Hostess Cakes Everyone remembers hostess cakes. Especially the Twinkies. For those who grew up with these cake, hearing they baker was closing was a travesty. This popular junk food stretches back over fifty years struggled to keep their doors open, until 2012. Hostess filed bankruptcy for the first time in 2004, because of products and high labor cost (Bethel, 2011). They were able to come out a few years later with outside investors. After coming out of bankruptcy they tried to keep up with how society was changing, by coming up with a low-calorie Twinkie bites. Hostess investors encumbered the company with so much debt. They could not afford new and up to date equipment. Management was partly to blame of their demise. They continued trying to build up the existing products, without coming up with a new one that would provide a higher margin. Management has as much to do with Hostess failing as others that were involved. They should have been able to see that the eating habit of consumers was changing. And began to create a new line, but at the same time keeping the iconic Twinkie. Even though management was to blame. The union worker going on strike played a part. Hostess was not only a company that was not …show more content…
Hedge fund is a private partnership that operates with little to no regulation from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. They played a part in the closing of this operation as well. When the Teamsters agreed to reduce the pay and benefits, the bakery worker’s union vetoed the deal. The workers where warned that if they continued the strike it would result in the closing to the business. Regrettably the union thought the hedge fund would give in and not sacrifice hundreds of jobs, but they were wrong. Ethically they make a wise decision, by being in so much debt they could not afford more. Reduction in pay and benefits for the baker worker would have been better than not having a job all
Roger & Me shows that GM's board of directors used company profits not to create new jobs, but to buy already existing assets, such as data processing companies (EDS) and weapons manufacturers (Hughes Aircraft) at inflated prices, and to automate their current assembly lines, and build new plants in Mexico and in Asia -- destroying jobs in the United States in the process. In Mexico, GM pays the worker only $.70 an hour, as opposed to at least minimum wage in the United States of America.... ... middle of paper ... ... This man is also upset because the point of unions is to increase the workers strength in bargaining with employers.
Looking into a brief history of how the Tim Hortons franchise became what it is today, Tim Horton opened his first restaurant in 1964 in Hamilton Ontario. Tim Hortons had the focus to sell top quality, always fresh product with great value and service. This first store started off with only coffee and two types of doughnuts, Apple Fritter and Dutchie. In 1967, Tim Horton joined with Ron Joyce becoming full partners of the newly formed company. After Horton’s tragic death in 1974, his wife sold her husband’s share of the company which had now expanded into 30 restaurants, to co-owner Ron Joyce for one million dollars. She quickly regretted the decision and tried to overturn afterward, but was unsuccessful in doing so. As of today Ron Joyce has taken the small coffee and doughnut restaurant and transformed it into a multibillion dollar franchise, made up of 4304 ...
The leaders of big business didn’t give workers the rights they deserved. In the text, Captains of Industry or Robber Barons?, it states, “Workers were often forbidden to strike, paid very low wages, and forced to work very long hours.” This evidence is a perfect example of the dehumanization of workers. The employers treated their workers like interchangeable parts, which were easily replaced. The big business leaders started paying less attention to the working conditions, and more to the production rates, and money. They didn’t care about worker’s family or the worker’s wellbeing. Due to the horrible working conditions, the workers were more likely to be injured, and sometimes, die. The capitalists didn’t give their employees the rights and respect they deserved, because to them they were just unskilled, cheap labor. If the workers were unhappy, they would easily replace them with other unskilled workers. That’s why they were considered interchangeable parts. This evidence shows the big business leaders only cared about money, and didn’t treat their workers
First of all, he ran a leasing company which meant he had no restaurant management experience. The next mistake, was allowing him to hire new people outside of the company for managerial positions who were not familiar with the culture of the business. There were decisions being made by those people who were brand new and didn 't know how things worked and this really bothered the employees under them who had been there a while. This caused a rift between lower level and upper level employees. Igor and Ludmilla should have worked with McRae on hiring these new people instead of allowing him to do it himself. He is new to the business so he doesn 't have an understanding of the culture they have established and what they 're looking for. They also should have spent more time with McRae grooming him the way they wanted as well as spent time training each new hire he made. They are in important positions and therefore should have a full understanding of what the culture and mission of this business is. They didn 't because they were not trained as they should have been. It is understandable that they want to be able to focus on the baking aspect and leave the business part to a manager, but if they want their business to have the same culture and success as they grow and expand, they need to put people in those positions who have been there a while and have a full understanding of how Igor and Ludmilla want their business
TCBY has been a frozen treats product innovator from the day its first shop opened in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1981. The great-tasting, low-fat frozen yogurt concept received an enthusiastic response from an increasingly health-conscious public. Its trendy new product propelled the company to the forefront of franchising, and was the ‘first in a long line of ground-breaking menu items that anticipated consumer preferences and continually refreshed the TCBY concept’ (Conlin 2001, p. 133). But TCBY products are just one of the reasons that thousands of operators have concluded that a TCBY franchise is the preferred opportunity in branded frozen treats, and a dynamic partner in any co-branded concept. However, TCBY is facing a lot of problems, both internal and external, during the difficult period from the late 1980s to the early 1990s, especially the problem with its franchising system. The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive situation analysis of TCBY, with special reference to its franchising system, and identify several concerned issues of TCBY and its franchisees, and how these issues have negatively affected the relationship between them. Furthermore, this report also provides three recommendations in the attempt to diminish these concerned issues and better maintain the relationship between TCBY and its franchisees, and most importantly, help TCBY to increase the company’s performance and achieve their strategic goals in the next few years.
