How Did Montesquieu And Rousseau Influence The French Revolution

340 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Contribution of the philosophers towards the french revolution essay

Philosophers Montesquieu and Rousseau influenced the French Revolution most, by changing the views of the power of man and government. They increased criticism of absolute monarchy and an increase in republican ideals. During this time, their words of criticism and beliefs on government encouraged the 3rd estate, the common people of France. The 1st estate, the Clergy, and 2nd estate, the Nobles, despised Montesquieu’s belief on government, and laughed upon Rousseau’s idea of “Equality in society.” Montesquieu’s view on government, was that power should be separated amongst the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. His view was based upon population, size, and wealth, to determine the type of government suited for the situation. This influenced

Show More
Related

  • Montesquieu's Influence On The US Constitution

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    Well, let me start off by saying that there were only three important people that have contributed to the United States Constitution, those three are Montesquieu, Voltaire and Diderot. Each one of these people have played a huge role in today's Constitution. In my opinion out of all of these people,I think Montesquieu is the one that influence the Constitution the most. It made the Founding Fathers, write the Constitution more easily and efficiently.

    Read More

  • Rousseau Influence On American Government

    1225 Words  | 3 Pages

    The authors of the Virginia Declaration of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and the United States Constitution pulled from many different sources during the infancy of these invaluable documents. They used pieces such as Hobbes’ Leviathan, Locke’s Second Treatise on Government, Rousseau’s Of The Social Contract, and Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws as inspiration for America’s fundamental government. Each of these influential political philosophers were instrumental in making our government what it is today. Hobbes brought the ideas of natural equality, a strong, powerful government, and the principle that governments must be able to protect the people to American political philosophy. Locke added that

    Read More

  • Comparison between the Bolshevik Revolution and French Revolution

    659 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ideas of change in the French Revolution came from Jean- Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau, from his book, Discourse on the Moral Effect of the Arts and Sciences, had the idea that civilization corrupted people and had once said “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains”. His ideas were the beginning of socialism. He believed in the common good. More extremely, there was Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) who fueled ideas for the Russian Revolution. He was the Father of Communism, a more radical form of socialism. Those who followed Rousseau’s and Marx’s ideas felt that the...

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Small Republic

    904 Words  | 2 Pages

    In seeing interests too varied, a ruler or executive is forced to impose domination onto the people he is supposed to serve (Montesquieu 140). This not only once again corrupts the principles of democracy, but it also weakens the entire collective of states. Such domination incites the people to rise up against those that govern them and to expel them and challenge their ability to govern and lead a free people – much as Shay’s rebellion demonstrates. Montesquieu is wise here to realize that the only way to govern large swaths of land is only through monarchy and despotism – that of which we have only so recently freed ourselves from (142). When large amounts of territory are placed under a single government, the only way it can govern itself is through coercion and force. In a mid-sized territory, failure to do so leads to the rise of an aristocracy that will, much like the aforementioned wealthy man, will see the oppression of their fellow man as the means necessary to advance their own wealth (Montesquieu 141). In a large territory, despotic command becomes necessary to ensure that the laws and powers of the government are followed quickly and immediately so that the territory can be adequately governed (Montesquieu 142). Both of these would lead to violence and the destruction of liberty and

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment Dbq Analysis

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    The writings that were created by them during their time, have shaped the basis of the US government. Locke’s belief that all men have the right to life, liberty, and property was incorporated into the US Bill of Rights. Montesquieu’s thesis that the government should be divided into three powers and no one power can overpower the others, is the way the US government is ran in order to created laws for the people. Finally, Rousseau’s idea that people have the right to happiness was included in the Declaration of Independence, and his idea of people coming together as one to create a general will was generalized in the US Constitution within the first line. It is important to know how the Enlightenment ideas impacted the world socially and politically because, it tells one about how their government came to be and how it operates. In conclusion, each philosopher played a different role to how the government is ran, and their ideas made a huge impact on the

    Read More

  • French Revolution - Fight For Liberty

    1631 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before the French Revolution that occurred during the late 18th century, France was considered one of the most advanced and opulent countries in Europe. It was in the center of the Enlightenment era, a period of time from the 1600s to the 1800s that is considered today as one of the most significant intellectual movements in history by encouraging a new view of life. The age sparked hundreds of important thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Thomas Paine, and Adam Smith. The Enlightenment was the fuel that sparked a worldwide desire to reshape and reconsider the ways that countries were governed. Limited monarchies, direct democracies, limited democracies, and absolute monarchies, among others, were many forms of government that were disputed by these thinkers. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, one the many significant Enlightenment thinkers, believed in a direct democracy, a system in which a country is governed by many, and where no one person has a considerable amount of power. This idea that citizens should receive independence and a voice would later stimulate the French and result in what is now k...

