Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contrast between macbeth and lady macbeth in their psyche
Lady macbeth and macbeth act 2
Describe lady macbeth in act 2 scene 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How Are Macbeth And Lady Macbeth Presented In Act 2 Scene 2? How Could
This Be Shown On Stage?
In Act 2 Scene 2 Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are presented in various
ways throughout the scene. This is because of the tense and anxious
nature of the scene. The characters go through a number of changes in
feeling through the scene; these changes will be looked at in detail
in the main body of the essay. This scene takes place immediately
after the murder of Duncan. Meanwhile Lady Macbeth is anxiously
wondering whether Macbeth will really do the deed. When he returns,
covered in blood and highly strung, she organises how to cover up the
murder so that they won't be found out. In this scene we see certain
emotions in the characters, which we haven't seen much of so far, or
in some cases totally new emotions for a character.
At the start of this scene the atomsphere is very tense as Lady
Macbeth waits for here husband to return.
"Hark, peace!"
This shows that at this point that Lady Macbeth is nervous beacuase of
her eratic reaction to the owl. She is worried that Macbeth might not
commit the murder, this is making her nervous; and is shown by her
reaction to the slightest noise.
This is a quick shift in attitude from Lady Macbeth as at the very
beginning of the scene she is feeling in control and powerful.
"The drink that hath made the drunk, hath made me bold;"
This shows that she is feeling powerful because she is saying the
guests and guards have been drugged; so that should make the murder
easier because everyone would have their guard down. I think that
there was a sudden change in her attitude because of the shriek of the
owl, because this was seen as a sign of murder.
When Macbeth enters he is confused because he still has not come to
terms with the murder that he has just committed.
"Who's there? What ho?"
This shows that he is confused because he is asking questions without
waiting for an answer. This also shows that he is worried that someone
has heard him and has come to see what has happened. this is typical
of Macbeth because when he is left alone his conscience gets the
better of he, particually because he was already sceptical about the
murder.
Because Macbeth is so panic-striken Lady Macbeth decides that she has
to take control of the situation. She knows that Macbeth is sceptical
about weth...
... middle of paper ...
...yed as a dominant and powerful,
power-hungry person who will do anything to get what she wants. She
comes across as having no conscience apart from one instance, where
she says that she would have killed Duncan herself had he not reminded
her of her father. Macbeth on the other hand comes across as a brave
and loyal person until he agees to the murder of Duncan this is were
Macbeths whole persona changes, he becomes unsure of his actions he is
paranoid and is scared that is actions will catch up with him.
Although he is brave and loyal he has an obvious inablity to say to
his wife, Lady Macbeth. His wife is clearly the dominant figure in the
relationship. Although this might bother him he is unable to do
anything because of having a weaker character. I think that the two
contrasts are what makes the tension inthe scene work in such an
effective manner. I think one of the reasons for this could be that it
was written by William Shakespeare, who was himself was an actor, I
think this is one of the reasons that it works because he knew how to
write the play so the actors would produce a performance that would
convey the continually changing feelings of each character.
Both Virginia Woolf and Annie Dillard are extremely gifted writers. Virginia Woolf in 1942 wrote an essay called The Death of the Moth. Annie Dillard later on in 1976 wrote an essay that was similar in the name called The Death of a Moth and even had similar context. The two authors wrote powerful texts expressing their perspectives on the topic of life and death. They both had similar techniques but used them to develop completely different views. Each of the two authors incorporate in their text a unique way of adding their personal experience in their essay as they describe a specific occasion, time, and memory of their lives. Woolf’s personal experience begins with “it was a pleasant morning, mid-September, mild, benignant, yet with a keener breath than that of the summer months” (Woolf, 1). Annie Dillard personal experience begins with “two summers ago, I was camping alone in the blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia” (Dillard, 1). Including personal experience allowed Virginia Woolf to give her own enjoyable, fulfilling and understandable perception of life and death. Likewise, Annie Dillard used the personal narrative to focus on life but specifically on the life of death. To explore the power of life and death Virginia Woolf uses literary tools such as metaphors and imagery, along with a specific style and structure of writing in a conversational way to create an emotional tone and connect with her reader the value of life, but ultimately accepting death through the relationship of a moth and a human. While Annie Dillard on the other hand uses the same exact literary tools along with a specific style and similar structure to create a completely different perspective on just death, expressing that death is how it comes. ...
We are first introduced to Lady Macbeth at the beginning of Act 1, scene 5, through the letter that Macbeth sends her. This shows her to be his, ‘dearest partner of greatness’ and that he has no secrets from her. The witches’ prophecies intensify her ambitions for her husband, to be the King of Scotland. Lady Macbeth is the one who encourages him to kill the king and she not only encourages him, she makes all the plans herself. We see how clever she is and how she understands her husband well, she knows he has great ambitions, but she also knows that he is honourable and mentally weak:
Both MacBeth and Lady MacBeth react differently from seeing so much blood and killing innocent men, women, and children. Lady MacBeth, in the fifth act, has become overwhelmed with guilt that she has gone insane. "Out, dammed spot! Out, I say! One- two- why then tis’ time to do ’t. Hell is murky.- Fie, my lord, fie, a soldier, and afeard? What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Yet who would have thought the old man to have so much blood in him?" Lady MacBeth is in fear that someone would accuse MacBeth and herself for the murder of Duncan. She is tries to get rid of the evidence, the blood that has stained her hands, that could hold her guilty for the death of Duncan.
