Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of the Industrial Revolution on Britain
The effect of the American revolution
The effect of the American revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At the height of its empire, Great Britain held dominion and colonial settlements on every continent in the world. By 1763, Great Britain dominated the eastern half of North America, and established colonies off the west coast of Africa, India, and the Philippine islands. The British Empire achieved dominance through industry, economic trading, and its navy, which gave Great Britain a superior advantage over competing sovereignties for three hundred years. Even though the largest British colonies revolted in 1775 and launched a successful revolution, Great Britain continued to grow through the industrial revolution of the nineteenth century and early twentieth century. Nevertheless, in the mid twentieth century the British Empire destabilized and quickly lost its superiority to the United States and the Soviet Union.
In spite of World War II, was the British Empire already on a decline as a global hegemony? Compelling evidence suggests that British superiority was lost based on four causalities. First I will illustrate the relationship between the British decline and the American Revolution (1775 – 1783) and how it demonstrated weakness within the British sphere of influence. Secondly, the rise of German hegemony (1871 – 1914) threatened British superiority and upset the balance of power in Europe. Thirdly, because German hegemony was on the rise, it threatened the British foreign policy of isolationism. Lastly, the Second Boer War (1899) contributed to a reevaluation of Great Britain’s foreign policy and its ability to fend off external enemies. Based on this evidence, Great Britain relinquished its stand alone policy and entangled itself in an alliance with France and Russia that resulted in World War One. In other words, the ...
... middle of paper ...
...re. In fact this was evident with the 22,000 casualties inflicted by unprofessional guerrilla soldiers during the Second Boer War. More importantly, Great Britain choose to ally with France (known as Entente Cordiale) in 1904, and allied with Russia in 1907. These alliances are crucial because they determined the position Great Britain would take in World War One. Because of Great Britain’s involvement in World War One, Ireland took advantage of the British and revolted.
Therefore its imperative to conclude that the one causality that contributed the most to the British Empire’s decline is the policy of isolation. One reason is because Great Britain established itself as a stand alone empire, without the need of entangling alliances. In other words, Great Britain achieved dominance through its isolation policy, and lost dominance through its isolation policies.
During the 18th century, the acts and policies Britain enforced on the colonists strengthened their resistance to British rule and their republican values. The British began to continuously abuse their power over the colonies. As a result, the colonies united against the British and started to fight against their rule.
While Britain still acknowledged the colonies, and the colonists remained loyal to the crown, the colonies were generally left to govern themselves. After the French and Indian War, however, King George III saw in his colonies a way to capitalize. Britain was in a post-war economic depression, and needed a source of income (Stamp Act). The colonies provided a perfect answer. They had set up their own systems of trade and manufacturing during the times of salutary neglect, and were becoming increasingly self sufficient.
Similarly, it is easy to see why these ideologies and institutions were met with such resistance. The British notions that the world would do best to follow in their footsteps, as well as the need to constantly expand their territories, is perhaps what lead to the decline of the British
British Imperialism in India and China Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance, Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effect on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so.
In pursuit of national glory, profit and religious mission, England started to explore and conquer the North America. Through the 1600s and the early 1700s, three major colonial regions, the New England colonies, the Middle colonies, and the Southern colonies, formed and developed, and the economic freedom from land owning drew people to the North America. However, during and after the French-Indian War, colonies cooperated to resist British policies and finally declared their independence in 1776.
By the year 1763, British colonies have been in America for over 150 years. The Seven Years war had just ended and British colonies were prospering. The Seven Years War drove out the French and pushed the Spanish to the west.
To expand, the European great powers took part in a tremendous race to colonize the world, and by doing so, enormous global conflicts began to take place. The revolution brought forth by the American rebels against the British created a tremendous and lasting effect on the globalizing world. Alongside the colonizing movement, originated new trade regulations, shifting alliances, and an ocean overran with commercial exploits (Bender 62). Colonies of the European superpowers, especially the thirteen American colonies, began to feel exploited, and further, were often denied the right commerce by their colonizers (Bender
It’s impossible to argue that the effects of World War One were devastating for all parties involved. Unfortunately the reason for the wars inception is not as transparent as its resulting destruction. This “Popular Amnesia regarding World War One” has been attempted to be unraveled by historians for decades resulting in multiple theories and explanations. The European imperial expansion that took place in the late 19th century and the tensions it created has been credited by many historians as a cause for World War One .This essay will examine the role that imperialism played in the lead up to the war, as well as the alliances that were formed as a result of the rivalries between European states.
