigative techniques were used.
DNA and blood samples were used to connect the two victims, Brown and Goldman, to a potential killer in O.J. Simpson. The DNA evidence showed a high possibility that O.J. Simpson was at the scene when the murders took place. The blood sample taken from Brown was also found on a sock at Simpson’s house (crimemuseum.org). There were also blood samples found in Simpson’s Bronco, and these blood samples were also matched to all three of Simpson, Brown, and Goldman (crimemuseum.org). Now a days with such strong evidence such as DNA connecting all three individuals to the scene, it would be likely to determine that Simpson was the killer. However, since DNA was still a relatively new concept at this time in history, it did not carry the weight in court as it does
now. In my opinion this case was poorly handled. The officers who responded to the scene decided to place a blanket that was found inside Brown’s house over Brown’s body to shield it from people seeing it (crimemuseum.org). As a death scene investigator I’d ideally want the body to remain untouched so that I can examine the body how it was found. Placing the blanket over the body allowed for the contamination of the body and anything around it that may have come into contact with the blanket. In addition to that, the medical examiner on the case could not determine how significant the brain contusion was that Brown suffered because only a portion of tissue was preserved to be later examined (Seigel). If it were up to me, I’d rather preserve more than I needed to adequately test the extent of the contusion, rather than not have enough tissue to do a proper analysis. Personally I believe O.J. Simpson committed both murders. There was a history of domestic abuse between Simpson and Brown which should put up red flags. There was no evidence of anyone breaking into the house, and with there being so many stab wounds on Brown, it leads me to believe that O.J. was out that night to end the life of Nicole Brown Simpson. As for Goldman, I believe he returned Brown’s mother’s glasses at the wrong time and was killed as a result. Even the blood and other trace evidence all signify that Simpson was the one that did it. Simpson’s blood was found at the scene. Brown’s and Goldman’s blood was also found in Simpson’s Bronco and on his sock that was found at his home. In addition to the blood findings, fibers from Brown and Goldman were also found in Simpson’s Bronco. Everything points to Simpson being the killer in this case. In conclusion, a forensic death investigator’s job is never easy. It a slow process that can’t be rushed.
something to think about. The wound that was found on his dad cut at a strange
Since the airing of the CSI: Crime Scene Investigation and the other televised series that followed have led jurors to compare fiction with reality. The shows have changed the view on the real world of forensic science as the series have a world of forensic science of their own. For this paper the televised series titled Bones by forensic anthropologist Kathy Reichs will be used as an example for comparison. In the series Bones Dr. Temperance Brenan arrives at the scene of the crime to examine the skeletal remains found in the scene of the crime equipped with one or more forensic kits. Upon momentarily examining the skeletal remains Dr. Brenan is able to determine the gender, ethnicity, and age. When this type of scenario is compared to nonfictional
One of the most coveted trials in terms of popularity and media attention the O.J Simpson trial which took place between 1994 and concluded on October 2,1995 with O.J Simpson being acquitted of charges laid upon him during the Murder Trial Due to handling of physical evidence and questions over whether Mark Fuhrman planted the bloody glove at the scene to frame O.J. so in an attempt to understand how a deviation from standard operating procedures in the handling of physical evidence can affect the outcome of a criminal trial; One most first understand evidence and how to preserve it. When the crime scene technician took blood samples from Simpson’s Ford Bronco (1996) she used a cotton swab to take samples; but instead of using
...on’s blood was found at the scene of the crime. There may be ways to plant such evidence, but it would be rather difficult to draw blood from a man without him realizing it and planting it at the scene of a crime. I also would have expressed that O.J. had a motive to kill his ex-wife, as well as a history of violent outbursts towards her. With all of the evidence that the prosecution had at their disposal, they should have been able to pin the murder on O.J. beyond a reasonable doubt. Everything pointed to O.J. and showed that he was the murderer. The only thing the prosecution was not able to do was fit the bloody glove on O.J’s hand. The only issue is, the glove was made of leather and had been soaking in blood prior to being found. When leather is soaking in a liquid, it tends to shrink. If only the prosecution had realized this, the case would have been theirs.