...usly shamed, embarrassed, and demeaned their employees. I think this kind of behavior is a way of separating employers from employees. It helps keep employees in line and also adds the benefit of making employers feel good about themselves at the expense of their employees. Demeaning actions prevent employees from organizing or protesting for higher wages or better conditions. It keeps them “in their place” and does not allow them to hope or strive for anything better. In spite of the dehumanization of employees by employers, there are silent rebellions committed by lower class employees such as jokes, gossip, doing other's work, and just in general helping each other out. These are silent protests, they do not change the status quo in any way, that would be too risky for these employees. It is survival and caring in a corporate world that does not care about them.
First, the comeback of this company was worthwhile because of it’s company worth. As mentioned in the article, “410 million dollars was the price that ‘Apollo Global Management’ and ‘C. Dean Metropoulos and company’ paid for the Hostess Cake division.” This shows that investors want to invest in the company because these two hot shot companies are showing confidence in Hostess. Also, the Twinkies were off the market for eight months after, …“having failed to reach a deal on a new contract with its striking bakers.” These eight months were spent in idle mode for this large company when it could be producing more companies. With these eight months not producing investors started to lose interest even though the public is still roaring over this. In addition, having failed to make a deal with bakers this shows that Twinkies are not appealing to bakers to produce, even though it is apparently “Americas favorite snack.” These facts are a negative weight to the company worth if Appollo and Metropoulos hadn't stepped in and had interest in the ‘indestructible snack’, overall been underdogs in saving the Twinkie and launching it into a successful comeback.
Most companies are just out there to make money and not care for the welfare of their employees. It may be difficult to see this as business has always been portrayed as a stimulator of the economy and always on the lookout for its employees. However, this is only because the companies that abide by such practices are given as examples and not the ones that do poorly. We oftentimes complain about the little petty things in life when we should be worried about the people who are suffering in our world. The saying always goes; you never know what you have till it’s gone. Unfortunately, this saying corresponds particularly well this
§ Frito-Lays were a highly profitable product line and had show phenomenal sales growth in the past five years.
This desperation does not in any way justify employers treating their employees poorly. All employers should treat their workers with basic human dignity and respect, and the exploitation Goldman criticizes should be rectified. However, what this example illustrates is that people in the end must satisfy their basic needs for survival and must occasionally do work that they do not wish to do. With anarchism, these basic needs do not instantly disappear. A person will either have to provide for herself everything she needs to survive, or work with others to trade goods or services in some way.
Another issue that stood throughout the work environment was Dale. Dale was very preserving he literally abused his power just so he can reach those numbers head office wanted from him. He only cared about performance not about his employees. He always had this one saying to his employees “you can either make money or go home”. All Dale actually cared about was making money so he can score big bonuses. Dale surely wanted to assemble to his employees selling patties is their number one priority if you want to continue working at Patty’s. Dale also loved to pick on Emma for the smallest odds and ends. Examples not smiling while working the drive thru, or not making specific drive thru times. Also there was one situation when Emma experienced sexual harassment and verbal abuse while waiting for her boyfriend to pick her up. These reasons defiantly woke her up to obtain a union at Patty’s before these conditions get wors...
As said above, Frito-Lay is a well-known brand of salty snacks. New dips products to differentiate Frito-Lay from the competition. Frito-Lay has a large variety of dips but there are still opportunities in the dip market that they haven't penetrated.
As successful as Hershey’s is, some factors have influenced set backs for the company. Devaluation in Brazil, Russia’s economic collapse, restructuring in China and the Asian financial crisis. World economics effect the Hershey’s company as well. Another closer to home setback occurred with a pasta divestiture. Evidently they tried a new venture in the pasta industry, but sold it because it just wasn’t making enough money.
According to Wheelen & Hunger (2010), Panera management believed that its specialty bakery-café concept had significant growth potential, which it hoped to realize through a combination of owned, franchised, and joint venture-operated stores. Franchising was a key component of the company’s growth strategy. (p. 29-10).
A new McDonalds was then opened a few blocks down and all crew members that signed union cards weren’t hired. (Schlosser 77) Fast food industries are ignoring and covering up the problems of their employees which is a result of work abuse. The managerial industrial workers and employees should be able to come together through unionization to address the problems and wishes of what employees are speaking about. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, McDonald’s workers were creating unions across the