The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.” (p.20-21) As a result of the war, Russia was severely weakened, which greatly upset the balance of power in Europe. Taylor claims that, “What gave France independence as a ...
The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and Social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans were aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on. Britain was endowed with geographic and political advantages that allowed the country to become the first to unwittingly stumble onto industrialization. Britain was an island, therefore had developed a unique naval strength which subsequently gave Britain leverage when globalization blossomed from expanding maritime trade. Meanwhile, the rest of Europe, including Belgium, trailed behind. Presently, colonized regions still bear the traits and scars from the subjugators of their past.
North America in the early eighteenth century was split between the three major imperial powers of the time, Great Britain, France and Spain. This period was a crucial moment in the colonial history of these three powers due to the expanding nature of their colonies, constantly looking to grab more land and resources for the nation at home. However, before the turn of the century, Great Britain had gone from a few colonies on the east coast of the continent, with the smallest amount of land claimed, to owning the largest part of the New World and obtaining almost complete control over North America. This dominance was not caused by the downfall of France or Spain’s colonies, at least not through their own fault. But rather through Britain’s
There is a point of time in certain a country’s history where they become dominant and more powerful than ever before. During this elongated process a country becomes an empire. The British and the Ottomans were states that succeeded in this process, but becoming an empire such as theirs required vast amounts of political and social maneuvering to expand their boundaries, called imperialism. Imperialism is, “a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force”. By becoming a modern nation enjoying economic prosperity and political stability, the British and the Ottomans created an imperialistic impact over the globe with distinctive motivations and approaches especially during the transition period of gaining ample amount power and influence globally.
Throughout the 1700s, the relationship between Britain and their colonies became more tension filled. The new generations of colonists felt more entitled to certain rights and liberties that had been considered privileges to their ancestors. Over the years Britain had been becoming progressively worse at keeping their colonies happy. Eventually, colonists did not even feel incorporated in their mother country, Britain. The deterioration of British colonial relations in the late 1700s was caused by a lack of representation and care from Britain.
In the late 19th century, the power of the British empire was at its peak. Spanning four continents and consisting of a quarter of the world’s population, it was, by far, the largest empire in the world. Its government was pushed to continually enlarge the empire’s territory by the overwhelming majority of Britons who supported imperialism, the policy of expanding a country’s power and wealth through the annexation of other territories, and believed their culture was superior to others’, and their duty was to spread these excellent principles to everyone. In the late 1880s, a minor brawl with a few obstinate Dutch farmers—Boers—on the tip of Africa seemed like a trivial matter to the government, which was sure the Boers could be defeated without difficulty. Britain never expected the tensions between these nations to explode into a three-year war that cost it millions of pounds, tens of thousands of soldiers, and, more importantly, its pride. The driving forces behind Britain’s decision to begin the Boer War were the imperalistic administrators at the head of the empire’s government, who wanted to squash the growing power of the Boer Republics and maintain the British empire’s global supremacy, in the face of the intense competition from rival European countries over controlling territory in Africa.
France and England, for several reasons, were usually on opposite ends of the historical spectrum. Although each suffered from some of the same political, philosophical and Ideological symptoms, the same could be said concerning their growth and accomplishments. While France evolved from a country ruled and driven by a monarchy handcuffed with religious restrictions, England, with similar components in place, transformed into a completely different state. I believe, because of England’s geographical location and not being invaded or conquered, the isolation shaped its foreign policies to reflect a free and pure state of mind; however, I think proximity dictated foreign policy for all of the countries of that time and place. Which begs the question: If England and France were to switch their locations on the continent, would the English try to conquer Central Europe, North Africa and Russia? I will compare the two countries by listing historically significant events and how internal and external forces influenced each countries foreign policy.