Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Describe the roles of the Senate and House of Representatives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The purpose of this chapter is to discuss relevant points associated with the congressional transitions. Congress has two chambers. The House of Representatives (HR) is known as the lower chamber and the people’s representatives. There are 435 members who are elected or re-elected every two years. Their tenure depends on being responsive to their district’s electorate. Once elected their second responsibility is to the leadership of their caucus which includes all of the members of their national political party. Their third responsibility is to the national political party that they belong to. The electorate demands that their representative conduct congressional scope of work is clearly associated with the issues requiring resolution in …show more content…
Unlike the House, the Senate is smaller and is elected to six year terms. Its membership stands for election every three years in a predictable rotation based on the end of incumbents’ terms. The upper chamber is considered to be more collegial and flexible in their dealings with the national party because they work in a smaller political environment and different procedures and pressures than the HR. Senators must be sensitive to their constituents’ needs as well as the importance of maintain collegial relationships with their colleagues and influential members in the House of Representatives. The bottom line is that senators look out for their state’s interests. At the same time they comply with national party’s principles and …show more content…
If the Senate majority becomes the minority following an election, the national party with the majority takes over. This means committee assignments, chairmanships, and key positions in the Senate would be controlled by the new majority leader. This happens in the Senate more frequently than in the House; however, when the senate changes and the House majority remains the same, the capability of both Houses to agree on the substance of new legislation is compromised. The difficulty is difference in philosophy of the two bodies. Thus negotiations between the two Houses is the only way to approach as solution. This means compromise and flexibility which is more likely to occur in the
Building good will with the people must be accomplished by making the members work with the voters. Congressmen will claim credit for good deeds done in certain districts so that the electors will honor the incumbent’s achievements by reelecting them for office. Mayhew states that the claims must be credible in order for the voters to believe them. Incumbents also take part in casework, such as bringing a “supplier of goods to the home district,” that way more trust is instilled within the congress members. Claims made can be perceived as either trustworthy or not, ultimately it beyond the voters discretion to decide
Members of congress have three specific goals. The one that seems to be the most important
In this essay I will explore whether or not members of congress are still doing their job or just trying to keep their good reputation with their constituents for re-election time. The question of whether or not members of congress are doing their job effectively has been a great topic of controversy. Being a member of congress has turned into a long term struggle of constantly working towards reelection and trying to balance keeping their districts happy and still being a part of major legislature. Is there a way for members of congress to keep their district happy and still manage the bigger issues they are expected to deal with? Most Americans will complain that they are not happy and that their representatives are not doing their job in
Representation: the effort of elected officials to look out for the interests of those who elect them
In conclusion, even though some of the Congress processes and its structure seem to be made to slow things down and to reduce effectiveness, they exist to, as discussed in class, protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. After all, one of the main objectives of having a government is to create a balanced society, and to reduce the chances of having social convulsion and anarchy.
The House focuses is made up of several parties and bills are passed by a majority vote where in the Senate even though there is a majority vote the Senators themselves are quite influential. Each Senator holds a lot of power so there is more weight in what they say. For this reason the Senate runs off of unanimous votes, if a vote is not unanimous then the transaction at hand will not move forward.
Such result is inevitable when there are both external and internal factors wrestling and, at the same time, supporting each other in every political match happening in Congress. External factors created the necessary condition in which internal changes could be and were discussed in the House and Senate. However, internal changes, in turn, have shaped and amplified the impacts that external factors created. Together, these intertwined factors have brought about their own changes to how Congress makes law.
Contrasts in the lawmaking methodology utilized as a part of the House and Senate reflect the distinctive size of the two chambers and individual terms of its parts. In the House, the dominant part gathering is inflexibly in control, stacking advisory groups with lion 's share party parts, and utilizing principles to seek after enactment supported by its parts. In the Senate, singular parts are better ready to hold up the procedure, which prompts lower similarity costs, however higher exchange costs. The complication of the lawmaking procedure gives rivals different chances to murder a bill, making a solid predisposition for the present state of affairs.
If the parties in our governmental system would openly discuss about the difference in positions and in point of views within the groups in realizing these controversies will minimize the unnecessary troubles greatly. Another possibility of improvement would be following the great examples of other countries with the Westminster governance system. For example, in countries like Australia and New Zealand have already a well-established party discipline rules that are less strict than the ones in Canada and way more effective than the ones we have. In an article, it was said that” Australian parties are considerably more discipline than those in the UK an even those in Canada, although the degree of discipline in the latter has been the subject of much critical comment. Parliamentary votes in the UK are subject to varying degrees of party discipline, with the most rigid being the so-called” three-line whip’ votes. Neither Australia nor Canada has such gradations. In New Zealand party discipline has increased under its mixed Member proportional (MMP) electoral system and, unless party leaders have agreed to a conscience vote, standing orders require a party vote to be taken rather than individuals casting their votes in the chamber. “(Sawer, Abjorensen and Larkin
The Senate also has many different responsibilities. In order to be a senate the qualifications you must have are you must be at least thirty years
Overall, the end goal is to make the Senate more efficient and privy to democracy. Currently the filibuster even makes the “majority leader’s role of coalition-building extraordinarily challenging (O’Connor 239). Undoubtedly this has added the negative stigma Congress has accrued. Nonetheless, a constitutional amendment reforming the filibuster by adding a declining cloture rule and making more explicit rules and proceedings, the Senate can be transformed into a more a more efficient, bipartisan body focused on lively, not stalling debate.
Stilborn, Jack. Senate Reform: Issues and Recent Developments. Ottawa: Parliamentary Information and Research Service, 2008.
When many people hear the words the Senate and the House of Representative they might think of Congress. They do not truly go into depth of what those two departments mean, and they do not understand how vital they are to our own government. Congress is part of the Legislative Branch and is a bicameral legislature. Which means that is a legislature that is separated into two houses, and in that case is the House of Representatives and the Senate. Many know the words "The Senate" and "The House of Representatives" but they do not truly know what those words entail, many do not know the contrast and comparisons of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Light, Paul C., and Christine L. Nemacheck. "Chapter 7 Congress." Government by the People, Brief 2012 Election Edition, Books a La Carte New Mypoliscilab With Etext Access Card Package. By David B. Magleby. 2012 Election Edition ed. N.p.: Pearson College Div, 2013. N. pag. Print.
For years, countries have had different legislatures bicameral and unicameral. The features of each legislatures are distinct from one another. It even accounts to various vices and virtues. Both legislatures exist in various countries in the world. The reason to which varies in each place. Legislatures are essential for a society to perform politically well. However, the political structure of every nations varies thus, there exist no simple generalization. The structural arrangements of different legislatures are distinct in relation to their number of chambers available. (Danziger, J. N. (1996))