In the beginning of the play, Lady Macbeth is overly whelmed by the letter she receives about Macbeth. This pushes her to the extreme and causes her to react outrageously. " Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here…make thick my blood…take my milk for gall, you murdering ministers…come thick night." (I;v;40-50) All these images of darkness and horror reveal the true character of Lady Macbeth; she feels the need to become wicked. Her attitude is even more horrific when she calls on evil spirits to come and possess her, taking control of her actions. This sort of behavior causes the audience and reader to assume Lady Macbeth is a psychopath, and therefore would have reason to hold her responsible for having a major impact on her husband and driving him off, enlightening a twisted sinister and threatening dark side of him.
The subject of death is one that many have trouble talking about, but Virginia Woolf provides her ideas in her narration The Death of the Moth. The moth is used as a metaphor to depict the constant battle between life and death, as well as Woolf’s struggle with chronic depression. Her use of pathos and personification of the moth helps readers develop an emotional connection and twists them to feel a certain way. Her intentional use of often awkward punctuation forces readers to take a step back and think about what they just read. Overall, Woolf uses these techniques to give her opinion on existence in general, and reminds readers that death is a part of life.
As she waits she decides that she heard a screech owl, and she takes that as a good omen, because the screech owl is nature’s own ‘fatal bellman’. A ‘fatal bellman’ would emphasize the idea of death/ execution in the audience’s minds, which makes it all the more eerie, ‘He’s at it’. This particular part of this scene has to be the climax of the play. When Macbeth and his wife are re-united they are both highly charged with nervous energy and excitement. Macbeth and his wife at first do not speak in sentences. Their speech is syncopated and highly charged emotions tell the audience all is not well. The fact that Macbeth still has hold of the daggers intensifies the tension felt in the scene.
start, but in real life he was apparently not as good a king as is
When the play first opens we hear 3 strange witches standing in a field while it is thunder and lightening. They begin to chant spells and talk about their meeting with Macbeth as they vanish into thin air.
(Act 5 scenes 2). This could be a sign of guilt along with her mental illness that starts to control her. Next Lady Macbeth starts falling into a deep dark depression. Lady Macbeth starts having crazy thoughts. All her guilt comes down to her hard work.
...verpowering. It also shows that the spirits she summoned at the beginning of the play have completely possessed her thoughts like she had asked them to. Lady Macbeth didn’t seem to realise exactly what she was asking them to do. This scene is the last we her from her, before we find out later on in the book that she chooses death, not being able to deal with the guilt and consequences of her actions.
The stage effects are in place right from the beginning of the play which begins in the first act with the witches, awakening Macbeth’s ambition. This carries on into Act II scene II, where Macbeth will take the first steps towards achieving his mean purpose. The second act of the play, represents an intense way the violence of King Duncan’s murder, which is dram...
In conclusion, Monsanto is destroying the genetic integrity of most naturally grown foods, ruining the life style of many small farmers who depend on their crops to make a living, and are stealing money from people who have Monsanto’s corn on their land just from natural cross breeding of plants. The public needs to hear about what Monsanto is doing. Their website seems perfectly happy and makes them seem super good and environmentally friendly but that’s what is made to do. They only tell you what they want you to hear not what you need to hear.
Monsanto is an agricultural organisation which specialises in biotechnology and genetically modifying organisms such as plant seeds. It was the first company to genetically modify a plant cell with the aim of creating better, stronger breeds of crops and plants in order to make agriculture more productive, efficient and overall sustainable which is vital for poorer countries and the population of the world as it is growing at a rapid rate. The Food and Agriculture organisation of the UN states that if the global population reaches 9.1 billion by 2050 then food production will need to rise by 70%, and production in the developing world will have to double. [https://www.populationinstitute.org/resources/populationonline/issue/1/8/] (Online) (accessed 12 May 2014). However, genetically modifying organisms seem to be very controversial as there are many people who believe that GMOs are unethical and are a health risk to people and the environment.
Many Americans eat GM foods without even realizing it. It is no surprise since GMO can better the shelf life of the food and put up at a reasonable price. GMO can be dangerous to the human body for many reasons. Genetically engineered food are shown to be unsafe and unpredictable because of the foreign genes that are introduced into plants which may have a negative impact on the human body. Studies show that when rats are fed GM potatoes, there were appreciable differences in the intestine as opposed to the rats that are fed the normal potatoes. (Whitman, 2000) Another concern is the allergens that are developed when eating GM foods. The promoter that is used in most GM crops turn on the foreign gene at high output, but instead turns on the other natural genes in addition to the foreign one, resulting in allergens, toxins, carcinogens or anti-nutrient. (Natural revolution, 2014) Another risk involved is the production of StarLink corn that is specifically designed ...