As we all should know, cats and rats hate each other. Some legends like “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” and “Cat and Rat” describe how cats and rats became enemies but is that the real reason? Both of these stories were created to tell a story about why cats and mice hate each other. This shows that no one really knows why cats and mice hate each other so they created legends to tell why. An overall theme for these two legends is learning who to trust. In both stories the rat or mouse is either not trusted or was not trusting.This essay will describe the similarities and differences between “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” and “Cat and Rat.”
Firstly, this essay will explain the similarities between the two legends: “How Cats and Mice
…show more content…
One difference between the two legends is that in one of the legends it is a mouse and in the other it is a rat. The rodent in each story is different from the other. There was a difference in where they were going. In the legend, “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” the mouse and cat were going to the village rather than in “Cat and Rat” where it was a competition to finish the race. Another difference between the two was how they were going to get across the river. In the “Cat and Rat” legend, the cat and rat crossed the river on the back of an ox. On the other hand, in the legend “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” the cat and mouse made a boat out of a pumpkin. There were some difficulties with trusting the rat or mouse. In “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” the mouse was misunderstood when he was eating the pumpkin boat; he was just hungry and not trying to sink the boat. In “Cat and Rat” the rat sabotaged the cat by pushing her off the side of the ox. One last difference between the two legends is what happened to the cat after she/he was sabotaged or the boat sunk. In “Cat and Rat” the cat had to swim to reach the other side of the bank and ended up losing the race while in “How Cats and Mice Became Enemies” the boat sunk right as they jumped off of it. These two legends have many differences between
works of literature have tremendous amounts of similarity especially in the characters. Each character is usually unique and symbolizes the quality of a person in the real world. But in both stories, each character was alike, they represented honor, loyalty, chivalry, strength and wisdom. Each character is faced with a difficult decision as well as a journey in which they have to determine how to save their own lives. Both these pieces of literatures are exquisite and extremely interesting in their own ways.
The stories may be derived from different periods and diverse countries however both characters of the stories showed similarity in character. The appearance of both characters, Tartuffe and the Monkey...
Both “To a Mouse” and Of Mice and Men are very interesting and intriguing well-developed works by two distinctly different authors. The authors have different writing styles, as well as different ways of formatting their works. However, they share the same message. This message is that no matter what one does to prepare, they should always have a Plan B. Things can and often do go awry. By comparing both subjects, the reader can gain a better understanding of the similarities and differences between the two. They also learn precisely why the inquisitive author Steinbeck found inspiration in Burns’ detailed and symbolic poem.
Obviously one example being Lennie and George, having such a close relationship but not even being related to each other. A critical thing to remember is how throughout the story “Of Mice and Men” George is always looking out for Lennie, knowing the ways of how Lennie always gets into trouble. This being undeterred by Lennie being killed by George, but for very generous reasons, one being Lennie may would have ended up dead or in jail, either way ending in a tragic circumstance. George knowing Lennie he could never survive in jail by himself, George decided to kill Lennie so he would not suffer for selfless reasons. As stated before “To a Mouse” has a theme of friendship, how both being immortal to each other but sharing the same struggles. Taking everything in mind we can see how even in two different friendships between distinct people, they can both approach the same theme in different
both stories shared similar ending and moral which is receiving enlightenment in first hand. "The
The first element that it similar among the two legends is the concept of sacrifice. In the memoir, the reason for Fa Mu Lan’s success is due to tremendous sacrifice by herself and others. One of the most prominent examples of immolation is when a rabbit sacrifices it’s own life in order to give Mu Lan food and to make sure she will survive a cold night in the mountains. The incident was written as follows in the book: “A white rabbit hopped beside me...I ate it, knowing the rabbit had sacrificed itself for me” (Kingston 26). The sacrifice of the rabbit was an act of selflessness that taught Mu Lan about benevolence and allowed her to live long enough to act on this lesson. Furthermore, in the movie, Mulan sacrifice’s her safety, rather than having something sacrifice itself for her like the Mu Lan in White Tigers. During the scene where Mulan was attempting to save the emperor from the Huns, she has a
Lastly, there is one similarity about the animal friends that help Cinderella. They help Cinderella all throughout her journey of becoming a queen. They all come during the bad times and try to help. However, there are far more differences than similarities in both stories about the animal friends. In Disney’s Cinderella, they are mice and they help her fix her dress. In Grimm’s Cinderella, it is a single tree and a white dove. Instead of fixing her dress, they give her a new, beautiful dress each time. They also came when she sang by her mother’s
The two stories, not only have differences, but also have similarities. Some examples are, they both take place in England. In both stories, people also suffer starvation. People in these two stories are also Native American.
