More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of English language in school curriculum
Importance of English language for students
Importance of English language in school curriculum
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of English language in school curriculum
Mr. Sumpter’s decision to establish an English-only policy at his school was not valid. The reading stated that Mr. Sumpter explained to his staff he was feeling pressure from “some people” at the district office to establish the English-only policy. However, he did not explain who “some people” were. Who were these people? If those people were the school district’s board members or superintendent, Mr. Simpter’s hands were pretty much tied. On the other hand, if the people expressing the need for English-only policies were other administrators from the school district, Mr. Simpter could have challenged their opinions on the need to change his school’s policies.
One principle states, “all individuals consider when making decisions: students,
His readers now see his perspective and why books should not be banned. It is clear the Conroy used the rhetorical devices in a planned way. This allowed him to create a letter designed to persuade the readers in a way that appealed to their emotions. He used positive and negative diction, positive and negative imagery, and conjunctions in a way that would grab the reader's’ attention leading them to believe banning books is ultimately censoring students from the harsh realities that the world has to offer. This is leaving them censored and ignorant to the truth of the
What is the official language or the United States? 90% of the people would answer English, but guess again. The United States doesn’t have an official language. The subject of English as the official language of the United States has been covered intensively by the world press over the past decade. Declaring it the official language of United States can make an improvement in many areas, and is very relevant for future generations. Even though English-only movement has close connections to restrictionist and anti-immigration organizations. Which suggests that the movement has a wider, more far-reaching, and more negative agenda than simply advocating an official English language policy. English should be the official language of United States because making it the official language of the United States refers solely to the language of the government, not of the people, private business, classrooms, etc., and in 1990 US census reported that 97.1% of the US population speak English.
Upon further analysis of Expelled: No Intelligence allowed, we can see that the documentary is tied up in fallacies of ethos, pathos and logos, misrepresentation of facts, and the deviation from the main theme of the documentary. With this in mind, Ben Stein fails to persuade the active viewing audience, but succeeds in persuading the inactive viewing audience. The inactive viewing audience will be convinced from Stein’s use of appeal to ethos, pathos and logos, and will overlook the fallacies in the documentary. Stein uses appeals that are rooted in fallacy, incredible information, and misguided reasons to persuade us of this. Stein wants us to raise our voices to bring down the wall between academic freedom, but we must look at his motives and reasons he takes to instill us with these notions.
She explains the economy and even politics are greatly affected because we all read “How to Kill a Mocking Bird.” Not only is every aspect of our lives a lie, we put sanctions on our imagination, which causes a negative living cycle for everyone. She chooses to argue, through using 20 dollar words, that money is something that is affected by a couple of books that no one really cared that much about. She also chooses to argue that even writers live with a false hope that literature will survive, when it doesn’t
America’s educational system is home to an increasing number of English language learners. Some research indicates that by the year 2030, over 40% of elementary and secondary students served by schools in the United States will come from homes where a language other than English is spoken (Thomas & Collier, 2001). In an effort to accommodate these students, the United States has adopted policies at both the federal and state levels. Generally, the direction taken to meet the needs of English language learners has depended on the climate of the nation. During times of peace and prosperity, policies reflect the nation’s tolerance of other languages and cultures. However, during times of war or conflict, policies have reflected intolerance or fear of anything deemed “un-American.”
Parker attempts to persuade the reader by highlighting the flaws in the pro-immigration supporters and their demonstrations. In paragraph 3, she states, “There is something not convincing about illegal immigrants demonstrating to claim they have inalienable rights to come here, be here, work here, become citizens here-and make all these claims in Spanish”. She adds in paragraph 7, “The civil-rights movement was about enforcing the law, not breaking it. The Civil War amendments to the Constitution were not getting the job done in what has been a long struggle in this country to treat blacks as human beings. If Americans were kidnapping Mexicans and selling them into slavery here, I might see the equivalence. But these are free people, who chose to come here and chose to do so illegally.” With these statements, Parker attempts to appeal to the sensibilities of the reader to persuade them into her way of thin...
D. “In their practice, nations agree with Paley; but does anyone think that Massachusetts does exactly what is right at the present crisis?”
This week’s readings were discussing liberty and what kind of issue it was for America in this time. George Washington had served his two terms and he was advising on what America should do to stay free. While on the other hand, Mercy Otis warren was wondering if America would go down the same road as Europe. Europe had just had a spread of religious infidelity and a decline of virtue. Washington has a more powerful way and smarter plan to keep freedom. Washington had been through two years of presidency and knew what he was doing. Oppositely, Mercy had never been put into that position while, she did make good points she hasn’t ever been in a political position.
English as the official language of the United States could benefit the U.S. Government and America as a whole. America has long since been a multicultural nation and has been an English speaking nation since it was founded. The constitutional and federal documents are all in English, which furthers the American people, believing English should be our official language. The majority of states already have English as their official language, for English has always provided a much needed cohesion to our diverse citizens since it was founded.
B. FINAL THOUGHTS (What should the reader consider or remember? How should reader act on this issue?
This plainly states that public school teachers, principals, and boards are required to be religiously neutral. They may not promote a particular religion as being superior to any other, and may not promote religion in general as superior to a secular approach to life. They also may not promote secularism in general as superior to a religious approach to life, be antagonistic to religion in general or a particular religious belief, be antagonistic to secularism, and they must neither advance nor inhibit religion (Religion in Public).
A. The word “constrained” displays figurative diction since Jefferson is stating that they are constraining, or with holding, the citizens but they are not literally doing so.
King, Robert D. “Should English Be the Law?” 1996. The Presence of Others. Comp. Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2008. 90-102. Print.
h) Her conclusion was clear.Her wrap was to make sure to tell everyone to vote because it is our future that we are voting
Rationalization. Mr. Sullivan justified his actions. He counted on future revenue to save the day and to keep the company going. In case of Ms. Vinson, for example, she felt guilty, but she started rationalizing her decision. From her point of view, Mr. Sullivan was one of the top CEO, he must know what he is doing; she is not in position to question his