Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Example business ethics case study
Example business ethics case study
Business ethics task 2 examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1895, James F. Lincoln started the Lincoln Electric Company with only $200 and a patent to an electric motor he had developed. Over the years, the company began to grow slowly and surely, even through the Great Depression of the 1930 's. Now, the company has several factories in the United States and overseas, employing thousands of people. Uniquely, even in a company with many workers and personnel, the level of employee satisfaction is high. Why was this company able to thrive and is still active during economic hardship, a factory fire, and changing times? It is due in large part to the business ethic and culture of the Lincoln Electric Company. We will discuss how James Lincoln 's beliefs influenced the way his company was run, and why …show more content…
As his father was a minister, John brought some of his Christian beliefs into to his work and these were the basis of his philosophy on business. Though the company, and John himself, never pushed those beliefs on employees, customers, or the public, they are the cornerstone of how the company was run from then on and still is. For instance, he believed that customers were the main priority of his company 's business. The Lincoln Electric Company 's goal was to “build a better and better product at a lower and lower price” (Sharplin, 1989). Therefore, it was imperative that customer satisfaction and service be the number one goal. The second priority is employees. The people who work for Lincoln Electric have never had an organized labor union, and the company 's turnover rate is remarkably low. Any turnover figured is accounted for in retirements. This level of employee satisfaction is due also in part to how well Lincoln Electric compensates and treats its …show more content…
With hard work and experience, a worker at Lincoln Electric can advance from a starting position to one of higher pay rate and responsibility. In the 1980 's, a high school diploma was all that was needed to be hired onto the company. Production workers are trained shortly on the job; once the worker has been employed a year, they are guaranteed at least a 30 hour work week and are not fired except for misconduct. This is a level of job security not seen in many factory jobs. Lincoln Electric tends to practice internal hiring initially; if an employee wants to advance they may apply for a job posted that is higher than their current position. If no employees apply or are qualified for the position, then it is posted to new hires and the
Lincoln was able to grow and prosper through the process of human motivation which is called incentive management. James F. Lincoln, who founded Lincoln Electric summed up in his monograph that employees have no desire to develop their skills in the workplace unless paid properly (Lincoln, 2016). He then talks about how incentives create cooperation, for if employees are not recognized, they will not cooperate with productivity (Lincoln, 2016). The incentive system included compensation and benefits e.g. bonus systems, piece rate pays
James Oakes gave a brilliant and unique perspective to a relationship between two well known historical figures of their time. Abraham Lincoln is a well-admired president for the United States because as Americans culture teaches that he was an honest and well-respected man. He heard about a young African American man, who had high aspirations for his life and the blossoming United States. This man’s name was Frederick Douglass. James Oakes demonstrates how both Douglass and Lincoln worked towards the abolishment of slavery and effectively producing better outcomes within antislavery politics.
True, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller may have been the most influential businessmen of the 19th century, but was the way they conducted business proper? To fully answer this question, we must look at the following: First understand how Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller changed the market of their industries. Second, look at the similarities and differences in how both men achieved domination. Third and lastly, Look at how both men treated their workers and customers in order achieve the most possible profit for their company.
...interpretations of their assumption of millions of dollars. Due to their appropriation of godlike fortunes, and numerous contributions to American society, they simultaneously displayed qualities of both aforementioned labels. Therefore, whether it be Vanderbilt’s greed, Rockefeller’s philanthropy, or Carnegie’s social Darwinist world view, such men were, quite unarguably, concurrently forces of immense good and evil: building up the modern American economy, through monopolistic trusts and exploitative measures, all the while developing unprecedented affluence. Simply, the captains of late 19th century industry were neither wholly “robber barons” or “industrial statesmen”, but rather both, as they proved to be indifferent to their “lesser man” in their quests for profit, while also helping to organize industry and ultimately, greatly improve modern American society.
In 1900 Andrew Carnegie made about $23 million and worked a 50-hour week and a 50-week year. Carnegie’s daily wage was about $92,00. The average daily hours and average daily wages in US manufacturing in 1892 were from 9.81 to 10.87 hours and workers were paid from $1.09 to $1.87, (doc 7). The average daily hours in shoemaking was 9.81 and the average daily wage was $1.58 (doc 7). Iron and steel workers, such as Carnegie’s co-workers, were given 10.67 hours and earned $1.81 daily. Furthermore, $600 a year supported a typical six-member family. In addition, Andrew Carnegie was a pioneer of the vertical integration business technique. Carnegie was in, “control of the production process from raw materials to manufacture and sale of finished product,” (doc 5). In addition, Carnegie’s Steel Company had several mills in and around Pittsburgh that were connected by the Union Railroad Company. Nevertheless, Carnegie’s company supported $600 to a family of six and bought out all his competition as well as provided individuals with jobs. This evidence helps explain why Andrew Carnegie was a hero because he had courage and integrity to provide jobs to his co-workers and support a six-member family per
In the book, If Aristotle Ran General Motors, Tom Morris argues that the teachings of the ancients can and should be applied to today's corporation. His message is that the four virtues - truth, beauty, goodness, and unity - form the foundation of human excellence. Putting them into practice leads not only to self-fulfillment, but ultimately to an open, nurturing, and ethical workplace that is more productive and successful in the long-term. The purpose of this essay is to examine how Morris treats the system of ethics in relation to these four virtues.