    Read More

  • Cause of the French Revolution

    384 Words  | 1 Pages

    The essential cause of the French revolution was the collision between a powerful, rising bourgeoisie and an entrenched aristocracy defending its privileges”. This statement is very accurate, to some extent. Although the collision between the two groups was probably the main cause of the revolution, there were two other things that also contributed to the insanity during the French revolution – the debt that France was in as well as the famine. Therefore, it was the juxtaposing of the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy as well as the debt and famine France was in that influenced the French Revolution.

    Read More

  • The French Revolution

    914 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the eighteenth century, France was one of the most richest and prosperous countries in Europe, but many of the peasants were not happy with the way France was being ruled. On July 14, 1789, peasants and soldiers stormed the Bastille and initiated the French Revolution. This essay will analyze the main causes of the French Revolution, specifically, the ineffectiveness of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the dissatisfaction of the Third Estate, and the Enlightenment. It will also be argued that the most significant factor that caused the French Revolution is the ineffective leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.

    Read More

  • John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract

    1125 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Enlightenment was an astonishing time of transformation in Europe. During this time in the eighteenth century there was a progressive movement that was labeled by its criticism of the normal religious, social, and political perceptions. A number of significant thinkers, with new philosophies, had inspired creativeness and change. These thinkers had many different thoughts and views on people and the way they act, and views on the government. Two well-known and most influential thinkers of this time were the English political philosopher John Locke and the French political philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. These two men had laid down some of the intellectual grounds of the modern day government and both had different opinions on what the government’s role in a society.

    Read More

  • Baron De Montesquieu

    785 Words  | 2 Pages

    Baron de Montesquieu was a French philosopher who lived around the late 1600’s and early 1700’s. This was before the French Revolution. He believed strongly in Thomas Locke, who was another French philosopher. Montesquieu also wrote many books that greatly influenced the society he was in at that time. Although Montesquieu was thought to be fair, he believed in slavery. Other ideas that he had were that women were not equal to men, but could still run government. He believed that women were too weak to be in control. Montesquieu thought since women were more calm and gentle that they would be helpful qualities in making decisions in government but not anything else.

    Read More

  • William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau

    581 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rousseau lived in the early 1700’s to the late 1700’s. He influenced the French revolution with his political philosophy. Rousseau believes that ...

    Read More

  • Jean-Louis David and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    1385 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...y as Jean-Louis David and his paintings. Both these influential people helped to ignite a passion amongst the French general public and change French politics. Looking at Rousseau's idea for government seems unacceptable or impossible to us, however, his idea, which was prominent in the revolution, that sovereignty resides with the people, that "man is born free". Both Rousseau and democracy preserve the idea that government is legitimate only if it emerges from us.

    Read More

  • Jean Jacques Rousseau's The Origin Of Civil Society

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout history, societies have seen power take many different shapes and forms. In Rousseau’s time, power was most often held by the aristocrats of the monarchy. His personal ideas of power, however, revolved around the idea of a sovereign people. This meant to him that people as a whole control

    Read More

  • Causes and Effects of the French Revolution

    2273 Words  | 5 Pages

    The French Revolution was spread over the ten year period between 1789 and 1799. The primary cause of the revolution was the disputes over the peoples' differing ideas of reform. Before the beginning of the Revolution, only moderate reforms were wanted by the people. An example of why they wanted this was because of king Louis XIV's actions. At the end of the seventeenth century, King Louis XIV's wars began decreasing the royal finances dramatically. This worsened during the eighteenth century. The use of the money by Louis XIV angered the people and they wanted a new system of government. The writings of the philosophes such as Voltaire and Diderot, were critical of the government.

    Read More

  • Causes and Effects of The French Revolution

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    The French Revolution was a time of great social, political and economic tumult in the closing years of the Eighteenth Century. The motivators pushing French citizenry toward revolution are varied in scope and origin. They range from immediate economic woes to an antiquarian class structure. Modern historians still debate the value of the changes that the revolution brought to modern society. The middle class made gains that would never be rescinded, but do revolutions always end in tyranny? In the years before the revolution citizens were rigidly constrained by the estates of the realm. These social strata had been in place since the medieval ages. The people were divided into three groups; clergy, nobility and everyone else. The clergy and nobility had many advantages and privileges that were unavailable to the average person, such as freedom from taxation. The share of French land and wealth were split without egalitarianism in mind. Although the clergy and nobility were a scant three to five percent of the population they owned thirty percent of the nation’s land. Social mobility was largely unheard of; your position in society and in the workforce was determined by birth. The buying and selling of titles and offices at great cost was the only way for the members of the public to advance in society. France was hampered by its large population, causing stress. The population had reached twenty million by the seventeen hundreds and grew by another eight to ten million in the century following. This boom leads to horrible living conditions in urban centers. Due to unsanitary conditions poor urbanites had a lower life expectancy than peasants living at subsistence levels in rural areas. The state of the French coffers was a major ...

    Read More

More about How Did Montesquieu And Rousseau Influence The French Revolution

Open Document