The Mouse and His Child, by Russell Hoban, is a melancholy fable about a wind-up pair of tin mice that explore various themes such as hope and perseverance. However, the prevailing lesson taken from this book can be found in the way that Hoban employs his cast of wind-up toys to advocate the importance of the family unit. The story begins with the family together, but it is divided and they go out in separate directions.
Of Mice and Men is an excellent novel which contains fruitful knowledge to the development of adolescent mind. Of Mice and Men may require...
Furthermore, is a summarization of the main points in “The Black Cat.” “The Black Cat” is about a man who always loved animals since he was little, but as he aged he started drinking. He then tortured his favorite pet cat, Pluto after he was getting annoyed with his presence. He goes as far as gouging out its eye before he hangs it in an old tree. Later on, his house burnt down and the outline of the cat was left on the only standing wall left by the fire. After he and his wife get a new home, they soon found a new cat that looked just like the old one except it had white around its neck. The narrator starts to believe that the cat is mocking him, so one day he tries to kill the cat but his wife interferes, and he ki...
Written in 1937, Of Mice and Men, by John Adolf Steinbeck Jr., American author and Pulitzer Prize winner, follows the lives of downtrodden farmhands, George and Lennie. As with many of Steinbeck's books, the themes in Of Mice and Men include his favored themes of class warfare and oppression of the working class. Steinbeck also focuses his literature on the power of friendship and the corrupt nature of mankind. In 1993, Professor Thomas Scarseth wrote a critical analysis of the novella analyzing many aspects of Steinbeck’s work including the presentation, themes, and writing style. In his essay, Scarseth explains the key themes of the Novella. He noted that the corrupted nature of man, the injustice of life, and the power of friendship were three important themes of the book. Much of Scarseth’s analysis contained numerous thoughtful insights. Were his insights and opinions valid, or were his, and Steinbeck’s, perspectives on these issues flawed?
Of Mice and Men is one of John Steinbeck’s most famous books. Although short, Of Mice and Men manages to fit a plethora of themes and opinions into a one hundred page package. The most common and reoccurring themes include the tragic nature of human existence, realism and the improbability of the American dream. Because of these themes, there has been hefty criticism against the novella. Thomas Scarseth has written an excellent essay in response to the criticism. Scarseth was able to answer the criticism and make his own points in this essay. Of Mice and Men uses the realism and unpleasant attitudes of the world to create a beautiful story.
The children couldn’t accept what they thought was so horrible. There was a lot of ignorance and carelessness portrayed throughout this short story. The theme of ungratefulness was revealed in this story; The author depicted how disrespecting someone can inturn feed you with information you may wish you never knew and how someone can do one wrong thing and it immediately erases all the good things a person did throughout their
The common elements in the two stories are the wolf, Little Red (Riding Hood/Cap), her grandmother, and her mother. The beginnings of the stories are also similar: Little Red?s mother sends her to grandmother?s house because the grandmother is ill. Both stories mention that Little Red is personable, cute, and sweet. This is something that, on initial inspection, seems irrelevant but holds a deeper meaning for the symbolism behind the story. In both stories, the wolf, wandering through the woods, comes on Little Red and asks where she is going. When Little Red responds that she is going to visit her sick grandmother, the wolf distracts her with the suggestion that she should pick some flowers so that he can get to her grandmother?s house first. The wolf arrives at Little Red?s grandmother?s house before Little Red and disguises his voice in order to be let in. When he is let into the house, he promptly devours the grandmother and disguises himself in her clothes in order to eat Little Red as well. At this point, the two narratives diverge.