In 1994 Nicole Brown and her friend Ron Goldman were both found dead in the courtyard of her condominium. They both had been stabbed profusely; with Nicole’s husband Orenthal James Simpson, NFL star, seeming to be the killer. O.J. displayed some very suspicious behavior to the police. There had been past incidents of him being to physical with her and threatening her life which came to a shock to the country. To Most before this incident he was seen as a role model and look up to by many. O.J. Simpson had showed little to no emotion or concern once he found out about her death, and he showed no surprise when they said he was a suspect ("101 PIECES"). It shocked the country at first to see that O.J. Simpson could possibly
No one will know the true events of the murder of Nicole and Ronald. On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found murdered outside of Nicole’s Brentwood home. Nicole had been stabbed multiple times in the head and neck, and Ronald has was alos slashed to death. Detectives believed O. J. Simpson had committed the murders, therefore they obtained an arrest warrant. Despite gruesome evidence against O. J. Simpson, he was acquitted of all charges with the help of his “dream team of defense lawyers.”
On June 12th, 1994, Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman’s bodies were found Nicole’s condominium; the victims had been stabbed to death. The identity of the murderer was unknown up until O.J was suspected to be a suspect. When accused, he was in another state, and was forced to fly back. (Aaseng 1996)
A great deal of people viewed Simpson as a role model and someone they desired to be. Not for one second did any of those people even think about the thought of a man that “has it all” being on trial for murder. When most people view celebrities like Simpson, they imagine them with no flaws, but they only observe a glimpse of the person’s life. Some would say a majority of Americans prefer watching someone else’s life than pursuing their own, some Americans would even say that they have an infatuation with celebrities.
The prosecution says DNA tests place Simpson's genetic markers on the drops of blood leading away from the bodies. There were also blood samples, similar to Simpson's and the victims, found on O.J.'s Bronco truck. Simpson's blood was also found on his driveway and his foyer. The prosecution says Simpson cut his hand during the murder. The defence says Simpson cut his hand when he reached for his phone in his Bronco and later cut his hand on a glass. The main focus of the defence is the contamination of physical evidence.
He had fresh cuts on his left hand the day after the murder. There was blood that was
Thirdly, the prosecution relied on some form of science evidence, in which the DNA tests on blood traces found inside the Bronco matched O.J. Simpson and the victims. Further, a glove found on OJ Simpson house had matched that of the victim type. A sock found on Simpson's bedroom had a spot of blood that matched his ex-wife. Meticulously, the DNA evidence was presented in June, July, and August by a witnesses, of the State Crime Laboratory, Gary Sims. In advancing its case, the prosecution produced the unavailable or rare figures for the general population and for various subgroups such as the black Americans.
She pulled out the kitchen knife with the six-inch blade and plunged it deep within his chest. In just one swoop Corday pierced his lung, aorta and left ventricle. As he lies bleeding, he exclaims “Help me, my dear friend!” He dies shortly thereafter.
On the night of June 12, 1994, tragedy struck at a townhouse in Los Angeles, this home belonged to Nicole Brown Simpson the former wife of former NFL football player O.J. b. (Orenthal James) Simpson. Near the front entryway of the home lay a bloodied Nicole Brown Simpson and her dear friend Ron Goldman. Nicole and Ron have been stabbed to death by O.J. Simpson soon became named as the first potential suspect. Many pieces of evidence directly lead to O.J.’s involvement in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, including blood evidence directly tied to O.J. The evidence in this investigation, as reported by expert witnesses, was often mishandled.
Exhibit D also supports the theory. It says that there were 23 wounds and that there could not have been more than 10 attackers because it would have been to many people to stab him at
This case study examines the Orenthal James Simpson trial, the details of the evidence and forensic science investigation, and how the defense put together a remarkable stand. If ever there was a criminal case in which scientific evidence should have taken center stage, it was the O. J. Simpson case. The extreme importance of accurate collection and analysis of physical trace evidence by police investigators and forensic experts was demonstrated in the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial. Many believe that the mistakes made by police and forensic experts with the physical trace evidence collected in this case led to the release of a violent murderer.