People like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morgan are men who possessed the intellect, the foresight, and most importantly the work ethic to become powerful industrialists. These men displayed their work ethic to the country by being ruthless and tireless. They started something so important that a hundred years later it is still making a huge contribution to our country (Maury Klein pg. 32). What they started was the industrial revolution. Today our country is the most powerful in the world because of our great wealth. This wealth comes from the strength of our industry. “If thou does not sow, thou does not reap”(Hofstadter Recon.-Present Day pg.79). Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Morgan are the epitome of this statement.
Abraham Lincoln named the "Great Emancipator" in actuality was the exact opposite. Having humble beginnings from the western and southern perspective, Lincoln claimed to be a common man; however he reluctantly wanted to give the rights of the common man to blacks. Beginning his policies in the Illinois legislature Lincoln supported the idea of liberating blacks and sending them to Africa, and not giving them free rights in the United States of America. Hofstadter would agree to a great extent with Lincoln's reluctance to emancipate the slaves because until he reached the presidency and needed to appeal to the populous did he denounce slavery in public.
Organizations face massive challenges in attracting and retaining a high-quality and productive workforce. Companies are continually looking for new ways to keep their employees satisfied at all levels in order to harness greater productivity and ideas from people while keeping them motivated and happy. One real challenge examined earlier is the need to transform General Motors to be a much more productive and fully utilized organization by examining the hourly workforce. This is a great change from the traditional "us versus them" mentality of the past between management and the union.
One of the biggest influences of the founders of Lincoln Electric is from James Lincoln, who created a board of advisors from the pool of employees to advise him (Sharplin, 1989). The board met every two weeks when it was first started, and it still meets today, nearly two hundred years after the company began. This board of advisors is made up of active employees in the company, and they are free to raise suggestions, criticism, or any topics of interest that the employees want the company to address. This level of honesty and openness is a rare quality, and this ability for employees to directly speak with their supervisors and discuss new ideas is probably one of the reasons why employees are so pleased.
Henry Ford, the man who revolutionized the car industry forever, founded his company under the beliefs that a car wasn’t a high-speed toy for the rich but instead a sturdy vehicle for everyday family needs, like driving to work, getting groceries or driving to church. However, Henry ford did much more than just this feat. He also tried to make peace in WWI before America had joined the war. In addition, Ford made the radical new five dollars a day payment. However, Ford also had his lows. At an early age, his mother died. His first two companies had also been failures. Against many of his closest friends protests, he published an anti-semitic (Jewish) newspaper. Ford had a very interesting and unique life and he changed the automotive industry forever.
The idea that many men had died for our country and that we should not
Abraham Lincoln was born in 1809 on the Kentucky frontier. His parents were Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks Lincoln. He and his parents were all southern born, even though his ancestors were born in Pennsylvania and New England. In 1816, when Lincoln was seven years old, he and his family moved to Indiana. Later on, close to his adulthood, they moved to Illinois. Lincoln’s mother, Nancy, died when he was only nine years old. In 1828-1831 he traveled in a flat boat down the great Mississippi River to New Orleans, Louisiana. When he got to New Orleans, he realized that Illinois was a better place to live in so he went back there. He went to a pioneer village to live at first, then on to Springfield, IL. He volunteered to fight the Indians as a “citizen’s soldier”, but never had to actually fight any Indians. He eventually decided to start studying law. “Later, he made fun of his military experience, removing it as far as possible from a real war experience, speaking of it as consisting of bloody struggles with mosquitoes and charges upon wild onions."
In my essay we will take a look at Frederick Taylors principles of scientific management and his contribution to manufacturing and the influence he has had. We will use Ford as the organization as Fordism I closely linked to Taylorism and has been majorly influenced by it. The U.S. motor vehicle industry emerged at the end of the 19th century as a craft production system with a labor force that included skilled workers who had knowledge about mechanical design and the materials they were working with. After World War I, Henry Ford invented the mass production system (now known as Fordism). In his system, the product, the production process, and the tasks that each particular worker performed were standardized.
Columbia’s corporate culture and business personality reflects a great deal of the ideals which Gert Boyle’s leadership had imbued into the company. ...